You need to explain more about what you are doing.

That's with an unoptimized CPU miner. If you want to co-mine with the CPU you could try cpuminer-opt.
It does quark at 1.2 MH/s on a i7-6700K. But I prefer to mine more CPU friendly algos.

Maybe a little patience is in order. The recent improvements to Lyra2 & Lyra2v2 are a welcome surprise as the prospects for
continued support of Cuda optimizations was not looking good.

These improvements were sponsored by Mona, which uses the lyra2v2 algo, I am hoping some of the talent can also be applied
to other algos if there is community support.

This is the best news I've seen in a long time and the timing couldn't be better with the release of Pascal, Cuda 8 & SM 6.1.

Thank you for the detailed information. It appears you are using QEMU. I have not tested cpuminer-opt with QEMU.

The CPU features listed do not include AES or AVX but does include SSE2. What is your actual physical CPU?

I suspect one of two problems:

1. Your CPU has these features but QEMU does not emulate them. If this is the case you can get a proper AES compile
 natively (without emulation) or with a different form of emulation such as a VM or mingw.

2. Your CPU does not have these features but the compiler running under QEMU is unable to  detect the missing features.
In this case your CPU is limited to SSE2 and you will have to specify "-march=core2" to specifically tell the compiler not
to attempt to compile the AES optimized code in cpuminer-opt.

Edit: It appears QEMU does not support AES:

http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/170016/does-qemu-kvm-use-intel-aes-instructions-for-encrypted-qcow2-images-if-the-host

Powered risers?

This is the best advice. You "can" mine with a laptop using the cpu or maybe the gpu if you have one installed on your laptop,
but it is not advised. Mining produces a lot of heat continuously and laptops are not designed for it. Get a desktop with a decent
power supply and gpu and mine with that. If you also want to mine with a cpu you can get an i7 but a top end cpu is not
required for gpu mining. Make sure you have good air flow and monitor the temperatures.

I have found a problem with the capabilities reporting for lyra2RE  and lyra2REv2 algos.

They are being reported an not AES optimized when in fact the AES build will crash on a non-AES CPU.
This will only occur if using the precompiled AES enabled binaries from Cryptomining Blog. If compiled
natively on the same CPU there should be no problem.

Users with older CPUs that see a crash mining lyra2 or lyra2v2 should use the SSE2 build.

The only impact of this bug is the crash is unexpected and using the SSE2 build will result in a slighly lower preformance.

The next release of cpuminer-opt will report lyra2 and lyra2v2 as AES optimized and the performance chart will be
updated accordingly. The fix will not be rushed out because it does not prevent the crash.

Thanks for replying. Unfortunately I'm not a GUI programmer otherwise I would have done it already. Seems simple
enough for someone who knows what the're doing. It's essentially what every file manager already does, click on the
column header to change the sort key.

A TD export feature might be something I can do, I'll look into it.

Try again.

That is too funny. If you did such great research you know that macminer is OpenCL, not Cuda. I already gave you
the answer but you're too clueless to realize it.

BTW I prefer hash over weed.

Not dead yet, have you taken a look at Nicehash lately? I have no clue what coin still uses lyra2RE
but it's been paying well on Nicehash for a few months,

It peaked at 1.59 BTC/GH/Day (0.53 normalized for nvidia) a couple of hours ago and even higher on CPU.

I have to say I'm extremely disappointed in the arrogance being displayed. Twice in the past few days I've raised
the issue of TD management and not even an acknowledgement.

Now the post above which translated means "We're going to whatever we want but we're going to make a web site so
users think they have a say."

There also appears to be an organised propaganda campaign. Whenever someone says anything negative about HOdl
users come out of nowhere to shoot them down.

Too many red flags popping up. I'm begining to think I've made a mistake believing in this coin.

A little impatient aren't you Jr? Only waiting a half hour to follow up on your own post.
Do you expect people to be waiting just for you to pose a question so they can race to
be first to reply to it?

To be honest your question looks like a troll. Pick an ancient GPU that likely predates cuda, a requirement to
mine, and the OS least likely to support mining and see if you can get anyone to take the question seriously.

You obviously didn't do any research before posting, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and answer.

It can't be done.

PS. the sarcasm is the price you pay for me answering a stupid question.

Pascal avaiability is also an issue. I bought a 980 off the shelf the day of release, same store won't get 1070s
until July 1, and that's only for preorders.

Current Pascal price/performance seems to be inline with Maxwell for most algos so there's not much incentive
to upgrade yet.

I vote for improving the management of TDs in the wallet. I even tried cut/paste into a spreadsheet but it
won't let me even do that. TDs are the distinguishing feature of HOdl, that's where your focus should be.

No contingency, it's part of the risk just like real bonds. Remember junk bonds?

Bond sellers can do whatever they want with the funds, the bond is just a promise to pay it back on a certain date
and with a specified interest, again just like real bonds.

One hinderence will be regulation and investor protection from fraud. One of the goals of crypto is to remain unregulated.
At the moment that is working because the market is still small. Our feds have already studied crypto and came to the
conclusion it isn't big enough to be concerned about, yet. But at some point, as crypto continues to grow, it will.

No need to convert, the bonds could be held in BTC or whatever other coin the seller chooses.
Bonds could also be tradeable like real bonds. Tradeable HOdl TDs might be a possibility if it is
possible to transact them, but I don't think it is.

PS. I corrected the quotes.

Just for clarification, it's the large increase in supply over a short time caused by maturing TDs that will drive down the price.
What they do with the matured coins depends on how HOdl performs from now till then. A common strategy would be to
dump half and reinvest the other half. Any deviation from a planned strategy would depend more on the future prospects
for the coin at that time based on past performance and trends.

Limited supply is not always viewed negatively. It creates scarcity which has an upward bias on price which increases the
market cap and the value of the trading volume.

Any new coin trying to get listed is affected by a smaller market cap, meaning lower trade volume. When 2 thirds of a new
coins market cap is tied up and not available for trading it has a bigger effect.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think this is a negative for HOdl in the long term, only that the unusually slow growth in tradeable
coins, and the resulting lower trade volume, can be expected to delay being invited to the big board. It's a matter of time, not if.

The big unsanswerable question is what ppl will do when the time comes. If they roll over their maturing TDs then scarcity
will continue and trade volume will remain stable and so should the price. If they dump the extra sell volume will drive down the price.

But you're right it's not for the timid.