Sadiq  Khan is an outstanding shitter that promote LGBT police and fight against knives. Most things he do is an absolute bullshit.
So what's your point regarding this guy? If such shitter is arguing against Trumps visit then he would obviously hear something unpleasant about his recent activities.
Great calculation and nice conclusion. Looks absolutely legit. Just as any 99% of posts made by TimeBits.

No one is taking those achievements into consideration. Especially when leftists got a chance to blame trump.

Then no one cares about simple transactions. You can easily pay some online shop for example that accept BTC without passing AML.

If you need some crypto related service with a decent volume to work properly then those services have to do some AML stuff. Everyone have to deal with it as soon as the volume is big enough.
Same thing is also related to normal fiat services.

I guess that Blockchain revolution is desperately needed in the country, where in 2014 60% of population had no access to toilets. Maybe now they are going to shit on the blockchain, duno.


Countries should not be accepted by the government.
But people should be free to use it.

It seems like we are using different bitcoins lol. From what I see everyone is crying every time some project is asking for their useless ID. Thousands of normal (and probably retarded) users refuse to invest in ICOs with KYC because they are afraid for their "private data".

Without this legal stuff cryptocurrencies won't get any volume.

If you think that you can easily perform transactions, that are legaly controlled by the government, by just using cryptocurrencies then you are probably the one who is not in line with reality.

I've never seen news regarding Trump supporting Bitcoin. I guess it is fake and it was made by some democrats that wanted to show the relation of republican party and crypto scams with the other illegal activities that bitcoin is involved in.
Anyway, it doesn't seem like someone heavily advertised crypto.

Why should someone use blockchain for that? Similar centralized services already exist and no one cares about the platform of this service. It seems better than trying to re-invent the bicycle but with blockchain, which is also extremely expensive right now.

why can't we do the same with centralized systems? For example mobile phone sellers offer counterfeit check via their centralized system and no one even cares about faking information there.

I guess that Binance would repay its users that suffered from their recent hack.
In case with exchanges if they are not registrated somewhere in offshore then they have to pay refund. But this would only work if the exchange is centralized. In case with decentralized exchanges hackers are more likely to attack its users so in this case you would lose everything without any chances to get your money back.
Everything should work the same way with centralized services where someone else is holding your coins. The problem is that if they don't have money then you won't probably get a repayment. At least this is what happening with most exchange hacks.

Venezuela is even worse. Their crypto community mostly consist of bounty and airdrop hunters.  People in a country with an average income about $10 per month can't make a decent community. The only global thing that Venezuela brings to crypto is different kinds of FUD and reputation loses. Don't be surprised that people associate cryptocurrencies with illegal activities.

Now we now that they can have cryptocurrencies lol. It would be nice if after the next step people in Cuba would get access to money. Why should anyone bother about this country? There is no projects there and even most people in Cuba are not wealthy enough to own any amount of money that can make an influence on crypto market.

There is nothing bad in KYC. This kind of data is absolutely worthless. You may easily buy someone else's document scans just for $1 in dark web. KYC is made to verify the user that is making financial operations and not trying to gather his data.

You can still make P2P transactions that would be annonymous but when it comes to using some 3rd party services then you should also follow their rules.
And btw this governmental regulation won't be seen for normal users.

The only fact that there is more people in the world than number of Bitcoins could be mined doesn't tell us that BTC is underpriced. THose numbers don't say that all those people should buy any amount of cryptocurrency.
This is a typical mistake of marketing students when at first they are making their project and they are sure that everyone needs this product while you need to classify its target audience.

No, It is not adding anything. To change the price those people have to use their BTC. Otherwise, it would be the same situation as it could be if lost bitcoins were now lost but only holded in someone else's wallets without any price moves.

The worst thing in that issue is that millions of innocent people around the globe (including US) are using Huawei phones are now getting screwed without android support and the other google shit. So at one day people may have the best flagman, but on the other day he can't install a single app on it.

Why not? Mining equipment production is a pretty good chinese business so US may ban them. Also most part of mining power is concentraded in china so that is another reason for strike.

We can see a strong trend about using different social media or messenger accounts also as your electronic wallet. Every shitty app now is either going to implement p2p payments or already did it. For example in China millions of people are already using WeChat Pay every day. And Facebook is also following this trend. No matter if they make a stablecoin or just their money transfer thingie it would be a centralized thing in all cases.

Some professions can be automated, and this would be only routine jobs where a robot can easily replace a human. In other cases such professions like a bartender or a waiter are not replaceable simply because we pay those people partly for being a human, it is always nice to talk to barman.
Without this feature, they could be already replaced by simple vending machine.

The only reason that allows some western countries to provide some socialistic policy is that everything is based on a capitalistic economy. And such policy is drowning those countries to shit, especially France.

In 20 century we had a long story of socialistic experiments that took lives of millions of people around the world and still left socialistic countries in poverty.
Maybe socialism let those poor people live in the afterlife, duno.

Meh, it still doesn't seem like a good reason. Why would Trump pardon the guy, that is definitely gonna keep digging under US government and sabotage his job? On one side we've got some mysterious inspiration for congressmen and on the other side we still get a real threat. I think their choice is obvious.
But at least now we see real accusations instead of claims that Julian raped someone.

And why can't they just record everything and store their data on a centralized server?
Elon Must already made a lot management mistakes while trying to automatize the production of Tesla cars. This bullshit is only leading to higher price with a lower quality. Considering that any Blockcgain development is expensive as fuck right now they will only repeat their previous mistake.

Generally by saying that people mean that now they can't buy 100 BTC for just $1 and later sell it for $8k per 1 BTC. And in this case they are right. It is pretty stupid to think that Bitcoin would ever show such growth.
No matter what volatility we have, BTC would not grow 8000% anymore simply because it is easier to sell a $1 pen for 2$ and get 100% growth than get a billion dollar market and double it.

This FB coin will be nothing more than a centralized stablecoin. No matter what Zukerberg says about it.
Facebook have a long history of selling their users private data. Even when they implemented end-to-end encryption in WatsApp they are still keep saving backups of conversation on centralized cloud. FB usually bans everyone who does not support their liberal left ideology.
After that I would say that there is no connection between FB and true crypto market. Or maybe only a name.

The real problem is not that you need a bank account but the thing that it takes a huge amount of time to open this account in your bank, verify this account and start trading. At the end you will get a huge pain in the ass just to get an access to exchange where you  can lose all your money. And even if you are lucky to earn something then it may take a week to complete your withdrawal.

They are either retarded or involved into some illegal activities.

It is another pain in the ass to move fiat from one exchange to another that is currently solved with stablecoins.