|
Project has plagiarized content on their whitepaper because they hire people to write their whitepaper while they themselves can't write the whitepaper which was supposed to be done by them.
Stop offering this shit service and let us get some good project.
|
|
|
|
|
Neither the news has been spread virally nor the incident has any chance to impact on cryptocurrency market as he is a former Prime Minister. Apart from that, I can't remember if cryptocurrency market had an impact if some politician died. Only the death of Putin may have a great impact following by US govt.
|
|
|
|
|
CD3D have partnered with Unifarm and shared the airdrop? I don’t know how much legitimate the project CD3D is but it doesn’t seem good. They may share an excuse but I doubt. I'm sure that they were doing this purposely. They are the scammer but playing innocent with you. In crypto, I don’t trust any link. I don't click them if they are not from my authentic source.
Also, always make sure you are in the right group. Most of the times, scammers create group on popular project name and promote these type of scams.
|
|
|
|
আমি একটা বাংলাদেশী Cryptocurrency exchange তৈরি করতে চাচ্ছি । আমার এই project এ কেউ interested থাকলে আমাকে telegram এ knock করতে পারেন।
Let's talk about cryptocurrencies future in Bangladesh.
Telegram: @Eru_09
ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সি এক্সচেঞ্জ অনেক বড় বিনিয়োগ এর ব্যাপার। আমি জানি না আপনি কেমন বিনিয়োগ করতে চাচ্ছেন। আমার মনে হয় না এত বেশি বিনিয়োগ করে আবার আপনি লাইসেন্স ছাড়া ব্যবসা চালিয়ে সফল হতে পারবেন। আমার খুব বেশি ধারনা নেই এই ব্যাপারে কিন্তু একজনের সাথে অনেক আগে, সম্ভবত ২০১৯ সালের দিকে আমি কথা বলেছিলাম। যদিও আমার টার্গেট ছিল বর্তমানে বাইন্যান্সের পিটুপি এর মত একটা মার্কেটপ্লেস বিল্ড করা। যে পরিমাণ বিনিয়োগ দরকার ছিল আমার কাছে সেটা ছিল না। তাই পিছু নামতে হয়েছিল। |
|
|
|
They don't have an existence in twitter? I had a look at twitter and found preev.pro which looks like same as preev.com however, the price isn't updated there for a long time as I can see 1 BTC = ~$35000 there now lol. Did some little digging and I have found the bitcointalk account of the owner named fennec.
I didn’t even know they exist here  |
|
|
|
I had a few minutes spent on the website and found a few spelling mistakes. Don't you think a professional business would cross-check a few times before launching the website? I don't think we are dealing with a professional team. At least, the website says so. For unlimited amount - we have reserves and able to serve big amounts
What's the maximum amount you allow? 10 BTC or 100 BTC or above? Never mind, would you mind signing from an address with a balance of 10 BTC? That would increase your trustworthiness. You don't have to share with me. In this case, you can trust LoyceV and I'm sure LoyceV won't share the PM with anyone else. |
|
|
|
|
What were you doing all these months since March and suddenly now complaining about the casino?
If you have been banned, there's a reason for that. Since you have been banned, you are unlikely to get an affiliate commission. You have been banned from their site, of course, no ban in any casino means a partial ban. It's a fool to expect to get an affiliate commission. You are no more eligible for that since you are banned.
However, as said above, if you have made an initial deposit, you may get the deposit back but for that you have clarify everything and of course, we need the nitrobetting part of the story.
|
|
|
|
P.S. We have decided to refund 10% to the user and have already done so. We hope it will help stop the conflict.
I'm wondering why a 10% refund, not the full sum? According to your ToS or rules, whatever you say, you are confiscating money because you want to prevent funds from being stolen and you are trying to get the fund back to the rightful owner as you said above. Now, since you have refunded 10% (no confirmation yet though), how will you send the full money back to the original if this fund is stolen? Trust me, it doesn't sound like you are looking for the rightful owner. Instead, it sounds like a scam. If you were telling the truth, refunding 10% or a single cent doesn't make any sense. It seems you are trying to shut him up with the little sum. You can find all the answers in section 7 of the User Agreement and our first post. Let's not duplicate information.
We write the rules in the User Agreement not for discussion. If you are not satisfied with the rules of using our service, you have the full right to use other exchangers.
This is what I can see in section 7. 7. AML and KYC verification.
