Well, I think you deserve more credit, so there. Even thinking about changing the one in my sig to yours


Not sure if you can still vote?! I also think voting is done on a facebook page of Genesis-Mining, but I'm not into Facebook.

Nah, don't trouble yourself looking all over the place. Just pick this code from one of the main Genesis-Mining supporters: CK_DISCOUNT



Neither can I, but that's also because I don't have a comfy chair 

Late update. Holiday time

Update for month 6 of CloudHashing mining:

Starting date Feb 15 with 420Ghs
Month 01 : 1.4 : 1.4 BTC -> actual 1.58 : total 1.58 BTC - (10%fee) -0.16 BTC = actual payout 1.42
Month 02 : 0.7  0.7 BTC -> actual 1.22 : total 2.81 BTC - (10%fee) -0.28 BTC = actual payout 2.53
Month 03 : 0.4 : 0.7 BTC -> actual 0.75 : total 3.56 BTC - (10% fee) -0.36 BTC = actual payout 3.20
Month 04 : 0.2 : 0.4 BTC -> actual 0.56 : total 4.09 BTC - (10% fee) -0.41 BTC -  actual payout 3.68
Month 05 : 0.1 : 0.3 BTC -> actual 0.41 : total 4.54 BTC - (10% fee) -0.45 BTC -  actual payout 4.09
Month 06 : 0.05 : 0.2 BTC -> actual 0.30 : total 4.84 BTC - (10% fee) -0.48 BTC -  actual payout 4.35
Month 07 : 0.0125 : 0.1 BTC
Month 08 : 0.007 : 0.08 BTC
Month 09 : 0.004 : 0.05 BTC
Month 10 : 0.002 : 0.03 BTC
Month 11 : 0.001 : 0.02 BTC
Month 12 : 0.0005 : 0.01 BTC

Total expected, around 4,69 (4,80 perhaps even)
Total investment 5.2 BTC

According to CH total payout in USD is $2,440.46, at which point they forget to mention the 10% fee they take from payout. Actual payout in USD minus fee would be: $2192. Selling price for the whole package was $3985. So, after half a year of mining, I'm half way there, and I'll be lucky to get at $2500. From that point of view the loss CloudHashing sells with a promise and a smile is devastating.

I've complained once again and got a reply what I think would be a fair offer, at which I told them: either double my hashrate so I can make up the lost money, or start charging decent prices for a change. No more replies since then, despite another inquiry from me, and no changes in my hashrate and no changes in the outrageous prices they dare to ask on their frontpage, as hashrate is still $300 for 60Ghs?! Wowww....

Still, I don't need to worry about heavy loss or overcharged Ghs prices, as CloudHashing has a mission:

I'm on a roll here, but did you change payments? From the 15th on I get one payment for all contracts. Before that it used to be one payment for each contract. Not that I mind, but it got me confused.

Ik heb zelf geen S1, maar ik haal info hiervandaan:
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/antminer-s1-power-usage
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/antminer-s1-temperatures
Ofwel zeker 400W, waarbij de temperatuur van de module oploopt naar 68 graden

Wat dat betreft zit er blijkbaar niet veel verschil in. KNCminers zitten in de ideale wereld ergens in de 60 graden, geloof ik, maar zet ze in een kleine gesloten ruimte en je warmte afvoer is om zeep, enzovoorts, enzovoorts. Ik vermoed dat ze wel een stootje kunnen hebben. Als je bij AMD klaagt dat je gamecard tegen de 100 graden zit halen ze ook hun schouders op en zeggen dat het ding daarop gemaakt is. Andere chips, andere leverancier, etcetera, etcetera, maar tja. Alles onder de 80-85 graden maak ik me geen zorgen over. Tot nu toe terecht.

heh, I need to wake up. I was looking at yesterday's payments

All I see is one payment for one contract indeed:
http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/5a409788e3ba52319b3b7cf7592dbbb0b3ef2f8c1bf705fd1814e81e279454d1

But no payments for the other contracts.

I know, I received one payment last night and nothing more when I went to bed. But today all payments from the exact same time are there. Different blocks for confirmations... but that doesn't explain why the payments were not visible. If someone can explain how this should be seen, the please. I'm all for better understanding

I've taken the time to re-read my post AND what was quoted, and I don't see where I said anyone asking for prove is an idiot?

If you misunderstood then I'm sorry, but perhaps you should take the time to try and wonder if you read it right. Perhaps even if someone meant it right or not, but this requires a certain level of empathy. Simply asking for clarification could be an option as well, but I'll try and clarify anyway since Jimmothy at least has taken time to respond:
What I meant in my post was plenty of threads and posts from, let's put the words a bit different now, very unreasonable people who say people who lost their coins somehow (and not always because of a scam) should be dragged out onto the street. That's rather personal and that's the idiocy I was talking about. I don't see in anyway how people expressing their willingness to hurt somebody else or see somebody hurt is "asking for prove". Once again, I have not said nor did I mean that people asking (or demanding) prove from PBMining are idiots.

Does that explain enough to see my post in a different light?

I assume mike18 is me? Explain the dumbass bit please. Seems rather inappropriate and disrespectful.

Spare time?! Wish I was rich like you

That's also the only thing that bothers me, but I doubt that's going to change. This grew from probably a garage operation into something quite large, by a man who figured it could all backfire somehow and seeing the insane reactions here by some total wacko's the best thing is to stay underground. Since then the idiocy displayed by some has only grown bigger and bigger and I've seen nothing less then the virtual equivalence of hanging mobs. Totally disgusting. I don't believe PBMining will go public. Not with the owner having to turn from "hidden is best" to "out in the open", while general idiocy has grown bigger then ever. Not in constantly changing attitude of governments which makes things legally awkward. Out in the open, at best, will be a (virtual?!) address in some tax paradise where lawmakers don't deliberately try to discourage coin businesses. Out in the open in Canada would instantly mean total destruction of profitability for all, so be glad.

