drown in your own self-pity
I will pray you get fatty liver disease so you can walk in my shoes (oh yeah you can't click a link ... how sad). Any way, it is coming cured finally. So now I can deal with you retards the way I have always done in the past before I got ill. I wish that you recover. Praying for someone to get sick? New level of low, but I can understand why you are stuck there. Your arrogance knows no bounds. You attack me alleging/implying that I am trying to generate sympathy (or that I am some weakling who wallows in self-pity). So I said if you walk in my shoes then maybe you would understand that being ill doesn't mean the person wants sympathy. In fact, what I wanted was to get well so I could code. Fuck why do I have to compensate for your very low IQ which causes you to not comprehend simple things. Stop dragging me into your retarded myopia. You have no fucking idea what struggle I went through with my health. It wasn't self-pity asshole. It was a fucking hell that you will not understand until you have the same illness. I fought every damn day in herculean ways that you can't see. But don't worry, I am coming cured thanks to a miracle called oatmeal. I didn't attack you in this thread. You attacked me. I responded rationally. You continue your nonsense myopia and attack me some more. Yet another looping reference. Why are you quoting gmaxwell's post, when I already posted that in my earlier post (and coincidently you also posted about it). I am just sick of you trying to take credit for someone else's work and pooping on progress made elsewhere which doesn't fit your agenda. You have been lying to yourself for so long, you have started believing in your own lies. Dude you have no fucking clue. And I have no desire to teach you how ignorant you are. You are too stupid to understand what is really going on. I refuse to argue with an idiot. I am not claiming any one else's work dumbass[1]. Try to learn how to read. If you think Gregory Maxwell is trying to help you, then you are a dumb sucker who either can't read or can't understand the technical points (or can't click links). I cover such a wide swath of technical information, you are inane to claim that I shouldn't use links to refer to what I have already written. What kind of total idiot would suggest that I should re-type all my posts into every post I make. Fucking retarded. That is enough talk. STFU and I will too. There won't be any need for words on the other side of where this is all headed. | [1] | And don't get so smug about my Zero Knowledge Transactions versus Shen-noether/Gmaxwell's RingCT. I will prove everything I claimed when I am ready. I love to make fools eat their shit. Consider that I might just be waiting for Monero to waste their time implementing a less efficient protocol. I offered to help them if they'd pay me something reasonable, instead they had Shen treat me condescendingly. I do not lose. Watch and learn how I deal with fucktards. You are playing checkers and I am playing 5D chess. |
|
|
|
|
Martin Armstrong's predictions coming true. It really looks like 2017 for serious global economic collapse, except the USA which will grow strong and US dollar will grow stronger:
I wouldnt describe as a collapse until the engine and main momentum of the failure actually comes to a stop. Collapse would seem to suggest an ending to the move and a negative settlement. What we have now is wild swings up and down, the motivator in this being Dollar; global growth being apparent if not stable. If Armstrong says Dollar will just get stronger then we are no longer discussing collapse but speculating on the amplitude of the waves created by USA gov policy both domestic and their monetary effect on world commerce via the reserve currency. When Dollar ends you have your collapse, either its default or a kind of melt down that leaves it no longer able to negatively effect. We have then a final collapse, rebuilding or whatever can occur at that point http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-26/how-the-fed-s-cold-war-with-congress-could-harm-the-u-s-economyI meant the debt collapse of the periphery which includes most countries except the USA begins in earnest in 2017. MA has stated that the collapse of the dollar reserve system will be after 2017, perhaps between 2018 and 2020. The rest of the world will complain that the strong dollar has strangled the global economy (when in fact it was because they had pegged their currencies to dollar and borrowed in dollars thus creating massive structural imbalances and carry trades that have to be unwound and will drive the dollar sky high). |
|
|
|
I replied to Gregory at where he had moved my post to: The container is very efficiently seek-able over the network, in fact. But your implementation must be sufficiently intelligent.
Here are some benchmarks from the opusfile library, On a 25 hour long variable bitrate audio recording performing 1000 jumps to exact sample positions with no caching:
Total seek operations: 1873 (1.873 per exact seek, 4 maximum).
So an average of less than two operations, and in the worst case 4-- meaning even with a 100ms RTT a worse case seek will not cause a noticeable delay. (and obviously, if it cached, it would be much better).
