|
This is exactly what they want you to do. We are attacking a whole subnet, maybe a competitor they wanted gone, testing for the future to maybe take down bitpay or something. If they were real, they'd use random ips.
You really think they'd use one subnet? And make it so obvious? With a homepage playing right into our fears? This whole thing is staged. Bitcoin is already designed to avoid peers from the same subnet. Why would they use that?
Using a node with tor is a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
https://bitcoinarmory.com/troubleshooting/#q22Troubleshooting:
To move BOTH Bitcoin Core AND Armory home dir:
1.Complete both steps above but instead, modify Armory Shortcut by adding: --satoshi-datadir="F:\Bitcoin\new\home\dir" --datadir="F:\Armory\new\home\dir"
That's not working for me.... Windows 7 64-Bit Only moving one or the other works, but not both. Other question... can I maybe move the installation also to my external drive, or does it need to sit on my system-drive? Did you also move Bitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
Man it must suck to be those employees, praying they won't get an sec subpoena and having to depose, their names will be tarnished, no one touches anyone from Enron.
|
|
|
|
I believe the terms of the domain purchase were 200,000 down balance 25,000 per month. Something that he certainly is not going to throw away at this point in time. The only other the important things are being paid from the dumping, like Homero's salary, his house rental in the US, his chalet rental in Europe, his wife's subscription to "naughty toys and cloths dot com" most certainly the new new team of lawyers, the 'in-house' lawyer etc. etc. Unnecessary things like 70,000 per month for PR remain unpaid .. oh look a live billing account https://wisepr.freshbooks.com/view/JNzPcFrg5ean8AiBills for custom signs, billing for designing floors for gyms, customer refunds for PNG's etc etc All trivial shit which doesn't really have to be paid from the dumping, isn't being paid. Again just the important things like his salary, the roofs over his head and absolutely the lawyers to keep everyone at bay. 70,000 per month for a cheezoid professional bullshit spin doctor? What do you suppose the retainer per month is on the best and brightest lawyers that might be out there who can continue to keep those roofs over his head and that salary rolling in while he eats sprouts in Brussels? Wow, even the invoices details are public.... that's some bad PR for WisePR :-/ Says one of the biggest paycoin shills Keep buying those cheap coinz bud |
|
|
|
Didn't Homeros train leave yesterday?  |
|
|
|
If my interpretations of other posts are wrong (which is possible), I'd like for them to clarify. I often include a question about what was meant, but rarely get a response other than a personal attack. The problem is that people have clarified. Over and over again. Eventually, they just get tired of saying the same thing in different ways. I think every question you pose has already been answered. Just reread the replies to your prior posts. Could you point me to where someone said "You thought I meant X, but I really meant Y"? I don't see many of the replies saying things like that. There are useful points being raised, but I really don't see a lot of clarification. For example, above Paul said that a company would shield its owners from prosecution and liability. (Or at least that's how I understood it.) I then posted something showing how that doesn't apply when there was fraud committed. He should either have clarified that his claim was different from how I understood it, admitted it was wrong, or defended it, none of which were done. I've read all the recent replies. There is a lot of "this is so obvious I'm not even going to tell you why", a lot of "you're stupid", and occasionally something that makes sense, which I usually acknowledge and respond to. There does seem to be a lot of misinterpretation here, and combined with people always assuming bad faith, it makes for very bad communication. How about this: whenever I feel that I might be misunderstanding something, I'll first post something along the lines of "I think X is what you mean, is that an accurate depiction of your argument", rather than argue right away. That way, if I've misinterpreted something you can tell me before I argue with a misinterpretation. Paul would never say that I was referring to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg10742449#msg10742449Once the fraud is complete and the now bankrupt corporation is collapsing it is discarded, along with any liability. I still don't see how that could mean something other how I interpreted it, but if he wants to he can clarify what he meant by that. Wake up ikeboy, he said financial liability Criminal is always personal, corporations don't fit in jails Go read Enron |
