I'm hoping next week we will begin the process.  I was hoping the end of this week, but it's taking a bit longer than I'd like.

As stated elsewhere, our first batch is going to be manufactured by the current pick and place house(s) we use.

Our new facility was selected (and is being built out) specifically with security in mind.

Thank CJ, I will expect your public apology when the ASICs ship.  Or are we going to hear crickets from you, too, when the time comes and you slink back to your hole and hide?

See my answer in the other thread.

Because we are setting up our new manufacturing facility, I am not giving out the address until the contracts are finalized.

We are discussing the possibility of an open house type event internally in addition to an "official" person verifying things as well.  No, I don't have a date on when that might be as of yet.

Welcome to the life man... La Vida Loca indeed. 

You can literally hand someone an FPGA and tell them to go do whatever they want with it and they will still believe it doesn't exit.  Franky1 et al are perfect examples... they literally have the entire device available to them to test in whatever fashion they want, but they *still* maintain it's not real.  It's absolutely mind boggling.  You just have to give in at some point and let the tinfoil hats rage until they are exhausted, because their whole Raison d'être is to complain and be contrarian just because they can.

I only engage with them because and when I enjoy it.  I love baiting people like Reese into situations where they start contradicting themselves or showing exceptional hypocrisy, it's kind of a past time of mine.  If you don't enjoy it, it will wear you down really fast.

Bruno... it's all your error, not just "that one."  You know what's messed up, though?  Even though I have disliked all your pointless posts and I think you are ditzy as hell, I've left you alone because you haven't bothered me, accused me of anything or been an ass to me for no particular reason.  You've stuck to your own nooks and crannies and for the most part, I think they've been in the appropriate places, unlike much of what other people post in various forums here.

So I question why you are now trying to lambast me on the forums for imaginary ties to people who were in high school ten years after I was slogging through the jungles of Panama, toting and M16 and a serious case of monkey butt. You are trying to disclose my personal information (which is readily available anyway, but you seem unable to find) publicly, without my consent only to satisfy your own ego and need for attention.  It's truly sad.

Na, but I got a pair of water cooled 6990's for sale   Low mileage, driven by a little old lady from Pasadena.

I bought one.  Should be arriving on Friday.

Ah fair enough!

What's funny is this guy thinks he's cursing the forums... but these forums were cursed long before he ever came on the scene.  And by one of the most powerful magiks ever: Greed and Stupidity.

Bullshit "religions" and fake magic can't hold a candle to the real deal.

@#$#@$ data center.  Power went out again.  I've got the new server built in the new data center, I just need to transfer everything over.

Yes, I see you lying again.  I'm not sure that qualifies as a "difference" though?

Please provide evidence for where I lied about my company.  Are you seriously trying to deny that Sonny was involved in gaming and that the patent application does not exist?  There is ample proof of both, the fact that you are claiming there isn't is yet another lie.


There you go again, more lies.  MY misunderstanding?  It's YOUR misunderstand we are discussing here... you made the claim that visiting the BFL offices would put your security clearance at risk:


I pointed out the fact that you were feeding everyone a line of bullshit, since it is bullshit.  Otherwise, why do you retain your security clearance after your association with Pirate?  This is disregarding the fact that even if there was no pirate connection with you, it's still BS.  I pointed out the fact that I actually have held a TSSCI security clearance, whereas you have not.  You called me a liar, made a claim to the contrary as if you had some sort of factual knowledge of the subject, I proved that you did not and that you lied.

Do you see the difference here?  You made claims that were demonstrably false.  I have not.  I have shown you exactly where your claims were false. I have documented them on several occasions and you continue to make false claims, but have yet to provide a single shred of evidence to support your claims.


Classic ad hominem attack when you know you've been caught red handed in a lie.  Wern't you just accusing me of that a few posts ago?  Problem is, I back up my statements with evidence, you just spew crap out and hope that people believe your BS.

Again, does your wife know you're a serial liar and have been lying to her by omission for quite awhile now?

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying/asking?

Sure, my origin ID is Nitrowolfe

It's not hard to dox people at random.  Just pick a name out of thin air and post info about them.  That's basically what he's done so far.

No, you made it about you when you lied.  Lets check your lie again, and we'll go over what a lie is, since you seem to be of the Bill Clinton persuasion when it comes to the definition of words:


You made a factual statement: "You didn't hold a clearance of any import."  You then made another statement: "I'm guessing if you did, it was secret at best."

Now, I could see where you might be able to wriggle out of the liar moniker for the second statement... but the first one is a factual statement about a subject you either:

A) Had no knowledge of, therefore making a factual statement about is a falsehood.
B) Had knowledge of, knew to be inaccurate, and thus perpetrated a falsehood.  

In either case, it was a lie.  You lied.  Own up to it like a man at least.  You, sir are a liar, plain and simple.  Given the fact that you've lied about your own security clearance and then proceeded to lie about mine, I wonder what else you're lying about.  You've already admitted to lying to your wife through omission (or is that also a lie?) Are you a serial liar or something?

Lets pick a couple of your quotes just to point out the lies of omission you tell (or not as the case may be) your wife regularly:





So... does she know you lie to her regularly?  Does she know you associate with criminals? 

PS - Please point out what I'm diverting attention from?  What questions in this thread that are on topic have I failed to answer?  Oh, that's right... none of them.  There's no attention being diverted, except you trying to divert attention away from the fact that you lie to your wife on a regular basis, you lie to the forums on a regular basis and that you've been caught and are trying to wriggle out of it on a technicality that's not working.  Good show, but I award a giant FAIL to your efforts, sorry.

I think I finally understand what you were trying to say here (It took three threads and 4 people to decipher your mad ravings).  Your claiming that it's somehow miraculous that I was able to type two sentences in what appears to be 24 seconds?  Is that right?  Barring the fact that I could easily type 2 sentences in 24 seconds and press submit, did you ever consider the fact that I could be:

A) Doing two things (or more!) at once.  I don't know about you, but I don't sit around staring at my IM window during casual conversations.  I'm usually doing something else.
B) Have already typed all or part of it and hit submit between IM sessions?

But A and B are really meaningless since 24 seconds is more than enough time to type a few words.  Let me guess, you are one of those goof balls that still types with two fingers while staring at the keyboard in the "hunt and peck" method and marvels at people who can actually type without looking, right?

I, too, would like to see where I said that.  Maybe I time traveled, too... but backwards and made a post I don't yet know about.  Well, I guess with great stupidity comes great irresponsibility.  Meh.