I am not an expert on streaming media and have just begun my research, but it seems to me that your quoted benchmark is assuming many seeks will be done on the stream. But there are cases where the user wants to only skip once or twice into a song as they are sampling the music for the first time, which is my use case. For that case, the lack of an index is afaics horrific because there will be the latency of some roundtrips required to optimally locate the seek position (by a bisection sampling method) and wasted bandwidth as well. There are many complaints about the lack of an index found on Google search. In particular I note the "Random Access" section of a list of complaints about the Ogg container design. And this requires no indexes which require the file be written in multiple passes or that it only be seekable when it's "finished"-- a live stream is seekable while it's being recorded.
You apparently assume your container is only going to be used for live streams. So you are saying Ogg is not designed as an optimal archive format. You could have instead made the index optional. I think the seeking performance, given a good seeking implementation, is pretty good, and it's often more efficient than other less flexible containers even when they have indexes-- because to keep their indexes reasonably sized they're not high resolution-- and getting them requires seeking to the end or a rewrite of the file. To the extent that an average near 2 is less good than 1 might be with a perfect index, that is a cost for the streaming functionality, and I think a reasonable one.
Hey the resolution could be a configurable parameter so programmers can decide the tradeoff that is ideal for their application. Since when should you decide for them. I didn't design the container, but if I did-- I might have only added an additional back-reference or two at each page; I wouldn't change how seeking works.
Seems you are excluding use cases. I am getting the idea now after several times interacting with you, that you are clearly better at math than I am but I am better designer than you. You seem to pigeon-hole often. Perhaps it is the heads-down quality that is required to have the patience to learn all that math? I recognize your intellect and attention to detail, but you seem to also be inflexible which is not the trait of the best software designers I've known in my life. I am guessing that maybe you are strongly German cultured and need everything neatly ordered in your own space. Note I have some German ancestry (and it shows sometimes in my perfectionism at times), but I also am a mix breed of French, Celtic, and Cherokee native. I think this makes me more creative/flexible than you. Not that I often think about comparing ourselves, just at times like this where you disrespect others (and then somehow expect they would respect you  ). Perhaps you were not intending to disrespect me in this case, but I think the past track record (see link above) is what leads to this tension which is ready to blow at any time. Also I holding you to a higher standard w.r.t. to this crap that you seem to be foisting with Segregated Witness, because you hold everyone else to such a higher standard and even threatening them of being scammers without sufficient proof (again see my link above). Perhaps I should realize this is just the German trait and brush it off my shoulder. I think the less we interact the better. Thanks for the reply and I wish your orderly orderness didn't rub me the wrong way. Sorry I am about as compatible with a German as I am with shooting myself in the head. I love freedom which means stop stomping on others. I am a sheepdog which means I will fight those who I perceive are oppressing freedom of expression. Hey I understand what it is like to deal with trolls and in that case I would support the swift action since trolls only aim to disrupt, but I wasn't trolling you. Tim hasn't really had anything to do with Rust-- I had some infinitesimally small influence on the language (lobbied successfully for overflow of ordinary signed types to be defined as an error). Rust has some nice properties for cryptocurrency infrastructure: in particular it has no overhead, deterministic operation, with high levels of safety enforced at compile time. These things matter for decentralized cryptocurrency, since speed is also a security consideration.
I know I read something about Rust and one of your two names mentioned, but I forgot the specifics and couldn't locate it again readily with a Google search (at least not on Tim's name). Okay I could understand the incomplete typing of Rust (as compared to say for example Haskell or Scala) would not be the priority when wanting to get as close as possible to the metal while having some higher level functionality not provided by C. Any way, as I said, the specifics of my former criticisms have been mostly forgotten by myself. I would need to refresh my memory. I think the flaw was w.r.t. to declaring the invariants for class members in the class methods if I am not mistaken (but that is very vague so I might be recollecting incorrectly). |
|
|
|
I replied to Gregory at where he had moved my post to: The container is very efficiently seek-able over the network, in fact. But your implementation must be sufficiently intelligent.
Here are some benchmarks from the opusfile library, On a 25 hour long variable bitrate audio recording performing 1000 jumps to exact sample positions with no caching:
Total seek operations: 1873 (1.873 per exact seek, 4 maximum).
So an average of less than two operations, and in the worst case 4-- meaning even with a 100ms RTT a worse case seek will not cause a noticeable delay. (and obviously, if it cached, it would be much better).
I am not an expert on streaming media and have just begun my research, but it seems to me that your quoted benchmark is assuming many seeks will be done on the stream. But there are cases where the user wants to only skip once or twice into a song as they are sampling the music for the first time, which is my use case. For that case, the lack of an index is afaics horrific because there will be the latency of some roundtrips required to optimally locate the seek position (by a bisection sampling method) and wasted bandwidth as well. There are many complaints about the lack of an index found on Google search. In particular I note the "Random Access" section of a list of complaints about the Ogg container design. And this requires no indexes which require the file be written in multiple passes or that it only be seekable when it's "finished"-- a live stream is seekable while it's being recorded.
