Одни и те же фокусы можно проделывать снова и снова главное что бы о них успели забыть. С 2014 года ничего не изменилось, разве что способы отъема денег у криптокомьюнити и интересующихся, стали изощреннее и масштабнее.

Посмотрите на STEEM. LBRY входит на рынок по этой же схеме.

Было очевидно, что цена нашла дно на уровне около $ 66-68 млн рыночной капитализации

Лучшая стратегия - хранить яйца в разных корзинах.

Probably one of the holders feared or purposefully removed cream. Now, without any important news is unlikely that trading volumes have increased. In many bins of lemons Boys oh boys, it makes no sense to drive the price. In addition, during these plums stopped working access to RichList. "coincidence? I do not think ..."
Unharmonized job holders who would kill themselves and NEM. Aims at them different. If someone has supported the idea, while others have deep @ host, their goal quickly cut the dough and roam to a new object.

P.S. It is not clear why it is not foreseen creators NEM?
We can analyze the situation.
Suppose there are about 300 primary holders of coins that financed development. But we clearly see that the active node in a network of 107 + -10. It is foolish to believe that the enthusiast finance the development is not able to establish and maintain a node, which also affects the reliability of the network. Considering that the holders of the GCD can be NEderzhateli starting coins is obtained that only <30% of the so-called HOLDERS really support this coin. The rest of> 70% likely to merge them in any suitable time. Calculate how much it billions of coins? Still there is another explanation - the original holders of coins somewhere 100 people max! What can testify to the initial deception and will also alienate the audience.
Why did it happen so? This is a big miscalculation NEM creators. There is no incentive to fund the establishment in coins continued support network. What is the point, if easier to cut down its profit X10-X1000 in the short term on the pampas and after financing with the same purpose has other projects.
I, as a user coins do not care who cuts the transfer fee, I need the stability of the network and a stable exchange rate is desirable in relation to fiat money. This is partly solved by the direct exchange pairs at Fiat, but did not provide incentives NEM coin holders do not pour your coins heaping thus pushing the market and investors and users.

Explain to me how XEM cost can reach $ 1 , if the developers - a formula laid morons Commission :


This means that in case of transfer to pay just such a commission:

Translate XEM 1 - 9 Commission XEM or 900% of the amount transferred
Translate XEM 2 - Commission 8 XEM or 400% of the amount transferred
Translate 3 XEM - Commission 7 XEM or 233% of the amount transferred
Translate 4 XEM - Commission 6 XEM or 150% of the amount transferred
Translate 5 XEM - Commission 5 XEM or 100% of the amount transferred
Translate 6 XEM - Commission 4 XEM or 67% of the transfer amount
Translate 7 XEM - Commission XEM 3 or 43% of the transfer amount
Translate XEM 8 - Commission XEM 2 or 25% of the transfer amount
.......
and only when the amount of the transfer fee is 200 XEM tolerable 1%

So all sorts of boxes, small businesses and the general online trading becomes impossible due to inadequate fees for transfer of coins. To enable accounting XEM $ 0.01 coin in principle can not be more than 1 / $ 100 or the current exchange rate of 1 / (100 * BTC) or ~ 0.00001545 MTC.
This is a logical ceiling price of one coin of the inadequacy of the formula determining the commission! But then XEM capitalization will total $ 90 million, but this is not enough to conquer the world.
So that everything would be fine, if not a large!!!!

И еще, я очень рекомендую вам продать половину своих BTC завтра утром. И зафиксировать свою прибыль в фиате. На этих выходных начнется мощнейший 10-ти дневный дамп битка.

Это мой вам совет. Почти отеческий.

Верить или нет, решать вам. Но вы еще вспомните этот пост.

И давно такая динамика? Я просто ржу с такой аналитики.

 Я за три года повидал всякого. И скажу вам одно детишки. Лиск не вырастет. Слишком много нищебродов, опоздавших на все великие пампы  ETH, FCT в декабре 2015, MAID... мечтают разбогатеть на Лиске.
Лиск вырастет тогда, когда вы перестанете ждать.

Guys ! I think I was able to uncover a huge scam which was organized by the developers .

Look at the history of this purse 6566229458323231555L account.

On the dummy account, it was translated more than 1000000 lisk, a real fraud of developers! History on dummy accounts transactions is also very interesting.
I recommend Max , to clarify the situation as soon as possible , otherwise Lisk after this information is waiting for the collapse .

Wisdom of the crowd will likely not work in this case, the rate is too volatile and dependent on a number of factors. Trying to guess - it is like reading tea leaves.
And yes - other results are not displayed. (Someone may indicate a course in rubles, which also make a significant shift in the final result)

Да, помнится год назад в одном подобном проекте я попал на 50 эфира, скам был быстрым