Bitcoin Forum
May 31, 2024, 12:09:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
221  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Is it possible to fake the BTC blockchain? on: November 08, 2019, 07:59:48 AM
It's a bit of time I'm asking myself this question.
Let's imagine the following situation:
A guy visits another guy to receive a payment in BTC.
He doesn't have mobile internet connection, so he asks his host to connect to his host's wi-fi.
His host, that we assume for the sake of our inquiry wants to scam his guest, connects him to a fake internet in which the real BTC blockchain was forked in order to fake a transaction that in really will never happen.
So once the first guy will go back home he'll see that his payment has disappeared.
Is this situation technically possible?
222  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Would you accept money backed by happiness? on: November 08, 2019, 07:48:19 AM
So should your concept be implemented the happiest people will also become rich?
223  Local / Разное / Re: Хотим снять сериал про Сатоши on: November 07, 2019, 09:25:09 AM
Хоть и тема уже вдоволь была поддана обсуждениям, но позволю заметить, что в российском кинематографе нет достойных картин связянных с криптовалютой. Парадоксально, но страна где одно из самых больших криптосообществ не имеет достойного фильма о них же. Думаю, в течении нескольких лет мы увидим что-то криминальное от НТВ продакшн, где в нескольких сериях будут искать людей связанных с теневыми схемами и криптой...Уж такова наша доля видеть светлую идею децентрализации в темном свете.

Согласен с Вами. Но с другой стороны, видимо такова человеческая натура - никому не интересны позитивные новости, к примеру.
224  Economy / Exchanges / Re: who is the best btc exchange ? on: November 04, 2019, 08:53:10 PM
You may also consider bisq.
225  Local / Разное / Re: Хотим снять сериал про Сатоши on: November 04, 2019, 08:49:02 PM
Мне кажется одной серии будет вполне достаточно. Как можно снять целый сериал о человеке, о котором вообще ничего не известно?
226  Economy / Economics / Re: How can we get people to use bitcoin as a currency? on: November 04, 2019, 07:08:17 PM
To make use BTC as a currency among normal people a solution for the paper money is needed, because internet is not everywhere in the world.
But BTC is not the currency for the day-by-day use. It was created for a completely new economy. In that economy it will be used normally, IMHO.
227  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 30, 2019, 10:23:16 PM
Update 2019-11-30: I've made an agreement with an advertiser, tomorrow I'd like to begin advertising SLM with him. Of course any brainstorming would considerably improve my decision.
That's fine, thanks! Yep, I would be interested in the details, you can send them via PM if you want.

It's ok for me to describe the thing publicly (transparency is the strength of any truly decentralised coin).

So the story is the following:
A guy went yesterday on Discord and asked whether we'd be interested to be promoted to the moon.
I answered him that we don't need to go to the moon, but an appropriate promotion would be fine.
Afterwards he contacted me privately and we chatted a bit.
They have a number of groups on Telegram where they discuss cryptocurrencies in different languages.
They have advertising slots there that they are selling.
They would make one advertising post each day in two channels they have, that have something like 21k subscribers.
It will last two weeks and will cost us 75$.
If nothing happens we won't be working together if we'll see results we can go on with this cooperation.
How does it sound to you?
 
Updates 2019-11-02:
- At the moment we are stuck with the above described advertising campaign, as the advertiser asked me to pay in advance which is not acceptable for me for obvious reasons.

- @gjhiggins, @d500 There is a guy that may be interested to rewrite our code, would it be possible for you to supervise his work?

Updates 2019-11-03:
- seems like the negotiation about advertising is going on, today I was contacted by a kind of superior of the guy I was negotiating with;
- there is another advertising proposal I've received privately, to pay a signature here on bitcointalk at 0.00012 BTC per post up to 10 posts a day, which should make considering the members of our Community to add our signature while posting here (seems like it has a great value);
- @gjhiggins has informed me that the rewrite has been already done by him! (seems like in SLM people prefer doing things instead of speaking).
228  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] We Built The Platform First, Then Blockchain [POW/POS/MN] DIY Tube Coin on: October 29, 2019, 08:24:53 PM
@DIYTube you did a great work.
Your site runs smoothly and it's a very ambitious project.
I don't think it will be easy to compete with youtube, but sooner or later someone will do things better than they.
I'd like to know. Is the site running on an ordinary server or on something like IPFS or Bittorent? Is it blockchain based or the coins are created to provide the payments?
Would be nice to have a decentralised video provider, but maybe there are some already.
229  Local / Хайпы / Re: Кто что слышал за проект all.me on: October 29, 2019, 08:10:49 PM
Мне не удается посмотреть сайт. Там сразу требуют зарегаться. Конечно это не вызывает желания продолжать, покрайней мере у меня.