You apparently assume your container is only going to be used for live streams. So you are saying Ogg is not designed as an optimal archive format. You could have instead made the index optional. I think the seeking performance, given a good seeking implementation, is pretty good, and it's often more efficient than other less flexible containers even when they have indexes-- because to keep their indexes reasonably sized they're not high resolution-- and getting them requires seeking to the end or a rewrite of the file. To the extent that an average near 2 is less good than 1 might be with a perfect index, that is a cost for the streaming functionality, and I think a reasonable one.
Hey the resolution could be a configurable parameter so programmers can decide the tradeoff that is ideal for their application. Since when should you decide for them. I didn't design the container, but if I did-- I might have only added an additional back-reference or two at each page; I wouldn't change how seeking works.
Seems you are excluding use cases. I am getting the idea now after several times interacting with you, that you are clearly better at math than I am but I am better designer than you. You seem to pigeon-hole often. Perhaps it is the heads-down quality that is required to have the patience to learn all that math? I recognize your intellect and attention to detail, but you seem to also be inflexible which is not the trait of the best software designers I've known in my life. I am guessing that maybe you are strongly German cultured and need everything neatly ordered in your own space. Note I have some German ancestry (and it shows sometimes in my perfectionism at times), but I also am a mix breed of French, Celtic, and Cherokee native. I think this makes me more creative/flexible than you. Not that I often think about comparing ourselves, just at times like this where you disrespect others (and then somehow expect they would respect you ). Perhaps you were not intending to disrespect me in this case, but I think the past track record (see link above) is what leads to this tension which is ready to blow at any time. Also I holding you to a higher standard w.r.t. to this crap that you seem to be foisting with Segregated Witness, because you hold everyone else to such a higher standard and even threatening them of being scammers without sufficient proof (again see my link above). Perhaps I should realize this is just the German trait and brush it off my shoulder. I think the less we interact the better. Thanks for the reply and I wish your orderly orderness didn't rub me the wrong way. Sorry I am about as compatible with a German as I am with shooting myself in the head. I love freedom which means stop stomping on others. I am a sheepdog which means I will fight those who I perceive are oppressing freedom of expression. Hey I understand what it is like to deal with trolls and in that case I would support the swift action since trolls only aim to disrupt, but I wasn't trolling you. Tim hasn't really had anything to do with Rust-- I had some infinitesimally small influence on the language (lobbied successfully for overflow of ordinary signed types to be defined as an error). Rust has some nice properties for cryptocurrency infrastructure: in particular it has no overhead, deterministic operation, with high levels of safety enforced at compile time. These things matter for decentralized cryptocurrency, since speed is also a security consideration.
I know I read something about Rust and one of your two names mentioned, but I forgot the specifics and couldn't locate it again readily with a Google search (at least not on Tim's name). Okay I could understand the incomplete typing of Rust (as compared to say for example Haskell or Scala) would not be the priority when wanting to get as close as possible to the metal while having some higher level functionality not provided by C. Any way, as I said, the specifics of my former criticisms have been mostly forgotten by myself. I would need to refresh my memory. I think the flaw was w.r.t. to declaring the invariants for class members in the class methods if I am not mistaken (but that is very vague so I might be recollecting incorrectly). |
|
|
|
The container is very efficiently seek-able over the network, in fact. But your implementation must be sufficiently intelligent.
Here are some benchmarks from the opusfile library, On a 25 hour long variable bitrate audio recording performing 1000 jumps to exact sample positions with no caching:
Total seek operations: 1873 (1.873 per exact seek, 4 maximum).
So an average of less than two operations, and in the worst case 4-- meaning even with a 100ms RTT a worse case seek will not cause a noticeable delay. (and obviously, if it cached, it would be much better).
I am not an expert on streaming media and have just begun my research, but it seems to me that your quoted benchmark is assuming many seeks will be done on the stream. But there are cases where the user wants to only skip once or twice into a song as they are sampling the music for the first time, which is my use case. For that case, the lack of an index is afaics horrific because there will be the latency of some roundtrips required to optimally locate the seek position (by a bisection sampling method) and wasted bandwidth as well. There are many complaints about the lack of an index found on Google search. In particular I note the "Random Access" section of a list of complaints about the Ogg container design. And this requires no indexes which require the file be written in multiple passes or that it only be seekable when it's "finished"-- a live stream is seekable while it's being recorded.
