I found the name repulsive from the beginning. The only reason why I was involved with the project at that time was the "Blackbytes". But they probably don't play a role anymore. The various inquiries in this direction are ignored obtrusively.

Besides an incompetent management, the uncritical community is also responsible for the "success" of this project.

Only with increasing demand does the value increase. A currency that "bites a ball", on the other hand, is not taken seriously.

First of all this problem should be solved.
Then the next in the whole series of failures...

Knowledge resistant and arrogant. Nothing new, then.

The name (Byteball) suggests something completely different. And this is precisely the point of criticism: The naming

But this argumentation again shows clearly how unwilling one is to encounter public criticism.

No, of course not, as long as the management doesn't give a damn about the user's comments.

As long as the thing is called "Byteball", every effort to advance this project is a waste of time and energy.

So if we find a more suitable name, we solve the next problem, but together.

Byteball Bytes Price Prediction

" If you are looking for virtual currencies with good return, GBYTE can be a bad, high-risk 1-year investment option. Byteball Bytes price equal to 42.580 USD at 2018-10-11, but your current investment may be devalued in the future. "

https://walletinvestor.com/forecast/byteball-bytes-prediction

Byteball is a currency for gamblers and players. Exactly this impression he also conveys name.

Should the general public finally take this currency seriously, first of all a change of name would be necessary. But the management shows itself very little insightful and unwilling in this direction.
And that is not the only point...