Sen çok yanlış yerlere gelmişssin kardeş e-sporda şikenin maç satısının Allahı döner Tier 1 geleni geçeni tokatlayan takım için bir gün 1000 dolar basarsın maçı izlersinki tier 4 takım ağzına sıçmıştır. Sonra discord facebook yazışmaları redditte dönmeye başlar.
Tier 1 takımımız tahmin edildiği gibi tier 4 takım ile anlaşmış ve maçı satmıştır çünkü oran Tier1 %12 - Tier4 %88 dir.
Bunları csgolounge de 60 dolar ile başlayıp 3 ayda 2800 dolar kazanan adam olarak yazıyorum. Espor bet işlerinden uzak durmak sağlığınız ve cebiniz için daha hayırlıdır. Özellikle Counter strike GO ve dota2 maçlarında anlattığım olay çok fazla yaşanır.
60 USD'ı 2800 USD'a çıkardıysan yanlış yer olduğunu hiç sanmam bahisçi kardeş  , bunu futbol bahisleriyle yapabilme ihtimalin herhalde E-Sports'a göre çok daha düşüktür... Tamamen istatistiki bir fırsattan söz ediyoruz, bahis oranlarının eşit tutulup sadece iyi oyunculara yatırım yapma şansı olan bir sürü oyun var, daha güzeli bunların tamamının 0 yatırımla yapılabiliyor olması. Şuna katılıyorum şike bahis işlerinin döndüğü her yerde olabilir, fakat bundan etkilenmemenin yöntemleri de var... neyse biz ilgilenen arkadaşlarla özelden devam ediyoruz. |
|
|
|
|
Mevcut sistemin içindeki ilişkileri düzenleyen, buna aracı olan projelere (Ripple, Libra gibi örnekler dahil olmak üzere) kripto para denmemesi görüşündeyim, bu tarz girişimlerin Nouriel Roubini'nin nadiren doğru söylediği konulardan biri olan "fintech" kategorisinde değerlendirilmesi çok daha isabetli olur.
Örneğin Çin'de Hindistan'da bile fintech zaten şu anda çok yaygın olarak hayata işlemiş durumda ve merkezi kontrolün, totaliter sistemlerin en ağır yöntemlerini sergiliyorlar, öyle ki bugün bir Çin vatandaşı bankadan 500 USD nakit çekmek istediğinde bile sorguya çekilir hale gelmiş durumda...
Kripto paralar gerçekten bir devrim niteliğindedir, bu tarz teknolojilere "disruptor" deniyor, yani paradigmayı değiştiren nitelikte buluşlar.
Herkes at arabası kullanırken araba üretmek, herkes uçarken uzaya çıkmak, herkes top mermisi atarken nükleer silah geliştirmek gibi...
Türkiye bugüne kadar hep takipçi ve taklit edici oldu teknolojik gelişmelerde, ancak kültürel bir devrim ve total reformlar olursa yeni buluşlar yapabilecek düzeye gelir diye düşünüyorum.
|
|
|
|
|
Kripto felsefesini tamamen ıskalamış bir proje daha.
Kriptolar özellikle bireylerin egemenliğini ilan etmek için, devletler, bankalar vb. kurumlardan bağımsız değer transferi yapabilmek için ortaya çıktılar.
Türkiye gibi kabile psikolojisiyle yaşayan toplumların önce kültürel devrime ihtiyacı var blokzincir gibi teknolojileri anlayabilmeleri için.
Blokzincir üzerinden altın alışverişi yapacaksınız, ama karşılğı olan fiziksel altın takasbank kasalarında duracak, bırakın uluslararası yatırımcıyı, temel bir genel kültür eğitimi almış Türkiye Cumhuriyeti vatandaşı da böyle bir ilişkiyi kabul etmez.
|
|
|
|
... Not only do I have extensive experience with trading, I know people who make a living explicitly doing what Cryptosparks does, and his claims are not at all unrealistic. Furthermore I have been in every role relating to cryptocurrency managing a project that at one point had a market cap of over $10 million dollars and was the highest returning asset of ANY CLASS globally as far as percent gains for the year of 2014 under my management. So excuse me when I say I probably have more knowledge in this arena than you do.