ну это типо социальная сеть на блокчейне! Продукт ,посмотрел готовый (сайт, приложение крутое, но торгуется только на одной бирже coinall уже почти год! вот думал может кто что слышал! Проект на самом деле интересный !

Может они не хотят себя рекламировать поэтому шифруются?  Smiley
230  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Would you accept money backed by happiness? on: October 29, 2019, 07:43:14 PM
Interesting concept, but do you have ideas on how to realise it?
231  Local / Хайпы / Re: Кто что слышал за проект all.me on: October 29, 2019, 07:39:15 PM
Мне не удается посмотреть сайт. Там сразу требуют зарегаться. Конечно это не вызывает желания продолжать, покрайней мере у меня.
232  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ✅✅✅ [ANN] BitAIrt - World First AI Art on the blockchain - 10 ETH to win ✅✅✅ on: October 29, 2019, 07:26:38 PM
Fascinating project, a bit frightening also.
Do you have a discord channel?
So it's a kind of ICO? Are the tokens traded anywhere?
233  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 28, 2019, 08:43:35 AM
I realised it was a pointless exercise and turned it off - the network conditions for testnet do not in any way replicate the network conditions for mainnet and so it is impossible to draw any reliable, well-founded conclusions. As regards testing a different staking regime on mainnet, well that option is wide open to any node owner whether they be blackhat, whitehat or greyhat.
Should we need additional nodes for testing I can provide them.

Instead, I returned to using a standard client (compiled from master) and it's been running happily for a couple of months now. I had to stop-and-restart it a couple of times when it froze up during the recent network instability but the restarted client synced up straight away and, now that the network has settled down somewhat, the client is running fairly economically (for Slimcoin, that is) using between 10-15% of its allocated thread.
I have a slimcoin wallet on a server compiled from master and I can confirm that it has been running smoothly for months by now.
It takes 1-2 hours to launch it and days to download complete blockchain, but I'm not seeing other issues with it.
The same thing with my desktop gui wallet. The only issue I had was that it had suddenly disregarded the blockchain already downloaded and begun downloading it again, to avoid this issue in the future I've just made a backup of .slimcoin folder so I have a bootstrap for the next time.


The token mechanism for proof-of-donation could be developed in parallel to point 2.
I'm still thinking about developing PoD based token using KMD CC because it will give us the possibility to involve other coins teams since the beginning and thus making this project more unbiased and decentralised. It will give also more visibility to the token I have in mind and will add visibility to SLM (as, to honour the fact SLM's PoB has inspired my invention of PoD, SLM will be certainly in the first group of coins enabled to mine the token we are speaking about). However I'm not sure I'll be able to code it/find a developer for this idea in a short period of time so if you'll have time to code it using PeerAssets before, we can swap the SLM based token on more advanced structure once it's ready later (I've also spoken with BLOCK developers to see whether they will be able to find a solution to smart blockchain keeping and managing the private key of another blockchain in a protected manner, so maybe even before I'm ready to develop the idea on KMD our challenge will be solved by BLOCK developers so we'll be able to create PoD mined coin with its own blockchain).

[Well, I agree. In my opinion, the top priorities for "core" development are:
1) Finalize tests for hard cap (see last entry at "develop" branch) and plan the coming soft fork. Improving SLM's security is top priority.
 the page. So you can be sure you really pay to a specific publisher.
Considering the last Graham's post should we consider that we are not working on this anymore?

