Bitcoin Forum
August 04, 2024, 07:42:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 284 »
2021  Economy / Economics / Re: Will negative interest rate be a boon to Bitcoin? on: March 07, 2015, 06:33:59 PM
I still have a savings account which brings me small interest. Not much, but I'm protected from the 30% drop in value BTC has experienced in January. Somehow, it's different money. I have money in that savings account and some other money for wild investments like BTC, but I do not move much money from one account to the other.

If it's intended as a currency, it's the same.

The price of products denominated in BTC are now more expensive, not so much for major conventional currencies.  Even oil has inflated in terms of BTC since months ago.

In global commerce, price of everything from US is much more expensive now for the rest of the country, comparing with one year ago

Indeed they are.  The US had to pay very high prices for commodity producing countries products, but now the marginal consumer China is slowly collapsing, causing that boom to go bust.  Now, the rest of the world will demand US technology to fund productivity or die and pay a high price for it.

The vast majority of the world economy is fighting near deflation, which may have already happened in February for the US:

"The latest Headline PCE price index year-over-year (YoY) rate is 0.22%, down from 0.77% the previous month."

Again, this deflation is caused by a lacking of demand, which printing more money will just make it worse long term wise. All new money is added in a form of debt, and raise the debt repayment cost later on. That large amount of debt repayment will decrease everyone but bank's spending power, but what they spend for? To buy more bonds (loan them out to trap more people in)

There is only one exit for this endless slavery, that is give up using fiat money as a transaction medium, but few realizes this
2022  Economy / Economics / Re: Will negative interest rate be a boon to Bitcoin? on: March 07, 2015, 06:30:38 PM

Those who demand money want no change in a currency's value by the general price level.

Are you suggesting that Venezuela type inflation is desirable or 2009/2008 crash deflation?  BTC provides many tens of percent of each almost every half month.

Everyone know now that it was the crazy credit expansion caused housing bubble and triggered that crash, the crash is inevitable under an inflation based monetary system, since it gave everyone a wrong judgement of real demand thus over invest and over spending

On the other hand, when you have a constantly deflative economy, everyone will expect that and prepare themselves well, the economy will be extremely stable


Negative interest for currency means banks push others to borrow money, however, they borrow money to only buy bonds, resulted in negative interest for the bonds. It seems there is no real meaningful investment that money can go nowadays, due to saturated production and demand

They can push forever, but if there's no demand for credit by the creditworthy, it mean nothing.

Banks do not buy bonds except where forced.  They produce loans, in the US almost exclusively mortgages and corporate loans.

All except long term bonds are undervalued at the moment, but there is below average demand, and production is well below historical trends.

As oil continues to collapse, US wage & labor incomes will skyrocket.  As the US expansion continues, technology will bubble.  The Fed could easily blunder and stop it all if they raise rates while the US deflates in the coming months.

BTC will benefit from none of this.  Its fundamental problems are too great.

Producing loan is the same as buying bonds, MBS are also bonds in essential

The real problem is on the demand: When people were really poor, they had lots of demand, but now when they are relatively well established, there is no need for further expansion of economy, they don't need so many houses and cars and useless things, they might want to retire earlier

This is a very natural phenomenon, no matter you use inflation or deflation based monetary system, it will reach that stage sooner or later, monetary policy can only do minor adjustments

In such a long term trend, people will tends to work less and save more, so bitcoin will fit into the picture well, while fiat money is losing its value faster every year, and all the other investment baiscally have no return due to shrinking long term demand
2023  Economy / Economics / Re: Will negative interest rate be a boon to Bitcoin? on: March 07, 2015, 06:03:07 PM
I still have a savings account which brings me small interest. Not much, but I'm protected from the 30% drop in value BTC has experienced in January. Somehow, it's different money. I have money in that savings account and some other money for wild investments like BTC, but I do not move much money from one account to the other.

If it's intended as a currency, it's the same.

