|
Received my payment at last!
|
|
|
|
My signature was changed after day 1, and i received my sig.campain payments daily  . ( This means no one did verify our post count or signatures after registering an account ) I never promoted this scam (see my sig.) i just collected some free BTC  Nice sig mate |
|
|
|
I can make it for 0.0025
Bahahaha alright |
|
|
|
I would draw anything for bitcoin.
I can give you too link for good rap music for tip:)
Would you draw female genitalia for 0.001 BTC? |
|
|
|
If you can obtain a warrant, you can contact abuse@enom.com and get their information for free |
|
|
|
BTW... I just logged in, and my $20 isn't listed as a 3% investment anymore... anyone else confirm their "investments" are still active?
I don't really care at this point, I know it is gone forever now, but just something I noticed.
=squeak=
For me it says: "Sep-9-2014 07:21:47 PM Ends in -6 days" Which means it ended six days ago |
|
|
|
He should be sentenced to some community service and home confinement for fair amount of time at most a relatively short stay in jail if you ask me. This is pretty disturbing to think a judge would even consider allowing such a long jail sentence and that DA should be worried about losing his job for having such horrible judgment on the matter.
I'm ashamed to admit how hard I laughed at the pics because that is a gross act in so many ways. But there is no way a person should go to jail for that long over something like this, that is the real crime..
WHY? WHy should he see any sort of punishment? Please do tell. Because his rights end where my feelings begin |
|
|
|
That 'footage' showed absolutely nothing - just some guy at unidentified date and location making commentaries that are supposedly true off camera. Why the hell weren't they filming the actual scene?
Exactly. Who does not own a mobile phone (with camera) nowadays? And even the very basic ones which come for $15 or $20 are having embedded camera with them. It is surprising that none of the witnesses had the balls to take video of this incident, although they were all standing at safe distance away from officer Wilson and Michael Brown. Oh they had the balls to record it alright. No one had the balls to turn the footage in |
|
|
|
I'm getting paid, no disruption for me. Withdrawals are coming through fine as well.
Are you all meeting your posting limit requirements?
Posts: 339 Yeah, I'm pretty sure I am |
|
|
|
I haven't received my $6 payout.
In transactions it says processed, but in mail I have a nonsense tx ID and another two mails with this 1000$ super offer .... guess this is beginning of end
This is why you should have been withdrawing daily |
|
|
|
your 1$ is in hell which is very impossible to get out from there  you know HYIPS are full of hell so Be aware of these They owe me $2 now Grr |
|
|
|
They are still heavily spamming a "Special offer!!!" investment with a ludicrous rate of return (30% per day) which is a cast-iron sign that a scam such as this is coming to an end.
actually, the rate of return was 130%/day... not 30%/day. =squeak= They said a $1000 "investment" yields $1300, that's a 30% profit, and a 1.3x which is 130% return The fact that they didn't know the difference between "profit" and "return" should have been a red flag Right... $1000 yields $1300... so, 130%... a 30% profit, would end up $1000 yields $300. =squeak= edit: even the site says 130%... "invest" $250, and you get $325 per day. Their calculator states that your "profit" would be $130 on a $100 investment They obviously have mixed the two up, when Business studies usually have a question regarding the difference between the two in their exams |
|
|
|
SCAMMER  anonymous22 YOU SOLD ME YOUR ACCOUNT FOR .2 THAN YOU DID RECOVER THE ACCOUNT YOU ARE THE SCAMMER AND I NOT STOP TILL YOU GIVE IT BACK Tough shit. That's the risk you take from buying accounts. Sounds rather cold, but it's the truth |
|
|
|
Because people are fucking stupid that's why, I can't be polite about it anymore, people who get offended over inanimate objects and by something they see on a screen just annoy the fuck out of me.
