***Obviously, the success / error ratio should be THE LOWEST.

The propaganda in related media or the posts of CMs are disgusting. The certain thing is that to little that is followed the project, the image of incapacity, botched and work badly done is little comparable even between the worst projects of the ranking.

Each of the steps in DBIX and PALMEX is done poorly. The ratio of success / error in the work of these people must be among the highest in the world. Literally.

I hope that interested posts, without any contact with reality, do not deceive more people who visit this thread. Absolutely painful , amateur and fifth division project, without palliatives.

Arabian Chain has declared that Lykos is its own initiative. I have asked here how it will influence DBIX ... and they do not answer anything.

The presentation was by his architect blockchain boss:

"Our main Blockchain architect, Mr. Jawad Riachi, presents the #Lykos project for the first time at the future Blockchain summit, the Lykos project will be a hybrid chain prepared for companies / businesses."

http:// [url]https://twitter.com/arabianchain/status/992195452564070401/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc^tfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoinmarketcap.com%2Fcurrencies%2Fdubaicoin-dbix%2F [/ url]


This is completely incredible. Total confusion.

To those responsible for DBIX / Arabian Chain:

Gentlemen, you must immediately state the conditions under which DBIX will remain before the issuance of its new chain, Lykos.

I'm not going to ask you if you consider their special way to attract international investors adequate ... Stop telling fantastic stories of expansion when neither your purse nor your exchange have yet a reasonable functioning at the minimum level of function !!! Enough to ignore your investors and issue and OFICCIAL STATEMENT !!!

After years of studying projects on paper, follow later the evolution of them and deal with countless responsible ... what about this coin, DBIX, I have not seen it EVER.

They bring to the market software with flagrant errors, so obvious that the most basic test at the user level, would reveal, both in the DBIX wallet and in the Palmex website ... and we are talking about a project with a year in existence in the ranking.

As an investor and user, I refer, like others, a list of errors and a request for reparation ... and do not deign any more to express any gratitude for the service to the community ... but they do not even provide an answer .

Not satisfied with this ... three days later, they announce unilaterally and with a brief message in twiter, a project attached or parallel to the existing one, Lykos, which can have a great influence on the original project and the rights of the holders, many of which we have all this year supporting this project ... and as, of course, claim an explanation about it, the only thing I get again from those who should be the first to clarify such changes is more silence and indifference , not to say lack of respect, total and absolute.

Sirs of DBIX: Do you know what a governance system is in a blockchain? Do they feel responsible for the treatment of their community? In what regard do you have to the DBIX community? Do you believe that variations in price, supply, project approaches, etc. are matters of interest to the community ... or just something that can be dealt with behind your back?

Waiting, again, for your consideration, I remain with your answer ... if they deem it appropriate.

Thank you.

But ... the cast has been made? It has not come to me.

I know it's a ridiculous amount ... I ask it to make sure the smart contract works.

Thank you

What Arabian Chain should do is make clear what influence Lycos will have, the new blockchian they committed the day before yesterday in DBIX. Immediately.

You can not play like that with the community. Is incredible.

I would add the relationship between Lykos, the new blockchain and DBIX ... and the protagonism of it. Of course, they were proposals from within those that can detract from protagonism, to whom he has supported the project ... it should be perfectly discarded.

Both the operational and marketing imbalances and a parallel blockchain that can leave us "out of play" generate the same: distrust and uncertainty.

I understand that these lines of action must be much clearer in the treatment of the community. Supporting an "exotic" project such as Arabian change, said with all due respect, is a good example of loyalty and risk assumed to a proposal of more than a thousand ... and understanding that it deserves more feedback.

that we guarantee that we do not have a dbix de lykos, the new blockchain>?

The owners of DBIX have been supporting the initial project for months. How can a new chain of blocks be made in our investment?

Gentlemen of DBIX, be clear, please ... this is no joke.

Again I insist on the errors of operation and design of both the DBIX wallet and the Palmex website. In principle, they are not serious ... but at this level, they are totally inadequate and are the most surprising in a project of this importance.

As I have read that Jibrel Network, with a highly professional staff and experience in Blockchain have a great presence in the initiatives of the sector in the area (as well as in its exchange), I would suggest a contact with them, who will undoubtedly know how to indicate a couple of them. good professionals who supervise their work ... and help them grow in the conditions of quality and timely image.

I leave a link to your new wallet ... good sample of the quality that the blockahin sector needs today.

Greetings and encouragement ... but the role you have in Dubai needs a lot more quality than you are currently contributing. If you are aware of it and act now we will all grow much stronger and more solidly ... which is what we all want.

JNT JWallet:

https://jwallet.network/jwallet?lang=en-US

Dear Sirs :

I have been using your new desktop wallet (Galaxy, windows64) and the window that opens to SEND, is cut off, hiding the bottom part and therefore, the "SEND" button ... with which I have been impossible make a transfer.

I suppose you have already been warned of the error ... but it would be necessary to fix it quickly, because it is very basic and transmits very little confidence in your software, an issue that when it comes to money, it could affect your blockchain.

Without the slightest desire to offend, but also seeing the design of both your website and the wallet mentioned ... have you considered hiring a professional? The results offered are far from the average level of the blockchain sector and, honestly, they give an image worthy of little confidence. Honestly, it is quite surprising to read news that Dubai wants to be the "blockchain center in your area" and find developments of such poor quality, with errors worthy of a student web.

Likewise, I am trying to send you this text from the ArabianChain website and the sending form does not work either ... and in Palmex, the "Create Account" button, either. And I am a user of the sector and I visit dozens of blockchains a day and this type of errors, so basic, do not occur. I firmly believe that they need a professional who supervises the work they are putting on the market. I assure you that the average Western user expects a much better level of work from Dubai, since it is considered his country with sufficient economic level to not enter such a low level of production.

With the greatest respect, but really worried after the investment made in DBIX, I send you a warm greeting.

The PIVX team is a guarantee of commitment, dedication and technique regarding the development of the platform. Could you expose Phore's advantages in this regard? (Technical capacity, experience, curriculum, etc. of the development team?).

Thank you.

Hello.

Any link or information about the members of the team? The ability of the dev team is essential to assess this `project.

Thank you.

You go normaly to the Mybits slack space ?

Im really bored of this people.      

A new website was not announced, leaving in the middle of this past month?

What is the benefit today of having a masternode ... when can anyone do staking and vote ? Are there added inducements to save those amounts?

______________________

Wallet updated and fully operational at 3.0.4.

thank you DRPD

I do not understand the operational limitations we had with Bittrex. I do not know if there were restrictions on sending or withdrawing PIVX ... or what exactly happened.

What is the way to know if they have updated his wallet and everything works as before those restrictions? I think it would be a good confirmation that everything is fine.

thanks.

It could be my fault, sorry .

My post, more than an allusion to the specific error you comment, was generally in the face of continuous references to user failures, when:

1- A great technical level of the users is not demandable, just as it was not at the moment of investment and entrance to the project.

2- In its limitations, I understand that the users have obeyed the official slogans continuously and executed the arranged means.

What can generate errors in the user is to massively animate and even tick mandatory updates that require a technical skill that not all have.

Not updating the provisional versions until a definitive one is no disrespect to the community ... on the contrary, it can save many unnecessary errors ... and it is very important that the steps in the good direction are solid, so much for the arrangement of the problem as for the image of seriousness of the project towards users who are not yet inside.