There is nothing wrong with your recommendations, but they will only be effective if a person follows all of them. For example, mixing your coins is a good idea. But mixing your coins and then having the device delivered to your home address under your real name defeats one of the purposes of mixing.

Delivering to PO boxes could be tricky depending on where you live and which courier does the shipping. When I order stuff online, I sometimes have to provide ID to the courier who feeds the information into the system. Staying anonymous doesn't work in that case. Some couriers in certain countries won't allow deliveries to PO boxes.   

First of all, which Ledger hardware wallet do you have?

A) Nano S
B) Nano S Plus
C) Nano X

I am asking because the code that introduces Ledger Recover was only released for the Nano X.
The word is that the old Nano S won't ever support it, and the Nano S Plus will at one point in the future.

If you haven't upgraded your Nano X firmware, don't do it and leave it as it is. The version of Ledger Live doesn't matter. The version of your installed crypto apps are also of secondary priority when we are discussing the Ledger Recover code. I see no problems in keeping your crypto apps and Ledger Live updated. If it's a trust issue, why keep using your Ledger hardware wallet in the first place? Switch to something else and abandon it.

I like what I am seeing. Hopefully we can see the mempools emptying to 100k or below in the next couple of days. That would be a good sign.

That's the way the world works. The price of gasoline is a good example. It quickly moves upwards due to any related price increases on the market, but when the situation stabilizes, businesses aren't as quick to reduce their profits.

I am not, no. This is the first time I hear about it. I got a notification by my bot that you and Poika5 mentioned my name in this thread. If it's only been 24 hours (more or less), let's give them some time to see what happens. Nothing else anyone here can do. I think icopress used to be their campaign manager. Maybe I am wrong. @icopress do you know something more? Are you in contact with anyone from their team?

I read a while ago that Sparrow wallet has internal support for Electrum-generated seeds, but they haven't implemented it yet. Maybe it's a topic they will reconsider in the future. Here is what they say about it:

https://github.com/sparrowwallet/sparrow/issues/59

When Electrum came out, there was no BIP39 standard yet, so there was no way of them supporting it in those days, just like pooya87 pointed out.

It terms of code verifiability, there is no difference between Coldcard's code and that of other open-source solutions. If you know how to do it, you can verify both, just like you said. Because of that, saying I don't trust them means very little. You don't have to trust them, verify it. But we all know that verifying isn't possible for the majority of us, so we are back on trusting this or that.

dkbit98 not trusting Coldcard is probably related to the way they acquired the code they now use in their wallets. It's based on open-source code that they modified, and are now preventing other brands from using it. There was even a time when they referred to their code as open-source, when it wasn't. It's verifiable but not open-source. Unethical approach by Coldcard on that front. Their CEO is also a controversial figure that some people don't like.

I don't think Wasabi will be removed as a recommended wallet on bitcoin.org. Therefore, I think it's a waste of time to suggest that. It's not a waste of time to put up warnings of their most recent activities. Hard facts only, no subjective interpretations and emotional statements. Wasabi is a software that allows partial privacy if you pass the tests their blockchain analysis partner puts you through. That alone is a privacy invasion. If you don't pass the tests (for reasons unknown), you have also had your privacy invaded and declared unfit to participate.   

Their Recover feature has been put on hold for now, but I am pretty sure it would only work with Ledger Live if/once released. You would also need the latest firmware with the feature/vulnerability code present on your hardware wallet. 

That should still work through the My Ledger/Ledger Manager tab irrespective of your firmware version. You might have to install the latest Ledger Live version, though.

The magic is probably recorded in the code for the firmware, and as you know, it's closed-source. That's the part they have to open for the public. Anyways, it's too late now. If such an option was there in the past, they can just remove it, work around it, and open-source a slightly altered code.

< This!

@rohanagarwal7 You should also avoid over-shilling your hardware wallet in other people's threads which you have been doing lately. Depending on the situation and/or mod, if those posts were reported, they could be deleted. That isn't something you want to see. 

You can read a bit more about the way the package looks in n0nce's unboxing part of his Foundation Passport (FE) hardware wallet review and walkthrough. As he explained, the Batch 2 is also shipped in the same white box with a security seal. Once you open it, you should see this:



There aren't any clear markings either on the outer box nor on the inner one that you are dealing with a hardware wallet. The Foundation logo is on the upper cover, but you would have to be familiar with it to know what it represents.

I changed it now to the correct number. Thanks again!

I have added the correct code for all exchanges that I believe should have it. The page struggles to display all the information, but the code is in the table. The info $X equivalent in BTC will remain for those casinos that don't have a fixed BTC amount for withdrawals and instead change it every time based on the current exchange rate. 

The Ordinals spam is still an ongoing issue. We currently have around 250.000 of unconfirmed transactions sitting in the mempools. This number will probably increase during business days by another 50-100k, so the situation is far from optimal.