You apparently assume your container is only going to be used for live streams. So you are saying Ogg is not designed as an optimal archive format. You could have instead made the index optional. I think the seeking performance, given a good seeking implementation, is pretty good, and it's often more efficient than other less flexible containers even when they have indexes-- because to keep their indexes reasonably sized they're not high resolution-- and getting them requires seeking to the end or a rewrite of the file. To the extent that an average near 2 is less good than 1 might be with a perfect index, that is a cost for the streaming functionality, and I think a reasonable one.
Hey the resolution could be a configurable parameter so programmers can decide the tradeoff that is ideal for their application. Since when should you decide for them. I didn't design the container, but if I did-- I might have only added an additional back-reference or two at each page; I wouldn't change how seeking works.
Seems you are excluding use cases. I am getting the idea now after several times interacting with you, that you are clearly better at math than I am but I am better designer than you. You seem to pigeon-hole often. Perhaps it is the heads-down quality that is required to have the patience to learn all that math? I recognize your intellect and attention to detail, but you seem to also be inflexible which is not the trait of the best software designers I've known in my life. I am guessing that maybe you are strongly German cultured and need everything neatly ordered in your own space. Note I have some German ancestry (and it shows sometimes in my perfectionism at times), but I also am a mix breed of French, Celtic, and Cherokee native. I think this makes me more creative/flexible than you. Not that I often think about comparing ourselves, just at times like this where you disrespect others (and then somehow expect they would respect you ). Perhaps you were not intending to disrespect me in this case, but I think the past track record (see link above) is what leads to this tension which is ready to blow at any time. Also I holding you to a higher standard w.r.t. to this crap that you seem to be foisting with Segregated Witness, because you hold everyone else to such a higher standard and even threatening them of being scammers without sufficient proof (again see my link above). Perhaps I should realize this is just the German trait and brush it off my shoulder. I think the less we interact the better. Thanks for the reply and I wish your orderly orderness didn't rub me the wrong way. Sorry I am about as compatible with a German as I am with shooting myself in the head. I love freedom which means stop stomping on others. I am a sheepdog which means I will fight those who I perceive are oppressing freedom of expression. Hey I understand what it is like to deal with trolls and in that case I would support the swift action since trolls only aim to disrupt, but I wasn't trolling you. Tim hasn't really had anything to do with Rust-- I had some infinitesimally small influence on the language (lobbied successfully for overflow of ordinary signed types to be defined as an error). Rust has some nice properties for cryptocurrency infrastructure: in particular it has no overhead, deterministic operation, with high levels of safety enforced at compile time. These things matter for decentralized cryptocurrency, since speed is also a security consideration.
I know I read something about Rust and one of your two names mentioned, but I forgot the specifics and couldn't locate it again readily with a Google search (at least not on Tim's name). Okay I could understand the incomplete typing of Rust (as compared to say for example Haskell or Scala) would not be the priority when wanting to get as close as possible to the metal while having some higher level functionality not provided by C. Any way, as I said, the specifics of my former criticisms have been mostly forgotten by myself. I would need to refresh my memory. I think the flaw was w.r.t. to declaring the invariants for class members in the class methods if I am not mistaken (but that is very vague so I might be recollecting incorrectly). |
|
|
|
Hitler replied: I am adding now the fact that I sent Gregory a private message about this yesterday or the day before that, before he posted about this new invention. I also note that weeks ago I posted to Sean Bowe on the Zcash forum the importance of zk-snarks for smart contracts.
I also note that I the one who recently exposed that Segregated Witness is a Trojan Horse designed to enable Blockstream to take over Bitcoin by enabling them to version the block chain with soft forks. They are trying to push their technologically flawed Side chains in through the back door. Thus it is not surprising that Gregory has deleted my post (and somehow it didn't even appear in my Inbox as it normally should, so he must have some super moderator powers on this forum).
I am sorry folks to inform you about the very deep level of corruption in Bitcoin runs to the core.
Okay Gregory send your hitmen. I am ready.
Note this copy is being copied all over the place so it can't be deleted.
Your post wasn't deleted. It was entirely off-topic (going on about an audio format, in a thread about a cryptographic protocol.. had nothing to do with Bitcoin) and ended up getting moved to the off-topic subforum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378533.0 . I even responded to it. I failed to see how (even if my comment about using Rust is considered off-topic, which also seems to be arguably relevant to jl777 asking if the source code is in C and your reply that it is in Rust and C++), that the following comment is off-topic and why it deserved to be removed from the thread within 60 seconds of my posting: Btw, I applaud the effort to develop zk-snarks for smart contracts. I believe it is absolutely necessary per the revelation in the "cut & choose" thread which if you think about actually has implications for any scripting on a block chain.
