I have no interest in helping you that's why. But I am now interested in seeing you look like a dick in the coming weeks.

I got no response I just wanted to quote you. This is going to be on a level of the Internet will never catch on. Fucking brilliant!!!

Hahaha you didnt research properly. Im going to hound you till you apologise around this forum when you prove you missed the biggest thing this year. You are going to wish you never posted. Zero credibility just went minus.

Yeah its clearly a shitcoin. Lol

Im going to enjoy rubbing your face in this shit posting of yours when the tech is released and it moons. Why do tou think I keep quoting your dumbass so you cant delete your posts. Gonna enjoy this..

What is your problem? Im interested in xtrabytes cause its a fact its innovative technology. Unlike all the shitcoins you post about. I didnt start those threads? I got to get your fucking permission to post on coins im focused on?

How about you fuck off?


Only time I started a thread before if i remember right was when the price was under 100 sats. Now its rock solid at multiple times that.

I started a thread on xtrabytes speculation in the speculation thread, different purpose. ill ask again do I need your fucking permission to post on coins im interested in?

I might of made one thread months ago. Otherwise ive just posted on others. You telling me I cant post in threads that im interested in?

Well it solves 51% attacks. You know the threat that Chinese miners have had over bitcoin....before ypu say its just theoretical. Lol

Does it wiithout pow or pos. Ans orher options like iotas tangle is susposedly a mess. So yeah damn right it solves a real problem for long term security of decentralised systems.

Posted recently from the developer. Looks to me like this chain they will build their modular system on will be the chain to beat all chains in terms of secure consensus.






Here is the response from Borz (in his greatly improving English):

Signed off inside the VITALS ?
Yes, and no.

example:

the block height is 1294
112 STaTiC online 400 STaTiC offline.
each 112 STaTiC signed the 1294 block and push these signatures to block signature database.
The block signature database is one independent blockchain tracked database.
All height have lot of related signatures. Not only the online STaTiC.
Of course the 1294 is new block therefore the online STaTiC-s signed and offline STaTiC-s not signed at this moment.
Before a online STaTiC signing 1294 block require all previous block validating.
If the online static was offline the previous day then validate and sign all previous day created blocks.
The final result is one very complex and hardly understandable hash table created. I don't want explain this. Need large and complicated infographics lot of time etc... The final result is just a very large unique number. These unique numbers is the result of consensus. These number will be attached to block. This number is the signature of VITAL. This is not real signature this is a hash of all signatures. I hope to understandable, the VITAL system how to be signing the blocks. The VITAL system "signature" is the big signature consensus. This is not real signature this is big mix of signature hashes. Impossible to change or reproduce without knowing all signers private keys. ( need previous offline STaTiC private keys too ;-)  = impossible )


I thought that was pretty powerful and was quite excited to share... Hope you also enjoyed!!

I've followed this from a distance for a while now. Seems like a good time to buy as the technology IF it's not vapor ware will be a very big thing. Possibly a billion dollar coin so ai wanted to get others plans on trading it's moves.


Recent info on tech shows how interesting this coin could be. Bad English as the developer is deaf and Hugaraian so poor English.






Here is the response from Borz (in his greatly improving English):

Signed off inside the VITALS ?
Yes, and no.

example:

the block height is 1294
112 STaTiC online 400 STaTiC offline.
each 112 STaTiC signed the 1294 block and push these signatures to block signature database.
The block signature database is one independent blockchain tracked database.
All height have lot of related signatures. Not only the online STaTiC.
Of course the 1294 is new block therefore the online STaTiC-s signed and offline STaTiC-s not signed at this moment.
Before a online STaTiC signing 1294 block require all previous block validating.
If the online static was offline the previous day then validate and sign all previous day created blocks.
The final result is one very complex and hardly understandable hash table created. I don't want explain this. Need large and complicated infographics lot of time etc... The final result is just a very large unique number. These unique numbers is the result of consensus. These number will be attached to block. This number is the signature of VITAL. This is not real signature this is a hash of all signatures. I hope to understandable, the VITAL system how to be signing the blocks. The VITAL system "signature" is the big signature consensus. This is not real signature this is big mix of signature hashes. Impossible to change or reproduce without knowing all signers private keys. ( need previous offline STaTiC private keys too ;-)  = impossible )

Who the fuck wants crypto to control the devices inside their homes? IOT's will do as well as 3D TV's.....no one wants them.

