No point it would just get jumped on by all the gun loving yanks they think neo-liberal Obama is socialist!
(Since you asked) gun toting, bible thumping yanks are much closer to the real deal of anarchy than euro-pinkos "anarco-socialists" (which can mean only "anarco-statists" -lol). Yanks rightfully mean "statist" for socialists/nazi/socialists/commies/fascists/trots/what have you; They are all the same for them, and they are dead on right. I told you so kokjo Fox news and the rest of the right-wing media have done well. Anyway serfs are always compliant when their obese and have plenty of beer tokens. Viva capitalism the gap between the 1% and the average person is not just growing but accelerating does that even matter? End of off topic if you want to start another thread in the "politics" sections inbox it me and I will read it. I wasn't bashing americans in general BTW I'm very fond of the country and people aside from politics. Anyway you yanks are just rebel colonists who can't make decent cheeses  |
|
|
|
Thread politics hijacking aside I2p is hugely popular in Germany, convert the site to German and make a mirror into an eepsite would get a lot of extra biz.
Tor would probably be too slow for GLBSE.. make your transaction and something times out.. NOOOooo somebody else buys it before you.
I agree it may bring more traffic to the exchange if people can access it as a darknet site plus there always know it will stay online if attacked by hackers or governments. If people know they can trade and invest on the GLBSE in full anonymity then it might make people more inclined to invest/trade especially if governments start getting bitcoin hostile or they just want to hide there going's on ect. |
|
|
|
Added a pic  |
|
|
|
Hand made |
|
|
|
Wouldn't it be "smarter" to have a bitcoin style sharechain, only the transactions are share movements + bits etc.?
It might even be doable via Bitcoin itself, using the output of "blessed" transactions as shares, recognized by a special client.
this is also available: namecoin btw: what about a glbse .bit domain? I think neferio has been looking for the owner of the domain (think someone has already parked it). |
|
|
|
Anarchy is very socialist so we shouldn't have to put socialist with the anarchy word but with these abominations popping up calling them self anarcho-capitalists its needed.
it depends on the way you describe anarchy. anarcho-capitalists, might describe anarchy as: "i have the right to kick you in the balls, if i can do it" while anarcho-socialist, might describe it as: "sure i have the right to kick your balls, but why not be nice to eachother instead?" If you look at early anarchists and all anarchists until modern times they all had very socialist like views on the redistribution of wealth and stuff. like the ones in spain? now im on a topic that i have only a little knowledge about. btw. we are off topic, should we start a thread? No point it would just get jumped on by all the gun loving yanks they think neo-liberal Obama is socialist! Free education and healthcare is not really socialism just looking after the workers so they can produce more. Also the biggest con of the last century was the painting of the USSR as socialism  America had a lot of socialists before the McCarthy era. |
|
|
|
|
Android LTC app? Where's it gone from the Android market?
|
|
|
|
Anarchy is very socialist so we shouldn't have to put socialist with the anarchy word but with these abominations popping up calling them self anarcho-capitalists its needed.
it depends on the way you describe anarchy. anarcho-capitalists, might describe anarchy as: "i have the right to kick you in the balls, if i can do it" while anarcho-socialist, might describe it as: "sure i have the right to kick your balls, but why not be nice to eachother instead?" If you look at early anarchists and all anarchists until modern times they all had very socialist like views on the redistribution of wealth and stuff. |
|
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me how to install CPU miner for LTC to auto-start with low aggression and auto-update would be nice too for Windows 8.
|
|
|
|
Thats pretty much what I was thinking, but what kind of lag do you think we could expect by running the backend over Tor?
