Now after America was going to sell oil interests with Saudi Arabia disperse. America can reduce oil prices on the world market. It is quite possible that they will be competitors. This is an economic war.
No matter how much crude oil the American frackers can produce out of the shale formations, the US will remain a net importer of crude oil in the long term. And that means that at last in the crude oil sector, there will be no competition between the US and the KSA. |
|
|
|
I dont hate muslim, if someone or a group make a mistake so you can not judge their religion we should judge people who make a mistake. Few muslim doing bad action, but we should know many muslim doing good action. It also happen in other religion, as we see budhist doing bad action to muslims in rohingya, but we know there are many budhist doing good everywhere
The Rohingya issue in Myanmar is very complex. The Buddhist (Rakhinese) reprisals against them were triggered by terrorist acts committed by the Rohingyas in the state of Rakhine. During the last 3-4 years, hundreds of Rakhinese girls have been raped by the Rohingya, and dozens of ethnic Rakhinese civilians were killed. Across the border in Bangladesh, the ethnic Rakhinese are undergoing a genocide in the Islamist-occupied Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) region. Every day ethnic Rakhinese (known as Marma in CHT) and Chakma girls are getting raped by the Bengalis and their lands are being invaded. Stop the genocide of Buddhists in CHT, and then you can expect the situation of the Rohingyas to improve in Burma. Else, there is only one solution. A total population transfer. Ethnic Rohingya from the state of Rakhine can move to CHT, and the non-Muslim groups such as the Buddhists (Chakma, Marma, Chak.etc) and Hindus (Tripuras, Reangs, Pankho, Mro, Murung, Bawm, Khyang, Khumi.etc) can move to the state of Rakhine. |
|
|
|
And I know several people who profess Islam and they are normal people and even much better than Hasidim.
I am not a big fan of the Hasidic / Haredi community. And it is true that normal people are endlessly harassed in the Haredi-majority areas. But outside their communities, the Haredis create no issues. And they never engage in terrorism against the civilians. |
|
|
|
I believe that she can and I believe that she will, UNLESS the elections are totally rigged and the elites take action to stop her. Which they very well might, they are simply losing too much control with the recent successful Trump campaign and BREXIT. They may take very serious actions to stop her.
Marine Le Pen as part of his platform had declared that when she wins the election she will create a local currency separate to pounds. This statement is just like saying that France is going to join the brexit and the Europian Union will make a way sto stop her winning in the election so that no more countries will leave the union anymore. The union knew that they will suffer a big deal if another country will going to exit the union. Perhaps she should bring back the Franc and replace the Euro. Aside from the initial hiccups, it will be beneficial for the French economy in the long term. Also, the French central bank will be having better control over their national currency. I don't think the French have something to gain from what comes out of the Eurozone and especially do not believe that the return of Frank revive the economy of France. They are not gaining anything by continuing to use the Euro. Just check how much value the currency has lost versus the United States Dollar, during the last two or three years. I have a feeling that the Franc won't do much worse. When the Euro appeared, he also rapidly gained its price. This led to the fact that to buy goods in America became more profitable. Who knows, maybe a cheap Euro is good for Europe. The devaluation of the Euro is a double edged sword. For sure it can make the exports from the European Union more competitive. But at the same time, the inflation will go up, and the bank savings will be worth less. |
|
|
|
The son of boxer Muhammad Ali was detained with his mother because they were religious Muslims. I also saw the news that airport officials ask whether he was a Muslim or not and have the name from the Arabic language. He and his mother flew with the airline JetBlue Airways to Florida will be allowed entry plane after talking with the Ministry of Homeland Security by phone and show a driver's license and passport in the name himself. Policies to ban the muslim entry to American territory should be to be studied again, it's too complicated to me.
Exactly. This is the second time that Muhammad Ali Jr was detained. This is crystal clear that this is directly linked to the President 's order to ban Muslim for entering United States. But Ali Jr is an American citizen. Of course, he wouldn't deny that he is a Muslim but he is also an American. I know that the executive order in binding but this could be a subject for legal review. This order's preferential treatment of Christians over Muslims violates the first amendment on freedom of religion IMHO. Exactly! I agree with you. Ali Jr. is an American citizen, but he detained because having a name in Arabic. He was detained in the country where he lived and it was very unreasonable. America as the largest democracy is not supposed to do that, it would eliminate democracy in America on religious freedom. This policy must be changed because it is not perfect if run. I am sure that Mr. Mohammed Ali Jr might have traveled hundreds of times by air. He never had any issues, with the exception of these two isolated incidents. Every year, tens of thousands of people are detained at the American airports. But none of them make such hue and cry. |
|
|
|
Ukraine and Russia are two Slavic friendly people, they can not fight each other. All claims are simply meaningless.
