|
I've compiled Bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt AND PPCoind directly under Windows and MinGW.
|
|
|
|
For sure we need more of these for Bitcoins  |
|
|
|
OP, seriously, you can be the perfect PR for yacoin because of your avatar is the whole image for yacoin.  I see the resemblance! |
|
|
|
nope, because all those other crapcoins hold the 'value' of LTC down. except for other settings these coins are just copycats. maybe except YAC.
And why would YAC be special? |
|
|
|
But it's still probably just an estimate.
My understanding is that it may overshoot or undershoot between blocks (because it doesn't know the exact number, only the average) but the average over all these years should be very close to the real number. And what percent is that number, from all the possible 2^256 SHA256 hashes? |
|
|
|
Can you explain how this is being calculated?
You can get the hash count every time there's a SetBestChain in debug.log. Then you log2 that number. But it's still probably just an estimate. |
|
|
|
What do you mean by "source wallet address"?
inb4 there is no "received from" concept. |
|
|
|
So, how do I calculate based on my balance and age of coins, what my PoS stake reward will be, what difficulty the block will be(and time to solve it)?
Self-bump. Additional note, it's been waay over 31 days since my last transactions, but my coins are not stake yet. |
|
|
|
But there's already a Windows one of which this one was BASED on
Exactly! In fact, I've borrowed the main loop from VanityGen by samr7, and glued the code to Android via JNI, I've also borrowed from BitcoinJ, but most of the Java code is mine. It isn't explicitly mentioned, but I am not much of a copyright person, anyway, it's open source so... I hadnt seen a ltc one just btc. The program has had LTC support for some time now. Just look at the screenshot on the first page what it says https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101612.0 |
|
|
|
But there's already a Windows one of which this one was BASED on
Exactly! In fact, I've borrowed the main loop from VanityGen by samr7, and glued the code to Android via JNI, I've also borrowed from BitcoinJ, but most of the Java code is mine. It isn't explicitly mentioned, but I am not much of a copyright person, anyway, it's open source so... |
|
|
|
My wallet isn't locked too.. is there any way I can get my bitcoins back?
Never, not a single chance. |
|
|
|
Link to sources work, plus, always better to build from source. As for updates, well I was pretty clear that there was no interest in the project so I have not worked on it at all.
If you were to add a windows gui for it with all the different coins then I would kick in 1 btc. I want a faster way to get a ltc vanity address. Erm, this is for Android, so I am not sure how a Windows(Microsoft?) GUI would help here. |
|
|
|
|
Please refer to the website as blockchain.INFO, as it is a website which is ONLY a Bitcoin-related Service, and has nothing to do with the actual Bitcoin blockchain.
|
|
|
|
|
Link to sources work, plus, always better to build from source. As for updates, well I was pretty clear that there was no interest in the project so I have not worked on it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
So, how do I calculate based on my balance and age of coins, what my PoS stake reward will be, what difficulty the block will be(and time to solve it)?
|
|
|
|
|
April 25 Overclock.net, a user called reflex99 posted a thread about earning money with your GPUs and two days later I had 4 bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
No. You control what you find. But at least you vote with your share of the hash power. If you are using another pool, the pool operator uses your hashpower and votes without asking you.
Then p2pool fixes nothing. |
|
|
|
|
Will that let me control what TXs go in the block? Even when I didn't find it?
|
|
|
|
Small transactions are not blocked. They will be discouraged by default, and now configurable by the individual miners. But this is not even close to the kind of change that people have led themselves to believe it is. This doesn't cause forks, and does not make any un-revertable change. It simply adds a knob to the miner's software, preset to a a sane level to discourage creating coins that cost more to move than they're worth. If people don't like the change, they can turn the knob back to the way it is right now.
Simply put, the default "knob setting" is to reduce propagation of transactions that are dust. If you send out outputs that actually cost external coins to spend (which was determined to be approximately 54 uBTC), then nodes won't propagate it, and miners won't include it unless they have used their new configuration option to allow it. Undoubtedly, if there's a lot of demand for these types of transactions to continue, many m
iners will choose to accept them, and many nodes will choose to relay them. This means that your dust transactions won't get full hashing power, and might take a couple dozen blocks to make it into the network. They are still valid, acceptable transactions, but may be difficult to send, and take a while to be accepted -- which actually seems like a good balanced level of discouragement.
If conditions change in the future such that 54 uBTC is a lot of money, miners will dial down that knob, and the developers will make the next release with a new default setting to accommodate the reality of that month.
I'm a miner but I can't do shit about anything. Oh wait, you mean pools, so we essentially let 10 people(read pool ops) control us? |
|
|
|
|
I also have a question! How does one take advantage of arbitrage between Gox and Stamp?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
