|
So many of these close threads, how to make Bitcoin online.
Well, I keep suggesting PoS coins, DMD Diamond s my favorite and it brings 25% annual interest. It does require initial investment but where can you make 25% per year doing nothing but staking? Also, always differentiate your investments.
|
|
|
|
Do you think this is legit or this is another scam like other hash cloud mining service..
I saw that many posted here are postive feedback..
A bit of a hybrid in my opinion; what you earn on hashes is faked, at least for the SHA-256, which can be proven. Though also, I recently saw someone selling one of their (re-branded) SHA-256 miners on Ebay; which surprised me, because thus far their hardware was more or like redeemed as vaporware. Prove the faked earnings on hashes! Sure, see page #33 within this topic. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1164418.msg15233440#msg15233440you misunderstood something. its totally clear, that hashflare take some fees for their services. You have the advantage, that u dont buy big equipments to mine bitcoins; its absolutely not more profitable for the little man by the way; so, of course hashflare wouldnt offer you the same hashrate like the pools itself! You made a comparison between apples and pears! Greetz Steve Well, actually no, I am not (regarding the comparison between apples and pears  ). I'm under the impression that you misinterpreted what I was referring to, so I'll try to rephrase it and elaborate otherwise: Firstly, I wasn't making a comparison between the two companies (fees, prices, size, etc), but the inconsistency between them, and then specifically the SHA-256 hashes; which, on Hashflare, are faked (at least, to some degree). What you would have to look at, are the graphs, as these will prove that the SHA-256 hashes on Hashflare are faked; prices, fees, the amount of hashrate and the total amount of hashrate present in either companies, do not matter nor are important: Now, take the SHA-256 graph in your Hasflare dashboard. The other graph you would need is the one from Hashnest, which is https://www.antpool.com/poolStats.htm If you scroll down to the bottom of Hashnest's, you'll see a graph representing the 'pool luck' of Hashnest. I assume you know what this means and represents; if not, well, it basically means and represents the daily earnings generated on Hashnest. Next, if you were to set and point your SHA-256 hashes on Hashflare for a few days 100% towards Hashnest, you would see that the graphs (i.e. generated income) do not match with each other! Example: (fees and total hashrate(s) and such are not important; it's the pool luck that counts, and which proves Hasflares's SHA-256 are faked) - day 1: Hashnest's pool luck is 150%, and thus would generate 50% more income that day from mining on Hashnest. On Hashflare, it does not. - day 2: Hashnest's pool luck was again 150%, and thus would generate again 50% more income that day from mining on Hashnest. On Hashflare, it does not. - day 3: Hashnest's pool luck was now even 180%, and thus would generate a whopping 80% more income from mining that day on Hashnest. On hashflare, it does not. - day 4: Now, Hashnest's pool luck was low, only 60%, and thus would generate 40% less income from mining that day on Hashnest. On Hashflare, it again does not. - day 5: ... etc. etc. A little more than a month ago I had sold all my hashes on Hashnest, so I cannot supply screenshots along with it. Yet should you point all your SHA-256 hashes on Hashflare 100% towards Hashnest, and just compare the graphs of boths companies for while, you would see they simply would not match. So which one of them two companies has the right statistics and numbers, and which one does not? Off course, since there are two parties (Hashflare and Hashnest), it could just as be that (the graph of) Hashnest might be the faulty one. Or, even both the companies could have their graphs/numbers incorrect. Though (!), the hashes, and thus the (daily) pool/income/etc, of Hashnest are trackable and verifiable; whilst, those of Hashflare, are not... Wow...I apologize my harsh comparison. Thanks for enlighten me. So, I am absolutely sure, if hashflare would show us some graphs, they would generating trust and easy quadruple the amount of customers. Greetz Hey Meta, community has already asked for this, no luck. They definitely mine something and in some form, having in mind those GPU photos around. Whether that is enough to avoid fractional mining danger, not sure. So, I always advise caution even though I ve been using them for a year and have reached ROI there some time ago. |
|
|
|
|
Well, it all comes down to added value and marketing. This means any new coin needs to introduce something really new, something crypto community needs and not just be a copy cat. Also, a lot of money needs to be allocated to marketing, especially via social networking. It simply does not seem you can provide either of these elements.
|
|
|
|
|
Generally I make about 0.4 BTC per week from several different streams of income. This form of differentiation s something I highly recommend. In case one stream goes away, there s away something else to keep you afloat. Also, do not waste your time of faucets and similar micro lending stuff. Simply not worth of your time.
|
|
|
|
|
In house developed mining equipment? You do understand you need millions of dollars to be able to that. This is an obvious scam, WARNING!
|
|
|
|
|
I have had big time issues with BTCJam, just too many scams there. Unless there s an option to secure your funds with some form of collateral, lending s not an option. Remember, crypto anonymity s really nice for scammers and speculators. Always stay safe.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey there, I would like to join if possible, long time legendary member.