Nothing wrong with admiring the work of one developer, unless you think BTC and Ethereum have no future? Borzalom has done nothing arrogant at all, it is simply early in the project, he has to do the key coding himself and is committed to open source 100% also he has called for help from developers so I don't think your criticism is legitimate. Also the project is a core with modules to be built by anyone who wants to so again I see no issue on the side of the developer.

There is zero reason to suppose this is a scam. If anyone has one single piece of evidence to show it is a scam other than oh the developer doesn't give his fucking home address etc. please give it so I can laugh at you.

Xtrabytes is crazily undervalued at around 14m market cap. This coin once done will be a top 20 platform.

There is no value in the idea of a coin 'replacing' another but I personally see what Xtrabytes is doing as a better version of a an ETH type platform. If only for the fact there is a capped supply which to me personally you can't be a cryptocurrency if you have an open ended supply like ETH. The whole point was to get away from this.

Read the OP sockboy.

Lol. You win the best post prize today.

Ive nothing against opening (yet) another channel BUT i think its more a culture of us and them that has developed. I dont attack people for this. Maybe it comes from wverythibg being some damn reveal or wveryone be patient amd wait. Its demotivating for people. No one really want to get channeled off to little channels. If i was king I would have no more than 3 channels. General which is anyone can talk from development to bullshit trading. One for devlopment which includes everything from website wallet and core. And maybe one for sticking important announcements. Roadmap etc. All this separating of community dosent work. This is one issue.of communication where some are in the know but the majority have no idea they are chatting to a devloper in silicon valley or some kid in a pc room in Bombay. community knowledge and sharing is key. My 2 cents.

hahahaha The project is not doomed because of some upset over a website.

There are some community streamlining that needs to be done and I think some change is happening now. CCREV must take some blame for that.


This quote from Borz is very telling...

"We started this project and we will finish this project. Some peoples who want fast profit without work maybe leave this project. I don't like these type of peoples. These peoples will write the negative criticism and never help. John often ask help but rarely get. I created very easy tasks and nobody done these tasks. The team building is hard work and never fast. We need stable team who contribute and help."


So there were jobs to do but I don't think those jobs were openly discussed. Everything is managed by the 'team' and everything is being taken care of by the board, no one being told even who is in charge. I think many talented people would of helped if they knew what was needed. I HOPE THIS CHANGE.


The other thing is BORZ quote:

"The stupids just criticism each other. Maybe i have wrong idea and need correcting. If peoples help then that is good. If you say destructive words: bad, shit, ugly etc... That never help to make better. If you say: the blue is better than red because... and you have idea why better, this is the constructive and good help."


Actually 90% of the supposed FUD CCREV talked about was EXACTLY this kind of criticism. It was nearly all criticism with solutions, i.e. get a new website designer, pay a pro designer, maybe more open communication, maybe some shifting of roles etc etc. So the community was doing what a community is supposed to do and CCREV is the one in the wrong in this case and should shoulder some blame like an adult. And at the very least not fucking attack and blame those offering constructive solutions!!! IS he humbly said yeah guys the site isn't as good as I thought it would be, lets get on and make a better one all this would of been avoided.


AND THEN LETS MOVE THE FUCK ON CAUSE THIS PROJECT TECH WISE IS FUCKING BRILLIANT>>>>

CCREV needs to learn what open source means. There are no such things as permanent jobs in open source. He better wise up or he might have to learn it the hard way. Open source means you are one community vote away from losing your role.