...
You can do a quick google search on me, find my identity and go to any reputable hedge fund in Zurich, Frankfurt or London today, and they will be happy to tell you about me and my trading record, but ok let's not digress so much here... Cryptosparks is a smart guy and I like some of his witty comebacks; however with regards to his capital management offers he is at best an overeager total rookie unaware of his fiduciary responsibilities as a prospective asset manager, and at worst is deliberately feigning ignorance and misrepresenting many of the risks inherent in his proposition to sign up as many people as possible because it's a free call option for him with 0 downside... If you disagree with such an assessment, that's fine, why don't you then meet his minimum requirement and make a 100 USD Bitmex account, and publish the track record here for the next 3 months (after all it's not so bad to make 20% / month ). I believe your statement that you are not affiliated with him in any way, and if you average even half of the roughly 20% / month performance he is claiming for the next 3 months, you will have made a phenomenal statement against your detractors, I'll also withdraw the neg feedback on him, and finally something substantial can come out of these incessant DT dramas... |
|
|
|
Just wanted to post here so that people looking to target me can't use it as a "gotcha" moment later as if I don't know my trust inclusions are public and they have exposed some crime I was trying to keep secret. I have removed Kalemder and Vispilio from my inclusions over their support of this flag. I am disappointed after themselves being targeted by these kind of arbitrary flags that they turn right around and do it to others. I am open to changing this later if I see a change in behavior. Tecshare what are you doing man, there are hundreds of posts demonstrating the total unreliability of Cryptosparks' business model, it's probably now become the most discussed flag on the forum: Check here, here and here:From your general tone I understand you are completely outside the realm of financial services, and yet you seem hell bent on protecting someone whose business propositions have been debunked very convincingly by many members just because you can never seem to palate the possibility that you may be mistaken on any issue whatsoever... And just like our old buddy Cryptosparks here, you seem to lash out with ad hominems whenever people disagree with you... My advice to you, the trust system might not be for you because you take every debate regarding it way too personally, relax and move on. It would do wonders for your psychology if you understand that being wrong every once in a while does not compromise your honor and dignity, it's just part of being human. Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
If the bounties literally pay less than 1 USD / hunter there will still be thousands of people signing up, I guarantee it simply because the
world has become too over-populated. There is tremendous unemployment everywhere on the globe; it was only a matter of time before
"bounty hunting" as a source of income became common knowledge, and you are observing the natural consequences of it now.
|
|
|
|
I just sent a request to Coinmarketcap to remove this scam token from their list. If anyone knows official representatives of CMC and / or Jinbi outside of this forum, please feel free to reach out to me. The phony Jinbi team gave multiple promises & deadlines to pay bounty hunters and failed all of them. Jinbi Token should be a veteran member in all the lists for scammy ICO's, just a small sample of their shameless "official" lies evidenced below:  |
|
|
|
|
I believe banning this campaign would be the worst of all possible decisions that the forum can take on the topic of signature campaigns.
Filtering out the spam and repetitive spammers is a great step in the right direction, and at a certain point forum purists should face the hardcore reality that a campaign paying 15-20k satoshi / post at a max of 20 posts per day is effectively valuing this forum at a much higher rate than many of the so called reputable campaigns which are content with offering 5k satoshi at 20 posts / week...
The main criterion should be: is Yobit keeping its promises and paying at the advertised rate, followed by spam control; once these 2 conditions are fulfilled, other advertisers might see these rates and decide a signature on this forum is worth far more than the 5-10 USD / week which most of the gambling sites seem to think is the fair value, so embracing serious advertisers like Yobit (provided they are true to their word) with welcoming arms would be the win win scenario here.
|
|
|
|
|
Çok tartışmalı bir kampanya, konu global forumda çözüme kavuşmadan bu imzayı bence henüz kullanmayın arkadaşlar.