|
|
|
If my interpretations of other posts are wrong (which is possible), I'd like for them to clarify. I often include a question about what was meant, but rarely get a response other than a personal attack. The problem is that people have clarified. Over and over again. Eventually, they just get tired of saying the same thing in different ways. I think every question you pose has already been answered. Just reread the replies to your prior posts. Could you point me to where someone said "You thought I meant X, but I really meant Y"? I don't see many of the replies saying things like that. There are useful points being raised, but I really don't see a lot of clarification. For example, above Paul said that a company would shield its owners from prosecution and liability. (Or at least that's how I understood it.) I then posted something showing how that doesn't apply when there was fraud committed. He should either have clarified that his claim was different from how I understood it, admitted it was wrong, or defended it, none of which were done. I've read all the recent replies. There is a lot of "this is so obvious I'm not even going to tell you why", a lot of "you're stupid", and occasionally something that makes sense, which I usually acknowledge and respond to. There does seem to be a lot of misinterpretation here, and combined with people always assuming bad faith, it makes for very bad communication. How about this: whenever I feel that I might be misunderstanding something, I'll first post something along the lines of "I think X is what you mean, is that an accurate depiction of your argument", rather than argue right away. That way, if I've misinterpreted something you can tell me before I argue with a misinterpretation. Paul would never say that |
|
|
|
Let me clear this up, someone bought the domain, Homero leased it from them
I thought it was bought on escrow. They have to keep paying on time or they loose the domain and the money they already paid for it. They already lost their Cloudflare |
|
|
|
that's 0 proof. It's equivalent to him saying he paid 8M for Zen, Eric told us that is not true. A press release is not proof of anything The closest we have to proof that I could find is http://domainguardians.com/btc-com-tops-this-weeks-domain-sales-chart-via/http://www.thedomains.com/2014/08/05/inside-the-btc-com-sale-with-mike-robertson-of-domain-guardians/ is also relevant, and says: As mentioned, we got responses from over 150 different parties. Our industry contacts allowed us to discuss the opportunity with everyone from the Winklevoss twins, to executives at BlockChain, BitPay, CoinBase, KNCMiner.com, OKCoin and, of course, many more. Of these 150, we were in serious negotiations with 2 other parties. They seem to be ICANN accredited, so if they're lying about the sale price they should get in trouble. Do you really think someone would own btc.com and sell it for much less, anyway? 1 million doesn't seem so much for that domain. Let me clear this up, someone bought the domain, Homero leased it from them Wake up ikeboy |
|
|
|
that's 0 proof. It's equivalent to him saying he paid 8M for Zen, Eric told us that is not true. A press release is not proof of anything
One of those sources quoted the other end of the sale, revising the $1.1 million number GAW provided to $1.0 million provided by Domain Guardians. I think it's pretty solid. No you shill |
|
|
|
Anyway, what are the gawtards waiting for now? Their premier accounts still so they can give homero more money?
they are waiting for some f*ing great that they know is coming but nobody knows anything. .bunch of morons Xpy space program lol SpaceCoin with a $20 floor |
|
|
|
|
Anyway, what are the gawtards waiting for now? Their premier accounts still so they can give homero more money?
|
|
|
|
Taken directly from the GAW SOP manual.  Lmao |
|
|
|
Wet dreams  |
|
|
|
My Armory upgrade from 0.92 to 0.93.0.70 beta with bitcoin core v0.10.0 was successfull on Windows 7 64-Bit.
Even the custom database directory was detected correctly.
Only the bitcoin core client did not keep the custom database directory, but that's not Armory's fault...
I had to perform a Rescan that I was triggering from Armory, Help, Rescan Databases.
Thanks for the good work!
Really? There's no way it remembered the directory. |
|
|
|
|
Instead of MasterCard, they destroyed hashtalk, nice innovation
|
|
|
|
|
Teamxpy is nothing more than big losers trying to dump and will pump until they're done
|
|
|
|
Gone like fine censorship |
|
|
|
|
I'm about to switch my ira to gbtc
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
