The reason russia was importing food from europe was because it was cheaper the hike will be reflected in the people wallets. Along with the 3% new sale tax that will be added next year. And with the 6% yearly inflation.
Mainly because the damned WTO membership and various international agreements were ensuring destruction of domestic production. The country is at war now, and economic one, but still a war. Russians are notoriously resilient when threat comes from outside (once again).
|
|
|
The Europeans / Japanese / Australians are going to suffer and the Americans will be sitting back and watching the game. Russian exports can't be sanctioned, as it is mostly comprised of crude and gas. But the imports such as meat and fruits can be sourced from somewhere else. Only the European farmers are going to suffer loses.
From where? From the farms on mars? If the farmers in brazil or argentina will sell their products to russia now it means that the country to which they used to export is not getting anything and will buy from europe. You can't produce out of the blue 5 billion worth of products it's not like in the oil industry where you can release a tap and that's all. EU farmers can, for a change, stop dumping their produce into the garbage abiding by various bureaucratic regulation, and instead sell it on internal market. Maybe something positive will come out of it for EU as well...
|
|
|
NATO's Rassmussen personally arrived to Kiev on Thursday, saying that he is ready to provide political support of NATO to Kiev (coup) government: http://www.tvc.ru/news/show/id/46929This is against a backdrop of a build-up of Maidan-3. (Hey, yet another revolution!) When allegedly more radical groups than the radicals that came to power now started burning tires, clashing with Police special battalions "Kiev-1" and "Kiev-2", shooting, and exploding bombs in the centre of the capital: http://ria.ru/world/20140807/1019117689.htmlIn the meantime, while everyone's attention is on Ukraine, Russia announced that its Far-East aviation on Kamchatka has bee raised on unexpected military exercise, involving up to 400 units of planes and ground vehicles, and 2000 troop. I hope it's not the repeat of the 1st of September of 1983 US provocation that lead to a 3-hour air battle over Sakhalin, when at least 13 US planes got shot down, and the world was at a brink of WWIII. http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20140807/1019140064.html
|
|
|
Sanction wars rage on, and taking funny turns: Russia published a list of goods prohibited for import: http://itar-tass.com/politika/1365746?utm_medium=rss20The list: http://government.ru/media/files/41d4f8cdfeeb731522d2.pdfRussia closed its airspace for Ukrainian operators. Similar sanctions are prepared against EU and US operators: http://lenta.ru/news/2014/08/07/ukrair/EU becomes frightened, and runs to the bully for help. EU will protest the sanctions that it came under through WTO: http://www.bfm.ru/news/268105So, EU sanctioning Russia is perfectly ok, while Russia replying in kind is bad? In the meantime, Belarus sees an opportunity and offers to replace the EU goods with Belorussian product: http://ria.ru/economy/20140807/1019101308.htmlThis is very well, especially since Belorus is the last country in Europe that retained all of its agricultural and industrial potential and has not been robbed by WTO like other post-Soviet states, including Russia. Medvedev promises protective measures (counter-sanctions) against Western heavy industries: http://top.rbc.ru/economics/07/08/2014/941548.shtmlAnd against the backdrop of all this, Obama tells how effective sanctions are: http://lenta.ru/news/2014/08/07/obama/Of course they are effective - for the US, in weakening Europe. Divide and conquer, eh?
|
|
|
The quote of Andrej Parubij to Ukrainian Pravda: Killing of enemy soldiers stops being the main goal - in a hybrid war it is enough to kill your own soldiers and provide it with proper information follow-up. The main object of influence in a hybrid war is not an opponent, but the population being "liberated".
He is the leader of the "anti-terrorist" operation.
|
|
|
Shooting near the crash zone overnight forced investigators to shelter, proving just one incident too many for officials.