Fakat şu bir gerçek ki altcoin kampanyalarının 95%'inin balon çıktığı ortamda düzenli BTC bazında ödeme yapan kampanyalara ihtiyaç var, katma değerin artması ve foruma ilginin canlanması için bazı katı forum kurallarının esnetilmesi gerekiyor,
serbest piyasada bir kullanıcının kendine meşru kazanç yaratma çabalarını yasaklamaya çalışmak geri kafalı abzürt bir tutum olur...
|
|
|
|
boş yorum yapanlara cevap verme tenezzülünde bulunmayacağım.
aferin, feyenoord - az alkmaar: 0 - 3 bitti ( 26 Eylül 2019), "karşılıklı gol garanti" diyordun, mesajını niye sildin  , aslında negatif trust alman gerekir, çünkü samimi ve dürüst değilsin, düzelt kendini. |
|
|
|
|
BNB is too dependent on the activities going on in Binance, even though it has its own blockchain now, the predominant view is that it's still
a utility token for Binance related gimmicks...
If CZ and company really envision greatness for BNB, they need to make this coin attractive for also being used outside the Binance ecosystem.
|
|
|
|
Önemli bir konu olmuş, teşekkürler. Ben de şöyle bir tahmin aracı paylaşiim: https://www.richterx.com/?go=forecastETAS denilen "Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence" modeline göre bir depremin diğerlerini tetikleme istatistikleri üzerinden olasılık hesapları yapan bir site, örneğin şu anda önümüzdeki 30 gün içinde İstanbul ve 100km çevresinde 6 veya üzeri büyüklüğünde deprem olma olasılığını %1.75 olarak gösteriyor, parametreleri değiştirerek çeşitli değerlendirmeler yapabilirsiniz, bilgilerinize. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin son 24 saatte neden bu kadar düşüş yaşıyor olabilir ?
Bakkt'ın açılmasının ilk gününde "fiziksel alımlı" BTC futures hacminin beklenenin altında kalması, "kurumsal yatırımcı Bitcoin için henüz yeterince iştahlı değil" tarzında bir intiba bıraktı piyasada, fakat ben bunun yeterli sebep olmadığını düşünüyorum, manipülatif hareketler var. Bakkt'ı ve futures sonuçlarını fırsat bilen bazı spekülatörler aşırı baskı oluşturdular fiyat üzerinde, ucuzdan geri almak için, 7500-8000 seviyesi bana göre Bitcoin yeni ATH'ler yapmadan önceki son dip olabilir. |
|
|
|
|
BTC getting into oversold territory now, this drop can be the last shake down before the strong rally resumes towards possibly a new ATH,
I would consider 7500-8000ish USD levels during the next 1-2 weeks as opportune places to incrementally add to your BTC positions
(while keeping some reserves intact in case of an unpredictable catastrophic event)...
|
|
|
|
Version 0.14.4 released.
Change log:
* Add x16rv2 algorithm (upcoming RVN fork)
* Add ability to auto-switch mining algorithm using new --fork-at parameter:
RVN fork: --fork-at x16rv2=2019-10-01T16:00:00
See the help file for more details
Bug fixes:
* (Linux) Miner wouldn't start in watchdog mode via symlink
NOTE (RVN hardfork): In order for the miner to automatically switch to mining x16rv2 at the time of RVN fork, please make sure
1) T-Rex is launched in watchdog mode (--no-watchdog parameter should NOT be set in your bat file)
2) Your system clock is synchronised with a time server (The miner uses your system clock to check if it's time to switch)
3) Add --fork-at x16rv2=2019-10-01T16:00:00 parameter to the miner start cmd line. If your pool changes ports for the new algo, make it --fork-at x16rv2:3637=2019-10-01T16:00:00 where 3637 is the new port the miner should switch to (replace it with the actual port number)
If the miner is started in watchdog mode and you've set the fork time correctly, you will see a message
Fork has been requested at Tue Oct 1 16:00:00 2019 UTC. Algo will be changed to x16rv2.
can you talk a bit more about your mining projections after the RVN hard fork, will it resume its spot among the top contenders as the most profitable coin to mine with GPU's, or would you decisively recommend to mine something else particularly for 1080 TI's at the moment ?.. |
|
|
|
|
hi, is this the best GRIN miner out there currently for 1080 TI's ?..
what settings do you have on the afterburner for 1080 TI's specifically,
and alternatively, what would you recommend as the most promising crypto to mine with 1080 TI's, after RVN completely fell off the radar...
|
|
|
|
|
Either scam or gross incompetence, or both...
