I think that something is wrong with the blockchain, and we should stop mining until everything is fully working.
Too much problems with this coin, I'm thinking of closing the pool and stop investing on this since we had no news about exchanges, and dev is moving slowly (in my opinion).
What do you think, should I?
P.D. If I don't receive news in 2 days I will be forced to close everything.
I think you are to much in hurry, in fact there was an issue with low transaction limit that dev already fixed and now with a node updating after finishing which chain get to go more smoothly, so there was only two problems with BAS that are solved/solving. Anyway it's your decision, do what you need to do, think maybe it can appear another BAS pool or people can mine it by solo  |
|
|
|
Let's continue to mine |
|
|
|
Is it viable to cpu mine this coin?
Could anyone please tell me how to set up the wallet on Ubuntu?
Also, is it viable to mine this coin on a CPU?
You can use latest cpuminer-opt for cpu mining. |
|
|
|
Don't even know how, i just updated the wallet to the latest for the pool. Maybe the other pool somehow influenced in it, because people where mining there after the fork.
Seems just was needed to resynch it by deleting old chain, that's all) |
|
|
|
Any idea why the wallet and block explorer are reporting a different height and no blocks found for over an hour? Pool is getting blocks correctly, but i think that the block explorer is not using the latest daemon. Neither are the wallets then.. . Here is mine:  Seems like. Need a dev response on it. If you try this, tell us if it makes a difference or helps. Have you taken the pool offline? Yes, fr0zn is updating blockchain now. btw, maybe need to resynch wallet from the beginning by deleting old chain? If you do this, let us know it it helps or makes any difference. Sync is reporting 51979 as the top block Starting to resynch wallet and it shows me the same - 51979, which is correct with an explorer. |
|
|
|
Any idea why the wallet and block explorer are reporting a different height and no blocks found for over an hour? Pool is getting blocks correctly, but i think that the block explorer is not using the latest daemon. Neither are the wallets then.. . Here is mine: Seems like. Need a dev response on it. Have you taken the pool offline? Yes, fr0zn is updating blockchain now. btw, maybe need to resynch wallet from the beginning by deleting old chain? Thats what i'm doing now, in 30-45 min all up I mean I will try to do so to. |
|
|
|
Any idea why the wallet and block explorer are reporting a different height and no blocks found for over an hour? Pool is getting blocks correctly, but i think that the block explorer is not using the latest daemon. Neither are the wallets then.. . Here is mine: Seems like. Need a dev response on it. Have you taken the pool offline? Yes, fr0zn is updating blockchain now. btw, maybe need to resynch wallet from the beginning by deleting old chain? |
|
|
|
Any idea why the wallet and block explorer are reporting a different height and no blocks found for over an hour? Pool is getting blocks correctly, but i think that the block explorer is not using the latest daemon. Neither are the wallets then.. . Here is mine: Seems like. Need a dev response on it. |
|
|
|
People really need to listen to the developer and stop mining. It looks like BASPool are on a separate fork now with a longer chain than the one being reported in the block explorer or wallet. Two different block heights....not good.
If it's so why I'm still getting a payouts from pool to the new wallet? I mean two different chains can't crossing with each other...? What block height is your wallet reporting on the bottom? It's the same height like in an explorer., and yes, pool block height is differ from explorer and wallet what a little bit strange  |
|
|
|
People really need to listen to the developer and stop mining. It looks like BASPool are on a separate fork now with a longer chain than the one being reported in the block explorer or wallet. Two different block heights....not good.
If it's so why I'm still getting a payouts from pool to the new wallet? I mean two different chains can't crossing with each other...? |
|
|
|
I sell everything because dev not work not support and leave cryto die,
Dev didn't go anywere and he is working hard to make this coin strong. If you want to sell your BASs so do it and make yourself free to go to any other project to support Blocks are back, though the time for each seems inconsistent. I guess it'll balance out.
Yes, blocks now are moving forward and getting again my coins |
|
|
|
Hi dev, can we mine NNT directly instead NNC mining?
Waves tokens are Non-minable assets I see, thanks. |
|
|
|
Looks like the hard fork was a success, network hashrate rising. Bigger transaction amounts. Excellent.
Did you tried already to sent some coins to somewhere? Whats the new transaction limit now? Cant send anything, no block the last 2 hours. so no comfirms. Have the same, last block was recieved 4h ago. So whats the issue in? |
|
|
|
|
Hi dev, can we mine NNT directly instead NNC mining?
|
|
|
|
Looks like the hard fork was a success, network hashrate rising. Bigger transaction amounts. Excellent.
Did you tried already to sent some coins to somewhere? Whats the new transaction limit now? |
|
|
|
Could anyone please tell me how to set up the wallet on Ubuntu?
Also, is it viable to mine this coin on a CPU?
You can use latest cpuminer-opt for cpu mining. |
|
|
|
|
Still waiting for second exchange...
|
|
|
|
|
Any news about exchange listing?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I guess so too, it was just not too long.
|
|
|
|
Actually within 1 minute must found only 1 block. Can't see it, in what height multi block was found? Yep, I have got it. btw can you tell where is a correct info, explorer is showing hashpower only 85KH right now and baspool have almost 1MH of hashes. What is true? I don't know what you're seeing. The explorer and baspool both have correct block heights and hash rates. I didn't made a screenshot but in time when I posted it hashrate on baspool was about 950kH and BAS explorer didn't showed the same, don't know what it connected with , maybe explorer can't get in time for real hash speed, but it was a fact. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
