2AVmIgP5Sv6SHv3t6rOPrTsBIio8bh5LWx
thanks
this is not a valid OSC address. capital I's are not allowed in base58 all sent up to here, but bear with us. some large asics currently have the difficulty through the roof and block generation has slowed to a stand still. currently looking at a creative solution to the problem. there are many solutions out there but they are incomplete "bandages" at best |
|
|
|
|
there seems to be a flaw in the difficulty retargeting every block, and there seems to be a large asic jumping on and off of the network which is causing difficulty stranding and long block times. i'm having a look into how it can be fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
Death and Taxes knows so much about crypto, i wanna see him make a coin. hell i'd mine it as long as it isn't scrypt based.
|
|
|
|
|
this is a scam dev trying to get you to download a fake client. be warned
|
|
|
|
Hrm I think this might be a bit out of my league, I've got a couple of moopless stratum threads I'm looking through so hopefully I find an answer there.
you need to contact x3 maniac, the operator of dsync pulls. he faced the issue you were facing and rewrote some parts of his stratum miner for OSC. |
|
|
|
What's the transaction message field? Is it something that goes into the submitblock hex?
yes |
|
|
|
Tried mining at my pool, looks to be a problem with submitting blocks. I've seen this problem on 2 other coins, ADT and something else, they were both scrypt coins. First time I've come across it with a sha256 coin. Here are the stratum logs: 2013-10-16 21:37:58,635 INFO template_registry # We found a block candidate! 00000000000128ef2851a4650ec796dfa1ba5d0d6758aa5d
675236e6627a39e0
2013-10-16 21:37:58,639 INFO interfaces # 00000000000128ef2851a4650ec796dfa1ba5d0d6758aa5d675236e6627a39e0 (56500) valid Tomm
o.3
2013-10-16 21:37:58,646 INFO template_registry # New template for 00000000002003267f3d2eb04ada518e608adcdd811b48325b9ace4d4cf
fe4f8
2013-10-16 21:37:58,647 INFO subscription # BROADCASTED to 3 connections in 0.000 sec
2013-10-16 21:37:58,648 INFO template_registry # Update finished, 0.002 sec, 1 txes
2013-10-16 21:37:58,651 ERROR bitcoin_rpc # Problem Submitting block 500 Internal Server Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/mystratumlocation/stratum-mining-litecoin/lib/bitcoin_rpc.py", line 49, in submitblock
resp = (yield self._call('getblocktemplate', [{'mode': 'submit', 'data': block_hex}]))
Error: 500 Internal Server Error And the stratum code: def submitblock(self, block_hex, block_hash_hex):
# Try submitblock if that fails, go to getblocktemplate
try:
resp = (yield self._call('submitblock', [block_hex,]))
except Exception:
try:
--line 49-- resp = (yield self._call('getblocktemplate', [{'mode': 'submit', 'data': block_hex}]))
except Exception as e:
log.exception("Problem Submitting block %s" % str(e))
raise
if json.loads(resp)['result'] == None:
# make sure the block was created.
defer.returnValue((yield self.blockexists(block_hash_hex)))
else:
defer.returnValue(False)
Is there anything different to submitblock with OSC compared to the usual sha256 coins? I have many other sha256 coins on my pool and they don't have this problem. I never figured out what the issue was with the other coins so had to take them off the pool, any help would be excellent so I can get it mining. you will have to either switch to pushpool or edit the blocktemplate to include the transaction message field. a good place to start is serialize.h if you need help, contact x3maniac |
|
|
|
|
agree with the post above me.
ps: in before flamewars
|
|
|
|
i've changed my stance a bit on MEC. kimoto is clearly atleast somewhat talented at what he does. however, it appears MEC was either a planned frontloaded coin or he lacks a grasp of basic economic principals like inflation, deflation, supply, and demand, or even less harsh he could have just been experimenting to see what would happen. just my two cents i know no one asked for  maybe he will weigh in eventually one why MEC was so frontloaded. Now now, I know you of all people know how amateur of a mistake neglecting to change ports is. what about network id's? |
|
|
|
i've changed my stance a bit on MEC. kimoto is clearly atleast somewhat talented at what he does. however, it appears MEC was either a planned frontloaded coin or he lacks a grasp of basic economic principals like inflation, deflation, supply, and demand, or even less harsh he could have just been experimenting to see what would happen. just my two cents i know no one asked for maybe he will weigh in eventually one why MEC was so frontloaded. |
|
|
|
Avast reports as malware.
