|
What is it? The second stage of the bounty program?
|
|
|
|
Old systems function stably, but they have a completely different problem: everyone knows how they work. This means that they are prone to hacking
The project has not only passive, but also active protection, as far as I know. It's not so easy to bypass all types of defense and make a attack |
|
|
|
The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive
developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked? I'm sure of the stability of the platform, it's true. I just explained to the person what is at stake. As I said above - it all depends only on the implementation of the product At the same time, I'm sure that no matter how hard you try to close the holes in the existing system, if it works badly - it does not help As an argument, I can say that not all the old works badly. Often, old algorithms that are tested and work fine make up for fewer problems |
|
|
|
The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive
developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked? |
|
|
|
It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?
Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform. Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it .. Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project! I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability Oh, it's hard not to believe a person who really understands the software, but I'll only conclude after a real test You are one of those people who do not perceive the experience of other people and do not digest the advisors, right? In this case, I suggest that you risk your money to understand Oh, come on! The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive |
|
|
|
It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?
Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform. Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it .. Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project! I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability What exactly are you talking about? Do you really think that the service will not work well? did you draw this conclusion only after reading the white paper? But the same method can be implemented differently |
|
|
|
It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?
Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform. Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit |
|
|
|
It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?
What makes you think that the platform mechanism is really "cumbersome"? It seems to me that now this mechanism is used by all platforms, and contrary to your words, the platform works well |
|
|
|
Judging by the excitement around the project we are waiting for a really high quality product
What do you mean by hype? I do not argue that the project is quite well-known in the cryptocurrency community but I do not observe any special hype around it Look how many people involved in the bounty company, see how fast was assembled soft cap, make a note of activity on social networks and the issue will disappear by itself) Progress is certainly there, at the moment the developers have collected 33% of the total funds. I think the hard cap is still to be harvested. If so many people are interested in this project means they need it , then they really do not like the modern centralized exchanges and they are waiting for a completely new approach to cryptocurrency trading Everything else personally I have not met so extensive and multifunctional trading platforms with such a huge functionality. It's not even an exchange, it's like some sort of community-driven trading platform. These voting and other very interesting pieces of this project The most important thing is that the exchange meets the basic requirements of uninterrupted operation and maximum possible security. If it is not, no other innovations will not help her I would have no doubt that the development team will use the best developments to ensure maximum safety and correct operation of the platform It remains to wait a bit for the launch of the platform is planned for August 2018 . Let's wait and hope we see the trading platform of the future) Investors will get access to the platform even earlier I know, investors will be able to test the platform in June. We will wait for good trading volumes and token growth) |
|
|
|
Judging by the excitement around the project we are waiting for a really high quality product
What do you mean by hype? I do not argue that the project is quite well-known in the cryptocurrency community but I do not observe any special hype around it Look how many people involved in the bounty company, see how fast was assembled soft cap, make a note of activity on social networks and the issue will disappear by itself) Progress is certainly there, at the moment the developers have collected 33% of the total funds. I think the hard cap is still to be harvested. If so many people are interested in this project means they need it , then they really do not like the modern centralized exchanges and they are waiting for a completely new approach to cryptocurrency trading Everything else personally I have not met so extensive and multifunctional trading platforms with such a huge functionality. It's not even an exchange, it's like some sort of community-driven trading platform. These voting and other very interesting pieces of this project The most important thing is that the exchange meets the basic requirements of uninterrupted operation and maximum possible security. If it is not, no other innovations will not help her I would have no doubt that the development team will use the best developments to ensure maximum safety and correct operation of the platform It remains to wait a bit for the launch of the platform is planned for August 2018 . Let's wait and hope we see the trading platform of the future) |
|
|
|
Judging by the excitement around the project we are waiting for a really high quality product
What do you mean by hype? I do not argue that the project is quite well-known in the cryptocurrency community but I do not observe any special hype around it Look how many people involved in the bounty company, see how fast was assembled soft cap, make a note of activity on social networks and the issue will disappear by itself) Progress is certainly there, at the moment the developers have collected 33% of the total funds. I think the hard cap is still to be harvested. If so many people are interested in this project means they need it , then they really do not like the modern centralized exchanges and they are waiting for a completely new approach to cryptocurrency trading Everything else personally I have not met so extensive and multifunctional trading platforms with such a huge functionality. It's not even an exchange, it's like some sort of community-driven trading platform. These voting and other very interesting pieces of this project The most important thing is that the exchange meets the basic requirements of uninterrupted operation and maximum possible security. If it is not, no other innovations will not help her |
