Truth.

I think it was the case back on the earlier days as miners used to backsell their Bitcoin, which could directly influence the price.

But now the price action and hash power don't seem to be correlated. Hash rate has been on an upwards trajectory for well over a year, whereas Bitcoin has.... obviously not done so well.

We will continue to see the hash rate increase while it's still profitable, it's as simple as that.

Common paste swap virus attack.

This is why it's important to use a secure operating system, ideally something that will only run signed applications, e.g. MacOS.

There is no point warning other people about your loss since these attacks have been going on for decades now and people still get duped by it.

You should ALWAYS double check the device, or ideally do a penny test if you're still not sure, since its also possible for these tools to modify the display too.

EOS with a $2 billion market capitalization is behind Harmony with a $10 million one? That's absolutely god damn pathetic.

It's quite clear by now that EOS is massively overhyped. The account system and resource allocation system is so unintuitive it's crazy. Plus, the bullshit misconception that transactions are free on EOS is extremely misleading, since people actually need to pay for resources just to use the platform.

No wonder EOS has been leaking dapps to other platforms. It'll drop out of the top 10 soon enough.

So you are basically suggesting a variable house edge. e.g. losers lose 2%, whereas winners have no house edge? That doesn't make any sense.

As far as I'm aware the logic works like this.

The casino simply deducts the 'house edge' numbers from the potential rolls as a fraction of the total available numbers that can be rolled.

e.g. if a player wager $100 to on a 2x multiplier and the casino says they have to roll 50 or below (out of a max of 100), this casino would have a 0% house edge.

However, by changing the requirement to roll 45 or below, the casino implements its house edge of 10%. This would be 49 or below for a 2% house edge house casino etc. It doesn't matter how many decimal places you go, the house edge values will always be deducted from the available pool of values.

e.g. if the player wagers $100 on a 200x multiplier, and the casino has a house edge of 10%, then they will need to roll something like 44.99 or below.

As far as I'm aware most cryptocurrency news websites are actually losing money if you just count readership.

They simply don't make enough money in advertising revenue to sustain their operations. Instead, they resort to other money-making avenues, such as providing premium research content like TheBlock (Genesis product) or taking paid content, press releases and thought leadership posts.

Do you have a way to make money beyond just PPC?

How exactly does using a credit card protect you from bad actors?

I thought that chargebacks could only be applied to goods and services purchases, not gambling?

Realistically, I don't think people should be gambling with money they don't have in the first place, that's exactly how people get into debt when they end up losing.

I've seen so many people get absolutely rekt by taking out loans to gamble, then they get stuck in a cycle of taking out ever bigger loans and taking increased risks just to get back on their feet.

I personally stay well away from Tether. I read that their last audit showed that they are only 76% backed by USD, which basically means they are operating a fractional reserve.

The entire purpose of Tether is to be redeemable against the USD whenever the customer wants. If everybody to decide to do a tether run (like a bank run), then 24% of the money would be unavailable.

That's why I stick with Gemini dollar and TUSD now, they're far more transparent than USDT.

5% isn't great.

Platforms like Nexo and Poloniex offer larger returns on that and support a wide range of investments... And they are collateralized.

I personally wouldn't invest in a casino bankroll unless;

1. The casino is unbelievably trusted, like crypto-games.net (but they stopped their bankroll feature).
2. The casino uses cold storage
3. The casino is able to generate a return in excess of 10% APR.

It's quite commonplace for multiple wallets to be under maintenance simultaneously, particularly when an exchange supports hundreds of assets.

It's also common for transfers to continue moving in and out of the wallet, since some exchanges have different privilages for API users, while some people might continue depositing to their own address since they don't know deposits/withdrawals are temporarily stopped.

If you genuinely think Coinall is running an exit scam, get some proof together and fire it over to some crypto news outlets. I'm sure they'd love to run the story.

Anybody seen the high roller leaderboard today? There's some seriously impressive wins going down.



One user managed to turn 0.001 BTC into 0.199 BTC twice within just 2.5 minutes, that's crazy.

Teja767 is also racking up some impressive stars on the roulette board!