What do you consider discreetly? Unless something changed, Passport Foundation allows shipping to PO boxes. You can also pay for your hardware wallet with Bitcoin through BTCPay Server, which is another privacy boost. Regarding shipping methods, I guess it depends on your country/location. I know that Foundation works with USPS and UPS, maybe other couriers as well.

Another thing that I noticed is that they have 3 different types of steel plates. Apparently, the Standard and Customized plates have a sticker on the back that protects the private keys. the 3rd one, DIY, allows users to engrave 12-word seed phrases.

The DIY is the only steel plate that makes sense because you can use it as a metal backup for one of your wallets. And that plate is the cheapest at $59. The other two where you have to use the private keys they generated cost $89 and $199, and include bullshit features like your real name written on the top, etc.

But there is no need to worry because the company offers a
https://materialbitcoin.com/en/

Naravno, dok god postoji ta mogućnost u samom kodu i centralizovanom načinu po kojem njihovi sustavi funkcionišu, to se može desiti, možda čak i očekivati u budućnosti. Ali kod banaka to već imamo i to se dešava.

Na ličnom primjeru od ne tako davno sam to osjetio. Šefica poslovnice banke poznala me na sastanak da me lično pita koji je izvor sredstava koje u posljednje vrijeme sve češće i češće primam. Kada nisam mogao da prikažem potrebne fakture, jer iste ne postoje pošto sam sa jednim klijentom sklopio dogovor rukovanjem, rekla mi je da će to morati proči internu kontrolu banke za pranja novca poslje čega će odlučiti o daljem postupanju. Poslje par dana me zove da mi kaže da sam "prošao internu kontrolu" i nisu pronađene neregularnosti ali pošto ne mogu prikazati ugovore o radu, banka prekida suradnju sa mnom.   

This is the equivalent of a paper wallet but on a steel card.
I have just had a look at their website, and there are some goodies there.

They claim they use military-grade security and that they have developed a wallet (it's not a wallet) that is immune to hackers.
After the card gets shipped to you, they will fund it with the amount you want.

I really love this part:
You need to trust their unhackable method of adding a metallic security strip over the private key that absolutely no one can see. But hey, don't focus on that. Focus on Buy bitcoin with the safest wallet in the world.

Let's talk about how to withdraw your coins from the wallet. After you peel off the military-grade metallic security strip , you have to manually enter the private key into whatever wallet you are using character by character.

Check out their tutorial on how to do it on a phone where they suggest installing a different mobile wallet:

That's how the military does it btw. 

https://materialbitcoin.com/en/
https://materialbitcoin.com/en/blog/how-to-send-bitcoin-from-your-wallet/

U TrustDice kampanji koju vodi Hhampuz od jućer imaju dvije slobodne pozicije za Full Member članove. 


Uslovi i tjedne isplate se nisu mijenjale.
$40 tjedno za Full Membere, min. 20 postova, 10 mora biti u Gambling forumu. Menadžer broji do 10 postova tjedno u lokalnim forumima.

Kontrola i blokade su moguće i kod stablecoina kako si sam naveo ali mene niko nikad nje pitao kome šaljem svoj USDT, od koga primam i za koju svrhu. U biti imaju načina da stave šapu na sve ali se u praksi to ne koristi osim za velike ribe. Mislim da jedan takav slučaj kad su bila blokirana sredstva FTX mjenačnice.

Počni primati više i češće uplate na svoje bankovne račune i svi će imati pitanja za tebe. Odakle dolazi novac, zašto dolazi, imaš li fakturu ili dokaz šta se to plaća, itd. Sumnjivo postane i banci, a da ne govorim o dušebrižnicima iz poreznih ureda.

That's great and it looks good.
I will begin making the changes later today to see how it works. Hopefully there won't be any issues since there will be many instances where I will use the code in the OP.

I am sure that many need to be updated. Last time I checked was the end of April. After the network fees exploded following the Ordinals hype, many casinos increased their withdrawal fees as a result. I decided to wait to see if the situation will calm down. But nothing has changed even several months after. We still have hundreds of thousands of unconfirmed transactions in the mempools and higher than usual fees.

After I update the code according to bitmover's suggestions, I will go through the table and change the numbers one by one. I adjusted the info for BC.game and OwlGames as Mahdirakib suggested yesterday. 

What we can observe is that stricter regulatory frameworks are coming to crypto. Anonymous betting isn't going to be a thing in the biggest bookmakers in the future. We already have many crypto casinos that require KYC or make you believe identity verification isn't required. It's not, as long as you are losing.

I don't think AI will help players make better betting decisions in the future. AI can analyze stats and data and determine the most possible outcome. The match still has to be played, and there are absolutely no certainties in sport, regardless of the odds.

I have never seen any attraction in eSports betting and I doubt that will change in the future. However, people love to play video games and they love to gamble. Combine the two and you got yourself a winning combination.   

Only partially. The software is the biggest concern, and that's where most of the attacks happen and where hackers abuse the vulnerabilities they find. But connected hardware can also be dangerous. What makes you trust your keyboard? Why do you trust the individual chips on your motherboard when you have no idea what you are doing? Etc., etc.