I think we need to use blockchain and specifically Slimweb for something peculiar, for instance being blockchain immutable it can be used as registry office (registering the marriages, births, deaths, ownership of properties).
One idea that was brought up by Graham was to use it to store scientific publications.
I'm thinking about where to publish ideas that are on the basis of the PoD token we are speaking about, struggling in my mind between the desire of glory ( Smiley) and the need to protect information before the whole concept has been realised. So maybe it can be bitcointalk, medium.com, livejournal, hubzilla, or Slimweb. Should I publish on Slimweb only people interested in Slimcoin would have the possibility to access this information in the beginning. Is it possible to create a kind of forum based on Slimweb? Is it possible to protect pages with a password (or gpg)?

- The price of publishing is the price of transaction? In this case should the price of SLM go up could it be that the price of publishing would become too high?
True. That's another thing that should be updated once the codebase has been ported to PPC 0.6+ (in PPC, the mandatory fee was also reduced drastically). It needs probably a hard fork, however (see hardfork wishlist).
Maybe the price of transaction is not an issue, as it can be reduced gradually as it was done for BTC for instance.

- If the file published on Bittorrent disappears the published pages disappears as well right?
True.
Don't really know whether it's an issue or it can be turned in an opportunity if applied to the right subject. By now I'd say that the content that is absolutely not popular will disappear from Slimweb, right?

The best long-term solution would be an own search engine, however.
I'd suggest us to develop Slimweb with advanced searchability by design since the beginning. I feel like traditional search engines are not giving good results anymore and sometimes they are changing parameters in order to hide the content they are not interested to be publicly available.  
 
- Being BTC technology not completely anonymous how the Slimweb publisher can be sure he stays anonymous?
There's no additional anonymization technique. If he's afraid to get his IP detected, the most safe way would be to publish the page from another computer (Internet cafe etc.), creating the needed hashes/transactions offline, for example if he's living in a repressive country.
For those who trade on exchanges with KYC implemented and without using Tor their public addresses has been already compromised (99,999% or people), so maybe we should consider a solution to turn Slimcoin publishing back into anonymous, but should someone begin publishing illegal content the node owners will be put under pressure sooner or later by authorities.

  
Do you mean something like the Semantic Web? That's also an idea that was circulating.
Yes Semantic Web is cool.


SLM will be used to pay the publishing or to tip the publishers in order them to go on with their business if the readers do like their products.
Agree. One of the biggest advantages of Web2Web/Slimweb is that it can combine websites and payments (e.g. for electronic commerce or donations) in a very simple way, because an address is already provided by the page. So you can be sure you really pay to a specific publisher.
Maybe we can consider that the pages that receive more tips will go up in their category as position, which will stimulate people writing better content and putting it into the right category, but of course in case Slimweb becomes mainstream the big companies will manipulate the search results using money.

Quote
You guys have a done a lot of work on SLM already but reading the OP here it doesn't shine. Maybe someone should begin popularising and divulging what you've done and doing for SLM.

Update: I think it could be strategically relevant if we begin working on the search engine before trying to create a parallel internet based on Slimcoin. I mean that it's difficult to compete with the whole internet as it can take centuries to create a valid alternative. What is possible is to begin categorising the already existent internet pages in accordance to our search engine rules. Which could lead to people using more and more Slimegine to find information. It can be a kind of business for someone, categorising pages. Whoever can categorise any page in Internet in agreement to our rules and let his SLM address on that page for tips. The best search results hopefully will receive tips from the readers. If not we should create a rewarding mechanism that let people make money through intelligently categorised Internet pages, IPFs objects, Bittorent objects, Newsgroups information and so on.

