Not sure what you're after but it's not likely a problem on the pool side.
What address did you mine with and what did the stats page say on zpool? I may have found the solution. I think the miner app I was using has a password length bug. I removed a few lower paying coins, and it now only leaves one launched. I noticed because the algos that were staying connected were at the end of my algo list in the password. The status page was showing my password field, well, as much as it could, and I thought it was seeing it all; but i guess the password just gets truncated, so the server never refused connections that it didn't think were coming in from that particular miner. =) Now I dont know if its a pool-side thing or a miner-side thing =) Probably on my end... |
|
|
|
|
First post edited again.
I tested it before posting it using coinig.com
I know it includes a return char; but it verified when I copied/pasted myself.
Maybe the original post should be updated with formatting preferences; I didnt want to read through 100's of results... lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry; I figured id just sign it if the need arises in the future =) Post edited with signed message.
Its also registered as my username on blockchain.info.
|
|
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP
Good idea to protect accounts.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP
H22Vb6p+3O4RzRJZOLZOHqROYKcPdzeu4RrKDAN+bTRZ/Ijvp56a0bIgQVkPEQ0tJ9EtV3TBivEIlcLrFE50M2M=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
|
@crackfoo I made a modification to my batch to launch all my miners at once. Once all processes are dead, it will launch em all again. This should theoretically work because stratum should only accept a connection on one of the algos ports correct? Well; I am actually getting 3 algos to respond on stratum at the same time. they all have the same password string. I have inserted my batch below for you to see how it does it; but it basically launches all apps then continually checks to see if process names are open, once all launched processes have been killed (stratum disconnect and app close) it loops back to launching them all again. With all these algos, it can take a bit of time to loop through them all to get to the algo the pool wants me on... but; for some reason, when they are launched in this manner; 3 of them get continuing stratum signals. Any thoughts? @echo off
SETLOCAL EnableExtensions
:start
cls
start ccminer50.exe -r 0 -a x13 -i 17.5 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3633 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer_.exe -r 0 -a x11 -i 17.5 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3533 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 17.2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4733 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x15 -i 17.5 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3733 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 17.2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer-DCD.exe -r 0 -a decred -i 22 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:5744 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a blakecoin -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:5743 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a c11 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3573 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 17.5 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminerB2S64.exe -r 0 -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:5766 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x14 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3933 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x17 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3737 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
start ccminer.exe -r 0 -a skein -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4933 -u 1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP -p p690gtx980-
1,c=BTC,x11=8.2,x13=6.8,qubit=12.5,x15=5.6,lyra2v2=9.6,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,quark=11.5,blake2s=1.2,x14=7.0,x17=5.2,skein=293.0,stats
:wait1
set EXE=ccminer.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN1
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait1
:FIN1
:wait2
set EXE=ccminer_.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN2
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait2
:FIN2
:wait3
set EXE=ccminer50.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN3
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait3
:FIN3
:wait4
set EXE=ccminer-DCD.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN4
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait4
:FIN4
:wait5
set EXE=ccminerB2S64.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN5
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait5
:FIN5
goto start |
|
|
|
:wait1
set EXE=ccminer.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN1
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait1
:FIN1
:wait2
set EXE=ccminer_.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN2
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait2
:FIN2
:wait3
set EXE=ccminer50.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN3
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait3
:FIN3
:wait4
set EXE=ccminer-DCD.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN4
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait4
:FIN4
:wait5
set EXE=ccminerB2S64.exe
FOR /F %%x IN ('tasklist /NH /FI "IMAGENAME eq %EXE%"') DO IF %%x == %EXE% goto FOUND
goto FIN5
:FOUND
echo %EXE% still running.
goto wait5
:FIN5
goto start |
|
|
|
|
So I am working on an upgrade idea for my GPU miner's batch file.
There has to be a way to check if an app is running through the terminal window and use it with logic in a batch file.
such as:
:beginfile
start ccminer.exe --options
:memoryloop
<check for ccminer.exe in memory>
true, wait x time and goto memoryloop
false, goto beginfile
Any ideas guys? Probably going to have to define a variable for the true/false?
I never learned the advanced windows-connected DOS commands...
|
|
|
|
|
Sucks that that's one of the unfortunate realities that can happen when you first set up....