pics? report? i have avast I.S. on my windows machine and not a peep. possible that you are fudding, as its highly unlikely someone was able to inject it on google drive, however i'll reserve to comment on it until you provide proof of your accusation. \ edit: downloaded from google drive and not a peep from avast or malware bytes pro. i'll unpack it with isa pro and scan each object for good measure. no one falsely accuses me of packing malware and gets away with it  I'm not accusing you of anything, simply stating what happened. I don't have a screenshot as I panicked and killed my internet connection and am now in the process of format/reinstall but I do have this screenshot from where Avast sandboxed it.  yeah avast automatically puts new exe's into the sandbox..... thanks for the bad pr though... That has never occurred for me whether bitcoin-qt, litecoin-qt or non bitcoin related programs, this is a first. thats because bitcoin and litecoin are digitally signed with gitian builder. i lack the hardware required to build a program with gitian builder, hence the unsigned binaries. eventually i will upgrade my build machine to a modern motherboard with a bios that supports hardware virtualization. all this being said, its fairly common knowledge that new unsigned binaries(or to be more specific, new coin clients) are some times marked as suspicious by antivirus programs(specifically Avast and Microsoft smartscreen, i have both and they often fight over who gets to block the application first. in fact, everytime i build a new client, windows 8 "smart screen" blocks me from opening it immediately after i click on it. like i said, calm your tits lol. ps: if you're this concerned with security, you may consider launching all altcoin clients in their own separate virtual machine. this is more or less what avast sandbox does when it finds something it deems suspicious. |
|
|
|
Avast reports as malware.
pics? report? i have avast I.S. on my windows machine and not a peep. possible that you are fudding, as its highly unlikely someone was able to inject it on google drive, however i'll reserve to comment on it until you provide proof of your accusation. \ edit: downloaded from google drive and not a peep from avast or malware bytes pro. i'll unpack it with isa pro and scan each object for good measure. no one falsely accuses me of packing malware and gets away with it I'm not accusing you of anything, simply stating what happened. I don't have a screenshot as I panicked and killed my internet connection and am now in the process of format/reinstall but I do have this screenshot from where Avast sandboxed it. yeah avast automatically puts new exe's into the sandbox..... thanks for the bad pr though... |
|
|
|
Avast reports as malware.
pics? report? i have avast I.S. on my windows machine and not a peep. possible that you are fudding, as its highly unlikely someone was able to inject it on google drive, however i'll reserve to comment on it until you provide proof of your accusation. \ edit: downloaded from google drive and not a peep from avast or malware bytes pro. i'll unpack it with isa pro and scan each object for good measure. no one falsely accuses me of packing malware and gets away with it |
|
|
|
will us residents be able to buy from the tobacco shop and do you carry vapage brand compatible cartridges?
Yes, I offer Cartridges, liquids and all replacement components for our ecigs. US residents orders, technically yes, but shipping is not profitable to USA from England. But no worry this will be in next step. I think I can tell now... I will offer shopping site for every companies all over the world, so they can make own shop site. For free or extreme low fee. All components ready installed and with full admin/dev permissions. No hosting, setup etc fees at all. Payment modules and currencies can freely choice. Only rule is, there need to be "buy with TIX or get TIX when buy" and "withdraw TIX" available. Can use own domain name or use free subdomain name. I believe there will be some "Shipping to US" ecig companies too. And just wait if/when China open eyes for TIX  My opinion is, Buy TIX now, and on the future you can buy what ever with your TIX... almost free. More about my planns for TIX, I will tell on later, but now, I'll focus to open 1.st shop. What you think TIX devs? Do we need "TIX accepted / Ticket accepted / Pay here with TIX / Get free TIX when buy here " or similar logos? I think they might be usefull... right on, i'm definitely interested in a US store. |
|
|
|
2009 is also when Bitcoin launched.
Coincidence?
Thats the greatest Bitcoin Conspiracy theory yet. EDIT: and maybe Satoshi is the Central Bank of China. holy balls batman! |
|
|
|
This thread is hilarious. A lot of bagholders out there. Pretty ridiculous when the only selling point for a currency is "0 premine!"
Adding a bunch of copy/paste coins isn't a great long-term strategy for Cryptsy.
no shit. tell that to the mouthbreathing staff |
|
|
|
|
Wizzerd bus another rap. that shit had me smilin
|
|
|
|
|
will us residents be able to buy from the tobacco shop and do you carry vapage brand compatible cartridges?
|
|
|
|
Want to inform you, TIX ecig shop is almost ready. All functions tested and working well. Just few days more.. we still import products to the shop. Hope you like it. Here one screenshot from site.  damn!!! that is bad ass. |
|
|
|
Scam tag his ass
c'mon spots. i paid you my .2 back. you still mad? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