Ukrainian artillery can report mission as accomplished. By the fact that MH-17 disaster faded into non-existence in the MSM, it seems that it'll by just another unsolved crime. The fact that the ATC tapes have still not been released by the SBU is extremely telling as well. In the case of Korean KAL-007, Tokyo ATC tapes were one of the major evidences, pointing out that the plane communicated on VHF radio, within the tower's VHF range up to 46 minutes after it was "officially" shot down. Coupled with the debris found along the coast of Honshu, hundreds of kilometres up the prevailing strong current, it constituted the evidence that KAL-007 was shot down or, more likely, exploded by a bomb off the coast of Honshu, within 6 minute of flight from Niigata. Looks like the relatives of the victims of MH-17 need to form an association and seek the truth privately, just like the relatives of the victims of KAL-007 did.
|
|
|
Is this all about Psakiing of the Russian military exercises that happen hundreds of kilometres from Ukrainian border? When the Ministry of defence advised Psaki to start learning geography? Or are they whining about something else now?
|
|
|
Switzerland to enforce EU sanctions on Russiahttp://rt.com/business/178144-switzerland-eu-sanctions-russia/The Swiss government has extended sanctions to include 26 people in Russia and Ukraine, as well as 18 organizations, so the country isn’t used as a channel to avoid EU and US sanctions.
Switzerland itself hasn’t imposed any sanctions, but some of the EU measures will now apply in the country which is surrounded by the European Union. Same shit... Known for its neutrality, Switzerland has delayed imposing sanctions, and didn’t heed America’s call in March to respond and sanction Russia over Crimea’s reunification with Russia.
The EU’s sectorial sanctions are its most serious step against Russia to date. European leaders have been increasing pressure on the Russian government for several months by imposing visa bans and asset freezes on a number of individuals the EU considers responsible for Moscow's policy toward Ukraine. Neutrality, right. Time to move accounts to Hong-Kong.
|
|
|
While on the topic of Putin Who Is Really Vladimir Putin? This May Surprise You! As the anti-Russian howling and barking of the American MSM and politicians gets more and more deafening, as the anti-Russian sanctions get more and more audacious and the vilifying of Russia and Putin goes into an overdrive, perhaps there are other voices out there as well. The presstitutes of the Western MSM won’t give the podium to these voices, furtively pretending they don’t exist. Even some of the so-called alternative media in the US is anti-Russian, or is timidly shying away from the subject.
But different voices, although quiet, do exist. Is this proof that perhaps there are some healthy and honest forces still left in the USA? Below are recollections of those Americans who actually met Putin well before his rise, during the turbulent and disastrous 1990s. Who is really Vladimir Putin? What you’ll read below may surprise you! Read on at Lada Ray's blog: http://futuristrendcast.wordpress.com/2014/08/05/who-is-really-vladimir-putin-this-may-surprise-you/
|
|
|
Russia is already a federation Yes, true but with very centralized federation. All main decisions coming from Moscow. I had a laugh at this. US is a very centralised federation with all main decisions coming from Washington, Germany is a very centralised federation with all main decisions coming from Berlin. Hell, EU is turning into an extremely centralised (con)federation with all main decisions coming from Brussels.
|
|
|
Putin is a loser.
Why is everyone shitting their pants about him?
.
Perhaps because your first statement is false? Otherwise no one would have cared what Russia or Putin did?
|
|
|
Economic warfare. Does US import anything from Russia? Space rocket engines? In the meantime, EU says they may act "an-eye-for-an-eye" and close EU air space for Russian companies if Russia closes tarns-Siberian airspace for EU companies as a response to EU sanctions. This actually makes it "an-eye-for-an-eye-for-an-eye". Does start to sound absurd already? There'll be more. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2540143
|
|
|
i'm searching for an author, and apparently he/she is not brave enough to post their name It's right at the top of the article: Opinion pieces by Peter Lavelle, the host of RT's shows CrossTalk and On the Money, who was also the anchor of the review programme In Context and the commentary series IMHO
|
|
|
and like I was saying: Russia would also be disproportionately hurt by any tit-for-tat move from the European Union to close its own airspace to Aeroflot and peers, said Oliver Sleath, a Barclays Plc analyst in London. “This is extremely unlikely to happen because the response would be more crippling to the Russian economy,” Sleath said. Russian flights cross EU airspace outnumber European carriers’ trips over Siberia, he said. So it will end up as usual with Russian troops in Paris and Berlin! Russian troops in Paris as usual? Please let me know the last time this happened.. In 1813. Do you think that it has been long time since? In 1813 like in 1945 it wasn't Russia against the rest of Europe and the US. In 1813 it was allied with prussia england and austria in 1945 it was allied with the uk , france and us. All of it's former allies are now on the opposite side. This time, French might yet end up being on the friends-side. In 1945 USSR could have done without such "friends" as US and UK.