Well I wouldn't say it's as extreme as that. Based on pure statistics just under half of people should walk away as winners.

Assuming a casino has a house edge of 2%, this means that 48% of people walk away winners assuming they only bet once. However, most people bet more than once, hence this multiplier is applied to each successive bet, which means they gradually lose more and more money.

This is exactly why more casinos will do what they can to ensure players wager multiple times, rather than just a large one and done bet.

Pretty much every bounty has this issue, they're pretty much relying on bounty managers who don't actually check the stakes and just award everybody maximum stakes.

In this way, by attacking the spreadsheets and being awarded maximum stakes for everything, the attacker practically secures 99.9% of the bounty rewards.

Fortunately, most bounties are utterly worthless so there it doesn't usually matter. 99.9% of zero is still equal to zero.

Would be nice if you could add a short description about each one.

Or if each person making their suggestions could produce a short 20-40 word description so people know what they're looking for. e.g. a discussion about the best features of the casino, the available games, its house edge and referral commission amount etc.

Would love to see this thread developed some more. I do think crypto-games.net should be number 1 though since it's one of the oldest casinos around and extremely well respected.

The trend is your friend, it's very simple.

Wait until the price of an asset breaks its previous high after being on a downtrend for some time. This indicates a trend reversal.

Wait for consolidation at the new price point and wait until a solid support wall forms, then buy in.

Usually, this period of consolidation precedes further upwards action.

Well, the entire idea of investing in highly volatile assets like Bitcoin is that you should let the money sit for months or perhaps even years before taking it out.

If you can't afford to be without the money, then don't invest in highly speculative assets like Bitcoin. Although BTC has seen radical price movements in short periods of time, it has also seen long periods of decline which have rekt plenty of people who got in high and sold out low.

Let this be a lesson to anybody who thinks Bitcoin is a get rich quick scheme. It's not.

No doubt the only people that are just itching to jump back into a brick and mortar casino are those that have gambling addiction.

If you literally can't live without risking your life to do something (e.g. by potentially catching coronavirus), then you almost certainly have an issue.

Even after the lockdowns are lifted people should be reasonable with how they go out in public. Don't go to crowded places like a casino if you can avoid it, since there will still be people transmitting the infection.

Just because the lockdowns are lifted doesn't mean COVID-19 is gone, it just means it's less prevalent.

I'm saying Bitcoin is still measure in USD, which means it practically has a floating dollar peg.

In order for Bitcoin to be truly anti-fragile, I would say it needs to have value in and of itself, or be the peg. e.g. USD should be pegged in Bitcoin, not vice-versa.

I don't believe it is anti-fragile. At least not yet.

Although Bitcoin can definitely withstand some punishment, I don't think the network is strong enough to survive a full-blown economic collapse—similar to that seen in the great depression.

Instead, I think that people will flock towards assets with known, sustained value, rather than extremely volatile cryptocurrencies—including Bitcoin.

Once the network becomes strong enough, and the fundamentals reach a point whereby Bitcoin has value in and of itself (without being compared against other currencies) then I would say it has truly reached a state where it can be considered anti-fragile.

We're nowhere near that point yet, since people still peg Bitcoin to the USD.

How exactly is Insure the best project of 2020? It has pitiful trading volume and a weak market cap of $55 million. Realistically, there's no way its market cap is even justified considering that it sees less than $50,000 in daily trading volume... At that rate, it would take around 100 days of trading just to turnover the market cap.

Take a look at Bitcoin and most other cryptocurrencies, they see tens of billions of dollars in trading volume. Ethereum, for example, has a market cap of $18.2 billion but has a 24 hour trading volume of around $20 billion (thats +10% per day against its market cap).

Stay away from small-cap coins unless the team is unbelievably experienced unless you want to get your hands burnt.

I have now opened a flag against OP.

He denies the presence of a driveby script on his fake website, then completely disregards a trusted member (Vod) when called out on it.

OP has almost certainly planted the covert mining script himself in order to steal CPU/GPU resources and should not be trusted under any circumstances.

Thread archived in case OP deletes/modifies his posts. http://archive.is/BlQqT