Thank you for elaborating on my rant We know that women can't go out on the streets shirtless like men can, yet, supposed "constitutionalists" would fight for your right to open-carry. Additionally, in movies, if a guy gets shot, and you can see his body hit the floor, blood flowing, a murder on screen in other words, the movie would get a PG-13 or a Mature rating at most. However, if there is a scene involving naked women, or passionate kissing, intimacy or romance that portrays the human body, it's an instant 'R' rating and the movie can't be broadcasted on television. Don't get me wrong, I'm a believer of the second amendment, but why is it that one right matters so much more than the other? Why is murder okay, where breasts aren't? This is the most offensive image I have ever seen. Shame on you!
Hahahahah! Gun control advocate + Conservative I reckon? Okay, I admit it, I lol'd badly at Wilikon's post HAHAHAHA INDEED how do guns even offend people.. wait how do tits offend people How? You mean why, I think. Tits are offensive so they stay in demand. Conditioning to keep birth rate up, I'd guess. If not taboo (prohibiting exhibitionism by law is a "pro-taboo pressure," though I'll admit it wouldn't necessarily make it taboo), much less excitement in it (where excitement/adrenaline leads to more [and better!] sex), though maybe people would just be more extreme in depravity to compensate. Most high-GDP Western nations are in dire need of baby-making and are happy to provide family allowances and similar pro-birth policies so they can continue with "$nationalracemajority first" politics and maintain regime with less criticism, since they won't be "distracted" as much by shrinking GDP and collapsing pro-senior welfare programs, so I'd assume maintaining these seemingly-ridiculous policies could only be social engineering to keep people boning. ... IMHO. Sexualizing women and objectifying their bodies is sick. There are still rules/laws/policies in place by old, rich, out of touch, geezers that are SEVERELY outdated. The good news is, with each generation that passes, those geezers die. A new generation comes along and realizes that said rules/laws/policies are lame and retarded. The fact that National Geographic still blurs out womens tits is ROFL absurd. Anyone with a 5th graders brain knows that there is simply no point for them to do that... Conservatives are still ruining the progression of this country.
Its up to the younger generations to review a lot of their "old fashioned" rules and change them for the greater good of society.
You're absolutely on point, SLVR4ME It's just like that line from Dylan's "The times they are a changin" "Come mothers and fathers, throughout the land, Don't criticize what you can't understand, Your sons and your daughters, are beyond your command, Your old road is rapidly agin', Please get out of the new one if you can't lend a hand! The times, they are a changin' " |
|
|
|
I don't think I'm allowed to sell invite codes, but I give them away for free and hope that I receive tips in return.
I suppose I may have "tips", why not give some codes to me for "free"? Also, sometimes they open registration.
Great, notify us when they do |
|
|
|
Hey guys, We're waiting payment for sig campain. They ran out of money so they're not paying for 2 days, If the newbies just invest money on this ponzi we're gonna get our payments I like the way you think mister |
|
|
|
Stop this BS. The original "eyewitness" was a guy who was accomplice to Micheal Brown in his store robbery, and there is not an iota of truth in what he said. These newly invented eyewitnesses are just parroting what the first one told. This has been proven in the autopsy report also. Also, if he had his hands up in the air, then how did officer Darren Wilson received those horrific facial injuries? There's video footage, no more denying That 'footage' showed absolutely nothing - just some guy at unidentified date and location making commentaries that are supposedly true off camera. Why the hell weren't they filming the actual scene? If that was an attempt at manufacturing evidence, that's pretty sad. Let's not cherry pick the witnesses |
|
|
|
The Whois lookup claims their registrar may be contacted at abuse@enom.com is just a domain reseller, they won't have any useful information about the scammer. They supply the WHOIS-Guard, they hold the information! What information? A throwaway email address and a false name and address? Good point, god damn it. |
|
|
|
They are still heavily spamming a "Special offer!!!" investment with a ludicrous rate of return (30% per day) which is a cast-iron sign that a scam such as this is coming to an end.
actually, the rate of return was 130%/day... not 30%/day. =squeak= They said a $1000 "investment" yields $1300, that's a 30% profit, and a 1.3x which is 130% return The fact that they didn't know the difference between "profit" and "return" should have been a red flag |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