I am glad to see the post ended up some where. Unfortunately you were very slow to provide any indication of where the post had been moved to, orders-of-magnitude slower than your frantic < 60 second effort to remove my post from your thread. Hiding something? Don't want your reputation to be in doubt? I was actually recognizing your accomplishments. I have no idea what brain damage you sustained in childhood which causes you to be so anti-social and controlling acting as Hitler even when you are technically wrong, but of course it probably has something to do with the fact that I have on numerous cases revealed flaws in your work, and the latest one being uncovered the scam of the Trojan Horse Segregated Witness that Blockstream is attempting to foist onto to Bitcoin. The only private message you've sent me is, quoted in its incoherent entirety, Yes that is the private message I was referring to. Well you better take time to understand the issue (unless you are just bluffing and pretending you didn't take the time to comprehend the point that is linked to in the private message), because otherwise I will have yet another technological insight that you ignored by which I am going to use to replace Bitcoin with. Gregory Blockstream's $70 million won't help you. Because you guys are so overconfident that you ignore the work that other people are doing. And that is perfect. Just as it should be. But I guess I should be glad you've exposed yourself as a shameful liar. Again.
Lying about what? I guess you've exposed yourself as a vindictive, hyperdefensive Hitler again. What else is new? I designed the protocol used here in _2011_, Sean has been working on this implementation since last November-- even the git history goes back to Dec 4th... These sorts of things are not accomplished in days. You owe Sean and the members of the forum a retraction. A retraction for what? Did I claim you haven't worked on your stuff before yesterday? Btw, the work you've done is not complete to handle the case I am referring to in the private message. So now go re-read my statements in light of that fact and see who is making false accusations here. You've been banned from the technical sub-forum in the past under your prior identities. If you don't want to be again, please get some control over your behavior.
Oh go fuck yourself. I don't give a fuck about your little Hitler technical discussion forum serfdom where you stroke your little spoiled prince cock. I will meet you in the $trillion market for crypto coins, where I am going to teach you a lesson little boy. I'd challenge you to a boxing match, but you wouldn't make it past 15 seconds. |
|
|
|
I am adding now the fact that I sent Gregory a private message about this yesterday or the day before that, before he posted about this new invention. I also note that weeks ago I posted to Sean Bowe on the Zcash forum the importance of zk-snarks for smart contracts.
I also note that I the one who recently exposed that Segregated Witness is a Trojan Horse designed to enable Blockstream to take over Bitcoin by enabling them to version the block chain with soft forks. They are trying to push their technologically flawed Side chains in through the back door. Thus it is not surprising that Gregory has deleted my post (and somehow it didn't even appear in my Inbox as it normally should, so he must have some super moderator powers on this forum).
I am sorry folks to inform you about the very deep level of corruption in Bitcoin runs to the core.
Okay Gregory send your hitmen. I am ready.
Note this copy is being copied all over the place so it can't be deleted.
Your post wasn't deleted. It was entirely off-topic (going on about an audio format, in a thread about a cryptographic protocol.. had nothing to do with Bitcoin) and ended up getting moved to the off-topic subforum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378533.0 . I even responded to it. I failed to see how (even if my comment about using Rust is considered off-topic, which also seems to be arguably relevant to jl777 asking if the source code is in C and your reply that it is in Rust and C++), that the following comment is off-topic and why it deserved to be removed from the thread within 60 seconds of my posting: Btw, I applaud the effort to develop zk-snarks for smart contracts. I believe it is absolutely necessary per the revelation in the "cut & choose" thread which if you think about actually has implications for any scripting on a block chain.
I am glad to see the post ended up some where. Unfortunately you were very slow to provide any indication of where the post had been moved to, orders-of-magnitude slower than your frantic < 60 second effort to remove my post from your thread. Hiding something? Don't want your reputation to be in doubt? I was actually recognizing your accomplishments. I have no idea what brain damage you sustained in childhood which causes you to be so anti-social and controlling acting as Hitler even when you are technically wrong, but of course it probably has something to do with the fact that I have on numerous cases revealed flaws in your work, and the latest one being uncovered the scam of the Trojan Horse Segregated Witness that Blockstream is attempting to foist onto to Bitcoin. The only private message you've sent me is, quoted in its incoherent entirety, Yes that is the private message I was referring to. Well you better take time to understand the issue (unless you are just bluffing and pretending you didn't take the time to comprehend the point that is linked to in the private message), because otherwise I will have yet another technological insight that you ignored by which I am going to use to replace Bitcoin with. Gregory Blockstream's $70 million won't help you. Because you guys are so overconfident that you ignore the work that other people are doing. And that is perfect. Just as it should be. But I guess I should be glad you've exposed yourself as a shameful liar. Again.
