Nope. Germans also had only themselves to blame, its Hitler who zombied them through the press and radio and other things are still used to brainwash ordinary stupid people that jews are up to "control all the Germany". Germans needed to fins someone guilty so jews were a perfect target due to their "public image"... Look at today Russia - the same thing. 70% of russian population are drunked idiots, thieves and liars, sometimes they even turn into church people which is the worst "modification" of typical russian (ukrainian, belorussian, kazakh, etc.) sovok.

Google sovok BTW.

Putin tells all the country that its AMERICA's fault that:

-no one in Russia wants to learn "brothers countries" languages (like Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Kazakhstan, etc) but its so bad that we dont know Russian
-no one wants ti move to Russia
-no economy in Russia
-No education in Russia (christian orthodox church schools are NOT education, also - governed by former criminals both in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus)
-No new tech startups in Russia
-No good salaries in Russia except Moscow and St. Petersburg residents (also thieves and scammers)
-No good politics in Russia (only Putin and his clown puppets)
-No fair courts in Russia (I mean NO AT ALL)
-No men older than 23 who are not f***n drunked assholes
-No free press in Russia
-No private social networks in Russia
-Internet censorship gets f***n harder every day, the best sites like lurkmore.to are BLOCKED FOR RUSSn IPs
-IRL censorship with a risk to be killed by govt agents
-No own medicine
-No own computer production and development (comparing to other countries with imperial habits)
-No bureaucracy control in Russia (you have to have a library full of documents to live in Russia)

And so on so on. Yea, this all Jen Psaki did (s***d b***ch).

Sorry for the Uh Oh content.



In case youre NOT serious. America really cares too much about what happens all over the globe, including our country and Russia too.
Eva = Ever, maybe my weak English got you think Im talking of my own country, no Im not.

Whops! Be careful with that torch. We don't want to burn all those people for being not so polite.
I wouldnt vote for giving any excuse to such reasons which persons like Trump could use for their behavior.
Politicians are not the fires of hell,  which hasty people like Lethn are trying to ignite, because they forgot to close the door to the church, when they were leaving.
They literally carry the bible and the apocalypse around with them.

  Trump is a politician, and obviously emphasising the wrong attitude.
But thats the trick. As it is this obvious, Trump and his supporters are able to argue from a good position, looking down on others,
trying to tease them, make them stickle, hurt them, without bearing any responsibility. <<Hey, cant you take anymore??>>
A senseful controversy or dispute has never been done, and isnt possible that way.

Now think about the white house. Is it a madhouse or the residence of the potus?
Trump is utilizing the same sloppy way americans did deal with recent politics and the results.
They just never took them seriously.  If they are going to reach the white house with this nonsense,
this would be a huge surprise.

Just correcting you.

According to a wide assortment of bankers and hedge-fund managers I spoke to for this article, Clinton’s rock-solid support on Wall Street is not anything that can be dislodged based on a few seemingly off-the-cuff comments in Boston calculated to protect her left flank. (For the record, she quickly walked them back, saying she had “short-handed” her comments about the failures of trickle-down economics by suggesting, absurdly, that corporations don’t create jobs.) “I think people are very excited about Hillary,” says one Wall Street investment professional with close ties to Washington. “Most people in New York on the finance side view her as being very pragmatic. I think they have confidence that she understands how things work and that she’s not a populist.”

The bottom line for Wall Street, says this executive—echoing many others—is that Clinton understands that America’s much-maligned financial industry wants to be part of the solution to the country’s problems. “Everybody who makes money feels a shared responsibility,” he continues. “Everybody sort of looks at her with a lot of optimism because they feel she doesn’t mind making hard decisions. She’ll do what she needs to do, but it’s not a ‘Let me blame you.’ It’s, ‘Hey, here’s what you’ve got to do.’ And I think that’s very different.” During a speech last December at the Conrad Hotel, in New York, her message could not have been more different from Obama’s hot, anti-Wall Street rhetoric: “We all got into this mess together, and we’re all going to have to work together to get out of it.”

Typical psychopath spin that idiots seem to fall for forever: It´s everybody´s fault and therefore not the fault of anybody in particular.

Glad you know better than me the question I ask. Of course it was a contempful question. I absolutely didn't sincerely want to know why people loved and trusted Trump. It was a question full of contempt from my Tour d'Argent 

Louis C.K. on Trump: "The guy is Hitler. And by that I mean we are being Germany in the 30s."

http://www.vox.com/2016/3/7/11173384/louis-ck-donald-trump

Im like not american but I respect George Carlin and Louis CK so I think I would not be voting for him if I happen to born in this "greatest country eva".