The price of products denominated in BTC are now more expensive, not so much for major conventional currencies.  Even oil has inflated in terms of BTC since months ago.

In global commerce, price of everything from US is much more expensive now for the rest of the country, comparing with one year ago
2024  Economy / Speculation / Re: To become a whale... on: March 07, 2015, 05:48:13 PM
Even a bear whale with 30000 coins can be slaughtered in couple of hours, anything less than 10000 coins can not be called a whale  Cool
2025  Economy / Economics / Re: Will the Fed delay raising rates as oil collapses towards $20? on: March 06, 2015, 11:06:15 PM
Actually I think they will raise the rate to a very high level, since there will never be a liquidity crisis in the foreseeable future. Now banks are sitting on a mountain of cash that is enough for the future 30 years, and those cash will earn them huge amount of interest in a high rate environment

So, when higher rates kill the expansion for normal business, it generated huge income for banking class, so the one that is most benefited from a higher rate is banks. They will become the major spender and driver for economy
2026  Economy / Economics / Re: Is deflation truly that bad for an economy? on: March 06, 2015, 10:46:23 PM

Again, it is a common mistake by economists to use currency as an absolute measure of value. But I understand that it is extremely difficult for them to understand that currency's value fluctuates all the time, since they have been using currency to measure value since they barely can do 1+1. If they start from an international point of view by looking at FOREX market, then they will understand that currency's stable value is just an illusion. Get rid of that illusion, then people will not look at the numbers in their account to decide if they are profitable or not, they will look at what they really gain from a certain economy activity

I have just one question. What are you as a producer going to do with negative profit, i.e. a loss that you may incur as a result of decreasing prices? Remember that you have to pay wages from your income, and your employees don't care about your ideas (absolute measure of value and all that) but love cash.

Indeed, if you use cash as unit of value, you will have this problem. And Keynes said that people prefer a rising cash income and rising price over a dropping cash income and dropping price. It is this basic instinct make inflative monetary policy seems reasonable

The problem is, in today's inflation based model, most of the new money do not enter economy as increased projects and salary, those money were used to buy assets and debt, which makes majority of people poorer

However, if new money can not be created at ease, and money becomes more valuable over time, business can still profit if there is demand

Take a bitcoin mining business for example, a mining rig of 2000W power now generate far less bitcoin income than 2011, but as a thumb of rule, the mining operation still roughly holds a line of 6 months return on investment (btc wise), regardless of bitcoin's exchange rate. And now the whole mining industry is making much more income than 2011, they are building larger sites, hiring more people. Those employees have much less bitcoin income comparing to 2011 due to the rise of bitcoin's exchange rate, but their purchasing power increased due to the overall industry is expanding. The reason is simply because the market demand is increasing at a fast pace, it is the market demand, not money supply, decide if a business is profitable or not

On the other hand, during 2014, mining rig price dropped as a result of contraction of aggregate demand, but that is a important sign of market telling you that now demand is weak, you must scale down the supply. Artificially increase the demand by printing more money does not change the fact that now aggregate demand is lower: When you are tired, you should sleep, instead of drinking more coffee. Luckily, bitcoin has a fixed daily supply, so the only way to adjust to shrinking demand is to drop its price and scale down the mining operation, everything worked as it should



2027  Economy / Economics / Re: Catastrophic Meltdown Coming to America - Doug Casey on: March 06, 2015, 05:30:07 PM
Another useless prediction. If you can't provide a date, time, some actionable information there is no purpose in your prediction. It's not even a prediction, it's nonsense FUD. People on BCT have been predicting a crisis and crash for the past 3 years, where is it?

USD has crashed against BTC for thousands of times, and this is just a beginning. Everything's value drops together with USD does not make the loss go away
2028  Economy / Economics / Re: Catastrophic Meltdown Coming to America - Doug Casey on: March 06, 2015, 04:15:30 PM

Having said that, I disagree with the core thesis.  The money printing has not led to inflation, so clearly something else needs to happen.