Lying about what? I guess you've exposed yourself as a vindictive, hyperdefensive Hitler again. What else is new? I designed the protocol used here in _2011_, Sean has been working on this implementation since last November-- even the git history goes back to Dec 4th... These sorts of things are not accomplished in days. You owe Sean and the members of the forum a retraction. A retraction for what? Did I claim you haven't worked on your stuff before yesterday? Btw, the work you've done is not complete to handle the case I am referring to in the private message. So now go re-read my statements in light of that fact and see who is making false accusations here. You've been banned from the technical sub-forum in the past under your prior identities. If you don't want to be again, please get some control over your behavior.
Oh go fuck yourself. I don't give a fuck about your little Hitler technical discussion forum serfdom where you stroke your little spoiled prince cock. I will meet you in the $trillion market for crypto coins, where I am going to teach you a lesson little boy. I'd challenge you to a boxing match, but you wouldn't make it past 15 seconds. |
|
|
|
"Oh ... Maria"...
Yaah, old age does kind of suck... Suck she did. |
|
|
|
Dash's Evan D. is going to be there, so perhaps you can get some scrumptious hookers[ladies dressed in g-strings] and soda pop there: http://satoshiLooks to me to be mostly the same gang of vested interests (and specifically mining interests who are vested in profitable mining). I won't be there. More time wasting. |
|
|
|
Aha, found it in Pastbin:
Allow me to play double advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies.
Ah thanks so he is a plagiarist a la John Conner of VNL VanillaCoin. These low lifes seem to have similar sc amb ug tactics. How technologically clueless does someone have to be to not realize that any text on the internet can usually be found with Google. It is as if they never used internet before. |
|
|
|
Allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies.
That is one of the funniest posts I have read in a long while  You guys must all have English degrees! It is entirely devoid of technological acumen. I haven't seen stoat display even a rudimentary level of comprehension of the technological issues we discuss. Last time I checked English professors do not create software. Btw, I did get an A in English 101 as a freshman at the University in 1983, but I think that is entirely irrelevant here. If stoat wants to display the value of his English prose, perhaps he should try a literary forum. We are investing in, analyzing, and developing software. As well, the level of creativity in that sentence is minor taken in isolation. It's no Shakespeare unless he can produce volumes of such material in a concerted form. And still even such an accomplishment would be essentially worthless in the context of this forum. Frankly I don't put that much thought into my verbiage on these forums. The volume of writing I do simultaneously with the volume of deep technological thinking, doesn't afford me the luxury of focusing on eloquent prose. The 80/20 rule of efficiency applies. Seems stoat subscribes to the 99.9/0.01% rule of pedantic non-accomplishment. Ran twice today. Starting my training awaiting stoat's arrival in Davao for the boxing challenge. |
|
|
|
|
You are probably correct about Argentina because ingrained culture doesn't die quickly. But one factor is the internet and the spread of information. Perhaps there is an educated core in Argentina that has seen the light. Nevertheless the privatization President only won by a slim margin. So you are probably correct about the cyclical aspect will remain. Thanks for that clarification.
|
|
|
|
Are sure it was the lake? I thought you said you had rented a vessel for fishing off the Pacific coast of Peru? Can you remember the name of that vessel, "Maria ..." something Maria. Oh wait, Maria was the housekeeper Old age sucks. |
|
|
|
|
I have always agreed with your 5% of net worth in physical gold for SHTF scenarios, but sorry to hear about the boating accident. Yeah my 18,000 oz of silver disappeared too.
|
|
|
|
The corruption in Bitcoin runs all the way to the core... let's see if Theymos and Cyrus will allow this to deleted: Yah right, how come they didn't credit you? Where is your actual idea from 2013? Any source code/math/crypto to demonstrate any of your claims?
