Big surprise in the match between Barcelona and Borussia, Rakitic playing from the beginning. As expected, Barcelona putting a lot of pressure on Borussia players. Messi and Rakitic coperate very well together. Dembele is the most dangerous player on offense so far.
Is this match last chance for german coach?
I don't see Barcelona at the moment. I only saw statistics that happened in the match. I saw on minute 26' Dembele was replaced by Antoine Griezmann. Is Dembele injured? Because it is not usually Barcelona doing the substitutions in the early minutes. |
|
|
|
|
Vietnam is my favorite to get a lot of medals in this tournament.
But there is little I want to discuss or people have already said this. That the host of the Games was very chaotic and lacking preparation. You can find everything on Twitter. That some things were not prepared in full by the Philippines.
|
|
|
|
Official starting XI  So Cristiano is on the starting list, the surprice is Dybala over Higuain. Very interesting match to watch. I am sure both of these teams will qualify for the next phase, only they will target to become group winners. Seeing current conditions, Juventus is very big to get a victory in this match. Plus Juventus play at home. |
|
|
|
|
Choose the Dex exchange that many people already use. Don't try the new Dex exchange, because this is very sensitive in crypto. So far I only use dex exchanges like Idex and BinanceDex. Because they have been trusted by many people.
|
|
|
|
IEOs has certainly become the order of the day for new start up in cryptocurrency. replacing the traditional ICO which was a means of raising funds for new crypto projects. As we all Know, IEOs are been conducted on Exchanges which was a means to guaranteed investors that they have a platform to exchange( buy/sell) their token and as well a trust and accountabilty in the crypto ecosystem.
Currently there are Exchanges that are not deem FIT To conduct these exchanges because:
1: 90% of the projects the marketed failed to reach softcap.
2; most projects been marketed are still Scam and have nothing to offer.
3; they never review any of these project but rather charge fees for IEO listing.( once, you make your payment, you are allow to conduct your sales on their platform) a sure way of damaging their reputation.
4: they list multiple projects at once making it difficult for investors to make their own review and choose a quality project.
I know of LATOKEN exchange as Number one in this category.
Please drop yours if you have any.
Not only the LATOKEN Exchange experienced this, I don't want to make another exchange. But it is true, that small exchanges like LATOKEN sometimes fail a lot when doing IEO. Precisely the 4th point, there are very many projects in the exchange. So that is really the wrong strategy to succeed the project. But LATOKEN also needs funds in this case, so that's why they do it. |
|
|
|
I think we should not discuss ICO anymore, because the ICO period has ended and as we know that at this time IEO is a new thing replacing ICO. I think IEO is better than ICO.
You are right, IEO is better than ICO. We cannot forbid people to talk about ICO, in fact also that investors will prefer IEO over ICO. But behind the better IEO, there are still a number of projects that are currently doing ICO. |
|
|
|
Happy with this condition now, the Italian league is full of competition that is still difficult to guess.
The Italian team has always been one sided for the past few years, juventus had been dominating, but this year might look a little bit competitive than previous years, I was expecting inter to had pull a draw against Juventus. It might take a while or perhaps not for Juventus to drop down from first position Inter and Atalanta are Juventus's main rivals both of these teams have potential and are closer to Juventus they are ready to jump at any time While Roma and Napoli are still trying to find opportunities to stay on track I wish Milan was in this group with the teams that are strong competitors to Juventus as old times. They need to sign players if they want to be competitive again, something similar to what Inter did and we see them now facing equally Juventus in the Serie A matches. There are two reasons why Marco Giampaolo was fired from his coaching chair. 1. There is no other choice Milan must fire Giampaolo because there is no other choice. Because, things are not going well under his care. 2. For the Sake of Milan Giampaolo is a good coach. However, they must separate for the good of the club " |
|
|
|
Most of the campaigns are paying low rewards due to users increased and when rewards received the price of token/coin very low in exchanges, so you should join the good project after analysis of the project.
participating in a good project is the main goal. But this is not a guarantee that in the future you will get great results, as you say that the number of participants in the campaign has greatly increased. Actually there is something that can be done so that participants get a lot of results by participating in good projects. If one campaign imposes a maximum number of participants. That is very influential. |
|
|
|
|
Do not expect ICO to rise again. ICO is dead slowly, so nothing can be expected. But I still see a lot of projects that do ICO, but whether it is effective with the current conditions. Mostly they fail!
|
|
|
|
All of them have their own advantages and setbacks, but I prefer IEO, it is better than both ICO and STO. It is more secure. According to experts from IBCGroup, IEO is a preferred method for the majority of investors.