I'm afraid that nothing would happen, the trick has been done, banks successfully exchanged their useless MBS into cashes and now they are sitting on mountains of cashes that should have been added for the future 30 years. There will never be a liquidity crisis for decades, a market crash is very unlikely, and when it crashes, banks will immediately release some part of those cashes to push the price back, so much for price stability of assets

The only risk is the value of their cash might crash due to loss of confidence in fiat money (due to widely spread knowledge of banking scam, or alternative currency like bitcoin), but that is still too early, not one in a million understand banks' tricks. Even those widely spread videos like "Money as debt" serials and "The biggest scam in the history of mankind" does not clearly make people understand the double spending nature of modern money creation
2029  Economy / Economics / Re: Is deflation truly that bad for an economy? on: March 06, 2015, 03:55:50 PM
...
So, the claim of deflation's negative impact is just based on a stubbornly hold belief that currency is a benchmark of value. In fact the whole modern monetary theory is constructed on this blind belief

By this argument inflation is irrelevant since inflation's "negative impact is just based on a stubbornly held belief that currency is a benchmark of value".

By this argument all the "benefits" of deflation are an illusion.

The observable fact is that the adjustment from mild inflation to mild deflation is painful. People lose jobs because both employees and employers do not reduce salaries fast enough and loans are paid off in fixed amounts and end up sucking more resources than expected to pay off and therefore reducing investment.

The ironic thing is you are right that, theoretically, the value of money does not matter and is quite arbitrary. It's the unforeseen changes in the rate of change of money value that causes problems. Steady is best. You can write contracts (loans and employment contracts) that take a steady %2 inflation or a %2 deflation into account.

So, given that we were at %2 inflation, why not just leave it there since contracts already take that into account? Why call for unneeded pain by calling for switching to a currency with deflation when the benefits are an illusion?

Exactly, if you get rid of the illusion of stable value of currency, then all the talks about inflation or deflation will be dismissed. In fact, even if you use currency as benchmark of value, in a same day, something's price is going down and some other things' price is going up, inflation and deflation happens at all levels at the same time in the economy due to supply and demand change, it does not matter

But saying that deflation will destroy job and create recession is some kind of political campaign: Banks want to create more money for themselves, so they prefer an inflative model, so they first inflate it and then stop printing and crash the economy, and tell people that deflation is bad, so that they could print more money for themselves. Considering that FED has successfully printed money of future 30 years and handed them to commercial banks, the success of this political campaign is enormous

If the mainstream economists insists on a deflative model, the world will be a totally different world, at least banks won't get a chance to rob during a financial crisis, and there would never have been a financial crisis in the first place

2030  Economy / Economics / Re: Is deflation truly that bad for an economy? on: March 06, 2015, 03:41:17 PM


Quote
If you give up the belief of absolute value of currency, then all the claimed problems of deflation will disappear: When price of something drops, the purchasing power of the currency is increasing, means productivity is higher thus everything become more and cheaper

Productivity, as per Wikipedia, is "an average measure of the efficiency of production. It can be expressed as the ratio of output to inputs [emphasis added] used in the production process, i.e. output per unit of input". As both output and input can be expressed in money terms, the money is effectively taken out of the equation, therefore the increase in the purchasing power has nothing to do with productivity.

Strictly speaking, it is not so simple, but your reasoning actually works against your assumption, i.e. it can be said that with the increase in purchasing power productivity is decreasing (since producers make less profit and can actually suffer losses).

Increased productivity means less value for produced goods, since the supply increased and demand does not change, this is the basic economy 123

Output and input should not be expressed in currency, since the currency's value is changing all the time (Ruble dropped 50% against USD in a year, is that mean Russian's productivity suddenly doubled?)