I could respond in more detail if I thought there was any benefit to doing so, but I'd rather let you continue with your overconfidence. Just a little note for you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378318.msg14023976#msg14023976Note the link the prior post was deleted by Gregory Maxwell, so here is the replacement post: The client is a mixture of rust
Let's try to this again. I thought I made this post before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378318.msg14023976#msg14023976But it disappeared and never appeared in my Inbox as "deleted by a moderator". So let me try to reconstruct my post from memory. Basically I said that I have been looking into Ogg Opus which Gregory Maxwell was an inventor of. I thanked him for producing that and with the word "kudos". I explained that it appears the Ogg container format was designed with a flaw in that it doesn't contain markers for jumping forward in a stream efficiently over a bounded bandwidth connection such as the internet. I said I presume that wasn't Gregory's area of responsibility. I also stated that Timothy B. Terriberry was apparently Greg's colleague on the Opus project and apparently Timothy B. Terriberry was involved also with Mozilla and I think I also read he is involved with the development of the RUST language. I found this to be curious because I remember some years ago writing some criticisms of RUST's typing of invariants when it was first conceived. I stated I would endeavor to locate my criticisms from several years ago and see if they still make sense (I believe so). So I said it is not surprising to see Greg experimenting with the Rust language. I also commended Greg et al for exploring zk-snarks for smart contracts as I think my comments in the "cut & choose" thread have demonstrated the critical requirement for such for scripting in general. I am adding now the fact that I sent Gregory a private message about this yesterday or the day before that, before he posted about this new invention. I also note that weeks ago I posted to Sean Bowe on the Zcash forum the importance of zk-snarks for smart contracts. I also note that I the one who recently exposed that Segregated Witness is a Trojan Horse designed to enable Blockstream to take over Bitcoin by enabling them to version the block chain with soft forks. They are trying to push their technologically flawed Side chains in through the back door. Thus it is not surprising that Gregory has deleted my post (and somehow it didn't even appear in my Inbox as it normally should, so he must have some super moderator powers on this forum). I am sorry folks to inform you about the very deep level of corruption in Bitcoin runs to the core. Okay Gregory send your hitmen. I am ready. Note this copy is being copied all over the place so it can't be deleted. |
|
|
|
The corruption in Bitcoin runs all the way to the core... let's see if Theymos and mprep will allow this to deleted: Yah right, how come they didn't credit you? Where is your actual idea from 2013? Any source code/math/crypto to demonstrate any of your claims?
I could respond in more detail if I thought there was any benefit to doing so, but I'd rather let you continue with your overconfidence. Just a little note for you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378318.msg14023976#msg14023976Note the link the prior post was deleted by Gregory Maxwell, so here is the replacement post: The client is a mixture of rust
Let's try to this again. I thought I made this post before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378318.msg14023976#msg14023976But it disappeared and never appeared in my Inbox as "deleted by a moderator". So let me try to reconstruct my post from memory. Basically I said that I have been looking into Ogg Opus which Gregory Maxwell was an inventor of. I thanked him for producing that and with the word "kudos". I explained that it appears the Ogg container format was designed with a flaw in that it doesn't contain markers for jumping forward in a stream efficiently over a bounded bandwidth connection such as the internet. I said I presume that wasn't Gregory's area of responsibility. I also stated that Timothy B. Terriberry was apparently Greg's colleague on the Opus project and apparently Timothy B. Terriberry was involved also with Mozilla and I think I also read he is involved with the development of the RUST language. I found this to be curious because I remember some years ago writing some criticisms of RUST's typing of invariants when it was first conceived. I stated I would endeavor to locate my criticisms from several years ago and see if they still make sense (I believe so). So I said it is not surprising to see Greg experimenting with the Rust language. I also commended Greg et al for exploring zk-snarks for smart contracts as I think my comments in the "cut & choose" thread have demonstrated the critical requirement for such for scripting in general. I am adding now the fact that I sent Gregory a private message about this yesterday or the day before that, before he posted about this new invention. I also note that weeks ago I posted to Sean Bowe on the Zcash forum the importance of zk-snarks for smart contracts. I also note that I the one who recently exposed that Segregated Witness is a Trojan Horse designed to enable Blockstream to take over Bitcoin by enabling them to version the block chain with soft forks. They are trying to push their technologically flawed Side chains in through the back door. Thus it is not surprising that Gregory has deleted my post (and somehow it didn't even appear in my Inbox as it normally should, so he must have some super moderator powers on this forum). I am sorry folks to inform you about the very deep level of corruption in Bitcoin runs to the core. Okay Gregory send your hitmen. I am ready. Note this copy is being copied all over the place so it can't be deleted. |
|
|
|
Yah right, how come they didn't credit you? Where is your actual idea from 2013? Any source code/math/crypto to demonstrate any of your claims?