I always highly recommend BTC as payout just to avoid all this account-type mess that happens when people don't fully read the mainpage, or like you mistakenly put in a username =(
|
|
|
|
x11=8.2,x13=6.8,x14=7.0,x15=5.6,x17=5.2,lyra2v2=9.6,neoscrypt=0.5,decred=1.7,blakecoin=1.4,c11=8.8,myr-gr=44,quark=11.5,groestl=24.5,blake2s=1.2,skein=293.0,qubit=12.5
These are they, scaled appropriately to the hashrate on my gtx980. Did you do the same for yourself? The pool should be multiplying profitability average by your normalization value in the password field... |
|
|
|
For those using ccminer from tpruvot I can now collect GPU statistics and display them on zpool. This is an opt-in collections so to include your GPU stats, simply add stats to your password field: c=BTC,stats,d=2,etc.... Once more people do this, miners will have an idea what cards can do. http://www.zpool.ca/benchCheers Can you have it be: Stats,c=BTC,d=.... This is the format I have been using because that way machine/device identifier shows up first. I label my devices as such: device name-device# I.e. P690gtx980-1. Which is my p690 with a gtx 980 and its #1. |
|
|
|
|
Heres a trickky question:
Is M7M considered a SHa256 algo? >)
|
|
|
|
that doesn't explain, it's always lower because larger amounts of hashrates can come in during the same period.... a spike in high hashrate is a typical explanation. |
|
|
|
Neoscrypt Blake2s and X17 i see them the most presently.... When machine #3 was on in sf, it would see reject rates regularly on X11; it was a GTX650 just on the x11 port. You can see the wild differences in my coin payouts on my wallet page: http://zpool.ca/?address=1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP Hashrate says to me that something is goin awry. Apparently the hashrates are good enough on my GTX980 that its been keeping me on X17 mostly, so im not hitting X15 and X13 as much as I used to before it was added. presently testing the new algo for a block or two. see how it fairs =) FWIW: I pulled myr-gr and groestl from my batch file because my machine would get stuck on them and the profitability chart showed me they weren't earning like the others. |
|
|
|
|
crackfoo, any idea why the reject rate is getting so high recently? I have even defaulting to letting stratum decide my diff itself; and it still hasn't helped.
Lots of times its 33-70%; and I see it in my profitability on each coin generated. My system is steady going, but the pool is giving rewards all over the place.
|
|
|
|
From my limited understanding of mining, with a pool you are all working together to split the rewards,
with solo mining, you are basically playing the lottery so that you have a very small chance of a large payout?
(And this is a bit of both- CK pool is doing some of the backend work so you dont have to download a whole block chain?)
correct. a pool is normally pooling hashpower to share the rewards; and a solo pool is for people whom can't have the bandwidth or hardware to run a wallet daemon to mine to that (your own pool basically). I love CK solo because I am on a cellular or a satellite link which has bandwidth and restrictions on data amounts; so not running the wallet at home is mandatory. I make use of every caveat that the solo pool provides because that's the situation i'm in =) |
|
|
|
If there is not enough to pay everyone their full balances, it will try paying 1/2. It just trys to keep paying out and rather than wait untill the pool has enough to pay in full, and risk creating tx that are too large, it will try 1/2.
oh, thx a lot Jared guy was close to write a novel  Yeah, I tend to write as much as possible to avoid confusion. and Im glad it was conveyed properly; in my initial reply I thought I was mistaken on what you were saying but it looks like i was......... half right... lol pun intended. |
|
|
|
Up and running. Out of the box, factory settings (700) my temps are 57,59,60 fan is 5640 rpm. 4689.35 gh/s It has been running for 30 minutes, and have had 14 hw errors (.0007). Pool difficulty just went to 32.8 K from 16.4 K. I don't know what difficulty is good setting to run at pool side, but i'll jump around over the weekend and find which one it is happiest?
I set this one fan S7 just like my S5 with a small box fan blowing air directly at the front of miner about a foot away. The miner is running in a closed off garage, but open to the main house. Out side temp is 77 F with an ambient temp of 87 F in the garage. House is 78 F ambient and fan is blowing the cooler air at front of S7.
I don't have a meter to measure db, but it sounds at least as loud as my S5. I will look into flexible ducting to sound proof.
if you can get a kill-a-watt meter on the miner, it would be nice to compare wattage draw to the two fan models. I doubt much difference, but worth a look. |
|
|
|
I explained it in my reply so I'll repeat:
The pool mines coins. Any it pays out must be generated by the pool unless it's BTC which is the exchange payout.
So it's a pool thing. It clearly describes it in the big paragraphs on left at main page.
sry pal, why do you bother to tell me a-b-c's ? do you know anything about halving balance payouts (check the graph link) ? NET was in short supply, then mined enough, then it started to pay, but not in random chunks or all of the debt at once - halving the balance The balance drops when you get a payout. the large sawtooth green is the amount to be paid, and the upper line is the total balance including unsold/confirmed credits. When the green section gets paid out; all thats left is the immature balance. So thus; the leftover. which is the same amount as when the payment was made. I don't see a problem; just a misunderstanding. You didn't show a photo pf your payment history so I wont comment further than that. If you paste your account address here; when the site is up ill look at the wallet page and see if the graph your posted correlated to a payment on your account in size and time. (which I believe I will find) Site is down for me as well. All miners up and running as far as I can tell. Can someone tweet to crackfoo about it? He gets those a lot quicker I think. |
|
|
|
|
I explained it in my reply so I'll repeat:
The pool mines coins. Any it pays out must be generated by the pool unless it's BTC which is the exchange payout.
So it's a pool thing. It clearly describes it in the big paragraphs on left at main page.
|
|
|
|
hmm, funny payouts pattern. pool pays me small NET debt each time half the balancewhy so ? This has been answered several times on this forum and is on the main page. Please re-read carefully. If we dont have enough of a coin mined to pay fully; then delayed payments happen. this is why BTC is recommended. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