Nee, alleen bij de Mercury heb ik bewust deels de koeling teruggeschroefd. De warme modules zijn "gewoon" een kwestie van geen fatsoenlijke ruimte/warmte afvoer.
Ik zit er aan te denken het spul gewoon onder een afdakje in de tuin te zetten, maar voor jet het weet valt de boel uit door een krokant gebakken naaktslak.

BitCoin (auto)
DarkCoin (auto)
LiteCoin
DogeCoin
AuroraCoin
FeatherCoin
LotteryCoin
MegaCoin
ReddCoin
BlackCoin

There, all current coins. And you do NOT need to choose Megacoin (but you should). Auto means the most profitable coin is mined and exchanged for either Bitcoin or Darkcoin.

We're not talking about a home pc here where you can install wallets until you run out of performance and/or diskspace. Simple as it may seem, I bet there's a shocking bit of work behind it all. More importantly, I think there's more to say for a careful collection of coins then for a sh*tload of coins just because they exist. Adding every hyped coin might be more of a bother then an asset eventually. I still believe only a few coins will keep value into the future, so maybe GM's Collector Mentality is future proof

The stale bit, I know the feeling, but I think GM was about to make some announcement two weeks ago? So, stale might be just our perception because we cant see what's going on behind the curtains

Als ik hem in zijn geheel verkoop moet ik hem ook als geheel verzenden en dat is is een hoop gedoe, plus dat je maar moet hopen dat het spul goed overkomt. In stukjes is handiger, opent de internationale markt, en levert meer op.

Ben wel verbaasd dat mensen in de tussentijd blijkbaar liever meer geld uitgeven een Antminer S1 zonder voeding die met moeite aan de 200 Gh/s komt, dan minder geld aan een kant en klare kncminer met voeding, die met 2 vingers in zijn neus begint bij 200 Gh/s en daarbij ook nog iets minder stroom verbruikt. Maar het zal dan wel aan de grootte liggen. Dit is een aardig grote (en halflege) bak.

Ben aan het tweaken/overklokken geweest en zoals op de plaatjes hieronder draait ie al ruim een half uur. Hoewel, hij is langzaam opgelopen naar de magische 300 Gh/s. Hopelijk doet ie het morgen ook nog zo. Het is best een gedoe



Tweede module is lekker heet, maar die moet ook goed warm worden. Maar niet warmer, trouwens. Ik heb speciaal voor die module de standaard fan verwijderd en vervangen door een kleintje die wat minder hard blaast. Ik denk dat ik die ook op de reservebank zet in plaats van verkopen.

De liefhebber mag nog steeds op het hele systeem bieden, mij best. Afhalen, en als je in de buurt woont wil ik hem ook brengen, maar als je een onderdeel wilt, roep maar.

Rejected means someone ordered hashrate but didn't pay the order

We gaan het anders doen:

Losse onderdelen mag ook, 2 keer een oktober module (met of zonder fan, wat je wilt) en 1 keer Mercury control board, €75 / $100 per stuk, exclusief verzendkosten.

[edit=]1 van de modules is een slow starter, die heeft 15 tot 20 minuten nodig om volledig op gang te komen. Deze start op 25% of 50% van zijn vermogen (1 of 2 die's) en naarmate de temperatuur op gang komt, komen de overige die's erbij. Bij voorbaat al een tientje korting op deze module.

Spulletjes gaan zo ook op Ebay.


Ik zal het ding aanzetten en wat screenshots maken vanavond als die een dagje gedraaid heeft.

Payday! That explains why my wallet contained more then nada 

I've sent you a pm with the details I have, greyfoxsylux 

As for the referral reward, in the previous program you would receive 10% of the hashrate that was bought. If someone bough 100GH/s you would get 10GH/s.
In the current program, if someone buy's 100GH/s at current price, you would get a one time 10% payment of 0.2800 BTC, which is 0.0280 BTC. Now, if you were to purchase hashrate with that, you would effectively have the same as the old program. On the other hand, if you check how much BTC you would get from the 10GH/s over 5 years (or rather like 1 year cause after that payout will be too low), then you can wonder what's best. Have the entire amount in hand now, or spread out over a long time. Benefit of this program versus the old one, now you have a choice

Well, your listing is incomplete and far from up to date, which I would find acceptable if you didn't post it in just about every post you make.
Further more, in your forum message you say that "When considering buying altcoin cloud mining look for reputable companies with a history of good customer service", yet you don't give any weight at all in your considerations whether a company is recommended or not. Everything is solely based on costs and price, so why confuse people by saying reputable should be considered when you yourself don't?!

The more reputable a company is, the less risk. In general Unfortunately at a cost usually, which will impact roi. Some of the companies  you "recommend" have never even showed a working product, so there's a high risk which may even lead to a way more serious impact on roi (like total loss of investment). If you want to help newbies to the best possible roi then take such things into consideration. Products may be a scam, or will arrive months later. Bye bye newbie investment, bye bye any chance for a decent roi.

GM is costly, roi isn't as good as we all hoped for, especially since altcoin value is going to crap, but GM IS a reputable company and has good customer service and quality products, now and in the future. It's solid. New companies may be great at customer service, but I see quite a bit of one man operations out there, with a few customers, but also a lot of energy. Which is truly great. Customer service almost instantaneously! But will that remain the same when they've outgrown their one man operation to the extent where they can no longer deal with all customer issues themselves, but are not making enough yet to also fund the needed extra quality or customer service?! You don't need to worry about such things with companies like GM because they've already matured. Good quality and good service comes at a price and that price may be worth it.