|
|
|
After all, the platform does have good advantages over existing centralized exchanges. Really wanted to what is described in the white paper was really brought to life
Centralized exchanges will cease to exist in the near future , they will not stand the competition with decentralized exchanges like this Well, they will continue their work, just lose a lot of their clients, trading volumes will be significantly reduced and therefore the exchange will have little income. With each passing day, technology is becoming more and more complex and progressive. If the exchanges do not keep up with the overall development of the cryptocurrency and the growing interest in it, alas, they will simply disappear I fully agree with you , this platform is a completely new generation that will combine a lot of cryptocurrency assets on one platform, it's time to do something global that will be able to unite all cryptocurrency traders in one place) I think the main advantage of this platform is accessibility. Today, none of the exchanges can boast of sufficient accessibility and clarity for novice traders. The procedure of registration in the input of funds to the exchange takes too long |
|
|
|
After all, the platform does have good advantages over existing centralized exchanges. Really wanted to what is described in the white paper was really brought to life
Centralized exchanges will cease to exist in the near future , they will not stand the competition with decentralized exchanges like this Well, they will continue their work, just lose a lot of their clients, trading volumes will be significantly reduced and therefore the exchange will have little income. With each passing day, technology is becoming more and more complex and progressive. If the exchanges do not keep up with the overall development of the cryptocurrency and the growing interest in it, alas, they will simply disappear |
|
|
|
After all, the platform does have good advantages over existing centralized exchanges. Really wanted to what is described in the white paper was really brought to life
Centralized exchanges will cease to exist in the near future , they will not stand the competition with decentralized exchanges like this |
|
|
|
|
The project will be in demand unambiguously. The ICO theme is very common now every day there are new startups. And besides, people's interest in new projects is always very high and many are happy to participate in the ICO. Generally very lively and developing market, the project will find its place in this niche
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I believe that there is no need for an internal currency on the exchanger. This is really good when the exchanger can perform its functions stably
Many people get good bonuses for becoming investors of this exchanger. This is one of the ways to earn and accelerate the development of the project I think that the development of the project is not accelerated in this way, but many more people are involved to participate in it. This is really true |
|
|
|
I then have a question: what is a cryptoshare? So is the internal currency of the exchanger? why is it needed if LCS is an exchanger?
More cryptocurrencies, more payment methods: LocalCoinSwap will offer a wider selection of cryptocurrencies than any existing peer-to-peer exchange. LocalCoinSwap will offer all conceivable payment methods for purchasing or selling, including custom options added by the community. |
|
|
|
I have one project site is very much freezes when I want to find information on it? What's the matter?
To be honest, my site hangs in one place: when I try to open a block of answers to frequently asked questions. It is very poorly decorated You're right, I was opening this part of the site. On other pages I have no problems, including Internet surfing. Connection speed is stable Maybe there is just now being optimized, and therefore the system does not allow us to get acquainted with the content. I hope this will end soon. I hope so! As correctly written above - the block of answers to frequently asked questions is really implemented very badly. Try to read the white paper of the project. In fact, all the answers to the questions are contained in it, and the block of answers to common questions is simply a extraction from white paper You do not need to read all the white paper. There are sections and a table of contents, you can read what interests you, finding it in a few minutes This is why a block of answers to frequently asked questions was created. A few minutes is a very stretchable concept, I believe And what if it does not work? This guy is right, I already found all the information in white paper. In principle, I did not spend much time, since I already read white paper There are people who have never read a white paper, but they need to get information quickly. The most convenient way is of course to use the answers to questions |
|
|
|
I have one project site is very much freezes when I want to find information on it? What's the matter?
To be honest, my site hangs in one place: when I try to open a block of answers to frequently asked questions. It is very poorly decorated You're right, I was opening this part of the site. On other pages I have no problems, including Internet surfing. Connection speed is stable Maybe there is just now being optimized, and therefore the system does not allow us to get acquainted with the content. I hope this will end soon. I hope so! As correctly written above - the block of answers to frequently asked questions is really implemented very badly. Try to read the white paper of the project. In fact, all the answers to the questions are contained in it, and the block of answers to common questions is simply a extraction from white paper |
|
|
|
I have one project site is very much freezes when I want to find information on it? What's the matter?
To be honest, my site hangs in one place: when I try to open a block of answers to frequently asked questions. It is very poorly decorated The developers have an excellent block of answers to questions. There the project team described the main points that should be paid attention to |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