Update 2019-11-30: I've made an agreement with an advertiser, tomorrow I'd like to begin advertising SLM with him. Of course any brainstorming would considerably improve my decision. And I think it's vital for the truly decentralised coin to have the community participating in decisions and the decisions to be extremely transparent and clear to anybody. So if you'd like to know the details of this action, to discuss them or participate in this small investment please let me know I'm open to explain my points and to change my ideas if reasonable.
234  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Namecoin & BitDNS on: October 19, 2019, 01:44:33 PM
I think all the coins are intrinsically useless because they are being used just for speculation at the moment and the true potential of the crypto hasn't been uncovered yet.
235  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 19, 2019, 01:21:42 PM
I'd like us to make a list of the goals we'd need to reach and to create a kind of roadmap (without binding timetables), it would help us to set up tasks for any additional developer we might find and to find investors to cover the expenses of each task/step.
I have no objections to that. I have already created a page for feature requests/proposals in the Wiki, but yes, some space to organize and assign priorities to the tasks that have to be done would be a great addition. If you want, you can create a page of this kind there.
To create a roadmap we need to activate a discussion. So we need people ready to discuss things. It can be just me and you, but it's a work that has to be done. And once it's done and we have concepts ready that make SLM different from any other coin we need to put it on bitcointalk SLM thread and everywhere we are speaking about SLM as first things to mention. Because there is so many coins that an investor doesn't have time to dedicate to understand whether a coin has any novelty or not. If it's not mentioned as first thing where he is reading he'll just pass to another coin.

Great tool, I think as you guys have worked in that direction we need to develop it further. Maybe connecting Slimweb to the project of hashed pages of Graham in order to be absolutely sure the page that the visitor is seeing is what the published wanted him to see.
My "Slimweb" tools are just some additions to Graham's original "ACME" concept. It uses the same codebase, only it provides a tool for easier publishing ("slimweb-publisher"), the Gateway at slimco.in (as an easy tool to access to hashed pages) and a little update to the code which transforms the blockchain data into a RDF database which can easily be queried (as SPARQL endpoints). To this code (a blocknotify script) I added some options to be able to re-sync the chain easier in the case the Slimcoin node or the "RDF node" crash.

Everybody can, in theory, verify the content comparing the hash stored on the blockchain with the HTML source of the displayed pages.

I outlined some ideas for new Slimweb features here: https://github.com/slimcoin-project/Slimcoin/wiki/The-Slimweb:--A-decentralized-web-based-on-Slimcoin on "Future plans"

However maybe the most urgent thing is that we would need more people hosting a "Slimweb" RDF node. Currently, as I'm the only one (Graham had a test node but I don't know if it's currently online), every time my client crashes, the node stops adding pages to the RDF database, and if the server crashes completely, Slimweb is offline. With more nodes, people could select the node they want in the Gateway, and if one doesn't work, another one would, surely.
I can host some nodes. What are the minimum specs to host a node? Where can I find setup instructions?

I'd like to ask some things:
- How Slimweb concept is different from steemed for instance? And from NMC?
- Right now we are speaking about just on page publishing, right? Wordpress publishing is out of our reach at the moment for instance, right?
- The price of publishing is the price of transaction? In this case should the price of SLM go up could it be that the price of publishing would become too high?
- If the file published on Bittorrent disappears the published pages disappears as well right?
- Is it possible to point a traditional domain name to a Slimweb page? If so is there any chance that the Google bots will able to find it at some point?
- Being BTC technology not completely anonymous how the Slimweb publisher can be sure he stays anonymous?

And what if we develop Slimcoin to use it as an unbiased search engine or a kind of web directory?
There was an user who wanted to develop something of this kind, but unfortunately I haven't heard any news from that project.

I think we need to use blockchain and specifically Slimweb for something peculiar, for instance being blockchain immutable it can be used as registry office (registering the marriages, births, deaths, ownership of properties).

Another idea could be to set up rules for Slimweb pages publishing in order them to be intrinsically easily searchable.

The main challenge in Internet is traffic. If we find some area that is not covered by traditional internet and which represents a need for many people Slimweb may become useful.


Edit: maybe we can create the internet of pages so there is no domain name involved and there is a maximum decentralisation. Each publisher may chose a category/sub-category/sub-sub-category for his page, so the pages are easily found (for instance inputting category tag on the page itself).  The readers may report the pages that are not in the correct category. The new categories/sub-categories/sub-sub-categories may be decided on the base of the voting inside of SLM ecosystem. Or on the opposite the publishers can create their own sub-sub-....-sub-sub-categories with the goal his page to be among few other pages in the same category in order it to be easily found by who needs them. Or the publisher in the same category may decide to split their category into sub-categories in order their pages to have less competition in their sub-category.
We can create a main distinction between "opinions" and "facts" to be the two root categories of the Slimweb.