In fact, there is no good way to measure the value, fiat money usually were used as an approximation, the precision of this approximation is about +-20%, any deflation or inflation is much lower than that scale, the pro-inflation talk can be regarded as an excuse for banks to print more money for themselves to spend


Quote
just like when bitcoin reached $1200, the amount of spent bitcoin is highest

Yes, people got rid of their bitcoins in every possible way (probably the only chance in our lifetime at such rates). And don't confuse speculation with consumption, which would most likely account for the increase in bitcoin turnover, if it did happen at all.

Speculation is also part of the economy, and in fact majority of today's economy is driven by speculation on assets, all of the newly created money directly goes to assets, not consumption, it is also the speculation of those assets caused the financial crisis

Quote
On enterprise side, although the amount of currency they earn decreased, but currency appreciated, their real income will increase, salary become cheaper, they could hire more people and drive larger projects. This also happened when bitcoin price reached $1000+, lots of projects were setup back then

In real life, producers' profits may turn negative due to decreased prices. But negative is negative, and you can't do anything about it, deflation or not. What you say is probably the most common mistake people make when they discuss deflation "on enterprise side". In short, deflation is not a mirror reflection of inflation (as many erroneously believe).

Again, it is a common mistake by economists to use currency as an absolute measure of value. But I understand that it is extremely difficult for them to understand that currency's value fluctuates all the time, since they have been using currency to measure value since they barely can do 1+1. If they start from an international point of view by looking at FOREX market, then they will understand that currency's stable value is just an illusion. Get rid of that illusion, then people will not look at the numbers in their account to decide if they are profitable or not, they will look at what they really gain from a certain economy activity
2031  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Methods of growing your Bitcoin? on: March 06, 2015, 06:35:02 AM
If exchange rate keeps going down then you can get more and more coins with same fiat, the hard part is to get more coins when exchange rate keeps rising
2032  Economy / Economics / Re: Is deflation truly that bad for an economy? on: March 06, 2015, 03:09:39 AM
All of these problem of deflation is based on one assumption that fiat money's value is constant, and it is used as a benchmark of value, which is not true

For example, when you see a house's price going up and everything else's price keep the same, you think it is the house become more valuable. But the reality is your dollar worth less and everything else also worth less against that house

Why people stubbornly use fiat money as a benchmark of value, like using meter to measure length and using minute to measure time?

If you give up the belief of absolute value of currency, then all the claimed problems of deflation will disappear: When price of something drops, the purchasing power of the currency is increasing, means productivity is higher thus everything become more and cheaper, people will spend more, just like when bitcoin reached $1200, the amount of spent bitcoin is highest

On enterprise side, although the amount of currency they earn decreased, but currency appreciated, their real income will increase, salary become cheaper, they could hire more people and drive larger projects. This also happened when bitcoin price reached $1000+, lots of projects were setup back then

So, the claim of deflation's negative impact is just based on a stubbornly hold belief that currency is a benchmark of value. In fact the whole modern monetary theory is constructed on this blind belief
2033  Economy / Economics / Re: Hayek was wrong? on: March 06, 2015, 02:33:51 AM
In "The Denationalization of Money", Friedrich A. Hayek says that private monies should be allowed to exist and that the one with the most stable value would be most likely to win.

In defense of Bitcoin, many suggest that the frequent, large price inflations and deflations are preferred over a currency with stable value.

Was F.A.Hayek wrong?



Side note: he also says that indexation is not a substitute for price stable money.

Value is never a stable thing, since supply and demand are changing all the time, stable value is just a wishful thinking. People look at the price label and feel that the price does not change, call that stability, but that is because the value of fiat money and those goods are all dropping at the same speed

Current large price swing of bitcoin is partly caused by extremely low liquidity due to low value, and partly due to large advances in mining technology. After the advance in mining technology has stabilized at more predictable speed, then price volatility will drop
2034  Economy / Economics / Re: Hayek was wrong? on: March 06, 2015, 02:24:10 AM
Private money has always been to allow to exist.

