|
Update: Minimum payment threshold is 0.01 BTC now. I recommend setting it higher to prevent flooding the network with small transactions.
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure I understand this - with pay per share, isn't the operator taking a greater risk by guaranteeing a fixed payout with uncertainty about how much time will be needed to create a new block. Yes, i do :) Moreover, currently i also take the risk of paying for unconfirmed blocks, one of which was found today and will be paid to my customers as normal one. |
|
|
|
|
Hello, people.
Please set your getwork request period to 5 seconds if you are using longer one.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice find, but people already frequently use x1 slots, especially ArtForz.
Some motherboards will require shorting particular pins to be able to detect such card. And sometimes you can also feed additional power from PSU to PCIe slot bypassing the MB.
|
|
|
|
Every time I try to use this pool, it works for awhile. But, every time I come back and check up on my mining rig I see the RPC communication error. It seems to work for a number of hours and then just completely stop.
Looks like your miner can't recover from communication errors. |
|
|
|
I just noticed on your index page you list the syntax for a couple of miners. Should the Diablo syntax be -r 8332? You have -p 8332. Thanks for pointing this out. Sadly there is no any info about that miner. Should it be --port 8332 or something else ? Are you sure about -r 8332 |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I've made a GUI miner for poclbm and it works great with deepbit. Thanks for posting :) |
|
|
|
No issues with crossfire on Linux (i.e. possible to turn it off and still mine with two or more GPUs)
You can do this on Windows too, without switching off Crossfire. |
|
|
|
Thanks Tycho your pool works fine  What is the best performance? Pay-Per-Share or Proportionnal ?  From what I've heard, PPS should end up being ~10% less than proportional, because you're transferring the risk of not finding a block to Tycho. No, it should not being 10% less because there is 3% fee for proportional. And sum wildly depends on luck. |
|
|
|
No longer getting the error, but getting 0 Mhash/s. In the past, that's only happened when username/password are wrong. After typing each in several times, and copy/pasting them straight from the account section, I'm still not getting any hashes.
Edit: It works, but takes some time to start showing work. Timed it to be exactly 60 seconds each time before the hash rate shows up. Not sure if this is on my end, or the pool's end.
It sends first request without authorization field in http headers each time and tries to authorize only after receiving pool's answer about required login. I'll try to ask ufasoft to fix this behavior, but he uses external library that works that way, so i'm not sure if it will be better than now. |
|
|
|
Attempting to throw ufasoft's miner at your pool, and getting these errors. The bold is the switches I tried to use to run the miner. C:\CPUMiner>miner.exe -o deepbit.net:8332 -u xx@xx.xx -p xxx0 MHash/s Error 8007007B: The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect. I closed the window with the error while typing this up, but when I put a "http://" in front of the deepbit.net part, it just said it couldn't make a connection. Just tried with vesion 0.3.2 and everything works fine. You should use http://deepbit.net:8332, not just the domain name. " The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect" is surely not pool's error but miner's one, ask ufasoft about this. |
|
|
|
|
Pool updated:
1) ufasoft's SSE2 CPU miner is now supported
2) workers creation is allowed
3) payments list is available to users
|
|
|
|
I am somewhat confused as to having multiple workers registered as opposed to just one. What is the advantage to having more than one worker registered?
There is no difference. It's just for better statistics - you can see which one is not working and can set different payment sharing for different miners. |
|
|
|
I keep getting RPC communication errors. Any idea?
How much is your ping delay to deepbit.net ? Do you have any packet loss ? |
|
|
|
Once I've chosen Proportional in Payment Method, there seems no changes with my BTC, is there something wrong? or just have to wait some time?
In Proportional mode your balance will increase in a next hour after finding a block. |
|
|
|
Awesome. Got my miner up and working! even though it's only 3000khash/s, it helps somewhat.
I have a question though: Can I set this up on multiple machines (and have all the "pay" directed at one account, mine?) Or is it against the rules, not just possible? I have no clue ::)
Answered this one many times already :) Yes, you can do this. |
|
|
|
Have been getting RPC errors and the following error message at the site for a few minutes now: Fixing this at the moment. |
|
|
|
Sounds good - one minor critique - password for worker shouldn't be seen?!? When you use a different p/w for the worker it shows in the text field.
Password is not shown when you use same password as for the main account (which can't be seen). If you set your separate password, it's not hidden anymore and even if it's stolen, other people can't do anything bad with it. |
|
|
|
How often should that happen? I've been running for quite some time (13 hours or so) and that's the first time that's happened. Just CPU mining...
3-8 times per minute on a single GPU, once in 6 minutes on modern Intel CPU and once in 8 hours on p3-class old CPU. |
|
|
|
What does "PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)" mean?
I think it means that your miner successfully submited a share to the pool. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
