Hey ralle14, the challenge I was referring to was the black mamba challenge and even with the reward being generous it still wouldn't hurt encouraging as many entries as possible? I think this is the case even it comes at the cost of spreading the news over a few more channels right, which in the end will only bring in more money to the casino

It looks interesting and like it has potential, so good job for that. Can you go in a bit more detail about how you auto bet works? At the moment I've not had a chance to try it out but it would super good if you could explain more about its usage etc. I would like to think that by answering this other people could benefit from it and hopefully help them decide if this is a platform they're happy to try out or not.

Hey there, in my opinion there are many measures one can use to determine quickly if a site is legit or not. Some of my favourites are how big is their community, is what they offer too good to be true, what do you get when you Google their brand name, do they seem professional, do they say guarantee winning etc. especially, with the latter if that's clearly put in red or something flashy then that's almost always not legit and you have to be careful.

I'm surprised to see that so far only about 5 people signed up for the challenge. In my opinion, it's a great challenge to hold whereby to the number generation gambling game real world situation/celebration is attached, even if its in the memory of someone. Returning to my initial observation perhaps using other mediums to increase the participating numbers might help    

The bottom line is to not expect anybody other than you to help you with this and especially not casinos which are only looking out for people like yourself and others to profit from. I'm afraid you have to maser the strength to do it or else it may get too problematic for you. Perhaps, thinking about the reasons why you're doing it and the benefits it would bring you if you're not spending all your money on gambling  

Errr, quick question. Isn't the website supposed to be live already  It seems that there's some domain issues and I'm not sure if this is something others have experienced 

So ar I don't know that many but I came across this article and it sounds to me like this might be what you/your friend might be looking for  Anyways, the casino can be accessed here (https://luckydice.com/) and the article describing it can be read here https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@kadjar/introducing-luckydice-a-new-take-on-the-classic-game-usd100-giveaway-contest

Happy reading 

Even so guys, this faucet abuse you're talking about there's no real benefit for players to use it other than just gaining insight about the games. So, even if there's a few people relying on the faucets the amounts are not enough to withdraw or play games where you can win for real money etc. And if the faucets are not built with these strategies in mind then rather than limiting the potential number of future customers by removing the faucets like you lot suggest which won't be sustainable not to mention that it won't look good on the casino, why not instead use the technology available to limit the power of the faucets in the way I mentioned above? This is something other casinos do btw

All you're saying is interesting but what I'm not sure about is whether you are quoting the exception here or not? It seems to me that many other casinos do have a high success rate from their weekly/monthly competitions so is this something that perhaps this casino may consider? This being reflecting as the voice from its costumers?

I also agree with these guys that if like most people you're in for the wins then the game you play is not important as long as you know enough about it that you think by playing the game you'll maximise your chance of winning. It would be futile though if people choose their games otherwise 

Is this something you tested several times to see that your win wasn't a one off? In any case, I find it quite pretentious to say that you can win and that it's almost a guarantee. I hope only people who can afford this type of loss or at least those who have consider the possibility of losing it all tries this as I would not like to think what it would be like for a newbie to go on and get wrecked because to be fair the chances are stupendous.

I'm not sure that from the perspective of a new player the chatlotto bot you're talking about is better than the faucet. The main purpose for having a faucet is to attract new players rather than reward the already existing players. And the reason faucets are so popular among casinos and players use it is due to its risk-free benefits it comes with

This is nice but can the credit be exchanged for anything else on here other than being spent on the games? I know some casinos where your deposited money can be converted into tokens which can then be used to either play directly or else exchanged for other tokens. Is there a similar feature that allows this type of interchangeability available here also?

Fair enough, I agree with the fact that decentralisation is the equivalent of provable fair, and since most casinos are built with provably fair in mind there's no real benefit to added decentralisation other than a huge spike in capital investment, and where the players don't receive any benefits either.
For matters concerning player safety, the casinos should be fully transparent and by ensuring their money is safe the casinos in turn can't take more than what the players are willing to gamble with.

In other words, introducing decentralisation would not benefit anybody and hence its a feature nobody is paying attention to. I hope these comments gave you a solid understanding that decentralised ownership isn't always valuable, especially in gambling as providers must adhere to other terms already covering customer safety/protection!

No competition? Mate, gambling is competition, isn't it? I know some people play for fun but I think we both know that most people aren't. And isn't competition bring out the best in people/players?
At the end of the day, for some, gambling is an addiction just as much as it a vehicle for ' the winner' syndrome. The bottom line is that people like to win and competition is good, it pushes players to do their best. SO let them do their best and increase their chance of success 

I like the UI and the designs also, but what concerns me is the invite-only access to the platform. Isn't there enough competition out there, why would players go through the extra hurdle of messaging you to get the invite link if all they want to do is try it out and see if that's something they like or not.

Having said this, do you think this is then likely to change in the future? I mean the crypt world is moving towards autonomy & accessibility and if you can't tick at least one of these boxes then what are you doing with your investments? Anyways, don't take it personally, I'm just trying to make sense of it!

Peace,
Josephdd1

After reading the article looks like even their first product (a USD stablecoin) has practically no users.

Does this company just pump out random stablecoins until something gains traction?

Personally, I think that it's unlikely to be a pre-existing title that will incorporate blockchain technology, but it will be a new intellectual property.

Something like Cyberpunk 2077 would be the perfect opportunity—particularly since the game is expected to feature cryptocurrencies as the in-game currency.

The bounty should be operating for several weeks before the ICO/IEO begins. Obviously bounties take a while to pick up speed since it takes some time to recruit enough bounty hunters to get the world out effectively.

Because of this, I think a bounty should run 7-8 weeks prior to the ICO/IEO, and then overlap the token sale period for a few additional weeks.

Bitcoin is definitely one of the tool's used by those that are under the thumb of the government.

I think I saw a report that the number of Localbitcoin registrations from HK significantly increased during the protect, then it was later revealed that this was likely an error.

That being said, there isn't much need for it during protests, they tend to just start using anonymous communication apps more (like Signal).