Several exchanges have shown their fangs in the world of sports, not only gambling sites, from big Italian clubs such as Juventus, SS Lazio, As Roma, AC Milan, and Inter Milan, also promoting some of the top exchanges, so that's pretty good news for the cryptocurrency world, that Crypto world has been accepted in the community and around the world..

This is a trap for the whales to make them profit on Dogecoin, so don't expect that you will get a profit by investing your money in Dogecoin, and it certainly happens, many are trapped in prices that seem to be going up drastically and dropping suddenly. ..

I still doubt it, and I've always been not very enthusiastic about news like that, so I don't want to conclude that it will be big in the future, in fact I prefer surprises not this news.

Actually I'm not so sure about this exchange, if asked to do KYC it's a natural thing, but whether the security that the exchange has can be trusted / not, but here everyone doesn't want to take risks, in terms of trading, of course we put money which are large, so why don't we look for bigger exchanges like Binance or Bittrex, Poloniex, which have been trusted for a long time..

Weak trading of Altcoins on several major exchanges, makes everyone think about trading about price conditions that are difficult to predict and often many people are trapped by the trade, it is even very difficult for us to deny, the difference in 2017 where many prices on several exchanges were so very stable, even the prices on the exchanges are not too messy, the increasing number of new tokens makes the growth of Cryptocurrency very bad from the last four years, we can see at this time on several exchanges..

That's true, but unevenly there is still a lot that needs to be fixed and needs to be corrected again with the number of tokens on some exchanges, sometimes investors only see tokens that have great potential, making the price of the newly listed token not have the potential to have a price increase, so that's why we can hold tokens for a long time...

The growth of BSC is very fast, the ease of transacting at BSC or Tron is equally cheap in terms of transacting the cost is quite cheap, that's why there is no doubt about the TRC20 and BSC networks, but BSC is superior to Tron, regarding the trends that the BSC network has so that's why BSC, much in the interest of many lower and upper classes..

As long as the transaction fee is relatively cheap, maybe I will continue to believe in USDT, because many users use USDT, because other coins are too expensive, for example like ETH, the shipping fee is quite expensive and costs quite a lot, then the most appropriate solution is using USDT, XLM, TRX, BSC, BNB, or other tokens that are not too expensive to send.

If the cost of sending ETH continues to be high then there will be a possibility that everyone will switch to the BSC network, because the cost of BSC is very cheap compared to the cost of ETH which is getting higher and higher, so that's why everyone is starting to switch to the BSC network now.

NFT is the current trend so it's the same with ICOs, IEOs, and IDOs which are currently being loved by new projects, I think NFT will only last a year, there will be many more new trends that will emerge..

There are many speculations that someone might have using the Polygon/Matic network, because the low fees make people want to transact quickly, because we know that transacting with the Erc20 network is because of the high gas that makes people reluctant to transact using networks like Erc20/Solana. ..

Very sure that the coins you hold at this time have long-term potential and many choices that you might take in the future, because there will still be many coins that will appear that have better potential than your five coins.

In my country only a few cities accept payments using crypto currency, my country is Indonesia and the city is Bali, because there are so many foreign tourists who vacation there, the Indonesian government allows payments using Crypto currency..

With the increase in Bitcoin at this time, it has a very good impact on the growth of Crypto, and as time goes on, bitcoin users are increasing, but the more concerned about fraud will be rampant.

Several months ago I heard that there was a discussion regarding the issue of the Indian government prohibiting the use of Cryptocurrency in their country, and now they are giving a statement to legalize Cryptocurrency, of course it does not look consistent with their stance or statement in a country and it is very confusing , if indeed their government has legalized Cryptocurrency then that's good news for everyone, and this could be a motivation for other countries to follow India's footsteps to accept Cryptocurrency as a digital currency in that country ...

I am not to compare the previous project with the current project, projects at this time tend to expect funds from different investors with previous projects that had private funds to list their tokens on the exchange with private funds, this is the difference between the current project and the previous project What is good is a project that has the main capital because that is why the project was successful in running an ICO, even though the current ICO is no longer attractive because of the possible factor of many frauds on behalf of the ICO and [there is an end to slander ICO in all communities, if I have to choose a project Which ICO in my opinion is good for a comeback, I prefer ICO projects that have capital so that all projects don't depend on investor funds ..

It is true that we cannot see at this time, because of unbalanced factors that make many countries do not want to take faster steps, because it involves economic problems, something can be risky, if too reckless a decision will result in a drop in the country's money, because Cryptocurrency also still likes to have problems with prices on all exchanges, so that's why many countries are not ready to do strange things about using Cryptocurrency as the main means of payment ...

Actually, the system they implement is very risky with accusations of fraud and it looks unfair to all circles, especially bounty hunters, and it could be manipulated by their team's calculations and not being transparent in the calculation of the prize, which is considered unfair, and bounty hunters have the right protest about this problem, if at the end of the calculation the spreadsheet is not opened ...

Yes, it's true they don't use BM to manage their prize campaign, and they use their own team to make it more economical or don't put much trust in BM, it's really strange that even this kind of problem is not only once, even it has happened very often even last month there are cases like this, at least we can just draw conclusions or think positively about this project, maybe at the end of the calculation they will reopen the spreadsheet they closed, so that all the bounty hunters can see the results of their income with the project, but if there is an irregularity then everyone has the right to give negative trust ..

At least everyone must first read and examine the project too deeply so that we can ensure that the project is safe for investors, the existence of bounty hunters can actually be quite helpful to prevent the fraudulent fraud created by the fraudulent project, because their role can be seen first and analyze it into the project, but at this point bounty hunters make reviews sometimes they provide information that doesn't tend to be good even if the information is unclear, so many investors are stuck with fraudulent projects, so at least we can avoid fraudulent projects more carefully be first and check all the teams and their roadmaps ..