|
Since there is no interest in LTC ... we will just keep running DOGE....
|
|
|
|
It looks like someone beat me to it so I just upvoted and commented.
I despise being anything that resembles a shill, but we're not being dishonest at all so I don't mind helping promote.
I would post myself but ... reddit does not allow if your posts get downvoted... no shill since you play the game yourself and win! Its pretty simple if some one is stuck waiting for payout on the end they can post in chatrooms or forums/reddit/twitter and get unstuck ad long as they tell people that they would have to do the same and there is risk involved  |
|
|
|
Looking at the last rounds, doge was about 2.5BTC, ltcponzi was 2.2BTC, but doge looked healthy, and ltc looked sad.
Maybe if less than 10 deposits, regardless of amounts?
You could lower the max deposit on ltc like you did with doge, I think that helped a lot. Not this round of course, its too close to the time to make any changes.
Can someone you or someone else post to http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinLTC Ponzi - round10 - game of get in quick! http://ltcponzi.com/?round10 |
|
|
|
Hmm, or have it so if a minimum amount of coin (or number of deposits) is not deposited, the whole thing is cancelled, and everyone just gets their own money back, minus tx fees.
What do you think the minimum should be? |
|
|
|
 Is there really someone trust 'such games'? We ran 10 rounds with LTCponzi.com and ponzidoge.com transparency is on the blockchain people loose if they are not fast or if there is no next investors but we keep it honest and transparent. |
|
|
|
|
Hey,
Only here because you mentioned us a few times.
I like some of your ideas like the insurance fund. Does it go out of your 5% or additional 5% from deposits?
Not a fan of registration since it makes the game less transparent since you have to use multiple deposit addresses which makes it harder to follow on blockchain. But progressive payout is interesting concept.
Will be watching closely and maybe will implement some of your ideas it in our games (Seems you are not running ltc and doge anyway).
|
|
|
|
|
Yep ratty, thinking of implementing an insurance fund to make sure more people are paid.
Not sure what happened with LTC its not doing good this time. Will see what happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Slow start tonight needs a big finish with a promotoion ... can be easy wins!
|
|
|
|
|
Wow what a stack tonight! 110% seems to work great in reducing the loosers
|
|
|
|
Will the next round start immediately after this one ends?
Will start the next round tomorrow... and we will follow the 24 hour format we had before |
|
|
|
me thinks 7 days was too long  Nice we are going to do 24 hour blitz ones like before... had to to try different models to make sure |
|
|
|
Nice game and site.
Thanks 2 more days left for this ponzo! And then we will be back to 24 hour format! |
|
|
|
So is your question answered?
it is. the 200% coming from the general pool explains it all. thanks! New game is coming... its going to be super simple and transparent... Its already in testing! |
|
|
|
|
200% comes from the general pool if it is available. Otherwise if there was no 200% at then end we would just keep the unclaimed balance... since we don't send incomplete payouts. However if .... the end game is big... this is how the coins get used according to rules in the FAQ
If your transaction is not the last one or it is not recorded those coins go according to following order:
1. Pay the 200% bonus to the "last recorded transaction"
2. Pay outstanding transactions in the regular order from oldest to newest
3. Remaining unclaimed balance that is not enough to pay next in line will remain with operator
(For future cases when there may not be enough transactions to cover the 200% pay back of "last recorded transaction")
All pretty fair... we use the same balance since it is in the same wallet... Not planning separating end game and main game.
Its simple ... if there was no end game... #14 would not go out... it could have reached enough to go out due to the end game if there was 5 more LTC?
We use late/early deposits as available to pay the 200%
So is your question answered?
|
|
|
|
I believe you are running this honestly, but professional victims might end up being effective in smearing you if this kind of stuff isn't just destroyed on sight. One thing that would help are more stats. What is there now is enough, but more stats could go a long way in easily proving the fairness. For example, a list of the incoming deposits, with a little running total column next to it. Then you can just read it, and see for yourself where the dogecoins are going, and if you know the logic, you can just easily see that it is matching.
Someone could still accuse you of fudging the numbers, but this way they can point at a particular number and say "math error here, where did these coins go?" and its easier to discuss it if there is a report to look at.
If you try to add all of this on the main page, it might confuse people. I like the simple design of the web page, I wouldn't suggest cluttering it.
Yea some people get pissy and start accusing. So I ask them for their calculation and that is when they usually stop and back down. Nobody apologized yet though. We are working to increase the game quality and transparency. Cool stuff coming soon! |
|
|
|
now I know there's a 30 ltc cap, so I guess to start you're not suppose to do multiple 30 ltc deposits, but is it ok once you've been paid to submit more ltc in that round (especially if there are rounds that go for 7 days) ?
There is no way we can stop "multisend" or multiple consecutive amounts so the limit exists as a warning to new players. We know for a fact people play several times with 30LTC and sometimes one right after another or with multisend, there is no real way to stop it so it is allowed. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
