|
Didn't you have a chat with cablepair about this? Did any plans arise?
|
|
|
|
Can you please email details to support(at)flexcoin.com and we'll look at the issue asap.
~James
Thanks but I can't access the support page I don't know if it is a problem with my DNS (which has happened before) but I can access Flexcoin and my account OK. |
|
|
|
I emailed a friend some BTC using Flexcoin. All it did is send them an email to there account saying the had received the funds that's all. So I told the person to sign up to Flexcoin using the email address I sent the BTC to and it says email already registered. How do she get the funds  |
|
|
|
So what is this magic machine you're using ? Any pictures ?
The new FPGA company should have gone public before I receive the first board. |
|
|
|
another question, how often is the bot supposed to buy/sell stuff? it's been running for 2 days and it didn't do a single trade yet, even though the EMAs were perfect and it had a few really good opportunities
When the threshold changes beyond the inverse 0.25%. So if your in dark green you need it to go to over red 0.25% if your in dark red you need it to go to over green 0.25%. |
|
|
|
What we need is a darknet p2p based exchange.
That too, but not enough. "Normal" people will probably always view darknet as the tool of hackers/pedophiles/sociopaths/money launderers/whatever. OK just a p2p exchange but if I had it my way the blockchain would be within the darknet too. |
|
|
|
|
What we need is a darknet p2p based exchange.
|
|
|
|
Board #1 is shipping today I will have the tracking number very soon it should take three to five days shipping. Board #2 should ship in about a weeks time and board #3 as soon as we have sold enough shares.
I have the tracking number so the first weekly dividend should be paid no later than by May 5th. Thank you all very much. The first weekly dividend that should be paid before May 5th I estimate to be at least 0.00171BTC per share then the weekly dividend should roughly double about one week later with the arrival of board #2 to 0.003421BTC per share then rise to 0.004BTC per share once we have raised enough for board #3. |
|
|
|
Board #1 is shipping today I will have the tracking number very soon it should take three to five days shipping. Board #2 should ship in about a weeks time and board #3 as soon as we have sold enough shares.
I have the tracking number so the first weekly dividend should be paid no later than by May 5th. Thank you all very much. |
|
|
|
|
Board #1 is shipping today I will have the tracking number very soon it should take three to five days shipping. Board #2 should ship in about a weeks time and board #3 as soon as we have sold enough shares.
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer -
2. Who wants to be a Bitcoinaire
|
|
|
|
I've just finished writing some optimized assembly code for the ARM11. Here are the results for scrypt on my iPhone-3G, running at 412 MHz: | C implementation* (cpuminer 2.2): | 103 h/s | | New hand-optimized assembly: | 160 h/s |
Of course a 55% speedup is not bad at all, but still if we assume that hash rate scales linearly with CPU clock speed, we can only expect the Raspberry Pi to do about 270 h/s. I still have to do some testing to make sure that the code behaves well on more recent ARM processors like the Cortex-A8, but I'm pretty sure this new code will get included in the next release of cpuminer, which will probably be out in a week or two. * The C implementation was compiled with gcc 4.2.1; I know that's not exactly recent, but it's all I can get on this device. It is possible that more recent versions of gcc produce faster code.Cool but the bounty is still very small maybe we could apply for DevCoin funding to keep it a work in progress? |
|
|
|
|
I have the suppliers promise the board is shipping tomorrow EDT morning. I am taking pre-orders for the board at $1129 and $20 US shipping and $70 (I think) International shipping for 1BTC commission. If you are seriously interested and have the money now then inbox me where I can provide you with more information.
|
|
|
|
I remember this thread from back mid-March, when the BFL was no longer wanted and people thought I was being belligerent for no reason. A well, good times.
BFL have only just started shipping January's orders and it was nearly March when I first made the order for one. |
|
|
|
matthewh3, would you be interested in getting 2 BTC from me and paying 1 of these 2 BTC as dividend to shareholders on a date + time specified by me?   |
|
|
|
If thats the case then why are there no distributed stock markets and why do all existing stock markets aim to be fast? Speed is a requirement when you want to buy or sell something before someone else. Stock traders aim to be fast. Stock Brokers aim to be fast. Stock Exchanges aim to be fast. You need to be more precise in your thinking about what services a stock exchange versus the clearinghouse. Well according to your link three days for stock brokers to buy your shares. On the GLBSE milliseconds after placing your order. I understand having a Tor and a I2P site might slow things down a microsecond but I think the exchange will gain extra business? |
|
|
|
Wouldn't it be "smarter" to have a bitcoin style sharechain, only the transactions are share movements + bits etc.?
It might even be doable via Bitcoin itself, using the output of "blessed" transactions as shares, recognized by a special client.
Then we're getting into distributed blockchain based stockmarkets, and I believe that there is already a thread on this, the major problem being speed, markets need to be able to process transactions quickly which requires centralisation (or very VERY fast replication). Speed is not a requirement. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%2B3A distributed system would be vastly superior to the "real" stock market. Isn't that link to do with "stock brokers" and not really "stock exchanges"? |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. Also the US gov (some parts of it anyway) also have good reason to be able to do things without being seen, it's why the CIA or some other agency is quite happy about Bitcoin. I'm anarcho-socialist so not a big fan of the US or any government really both the UK and US governments are bordering fascist regimes these days both the big parties who can only win the elections are basically the same fighting for the rights of banks ect above the average person needs. Sorry off-topic again  Please don't all attack me back now for mentioning I'm a anarchist which I have to put socialist after to explain my stand point. I'm a big-fan of bitcoin please all leave it at that  Hey, that is pretty interesting. You're a socialist, yet you support GLBSE, which is a stock market?  Yep no one else was going to give me money. Stay on topic. Also if you can't beat them join them. I'm more of a realist then socialist capitalism can't continue like this there needs to be a redistribution of wealth. Sorry for going off topic please start another thread in the "politics" section. I will read it but can't promise I'll post because I feel like I'm pissing in the wind trying to fight the mass media which teaches and reassures you all that it's healthy for the power in society (money=debt) should be held in the hands of a minority and also that under our watch that transfer should accelerate! |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. Also the US gov (some parts of it anyway) also have good reason to be able to do things without being seen, it's why the CIA or some other agency is quite happy about Bitcoin. I'm anarcho-socialist so not a big fan of the US or any government really both the UK and US governments are bordering fascist regimes these days both the big parties who can only win the elections are basically the same fighting for the rights of banks ect above the average person needs. Sorry off-topic again Please don't all attack me back now for mentioning I'm a anarchist which I have to put socialist after to explain my stand point. I'm a big-fan of bitcoin please all leave it at that Hey, that is pretty interesting. You're a socialist, yet you support GLBSE, which is a stock market? Yep no one else was going to give me money. Stay on topic. |
|
|
|
It never worked for me either but it's not in the app store anymore? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