Why is it preferred? Because IEO is safer than other options such as ICO and STO. So anyway, IEO is definitely liked by many Investors. Actually the ICO method is good too, but unfortunately this method is used by many irresponsible people, because that is the emergence of IEO. Many people prefer this method when they want to invest. |
|
|
|
|
Oh God, if we want to invest in IEO we have to wait for a response from the community. Of course it's a strange thing, what's the use of ourselves if we still believe in other people's words. If for example the project fails and you experience a loss, whether the community can be responsible.
|
|
|
|
|
ICO is not visible now.
That does not mean that ICO is dead and abandoned, but most projects do not dare to do ICO. Not without reason, they have seen investors no longer interested in investing in ICO. Even though the project was good, ICO still doesn't have full trust right now.
|
|
|
|
Before joining any bounty check if they have an established date of when they will deliver the tokens to their bounty participants, if at the end of the campaign they try to change the rules with the excuse of not wanting to distribute the tokens to the bounty hunters because this could crash the price make a scam accusation against them since they are violating their own terms, besides if the developers need to do that to protect their coin then this means their coin was not that good to begin with.
I believe this has often been done by the Bounty Hunter and in the end it was all in vain. Because the project always does not care about the changes they make for the usual reasons. But usually at the beginning of a bounty campaign, if we ask for distribution then they will answer after the sale. That is a condition where we want to participate or not, unfortunately we entered there. Because what is seen is whether the project is good or not. |
|
|
|
|
If you are a Bounty Hunter then having shitcoin is a must have in your wallet. If shitcoin doesn't have an exchange, of course you can't do anything except see it in your competition as a complement to the life of the Prize Hunter. One way to get rid of it is to sell it in FD or ED. That is also if someone buys it.
|
|
|
|
|
Why did the ICO become tarnished? Because everyone has the opportunity to develop their projects and that opportunity is used by a number of people. Even though the project developed was not going well. Previous investors had trusted the ICO and now that trust has been lost. ICO is also no longer trusted.
|
|
|
|
I can't imagine if Ethereum can really replace Bitcoin in the future. Really ethereum would be very scary if this kind of hope could happen.
And the fact that hope is so empty doesn't mean I'm not sure. It's just that it will be very difficult to do ethereum to replace bitcoin.
Well that's good to hear but I don't think bitcoin can be replaced with ethereum, For now, Ethereum is still too far away from bitcoin and it really takes times or it will never happen but both bitcoin and ethereum are great coin is just that bitcoin is first and have gone too far already. I have a strong doubt that ethereum will be the next step to bitcoin but when it comes replacing I don't think so. Remember the ethereum surge when it almost surpasses bitcoin price, at the end ethereum failed. Actually as I said that this Substitution can happen and nothing is impossible. It's just, if you think logic. Then this is very difficult to happen or even mustahila happen. Not that pessimistic about ethereum, it's just that ethereum is now difficult to rise from its downturn. |
|
|
|
|
If speaking of ICO at the present time it has indeed been said to be less desirable (dying slowly) especially now that the crypto market is in a declining phase, people have not invested much in this ICO method. Because not without reason, they mostly experience losses when investing in ICO.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't imagine if Ethereum can really replace Bitcoin in the future. Really ethereum would be very scary if this kind of hope could happen.
And the fact that hope is so empty doesn't mean I'm not sure. It's just that it will be very difficult to do ethereum to replace bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
This decision has two sides of the same coin. On the first side is a good move to attract investors, and on the other side it is a big risk. Project developers should be able to correctly use this method of attracting investors.
I agree with that. Indeed their aim is basically like that. But most of these methods fail to apply. In sales they are indeed successful because prices have been lowered. But in the future they could not even maintain the value of the token and ended in destruction. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