But the only money the state accepts for taxes is legal tender.  Because of this no private money can compete with states money

States money does not have power against another nation, it is the currency war we are experiencing right now, eventually all those currencies will depreciate faster and faster fighting each other, while the universally accepted bitcoin will become the last stable ground of value
2035  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MegaBigPower Opens Buyback for Unprofitable Bitcoin Miners on: March 05, 2015, 09:09:30 PM
Actually mining rigs investment will be the same as bitcoin, buy low and sell high, now it is a good time to buy.  A large scale of hash rate increase will not happen due to highly concentrated production and low profit of mining farms. If chip makers make  alliance like OPEC to limit the chip production, then mining cost will rise quickly for retail customer
2036  Economy / Economics / Re: Is deflation truly that bad for an economy? on: March 05, 2015, 03:02:54 PM
It depends on the person

From a consumer's point of view, deflation stimulate spending, since his money now have more value, he can buy more things. Inflation will stimulate saving, since his money can buy less things and he will save the money to buy more important things

From an investor point of view, deflation will increase his cash holding, and inflation will increase his investment and asset holding

So, for a consumer driven economy like US, deflation is good; for an investment driven economy like China, inflation is good

A relatively small yet sharp deflation in 2008 gave the US the worst recession since the Great Depression.

Inflation is hurting China.  That and a closed credit market makes investment except in real estate and hot money impossible.  They would do well to abandon the yuan for a price stable alternative and to open the credit market to foreign investment.  They will have to deal with the endless ghost cities first.  Frozen bank accounts of the poor should do it, that or accept a counter-revolution.

For an inflation based economy, deflation is kill, just like penicillin to bacteria

The deflation in 2008 is a cure for the disease that US has caught since 1971, however the bacteria has not been killed, they kidnap the whole world by printing more money

The slaveholders were sick, and the king decided to have all the slaves voluntarily double their work for free to make them recover from the disease.

The interesting thing is, the slavery is not intended, but a natural result of countless human's selection over hundreds of years, all the other solutions had been unstable and abolished (like gold standard), is it a human nature to prefer slavery over instability?
2037  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why do you deny evidence? bitcoin has deluded all us on: March 05, 2015, 01:49:01 PM
Before human mass adopt bitcoin, machine will. In future when human is going to request some service from machine, they must pay bitcoin, since machine does not know anything about fiat money, they only recognize blockchain

Human's ignorance is the source of their slavery, there is nothing you can do about it, but not every human is ignorant
2038  Economy / Economics / Re: Help me understand... on: March 05, 2015, 02:36:19 AM
If the US economy is destroyed because of a few percent deflation in 2008, it's no wonder that sellers completely stop pricing products in BTC during its price instabilities.

The only one will be destroyed are the banks, and the whole scam exposed. People will learn from it and reorganize the economy with what they have left. However, FED printed 30 years' money to save the banks and now people did not learn anything from it and they have been ripped off even more due to this large scale of money printing
2039  Economy / Economics / Re: Is deflation truly that bad for an economy? on: March 05, 2015, 02:22:44 AM
It depends on the person

From a consumer's point of view, deflation stimulate spending, since his money now have more value, he can buy more things. Inflation will stimulate saving, since his money can buy less things and he will save the money to buy more important things

From an investor point of view, deflation will increase his cash holding, and inflation will increase his investment and asset holding

So, for a consumer driven economy like US, deflation is good; for an investment driven economy like China, inflation is good
2040  Economy / Economics / Re: Price inflation =/= Monetary inflation , but why do CB use the CPI data then? on: March 05, 2015, 02:10:53 AM
Reading this thread clearly make me understand why it is so important to have an alternative monetary system: You can write a novel about the topic but still no one understand if it works, so it is better to have 2 opposite systems running side by side and compare the effect

As observed during the past year, when bitcoin becomes more valuable (deflation), people spend more bitcoins, and when price of bitcoin crashed (inflation), people like to hoard more. So, this is against the traditional claim that inflation will stimulate spending and deflation will encourage hoarding
Pages: « 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 [102] 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 284 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!