|
|
|
Another fun Op-Edge: It’s Putin’s fault… really?http://rt.com/op-edge/178352-western-media-putin-fault/If one relies on Western mainstream media and those who claim to represent the Western world, it is easy to come to the conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin is the most evil political figure in the world.
Actually, it would not be a gross exaggeration to claim Putin is responsible for just about all that afflicts the human condition today. One simple sentence says it all: “Putin did it.” The fact is the West is infuriated by Russia’s refusal to accept its place in the world assigned by the Washington consensus. And Putin gets all the blame for this.
...
Applying the logic outlined above, the West’s onslaught against anything related to Russia and Russians must be personalized to be effective. Otherwise there would have to be a real discussion (even dialogue) surrounding very serious, meaningful, and differing national interests. Since there is no indication this is going to happen anytime soon, Washington must play an alternative card: fall back on emotion and caricature. Instead of a coherent foreign policy, the West, particularly its media, prefers a narrative in which an invented cartoon figure is the essence of all evil in the world and “against our values.” This of course is not a foreign policy, but it is a rejection and a refusal to entertain simple commonsense. It is also foreign policy failing to achieve Washington’s goals when attempting to stare down and isolate Russia. Is it because of this image US wants the right to use nuclear weapons first with their "aggression-prevention" doublspeak act?
|
|
|
Bitcoin Britain: Jockeying for position as leader in cryptocurrency innovationhttp://rt.com/uk/178340-bitcoin-osborne-review-currency/The UK is looking into the potential of virtual currencies, such as bitcoin, as part of the country’s measures designed to ensure it becomes the “global leader of financial innovation.”
Chancellor George Osborne unveiled the plan, which includes possible regulation of virtual currencies.
"The government will look at the potential virtual and digital currencies have for achieving positive change and for encouraging innovation in our world leading financial sector, as well as the potential risks," the finance ministry said in a statement.
|
|
|
UN: Scared of the way military operations conducted in E. Ukrainehttp://rt.com/news/178384-un-ukraine-refugees-humanitarian/The UN has expressed its major concern over the plight of the eastern Ukrainian territories and their soaring numbers of refugees. There are 118,000 internally displaced people, and 740,000 have fled to Russia during the crisis.
“What we are scared about is the way the military operations are conducted. What will happen if we have intense fighting inside the big urban centers of Lugansk and Donetsk? Fighting in highly intensified urban areas could lead to massive exodus and massive destruction,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees Vincent Cochetel stated on Tuesday.
...
Some former residents – and now refugees – told RT’s Maria Finoshina how and why their lives have changed forever.
“They were bombing us non-stop, day and night. They hit our neighbor’s house, killing her. How can one live in this country?” Tatyana Belyaeva, a Lugansk resident, said.
“My house was destroyed, there’s nothing left. <…> There were no strategic targets in our neighborhood,” Pyotr Seletsky, a Lugansk resident and ER doctor, told RT.
And his wife spoke of how they had lost their home.
“I have no idea what kind of a bomb can turn a house into an inferno in a matter of minutes,” Elena said.
“The temperature was so high that the bricks crumbled,” she added. See also: Dangerous drive: Missile narrowly misses car on road near Donetsk (PHOTO, VIDEO)http://rt.com/news/178368-donetsk-missile-car-road/
|
|
|
|