7.1 The Company conducts AML and KYC verification of Payin transactions according to its own algorithms.
7.2 AML and KYC verification includes the use of specialized services for analyzing cryptocurrency transactions for the presence of funds that have high risks for the Company. These risks include Dark Service, Dark Market, Illegal Service, Exchange Fraudulent, Scam, Stolen, Gambling, Mixer, Ransom, Sanctions, Child Exploitation and Terrorism Financing.
7.3 If the analysis of the Payin transaction revealed the presence of these types of high-risk funds and their total percentage was 40% or more, the Company has the right to withhold 10% of the amount of the incoming transaction.
7.4 If the total risk of the incoming transaction is 70% or more, the Company has the right to withhold 10% of the amount of the Payin transaction.
7.5 The Company has the right not to inform the User about the deduction of 10% of the amount of the Payin transaction.
7.6 The user has the right to receive the results of the audit and/or independently verify the correctness of the risk assessment.
7.7 Payin transactions are verified by AML and KYC by Cryptocurrency exchanges.
7.7.1 If a high risk of an Payin transaction is detected and/or if outgoing wallets are involved in illegal activities, the received funds may be frozen.
7.7.2 To unfreeze funds, documents may be required to verify the identity of the sender and information explaining the source of origin of the funds sent.
7.7.3 If the sender provides comprehensive information upon request, the funds can be unfrozen by the exchange, credited to the account of the Company and the Order will be completed.
7.7.4 Realizing that the verification requirement is not from the Company, but from the Cryptocurrency Exchange, the User undertakes to wait for a decision on verification and not to make a claim against the Company. Can you please check the bold part and say what was the reasoning of confiscating fund in this case? I think since we gave enough justifications and made a return of 10%, this conflict can be considered solved.
Solved and stolen by you or what? |
|
|
|
Flush.com team isn't active anywhere. Their telegram channel is inactive since October month of 2021. Moreover, OP hasn't given any update in the forum since January month. He made his last post on the 12th January. Flush casino team aren't promoting their platform in the perfect way. They aren't going to get the attention from the worldwide gamblers if they don't take proper marketing steps. Maybe they haven't completed the development of Flush casino yet. It could be a reason for not focusing on the marketing steps.
They are more into development than anything else at the moment. As they said, they launched the version and that's still in experiment mode. They are looking for starting with no bug left. That's what OP said me last month. Only after that they will consider marketing campaign etc. |
|
|
|
|
If you are from a restricted country and expecting casino to allow you withdraw, then you are not living in the right world. From my experience here, I have seen most casinos look for excuses so that they can confiscate user fund. As long as the thing isn't clear, they will never allow you to withdraw. It's always better to follow the rules. Alternative option can be looking for casinos which allow you to play with VPN.
By the way, I uses to know bitsler for quite a long time and it's provably one of the sites which I haven’t seen any accused here in bitcointalk. If you think you have been scammed, you can create an accusation on the scam accusation board too.
|
|
|
|
The reality is getting paid out in full is gonna take a long time
Whether they will pay you the full sum or not, that's the fact. It's pretty much understandable why they are not going to pay you in full. It's because of their liquidity. Very much likely that if they pay you the full amount at once, they will lack of liquidity and as a result, bankruptcy. Since, they have taken step and promised to pay you installment, you have no other option but to bear with that decision. Good luck man. |
|
|
|
An account newly created is promoting the scam project Partyland in a bounty campaign without any research and after being alerted.
Apparently, bounty hunters should think twice before promoting and joining a project managed by a novice account manager, sadly no one cares, bounty hunters still enroll in such projects. Maybe, if all Bounty campaigns were managed by beginners, without any participants registering and participating I'm sure, project companies will look for managers here who are well-established to manage their projects, if so will avoid the so-called fraudulent project (escrow) running. Neither bounty hunter is ever going to check out what is what, nor the project owner is going to change their habit of hiring just anyone who is willing to even work for $50/week or even for the shit token only. That's the problem lol. Only a few bounty hunters care about project and campaign manager. Almost all of them can't evenb read or bother to read a little about the project. How do you expect them have background study of campaign manager?
BM needs to do researches and check the projects they are promoting
Very few BM does that. Maybe yahoo62278 and Hhampuz do that if I'm correct. I used to have my own criteria but sadly I would never be able to a single bounty to manage if I were determined on that standard. Also, if I'm not managing a campaign, there are hundred more managers to do that job without thinkiong twice. |
|
|
|
For multiple-network supported wallet, I use metamask and trustwallet. Their securities are just normal for a crypto wallet. As long as you are the only one who knows its seedphrase/private key, then your assets are safe.