Also I don't see how the frontend would be unsafe, just vulnerable to being shut down taken over.
not much lag i think, you could always cache the big things, like bid/ask. i would rater interact directly with the backend, then using a frontend. the code for a frontend could be open and anyone could setup their own(or use a public one), in a similar way as diaspora does it(except they are totally decentralized). Could you also please run a I2P site too |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. Also the US gov (some parts of it anyway) also have good reason to be able to do things without being seen, it's why the CIA or some other agency is quite happy about Bitcoin. I'm anarcho-socialist so not a big fan of the US or any government really both the UK and US governments are bordering fascist regimes these days both the big parties who can only win the elections are basically the same fighting for the rights of banks ect above the average person needs. Sorry off-topic again Please don't all attack me back now for mentioning I'm a anarchist which I have to put socialist after to explain my stand point. I'm a big-fan of bitcoin please all leave it at that  RAGE!!!!!!!! NATIONAL SOCIALISTIC, NAZI COMMUNIST! DUMB INTERNET TROLL RAGE!!!! (... what was the internet law about the nazies again?)  btw. i would also describe myself as a anarcho-socialist or nihilist. Anarchy is very socialist so we shouldn't have to put socialist with the anarchy word but with these abominations popping up calling them self anarcho-capitalists its needed. |
|
|
|
|
As a forum special FREE delivery in the UK.
|
|
|
|
There hand made |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. Also the US gov (some parts of it anyway) also have good reason to be able to do things without being seen, it's why the CIA or some other agency is quite happy about Bitcoin. I'm anarcho-socialist so not a big fan of the US or any government really both the UK and US governments are bordering fascist regimes these days both the big parties who can only win the elections are basically the same fighting for the rights of banks ect above the average person needs. Sorry off-topic again Please don't all attack me back now for mentioning I'm a anarchist which I have to put socialist after to explain my stand point. I'm a big-fan of bitcoin please all leave it at that |
|
|
|
Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic.
Either they are government agents that lied to you on purpose, or just dumb. I2P is not more secure then Tor(they are about equal) my personal opinion is that tor is most secure, because of simpler and cleaner code(and of course its more used, but that not relevant when we are talking about the underlying systems). staying on topic from now on. Sorry going off-topic again are you a software/network security engineer or just interested. Also putting on my tin-foil-hat Tor started off as a US government darknet and I only believe they let it go public to make their darknet bigger to hide in. So I believe they have full control over it. Taking tinfoil-hat off I2P was made by some opensource german engineers and the germans are generally privacy nuts look at their privacy laws. Plus I messed up my Tor install on Ubuntu messing about with it and can only use the browser version now so yes I am biased |
|
|
|
Who else thinks its a good idea to have a darknet (I2P or FREENET) mirror of the GLBSE?
why not .onion (Tor)? I think I2P and FREENET are more secure but wouldn't hurt to have a mirror on all three? and i think you don't know anything about it... I'm no whitehat hacker but I've studied Software and hardware engineering as a undergraduate. I do honestly believe every Tor exit node could be monitored by "Echelon" I2P doesn't use exit nodes in the same way and if you look at FREENET that is a much more secure darknet than Tor. My two satoshi worth anyway. exit-nodes have nothing to do with the internal .onion. exit-nodes are only used when you are accessing the normal internet, and are therefor not used in the tor darknet. your argument is irrelevant, to the darknet part of tor. Internal traffic from Tor is feed to end users via exit nodes. That's why there is a warning when you set up a exit node that the traffic your relying could be illegal and get you in trouble. There is no such problem with I2P and FREENET while being a lot slower looks the most secure option. you don't read what i write, and your posts shows lack of knowledge, please educate yourself on the inner workings of tor before you continue the discussion. EXIT-NODES ARE NOT USED FOR TOR'S INTERNAL .ONION ROUTING, EXIT-NODES ARE ONLY USED TO ACCESS THE NORMAL INTERNETyou can't access the normal internet from within I2P(without some none-standard vpn application). it was not what it was designed for. I see you point totally with the new GLBSE .onion site being within the darknet the "Exit node" issue I don't like wouldn't even come in to it. Like I said in a previous post I did say you probably new a lot more about Tor than me. Just the couple of experts I spoke to said I2P was a more secure design but currently more vulnerable than Tor to attack due to Tor being a bigger network. Like I said before I was also in favour of a .onion site as well. Sorry for the confusion can we stay on topic. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
