How do you do that? I know some users can but I can not remember how it's done LOL

Wait a minute.

I was off for a day and is it what I had to see 🤣

Do you call it best?
Totally injustice to the guy who deserved it. 😉

There are no need to pull the rubber and making it unnecessary longer. Since OP is happy, owl.games were too, let it be. We have no business left now. cryptostuneris, you should be locking the topic.

How could you don't know that they are scammers? LOL

Doesn't surprise me or how are they paying domain and hosting charge 🤣

May be they are in brothel business 😉
Sex, drug, bitcoin what else they need?

@OP, sorry to hear your experience. Do not expect anything else from the thread. After few times someone will post a picture of a green dildo if you continue 😂

Mexico vs Poland
31’

No one was seeing it. After long streak of winning Argentina never thought they will have to lose against a team like Saudi Arabia. No one even imagined it.

It's gone. It was supposed to be a sure scoring for your acca. They were unlucky too besides the poor playing.

Today really is the day for the bookmakers. They made billions from Argentina vs Saudies. They also made money in Denmark vs Tunisia.

Good to see the accusation resolved and you both came to an agreement. I am more than happy to see the mutual ending.

I do not mind to remove the red feedback at all. In the future I will suggest to focus on resolving the issue without blaming the accuser and telling why did he do other things on the forum. Not only on the forum but on anywhere. When you have enough evidence let the evidence to speak for you (you were saying 97% win rate but you failed to show any data to support it).

I understand it's been rough for both of you (owlgames team and the OP), but eventually this is a happy ending. My best wishes for your team and project.

What do we say?
LOL LOL Argentina, LOL LOL Argentina 🤣
Is anyone in the world ever thought Saudi Arabia would win by 1 - 2 today? Even their team management?
Feel sorry for Messi and his team. They were super unlucky today.
We can register the biggest upset of this world cup so far already happened.

Well done Saudi Arabia!

P.S: I pray for that lad who got hit on his face. It looked really bad.

Possible but since I am straight I was thinking straight LOL

Who wants to spend hours to make a post while he can just copy and paste others idea unless there are guys like me who PMed 3 to 4 users including you (🤣), both forum admin only to know best reporter then later get help from a regular member.

I think miss bitcointalk is a category we should not have from the next years. Spambuster should be only for mods and admins to vote. The event of the year, who will take it? There are no user for it normally.

I was going with 2 - 1 for USA then changed mind for 1 - 2 to Wales to win. Then finally again sicked to the original one which was 2 -1 for USA but nothing happened LOL. Watching the first half I was pretty sure that USA was going to win but the 2nd half was totally different. Wales took over the entire 2nd half and deserved to score.

Argentina is going to win there are no doubt. Question is how many goal difference we will see LOL

After long hours of brainstorming I found my people. I wish you all make it. Good luck. 🥰

• Hero of Good:  Team Cryptios and Cyrus. They are doing fantastic job recovering accounts and no one talks about them.
• Golden Feather: suchmoon. I like to read his/her response in controversy. LoyceV, fun to read his response in jokes. RickDeckard. You will enjoy his posts when reading
• Bitcointalk Ninja: PowerGlove. He knows coding to improve experience of the forum.
• Bitcoin Geek: nc50lc
• Event of the Year: ChiBitCTy for Bitcointalk pumpkin craving (I was squeezing my orange 😉)
• Fail of the Year: BTC price, TheBitcoinTalkShow, Centralized exchanges (Because of CZ FTX fall, People are now realizing danger of centralize exchanges.)
• Discovery of the Year: n0nce
• Best SpamBuster: Ratimov Impressive contribution with over 100k reports.
• Best ScamBuster: No vote. This group of people are tricky. Most of the time they use it to build their reputation and sometimes they scam others when get their chance. I don't trust users fall in the group.
• Craft Master: xhomerx10 and all 65 nominated users from 🎃 Pumpkin Craving Contest.
• AntiHero: JollyGood. A sadist, cashing out from 1xbit, giving feedback (both negative and neutral) for others like a candy man and trolling others who do not support his flawed arguments
• Miss Bitcointalk: lovesmayfamilis this is must be a woman with lots of kids 😉

Not at all 😉

Bot stated many times about his wife and kids. So he is a husband. LEO is a man from the name. Theymos is masculine in his style, no doubt. I am totally unaware about Rikafip. Everyone likes to think Foxpup is female but I found him attracted to women LOL. Lauda was a woman. The Pharmacist is a man. Suchmoon is an woman. Jet Cash is a man a senior citizen. JJG is a man, Mic is a man, Homer is a man, LFC_bitcoin is a man, Bob is a man, Dabs is a man, yahoo is obviously man and he got married not long ago. I can go on and on, it's been a long year with the community and watching all these peoples how they react and act. In one or two cases I might be wrong though, take it easy 🤣

Amazing work from Ratimov. I had my pick in the category. Thanks

All casinos are not in the same situation as them.