Metamask or trustwallet both are hot wallet, connected directly with online. I don't think they are safe enough. There are hundreds of example of people getting tricked because they use this kind of hot wallet to store their crypto. These are indeed one of the most risky wallet. No matter what, as long as your wallet is in online, it's nit anymore safe. I use this types of wallet only for regular transaction purpose with a small amount of crypto asset but never used to store my asset for long term nor to store even a decent amount for few days. |
|
|
|
|
$AVAX? No bitcoin?
Then you should move the thread to altcoin section of the forum because this board is bitcoin only. Casino which have bitcoin accepted is allowed to make their announcement in this board.
Also, try copper membership to get the benefit of posting image on the forum. Check the link shared above.
|
|
|
|
If the old thread have been locked and the @OP already inactive since 2018, so I guess there's nothing will harm your project. You can start create new thread and you're become the thread starter, AFAIK there's nothing wrong to create another thread. Although forum doesn't allow duplicate thread, but if the previous thread have been locked, it's fine.
OP is unlikely to get any solution but your recommendation is not also the one. That guy who is inactive may come someday later and unlock their thread and claim as the real owner of the project/thread. That makes sense but yeah, that's the best OP can do now, creating new thread. |
|
|
|
I don't think it's trust abuse, though. If there is a basis on why they would trust each other, then it's not abuse.
It’s not about feedback. You can check my thread. I have already pointed that their feedback to each other makes sense because Dabs is providing escrow service and they may have a lot of trades. Feedbacks are normal in my opinion too. But we are talking about the trust list inclusion. You must not include a lot of people sent you positive feedback. It's kind of increasing your own trust score by including anyone who left you positive feedback. Is it abuse? Whatever it is but it's not good. As pointed by LoyceV above, if Dabs is in no longer a DT1 member, their trust score will significantly drop because most feedbacks in his profile are from DT member who were made DT by Dabs himself. |
|
|
|
You have the list already I spent half an hour compiling the list. Next time, I won't forget to PM you. I don't think that's the best way to use the Trust system.
That's the point. Though he has added most of them, still it doesn't make sense to list people who left them positive feedback. I wouldn't see this as a problem if all of them had actively sent feedback to others as well but look at their feedback sent. Most of them only had one feedback sent and that's to Dabs. This of course doesn't make sense. Dabs as a DT1 member, should know what he is doing. |
|
|
|
This is a discussion topic, not an accusation to Dabs. I was reading the thread by nullius and checked the profile of Dabs. It shows 5 DT positive feedback according to my trust list but later on when I tried with ;dt, I found it 40 positive feedback. That's why I was checking who were they. No personal issue but I found some DT feedback which was left by people who were only trusted by Dabs. Here is the detail of some DT members who left feedback to Dabs. 1. Voxterra- 1 feedback left Voxterra's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 2. BitBot.V2- 1 feedback left BitBot.V2's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 3. ma7555- 2 feedback left ma7555's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 4. Frank Lefty Rosenthal- 5 feedback left Frank Lefty Rosenthal's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 5. bittrojan- 2 feedback left bittrojan's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 6. nihilnegativum- 5 feedback left nihilnegativum's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 7. ZypheronBits- 2 feedback left ZypheronBits's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 8. nagysifa- 1 feedback left nagysifa's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 9. guncoin_support- 1 feedback left guncoin_support's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 10. mavrick951- 4 feedback left mavrick951's judgement is Trusted by:1. Dabs ( Trust: +9 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (3) 888 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) And continues. Please keep in mind that according to the feedback sent/received, all of them have traded with Dabs as we know Dabs has/had escrow service on the forum. Also, note that Dabs have this list from long ago. It's not something like he has recently added them. I can see most of them from 25th January 2019 from Loyce.club- https://loyce.club/trust/2019-01-25_Fri_22.33h/54791.htmlMost of these people are old members of the forum. Dabs has included most of the members in their trust list who left him positive feedback. Do you think this is an abuse to increase the trust score? |
|
|
|
|
Asiska02
Paul Pogba
elisabetheva
Lousie9
91254vvpatel
poonam8288
aylabadia05
Mehedi72
Orange89
JahriMeayer
indah rezqi
LastKiss
Nazmul012
||bit
mzuhry19
Joymarsha
Jocuserious
AnonBitCoiner
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