Name: crazyivan
Post count: 4616
Rank: Legendary
Bitcoin address: 3Qkhu91huewuJReGVyD1dVKvYxEzKBrtTE
Profile UID:102057
Thx a lot
|
|
|
|
|
The last post in Factom blog is from late August. Guys, is there anything going on? The whole purpose of a blog is to repeatedly share information with the community. Thx.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, just more pump and dump by our favorite whale. Not yet a real push we all expect.
|
|
|
|
Trolls re getting more and more desperate. I m sure he dumped and is now short. What s gonna happen if he does not re-buy, which he will not be able to, and Factoids skyrocket. Man, he must be scared of that. I know I would be.  |
|
|
|
|
To quote Brian:
"Factom has a source and a sink for Factoids. Both the sink quantity and the price of Factoids are variable. The price of Factoids is at the whims of the market, but here is where the negative feedback loop comes in. The conjecture is that Factoid price will reach an equilibrium directly proportional to Entry Credit usage.
Let’s conduct some thought experiments. First assume that the EC usage is constant, because the cost to submit Entries and usefulness of the system is independent of the Factoid price. Let’s postulate that the market drives the Factoid price to a low level. The Federated servers will match this internally and raise the Factoid/EC exchange rate. If the price drops to 1/10th of the earlier price, then 10x more Factoids will be needed for the same number of ECs. This means that now 10x more Factoids are being removed from the market. This will lower supply, which will tend to push the Factoid price up."
Nice, let s hope this will be the case and not correction downwards cause as an early investor I DO care about the price and not only technology.
|
|
|
|
|
Another referral link hunting scum who s trying to cloak his referral link in order to scam as much as possible naive noobs. Fuck you scum!
|
|
|
|
|
It s obvious you do not know much about cryto. Even worse, you seem to be big time limited in funding. These two elements combined will bring failure to this project. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
Hello,
nodes working properly,
Thank you vegasguy.
Good luck FLYCOIN
regards
okane
What nodes? |
|
|
|
|
Has anyone contacted them about ETH payments? Cause I think GM s paying without issues.
|
|
|
|
So u think coin payments and hashflare, both multimillion dollar companies re going to after yours $1.77?  ?? What a BS. Write to Hashflare dude and preserve your nerves, the world will not stop over pocket money. Even though I m sure you ve not been scammed and your just need to wait for the Hashflare to respond. Also, you know what, I ve written an initial message to you that I will be covering your loss if they scam you, just cause I m a nice guy. But after seeing your racist messages about Russians, I aint gonna do it. Btw, I m not even a Russian. Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
Another message to the manipulator who s constantly trying to activate as much as possible sell triggers by staging these fake dumps:
I AM NOT SELLING UNTILL THE PRICE AT LEAST DOUBLES SO GO SUCK A DICK!
Sincerely,
Crazyivan
|
|
|
|
D-lux, question for Paul I think we all care about a lot.
Will M2 be available during Q4 of 2016? If yes, can he specify expected month. Since we have 2.5 months till the end of the year, this should not be a big time speculation on his behalf.
Thx for making this possible D-lux.
you start to annoy me. There s a button for that. Please use it. |
|
|
|
|
D-lux, question for Paul I think we all care about a lot.
Will M2 be available during Q4 of 2016? If yes, can he specify expected month. Since we have 2.5 months till the end of the year, this should not be a big time speculation on his behalf.
Thx for making this possible D-lux.
|
|
|
|
I think you can explain the suppressed Factom price without manipulation:
- Factom is all speculation, there is no guarantee people will use their blockchain and their services.
After all, for Factom clients, this is all considered as a "cost". publishing information on a blockchain is something they didn't do or need before, why pay this extra cost ? CEOs always want to reduce their costs,
and how can they be sure that this will be handled properly. What is the impact on the client business if Factom goes under ?
As long as there is no collective industry needs to publish data on a public blockchain nobody will do it.
There is no guarantee there will not ever be any competitor. Actually i think there are a lot of similar projects already under development.
- Those who believe in Factom have already bought. and a lot of them bought at much much cheaper level than today, and have been happy to sell some to take profits. Clear now that over 0.005 there were not enough buyers to absorb all those sales, and that many recent buyers had been tactical leveraged players, they are now out of the market.
- So unless there are good news from the client side that brings new players willing to move in, or that the existing longs are willing to add to their longs, the market will be subject to gyrations. With a lot of high conviction longs being burnt recently i doubt we see those guys trying their luck again, so...
- where from here short term ? sentiment is still fragile. M2 can give some hope and hype, but then again, so thought people long at 0.005 and above. I don't think we go back to the intraday lows 0.00306 from the other day, but 0.0036 is not impossible, especially in a scenario where BTC gets strong. 0.0038-0.0039 is I believe a good buy zone for short term traders if we get there. i think we will try at least once to climb to the Daily MA10 again.
the classic bearish divergence (RSI+Volume) on the weekly chart paints a very bleak medium term picture for FCT (0.0025 or even 0.0015 as targets, 2sigma Lower Bollinger Band value when the signal appeared)
Of course, charting has limited predicting powers in such a small market as FCT. What ultimately matters is actual clients using FCT. in that case, the price will be much much higher. If nobody uses it, it will go to 0.
The price might go to 0. Damn, when has ever price of any coin with at least 1 alive and kicking dev and not to mention this kind of team, went to 0. It s been a long time since I d seen this. I seriously think community should start considering to leave negative trust rating to you, this much of trolling I have not seen in a long time. Then again, I come from an ex communist country, we used to execute people who didn't think "the proper" way. So maybe some of community members coming from more democratic societies should comment on this issue. Let me repeat myself one more time. YOU CANNOT HAVE MY COINS, SO STOP TRYING. NOT SELLING CAUSE I KNOW THEY RE WORTH MUCH, MUCH MORE. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