Open your eyes and look. Russia only pretends to be a friendly state. In fact, this aggressive Imperial state which considers a neighboring state as a target for expansion of their territories. In the Donbass now there is a real war of Russia against Ukraine. Crimea is Ukrainian territory occupied by Russian. Since when did Crimea became Ukrainian territory? In 1954, right? Two hundred years before that, the territory was under the rule of Crimean Muslims, who used the ports of Crimea to ship Russian and Ukrainian slaves to the Ottoman Empire. The slave trade came to an end when the Russian Empire annexed Crimea in 1783. Good point, Sithara. Ukrainians have this national legend, that it was communists who destroyed the country, yet it was precisely evil Soviets, which formed country in its pre-2013 borders. Crimea was never part of any local state, sans slavetrading Tatar muslim Khanate. Yes. Ukraine was an artificial country created by the Soviets to split the majority Slavic population. And the Muslim rule of Crimea lasted only 300 years (from 15th cen. to 1783). Before that, it was inhabited by ethnic Slavs for thousands of years. |
|
|
|
Killing of Givi probably was ordered by Moscow. And he is not first important separatist who was killed - Alexey Bednov, Yevgeny Ishchenko-Malysh, Roman Voznik-Cygan, Alexey Mozgovoy and some more was killed already. I wouldn't surprised if soon Zaharchenko and Plotnicky will be killed. I think Russia want to replace these leaders due to bad reputation of them.
The mystery behind their death is still unknown. Though there are many rumors spreading across the saying they were killed by the terrorists but this idea as kinda absurd and possibly made to cover up something. On the other hand the russian goverment doing the dirty work to dispose of them is also a conspiracy theory that has no clear evidence or whatsoever. Hence their death remains a mystery up to this date. All these men were on the hit list of the Right Sector. The Ukrainian neo-Nazis badly wanted them dead. Both Givi and Motorola were among the most important rebel commanders during the battle of Ilovaisk, which lead to around 2,000 Kiev deaths. |
|
|
|
First attacker will have a major advantage and will most likely be the winner of the coming war.
Why do you think so? You doubt the possibility of retaliation? Although I'm not sure that all the missiles explode and reach the goal. It is not possible to win a war in 2 hours. So the first strike doesn't automatically guarantee you a victory in the nuclear war. Both Russia and the United States are huge countries and it is not possible to destroy all of their nuclear weapons in one go. |
|
|
|
S400 is by its designation not meant to by the ultimate weapon, rather it is a tool that will prevent enemy air strikes to destroy infrastructure. And given all the attention of media and "experts", Id say it works.
The primary aim of the S-400 is to protect the strategic defense assets of the Russian Armed Forces (especially the nuclear-tipped ICBMs). From what I have heard from Western defense experts, the S-400 makes it almost impossible to target these assets. |
|
|
|
How can anyone claim that US election get hacked? Did Trump really won by hacking? Isn't that was a fair election? If it really get hacked now what steps US will take place for it? Do they again have election or Trump will be the next President?
I remember that in case, where Democrats/Greens forced recount, "surprisingly" Trump thereafter won by even larger margin. Nobody can guarantee this wouldnt be the case in national recount. So I highly suspect, that this part of smear campaign aimed at new administration by old power elites. If you remember, the recount in Michigan was hastily halted by a judge who is on the Democrat payroll. The reason was that during the recount, evidence of massive amounts of voter fraud favoring Hillary Clinton was uncovered from the city of Detroit. |
|
|
|
To a claim against the anti-immigrant decree of the President of Trump except Hawaii joined the States of Washington, new York, Oregon and Massachusetts. The new Ordinance may not take effect.