Asking proof of bankroll was done before. If I am not wrong once Cloudbet or Primedice was in a situation where they had to prove their bankroll and it found out they had BTC over 300 or 3000 which was huge to cover the fund of the accusation against them. A casino once even paid over 300 BTC to one of their client when the accusation was raised on the forum. In several occasions many other gambling website were asked for it too. So asking for bankroll to all casino will be weird but when there were situations, it's already done before.

Not long ago MoonbetEcosystem from Moonbet.io had bad experience with owl.games and it's still fresh. If you closely look at to this particular accusation, you will find instead of answering direct questions they were choosing the path of arguments, blaming the accuser and harassing him. Until now they have not shown any evidence to support their legitimacy. Except saying all stupid things like:






Even look at the screenshot provided of the email they sent. Blackmailing a user and saying if you do not do this then we will not pay you? Very unprofessional and questionable behavior.

After considering everything I have huge doubt that they are capable of paying big wins. May be one of the poster is correct about having only $300k bankroll. But it's should be easy for them to prove it wrong instead of trying to get away by blaming the accuser.

They are lucky that I am not a fan of giving feedback to anyone especially to a business. I do only when it's necessary but when anyone clears my doubt I am always open to remove it completely which I already indicated to my reference post. Removing the tag will not be very hard, do something that is satisfying, they will even find me vouching for them. But being unprofessional. acting shady; is not going to work. Player risks their money to win and when they win you make sure everything not to pay them is not a good business model at all. I am even confident that claiming OPs win rate is 97% was a lie too. They said it so that it looks better for them.

@owlgames, at this point after reading the response from my last reply to the topic, looking at the email screenshot from you giving ultimatum to the OP, trying to create diversion by accusing OP not having an old forum account, why he not playing with others and many more irrelevant statement; I think you are fishy and you do not want to honer the OP his wins but trying everything to make him guilty to keep the money that he won. You even did not response to my question of showing the win ratio that you claimed was 97%. All you are doing is avoiding legit equerries which was supposed to be an easy path to chose if you were transparent in your words.

All these concludes me that you do not have enough bankroll to protect your business. Playing in your casino for high rollers are risky. Thus I will leave you a negative feedback. The feedback will be reconsidered only when you will show following and the results are satisfactory:
1. Current Bankroll with blockchain evidence
2. Show data of you claiming OP's winning rate was 97%

I already decided it for Fail of the year. Credit to shahzadafzal.

Theymos, my man! do me a favor. Three reporters in your mind?
Please PM me if you don't want it influence others.

@Welsh PM sent to Cyrus too, let's see what he has in mind.
A report stat at least before the event could really help everyone. Or The category should be for the mods only since they handle the reports. A regular user does not have any idea at all to judge the quality of reports and the numbers.

Asking theymos for information is a gamble, I am not taking the risk 😉
I sent you a PM, just in case you miss it, please check.

Thanks brother.

Is it possible to know top three reporters from the last year December to till date please?

Step ahead of my brain storming. I still have a lot of time to put in though.

Absolute Hero of Good: Team Cryptios and Cyrus. They are doing fantastic job recovering accounts and no one talks about them.
Golden Feather: [working on it]
Bitcointalk Ninja: PowerGlove. He knows coding to improve experience of the forum.
Bitcoin Geek: [working on it]
Event of the Year: ChiBitCTy for Bitcointalk pumpkin craving (I was squeezing my orange 😉)
Fail of the Year: BTC price, TheBitcoinTalkShow, Centralized exchanges (Because of CZ and FTX fall, People are now realizing danger of centralize exchanges.)
Discovery of the Year: n0nce
SpamBuster: [Going to need help from forum moderators for top three reporter of the year]
ScamBuster: No vote. This group of people are tricky. Most of the time they use it to build their reputation and sometimes they scam others when get their chance. I don't trust users fall in the group.  
Craft Master: xhomerx10 and all 65 nominated users from 🎃 Pumpkin Craving Contest.
Antihero: [working on it]
Miss Bitcointalk: lovesmayfamilis this is must be a woman with lots of kids 😉

May be tonight I will give more thoughts and will do my own findings before making my final list.

Good catch and updated.

My take from the match today.
Ecuador's captain Valencia is a fantastic player. He could have a hat-trick but unfortunately first one was an off-side. The semi referee system played a good role to the match. Ecuador's defense is cooperatively strong. They have not conceded goals for the last 11 plus playing hours now.

Qatar does not have a good defense and their forwards have no ability to score too. An average team in my opinion.

After losing by 2 - 0, isn't it confirmed now? There will always be a group who try to create hype. It's was their idea. I don't think there were any fixing at all. It's a big event and we are at 2022.