Edit1: Maybe we can think about internet of objects instead of internet of pages. Each object: text, video, audio, code, file, tweet and many others that maybe are not invented yet would have one or more than one identification category array. So the internet of objects will be a kind of multidimensional matrix. Everybody can create objects or assembly them from the objects of the others. Such constructs can be quite complex, so the structure resulting from the assembly activity can be more sophisticated than a site or a platform used in traditional internet. The publisher may split its own objects into smaller pieces and give to each piece its own categorisation array. SLM will be used to pay the publishing or to tip the publishers in order them to go on with their business if the readers do like their products. The search results of a possible search engine could be a number of category arrays to chose from, each one of those category arrays containing a limited number (10?) of objects.
236  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 14, 2019, 06:06:31 PM
That's great! By the way I've just discovered that there is another explorer not mentioned in OP: https://bchain.info/slm/
Good news, so somebody probably paid this block explorer again (it was the main SLM explorer in 2017 but then it was discontinued). I'll link it in the OP again. Thanks  Smiley
It's seems like their business model has changed and they are basing on donations right now. I think we'd better donate something to them at some point to keep them working.

Regarding the problem of the coding style: I don't know if Graham has tried that, but wouldn't it be easier to port the original SLM changes (PoB and DCrypt, mainly) to a newer codebase (at least PPC 0.6 or 0.7) than vice-versa? In this case, the coding style could be reviewed and adapted.
If your idea could be implemented it would be great. I'd like us to make a list of the goals we'd need to reach and to create a kind of roadmap (without binding timetables), it would help us to set up tasks for any additional developer we might find and to find investors to cover the expenses of each task/step.


Ah, one thing: Due to the mentioned VPS problems currently the Slimweb gateway (http://slimco.in/gateway.html) isn't working. I doubt however many people were using it lately Wink

Great tool, I think as you guys have worked in that direction we need to develop it further. Maybe connecting Slimweb to the project of hashed pages of Graham in order to be absolutely sure the page that the visitor is seeing is what the published wanted him to see.  
And what if we develop Slimcoin to use it as an unbiased search engine or a kind of web directory?
237  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 14, 2019, 05:44:41 AM
It has been a bit bumpy, both my develop and master clients discovered they'd lost touch with the network, suddenly reporting that they'd found themselves several hundred blocks behind. I stopped and started them both, they synced up without problems, seeing stake and burn rewards. chainz client seems to suffered the same problem, a simple restart might well fix it.

I thought so, is there any way to contact them asking to reboot their wallet? (I was not able to find any info on how to get in touch with them on their site)

No need, the chainz node is now synched.

Cheers

Graham


That's great! By the way I've just discovered that there is another explorer not mentioned in OP: https://bchain.info/slm/
238  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 13, 2019, 07:47:58 PM
It has been a bit bumpy, both my develop and master clients discovered they'd lost touch with the network, suddenly reporting that they'd found themselves several hundred blocks behind. I stopped and started them both, they synced up without problems, seeing stake and burn rewards. chainz client seems to suffered the same problem, a simple restart might well fix it.

I thought so, is there any way to contact them asking to reboot their wallet? (I was not able to find any info on how to get in touch with them on their site)
239  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 13, 2019, 05:08:53 PM
The guy you are indirectly mentioning among those invested in some large amount of SLM is me.
No, I meant muf18 who spent weeks of his time searching out and talking to various devs, trying to find any interest in taking on the legacy Slimcoin codebase, unfortunately without success.

Cheers

Graham

That's why you were advising me about people who made a lot of effort before me. Now I understand a bit better the situation.
My idea was the following: I've bought a quantity of SLM as I said in order to offer a share of the market to a possible interested developer. How does it sound to you?
240  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Decentralized Web on: October 13, 2019, 11:54:40 AM
Do you guys have a problem with a lot of orphans in the last a few days? I have confirmed blocks, but after some time all are going in orphans

i have some ones



but i think it's not critical
From here it seems like the last block was generated 3 hours 51 minutes ago.

Explorer shows 4 hours 19 min the last block
Is it some kind of network outrage?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!