I could respond in more detail if I thought there was any benefit to doing so, but I'd rather let you continue with your overconfidence. Just a little note for you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378318.msg14023976#msg14023976Note the link the prior post was deleted by Gregory Maxwell, so here is the replacement post: The client is a mixture of rust
Let's try to this again. I thought I made this post before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378318.msg14023976#msg14023976But it disappeared and never appeared in my Inbox as "deleted by a moderator". So let me try to reconstruct my post from memory. Basically I said that I have been looking into Ogg Opus which Gregory Maxwell was an inventor of. I thanked him for producing that and with the word "kudos". I explained that it appears the Ogg container format was designed with a flaw in that it doesn't contain markers for jumping forward in a stream efficiently over a bounded bandwidth connection such as the internet. I said I presume that wasn't Gregory's area of responsibility. I also stated that Timothy B. Terriberry was apparently Greg's colleague on the Opus project and apparently Timothy B. Terriberry was involved also with Mozilla and I think I also read he is involved with the development of the RUST language. I found this to be curious because I remember some years ago writing some criticisms of RUST's typing of invariants when it was first conceived. I stated I would endeavor to locate my criticisms from several years ago and see if they still make sense (I believe so). So I said it is not surprising to see Greg experimenting with the Rust language. I also commended Greg et al for exploring zk-snarks for smart contracts as I think my comments in the "cut & choose" thread have demonstrated the critical requirement for such for scripting in general. I am adding now the fact that I sent Gregory a private message about this yesterday or the day before that, before he posted about this new invention. I also note that weeks ago I posted to Sean Bowe on the Zcash forum the importance of zk-snarks for smart contracts. I also note that I the one who recently exposed that Segregated Witness is a Trojan Horse designed to enable Blockstream to take over Bitcoin by enabling them to version the block chain with soft forks. They are trying to push their technologically flawed Side chains in through the back door. Thus it is not surprising that Gregory has deleted my post (and somehow it didn't even appear in my Inbox as it normally should, so he must have some super moderator powers on this forum). I am sorry folks to inform you about the very deep level of corruption in Bitcoin runs to the core. Okay Gregory send your hitmen. I am ready. Note this copy is being copied all over the place so it can't be deleted. |
|
|
|
The client is a mixture of rust
Btw, I have been looking at Ogg Opus which you were intimately involved in, and kudos on Opus! But it seems one major error was made on the container format Ogg in that it doesn't include markers so that one can't jump forward in a stream efficiently over a bounded bandwidth source such as the internet. I presume the container format was not your responsibility. Any way, I mention that because I notice Timothy B. Terriberry was your colleague on Opus and I believe he also has a connection to Mozilla and the RUST language development. This caused me to remember that I had been critical of RUST several years ago when it was conceived, because I had some complaint about the way it types invariants. I will try to locate my former criticism and add it to this post. So I guess it makes sense you would want to experiment with RUST. I am not sure if I would still agree with my former criticism, so I will try to locate it and see if it still makes sense now. Btw, I applaud the effort to develop zk-snarks for smart contracts. I believe it is absolutely necessary per the revelation in the "cut & choose" thread which if you think about actually has implications for any scripting on a block chain. |
|
|
|
One last time... I even told you I would fund your project more than an year ago
Damn glad I didn't accept your offer. I don't remember because so many people offered me money. I could have easily taken $100,000 in angel investment, but I didn't. Because I don't need it. Yet Ethereum needed $15 million to produce nothing. And now needs more. I expect Zcash will need more than the $1 million they have. Your overconfidence is perfect. drown in your own self-pity
I will pray you get fatty liver disease so you can walk in my shoes (oh yeah you can't click a link ... how sad). Any way, it is coming cured finally. So now I can deal with you retards the way I have always done in the past before I got ill. Yah right, how come they didn't credit you? Where is your actual idea from 2013? Any source code/math/crypto to demonstrate any of your claims?
I could respond in more detail if I thought there was any benefit to doing so, but I'd rather let you continue with your overconfidence. Just a little note for you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378318.msg14023976#msg14023976 |
|
|
|
Thanks for the response. I too am not worried about government data collection however if this crypto takes off it will attract a whole new breed of scammers, hackers, etc... trying to take advantage of new users. I am no IP expert however when it comes to masking your IP with while accessing crypto wouldn't a centralized web based wallet provide more anonymity?
For example, in BitShares the wallet keys stay local and we simply access a portal such as OpenLedger to get the blockchain. If one were to use a VPN, Tor, whatever method you want to access OpenLedger is there anyway on the IP level a user could be tracked? I'm not asking beyond the IP level as each chain has their own privacy issues with transactions etc... This appears to be a better approach instead of running a full node locally?
Trusting any centralized node is roughly akin to trusting a mixnet that has only one node. Timing attacks still apply. Trust that the node isn't compromised still applies. When I tell people that I thought deeply for 3 years about all the ways anonymity could be achieved, they don't appreciate all the designs I contemplated while sitting on the sofa over the past 3 years. I simplified the conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