No trolling, Im serious.

It's not clear to me WHY Hitlery would be the "darling of Wall Street."

What specific policies or actions would cause that?

Obviously somehow it involves allowing Wall Street to have some of that free printed money.

Not unusual at all. European justice is long. And it's the case everywhere. Only 3 years ago man, 3 years for national cases is nothing. I don't see your point here.
Stop right there!
Where did I say anything like this?
I was talking about American presidence run. The fact that people seem to actually love Trump and I was wondering why.

I NEVER said French politic was different. The only different is that we don't like them, we vote for the one we think is the less horrible that's all.

It was an honest question, I wanted to know why Trump is loved so much. Galdur answered. End of the debate. Never gave you lessons about politics here.

Now; read this and weep...

Why Wall Street Loves Hillary

She's trying to sound populist, but the banks are ready to shower her campaign with cash.

By William D. Cohan
November 11, 2014



An odd thing happened last month when, stumping just before the midterms, Hillary Clinton came in close proximity to the woman who has sometimes been described as the conscience of the Democratic Party. Speaking at the Park Plaza Hotel in Boston as she did her part to try to rescue the failing gubernatorial campaign of Martha Coakley in Massachusetts, Clinton paid deference to Senator Elizabeth Warren, the anti-Wall Street firebrand who has accused Clinton of pandering to the big banks, and who was sitting right there listening.

 “I love watching Elizabeth give it to those who deserve it,” Clinton said to cheers. But then, awkwardly, she appeared to try to out-Warren Warren—and perhaps build a bridge too far to the left—by uttering words she clearly did not believe: “Don’t let anyone tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs,” Clinton said, erroneously echoing a meme Warren made famous during an August 2011 speech at a home in Andover, Massachusetts. “You know that old theory, trickle-down economics? That has been tried, that has failed. It has failed rather spectacularly.”

The right went wild. See? Hillary Clinton has finally shown her hand. After having sat out the financial crisis and all the economic turmoil that has followed in the past six years—and with good reason, since for most of that time she was tending to the nation’s diplomacy as secretary of state—she is proving to be an anti-Wall Street populist too, and as much a socialist as her former boss, President Obama.

But here’s the strange thing: Down on Wall Street they don’t believe it for a minute. While the finance industry does genuinely hate Warren, the big bankers love Clinton, and by and large they badly want her to be president. Many of the rich and powerful in the financial industry—among them, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, Tom Nides, a powerful vice chairman at Morgan Stanley, and the heads of JPMorganChase and Bank of America—consider Clinton a pragmatic problem-solver not prone to populist rhetoric. To them, she’s someone who gets the idea that we all benefit if Wall Street and American business thrive. What about her forays into fiery rhetoric? They dismiss it quickly as political maneuvers. None of them think she really means her populism.

Although Hillary Clinton has made no formal announcement of her candidacy, the consensus on Wall Street is that she is running—and running hard—and that her national organization is quickly falling into place behind the scenes. That all makes her attractive. Wall Street, above all, loves a winner, especially one who is not likely to tamper too radically with its vast money pot.

According to a wide assortment of bankers and hedge-fund managers I spoke to for this article, Clinton’s rock-solid support on Wall Street is not anything that can be dislodged based on a few seemingly off-the-cuff comments in Boston calculated to protect her left flank. (For the record, she quickly walked them back, saying she had “short-handed” her comments about the failures of trickle-down economics by suggesting, absurdly, that corporations don’t create jobs.) “I think people are very excited about Hillary,” says one Wall Street investment professional with close ties to Washington. “Most people in New York on the finance side view her as being very pragmatic. I think they have confidence that she understands how things work and that she’s not a populist.”

The bottom line for Wall Street, says this executive—echoing many others—is that Clinton understands that America’s much-maligned financial industry wants to be part of the solution to the country’s problems. “Everybody who makes money feels a shared responsibility,” he continues. “Everybody sort of looks at her with a lot of optimism because they feel she doesn’t mind making hard decisions. She’ll do what she needs to do, but it’s not a ‘Let me blame you.’ It’s, ‘Hey, here’s what you’ve got to do.’ And I think that’s very different.” During a speech last December at the Conrad Hotel, in New York, her message could not have been more different from Obama’s hot, anti-Wall Street rhetoric: “We all got into this mess together, and we’re all going to have to work together to get out of it.”
 
During the 2012 presidential election, Wall Street felt burned by Obama’s rhetoric and regulatory positions and overwhelmingly supported with their money Republican candidate Mitt Romney, co-founder of private-equity firm Bain Capital. Now, though, there’s a significant momentum back behind the Democratic contest. “The money is already behind her,” the Wall Street money manager says. “I don’t think it’s starting to line up behind her: It’s there for her if she wants it.”