You are ill-informed about the American legal system. A few states can't block an ordinance. Doing so requires a majority in the house or in the senate (which the Democrats doesn't have). Else, the ordinance can be suspended by the courts, but that is not going to happen this time. Why do you think so? Any law which provokes racial or religious hatred may be suspended in court. I think it will be this time. Discrimination on religious grounds 100% against the Constitution of America or any other democratic state. How can you claim that the travel ban is a form of racial and religious hatred? If he was banning every Muslim from a particular country, then you could have said that. But the travel ban is applicable to every single citizen from these nations. |
|
|
|
He may be. Because of his acts that is very far from the previous us Presidents. However it is not to be considered as for good or for worse who knows
He will act different from establishment politicians such as Obama and GW Bush, as he is not a career politician. The difference between him and others is that people like Hillary Clinton and Obama became rich after they entered politics. On the other hand, Trump was a billionaire even before he entered politics. First he made his money not construction. Start-up capital borrowed from his dad. So anyone can do it! And secondly, he will have to answer for the slander about wiretapping. Obama just will not allow it. He got around $30 million from his dad, and now his current wealth is around 125 times that amount. It is not very easy to multiply your wealth by 125 times, no matter how shrewd you are. |
|
|
|
The whole idea of racism is stupid. It is designed by Government to take freedom from people.  The problem with racism is that allegations of racism can only be pointed against white males. It can never be alleged against Africans, Muslims, LGBTs, Japanese, Koreans.etc despite the fact that many of these people are even more racist than the whites. That's because white people have always been above it and didn't care. Would you feel insulted if someone called you a white? You pale man, you white flour! You christian!  Imagine walking in the street with a sign "I hate whites" - nobody would care. Do the same with "I hate blacks" and you'll get shouted at, maybe assaulted. Now try doing the same thing with a sign "i hate muslims" and you'll be spit at, possibly stabbed and killed. Groups that feel most insecure will react most violently. I think you are affirming position of poster before you. White people have been victims of hate crimes at increasing rate "because they are above it", so it doesnt count in media  Yet, certain minorities reaffirm violent stereotypes with their own insecure, psychotic behavior towards all outsiders. Indeed, this has been supported by double standarts of media and government. Nobody else is to be blamed for it. I don't think that this scenario can continue like this in the long term. There can be two outcomes. Either the white majority will accept its fate, and exterminate itself through race miscegenation. Another outcome may be a violent resistance by the whites against the ongoing ethnicide. |
|
|
|
These measures, Greece will not avoid default. She just postponed it. The less ownership is a Greece the less income and the country closer to default. You'll see a Greek default will be, it's a matter of time.
If a nation is seen vulnerable to default, then usually the creditors and the debtor initiate talks, and in a normal scenario a part of the loan is waived off in exchange for guaranteed payments to the remaining part. |
|
|
|
Recently there was a case when in Ukraine, Russian troops shot down a civilian Boeing.
I heard that it was the Ukrainian troops who shot down the Boeing, using the Buk anti-air missile. Didn't came as a surprise, as the Kiev regime has already killed many thousands of civilians in the Donbass using indiscriminate shelling. Almost the same thing happened in Chechnya. True, there planes did not fall. Chechen war was probably the bloodiest war ever fought during the last 3 decades. Both the sides used horrendous methods for their own advantage, including massacre of civilians, rape and torture. A majority of those who died were white Christians (ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, Armenians.etc), but the Western nations were overwhelmingly favoring the Chechen Islamists. |
|
|
|
About 2500-3000 deaths per month, last 15 years.
Check the number of deaths produced by adding sugar in Your food. Deaths from sugar can be avoided if you reduce the consumption of that substance. But what about the deaths from terrorism? Also, deaths from diabetes are rare nowadays, due to effective medical treatment. But there is no treatment for terrorism. Eating sugar has nothing to do with the emergence of diabetes. It is a myth. Another thing is that if you already have diabetes you can't eat sugar. Muslim terrorism is already there and it cannot be repaired. You can only limit the access of Muslims to the areas of normal States. Limiting the number of Muslim immigrants is the best solution, but anyone propagating it will be quickly branded as Nazis and xenophobes by the radical left. Western nations need educated and civilized immigrants, and not uneducated Muslims from the Middle east. |
|
|
|
Trump just put forward his executive action on the Travel Ban, and as we all know the first one faced legal blockade from the 9th circuit of Appeals.
....he went forward and changed a couple things on the executive action and put a new one in order....
An efficient way to get the job done don't you think? He missed Saudi Arabia. That country's religious ideology is the root cause of all the ISIS like behaviours. From where I stand, he is not doing his job. If the objective is to fight terrorism, he should start with Saudi Arabia. That is where the terrorist ideas and money originates. Targeting Saudi Arabia will be a strategic mistake. Considering the amount of investments done by the Saudis in the US, antagonizing them will be suicidal, both economically and politically. |
|
|
|
Hey, No Trump is so rich he can buy all votes on election  Sure about that? As per the official figures, Trump's campaign spending was much lower than that by Hillary. Oligarchs and billionaires (such as Soros and Al-Waleed bin Talal) were pouring huge amounts of funds to Hillary's campaign. |
|
|
|
I do not mind refugees. I would not let them under any circumstances. They made their country the war may defend it. Another thing that can help them in the confrontation with the enemy, but this is different. How can you flee the country?
Religious minorities in Syria, such as the Yazidis and the Assyrians have legitimate reasons to flee the country. But the immigrants to the US/EU are overwhelmingly Muslim (around 99.8%), and their proportion is even greater than their percentage in the Syrian population (88%). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