Now the scammy part of the administration is allegedly removed from the team, and there is a new CEO.
However Miracle TELE won't be able to mend its destroyed reputation unless all tokens are treated equally as naturally intended for any
crypto currency on a blockchain, and their services are fully functional again including stacking and SIM card usage...
|
|
|
|
I've been watching the development of trading bots/quants for a long time and seen them come and go with varying results, not just in crypto.
CryptoSparks has had to field some pretty dumb assertions and has reacted strongly, I don't blame him for that.
Obviously we're all on Scam Alert on a daily basis, usually triggered by high ROI's, and I'm making no judgement on CS and his scheme at the moment.
The central question is "How will he scam you?"
If you invest your money directly into your own Bitmex account and IF the API key is set up so that no third party has direct access to those deposited funds, where is the scam?
You may well lose your money if/when the trading system incurs trading losses, but how will CS profit from that if his only income comes from sharing in your profit?
Until that can be answered, everything else is just peripheral noise.
He wants to participate in the upside of his investors without disclosing the full range of risks involved in his proposition, that typically counts as the equivalent of fraud in the world of hedge funds & asset management. He will not profit when his trading system incurs losses, he will have simply offloaded the losses onto his naive investors who trusted his 100% false marketing propaganda like "ROI 490%" and similar (what RoI , it was a hypothetical backtest, which is one of the first standard basic steps in creating any trading strategy, nothing was invested, just to give you one example)... |
|
|
|
Based on the evidence you are citing, I would say it is more likely they are in some kind of business relationship than the two being alts. Technically speaking, BestWebCreator didn't offer shilling services (he solicited a TG handle in response to a solicitation for these services), but if his name pops up in a case of likely paid shilling, one can make a reasonable conclusion. I don't want to get involved in forum drama, but I also don't support the flag against CryptoSparks. I would describe what he is offering as similar to GunBot, who has many vouches from reputable forum members, the main difference being that CryptoSparks has settings 'pre-filled' for his customers. GunBot also appears to have what I assume to be paid salesmen, and although I don't know the specifics of the commission/payment structure, I think it would be fair to say it would be similar to what CryptoSparks is offering in the thread you describe as "offering to pay for shilling". CryptoSparks loan request was a little scammy, but a lender could negotiate better terms that would better protect the lender, such as asking CryptoSparks to put up some of his own money that would be used to cover the first trading losses, if any. I would not personally trade with a bot I didn't code myself, but I cannot deny this does not commonly happen. CryptoSparks made a number of critical errors that completely undermined his credibility as a prospective asset manager: Apart from the very childish and atrocious attitude which has already been discussed at length, here are a few breaches of trust that would justify the flag and disqualify him from any serious business proposition: 1) He claimed his bot returned 480% in 20 months, it turns out these were just pro forma backtests, ie: NOT LIVE RESULTS (presenting a backtest as real trading performance would lead to the revoking of your license as a CTA or asset manager in many jurisdictions, including the United States, where legally you can't even publish live results unless they are audited by a certified 3rd party...) 2) He was visiting the forums at the beginning of every month and publishing some Bitmex trades, claiming that he already had a very profitable bot working very well for his investors going as far back as 3 months ago (as AdolfinWolf quotes here ). Later it turns out that project got scrapped, and now he has a new bot called Arakne, which begs the question: what happened to Phoenix and your earlier investors bro, and why you are down to trading with nominal lots of 10 USD in a massively leveraged exchange, where you used to do round trips of 10k USD or greater just a couple of months ago... How many people got rekt already because of your immoral marketing tactics and shamelessly deceptive presentation of your experimental bots?..As it stands, unless CryptoSparks tremendously improves his honesty and ethics, a warning flag against him is very appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