The informal head of her informal Wall Street outreach effort for her informal campaign is a finance executive she knows well—and recruited to work for her at the State Department. Tom Nides, 53, the Morgan Stanley executive, knows both New York and Washington intimately. Today he speaks with Clinton regularly and has begun to play the role of gatekeeper on Wall Street to her embryonic campaign. He also has been known to run interference between the Obama administration and the leaders of the Israeli government, in order to try to patch up their dysfunctional relationship. “Tom at the end of the day is the guy—she trusts him, she knows him,” says the Wall Street investment manager.

Nides returned to Morgan Stanley in 2013 after two years working for Clinton at the State Department as deputy secretary of state for management and resources. Nides (with whom I once shared a one-week summer rental on Nantucket) epitomizes the revolving door that has long existed between Washington and Wall Street. Born in Duluth, Minnesota, he served in a senior leadership role for a diverse group of Washington politicians, from Representatives Tony Coehlo and Tom Foley to, as chief of staff, Mickey Kantor, Bill Clinton’s U.S. trade representative. He worked at Fannie Mae for six years, ran Joe Lieberman’s 2000 vice-presidential campaign and served a brief stint as CEO of Burson Marsteller, the public relations firm.

In 2001, Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack took Nides under his wing. When Mack was named CEO of Credit Suisse, Nides went along with him as chief administrative officer. When Mack returned to Morgan Stanley as CEO in 2005, Nides accompanied him again as chief operating officer and then stayed another year serving in the same role for James Gorman. Then Nides returned to Washington to work for then-Secretary Clinton at the State Department, replacing Jack Lew, who became head of the Office of Management and Budget. Many thought Nides’ time at Morgan Stanley was over, especially with Mack’s retirement at the end of 2011. But Gorman—also a Hillary supporter—surprised people by bringing Nides back to the firm as a vice-chairman.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/11/why-wall-street-loves-hillary-112782#ixzz3mVnl0B76

Quote from: galdur on September 22, 2015, 07:21:05 PM

Donald Trump leads the Republican primary field with 34 percent support

hmm, any odds on when he´ll get whacked by a lone gunman? It seems to me that he´s the only participant of consequence in this reality show that doesn´t need immediate treatment by men in white coats in rooms with rubber walls.

Wilikon says: D+media and R, are trying hard to take him out. If this happens for real the fbi will take years to find out whodunnit . Multiple decades even.

galdur: Well, can´t say I´m a fan and he´s probably a scumbag but I doubt that he´s crazy. So, I´m not surprised that he´s top of the field there. A sane scumbag would be the best on offer for decades. Hope he has very competent security. Good luck, g

I didn't actually hear him say it, but it sounds like you are implying he said something like, "It is difficult to understand how it feels to be oppressed when you have never been oppressed"... yeah, I agree with that 100%... not racist in the slightest

Keep in mind, Bernie is a 75 year old Jew... people have been openly hostile towards Jews his entire life... for some reason antisemitism is accepted in America

Bernie defends blacks, gays, et al, because he understands what it feels like to be hated because of his ethnicity...

If the best you have against Bernie is twisting something he said to sound kinda sorta almost racist-ish... keep trolling loser

Well, I´m much more of a fan now than last Sept. especially since he´s so consistently being bashed by generally the scum of the earth. 

What is the worst possible outcome for the presidential election of 2016?  Assuming that an election will actually take place, that is an easy question to answer – Hillary Rodham Clinton as the next president of the United States.  She is truly evil in every sense of the word, and the implications of what four (or eight) years of Hillary would mean for our nation are almost too terrible to imagine.  That is why it is so depressing watching what is happening to the Republican Party right now.  The civil war in the Republican Party is ripping it to shreds, and as a result of all this warfare every plausible scenario for what will happen the rest of the way ends with Hillary Clinton winning the 2016 election....more

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/thanks-to-the-republican-establishment-every-scenario-ends-with-hillary-clinton-winning-the-2016-election

Because you think Bernie owns reddit or something?

You must have a raging clue

You forgot:

"I've assembled a team of wonderful people.  Great people.  Amazing people.
We know how to change light bulbs.  People always ask me, Donald, how did you
change light bulbs in the past?  I tell them the same thing:  you negotiate,
you talk to wonderful, truly amazing people, then hire Mexicans to do it.
Believe me when I say this:  Mexicans will change the light bulbs and pay for them.
Make America Great Again (one Mexican at the time)."