|
no auto-update for the last version of desktop DEX?
does not open any more.
|
|
|
|
|
in effect the situation is severe..as far as waves price is concerned.
|
|
|
|
on this page i found in third position by marketscap ATOM (cosmos) http://dev.pywaves.org/marketcap/is it the well known token, of the same name ? i cannot find it on the DEX. |
|
|
|
yes, i had read that. from it: citation begins: – What do you mean by Waves Platform and Waves Enterprise networks merging? This is what will happen in our next major release, which we are calling ‘Waves 2.0’. This is currently in the research stage. Further details about this release will be published in Q4 2019. – Will there be a VST and WAVES merger? We do not plan to merge these tokens. We are starting development of both Waves Enterprise and Waves Platform networks in a such a way that they will become sidechains for each other, and they will interact with each other via a special protocol. Again, technical details about this development will be published in October 2019. citation ends. so there will be no fusion but interaction between 2 sidechains, with still unknown modalities. but marquise museum said that this plan has been changed, with government interaction.. so i was asking more details... if the initial waves plan is mostly changed, the price will fall again, and we will reach some cents to the waves.. for exemple remember what occurred to iconomi ICN, whose initial whitepaper was subsequently changed... investors left. the other possibility being a significant fork. IMHO waves must remain waves. |
|
|
|
no real response from waves support or forum members to the thesis of marquise museum.
so should we assume that he is correct, and that waves, waves enterprise and vostok would merge in the future..?
this is a very important point IMHO.
WAVES - it's WAVES. WAVES 2.0, TurtleNetwork, or all another probable projects - this is just a fork from the main WAVES. Do not believe dirty speculations about relationship of this forks with the WAVES. Total available supply of WAVES is 100 million coins. And no more. And cann't be more coins, in future - this is a maximum. Else, we will disagree with some updates, and will supporting, together, only the orthodox source code, and old blockchain. thank you for response. seems legit, we have paid for that. |
|
|
|
|
no real response from waves support or forum members to the thesis of marquise museum.
so should we assume that he is correct, and that waves, waves enterprise and vostok would merge in the future..?
this is a very important point IMHO.
|
|
|
|
I understand it differently. VST has been sold, and is a separate private network with waves technology. VST will have another token increase for public and private associates, when they bring new money. waves enterprise is a new entity that is parallel to VST and still not very precisely described. So a second professional entity, TBD..probably for different users. it is this entity that is projected to merge with waves platform. Ref: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=253762471501505&story_fbid=1096672997210444we need to ascertain this scheme. Maybe waves support has something to say for that. meanwhile waves turns to an inflationary level, its price decreases accordingly. |
|
|
|
VST integration with Waves in 2021, it will lead to increased supply from 100 million to 1.1 billion because VST will do everything that waves can do now.
Waves market cap should be determined from supply of 1.1 billion because VST cloning. So the value is actually 1.1 billion at $1 and this can go to $0.1.
Hello. I am interesting in more information on this. Do you have links or information on VST cloining or is this an assumption? I find this alarming if it happens. this is intriguing and would constitute another bad news. more details are required if true. |
|
|
|
|
I do not agree with the adoption of inflationary model.
EDIT: slight rebound now, but has been under one usd per waves.
|
|
|
|
We know that the community has lots of questions about the global plans for Waves, the purpose of Waves Enterprise, and the role of the VST token going forwards.
We've published this FAQ to answer as many of these as we can.
If you still have questions, please let us know in our official Telegram group.
Today I will sleep peacefully, knowing that you have the capital to do all the marketing you have not done and change the image of distrust you have now. citation begins from: https://blog.wavesplatform.com/your-questions-about-waves-enterprise-answered-dcc892589700– "What do you mean by Waves Platform and Waves Enterprise networks merging? answer:This is what will happen in our next major release, which we are calling ‘Waves 2.0’. This is currently in the research stage. Further details about this release will be published in Q4 2019". citation ends. For me this merge would be a fatal error, because waves would become only permissioned ! remember the fate of poloniex, whose market share fell from 60 to one percent after mandatory kyc; waves is fragile, considering its limited world adoption until now. keep its fate open, so that the market could decide. |
|
|
|
I like it, however, the information is not that different from other cryptocoins. We have already seen this before repeatedly. It is not interesting anymore. I reckon Aeon should go back to its original vision. A lightweight cryptonote coin that can run on your smart phone. Those documents were more of a “welcome to Aeon” sort of document. They were not really intended to be some large informational source about what Aeon is. It’s a marketing document with more in depth to come. Aside from that we are inching closer to k12. How are the present GPU miners weighing in on the change? I reckon they should have no vote because they can always leave and transfer mining on another coin or continue mining the old chain. However, who is making the Asics for k12 and are they accessible for anyone? I reckon this would be the next problem in this challenge hehe. Producing ASICs for k12 will make sense economically only when the network grows substantially. And the availability of ASICs will be improved along with the market growth. If the network grows and K12 Asics' availability is wide, I reckon Aeon's experiment on Asics might become Monero's insurance policy in case RandomX might prove to be not Asic resistant? This is what I speculate. it seems that Randomx is a technical success: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=753252.msg52027258#msg52027258 |
|
|
|
|
would participate to the bounty program;
|
|
|
|
|
yes probably FOIN is a thing of financial people.
it is represented as an important coin on front page of cryptos at investing.com (financial site)
and exhibits large variations more or less correlated to btc tendance.
|
|
|
|
I haven't heard about waves this year, seems that it was just passing at my busy days. However looking into that statement that it could replace ethereum, there's no possibility for now. I couldn't see a good reason for waves to replace eth, because it has no strong community as compared to ethereum. Few projects were silently associated with waves, and I think it wasn't growing or not gaining fast market demand.
maybe you could have a look to some waves properties: -much higher scalability -instant transactions (with lo cost) -new dissemination of waves tech to public and private entities -turing incomplete dApps less risky than turing complete (DAO experience), anyway waves support both categories. |
|
|
|
|
Are dApps devs obliged to buy a certain amount of waves ?
|
|
|
|
Compared to ethereum and waves, of course it is very different. Some people will support ethereum if for this comparison. Because we know for ourselves that ethereum is the king of altcoins right now and waves and other altcoins are just shadows of ethereum.
It's already expected that we will see more supporters of ethereum as between the two, ethereum has the most success and we can see it in their current value now. Comparing the price graph of the two. ETH - https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/Waves - https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/waves/ETH started less than one usd and now valued at over 300 usd, let's say 300 times increase. Waves as well started with less than a dollar but now its price is just over a dollar, now much of a profit from investors here. well, the two coins have different beginnings, and look to have the same potential. however, people sometimes choose ETH because it is very commonly used. besides, ETH is also the same as bitcoin in altcoin. however, there is no doubt that the two coins are potential coins. this thread's activity has also increased since smart contracts arrival, as well as waves leasing revenues. |
|
|
|
|
i understand that DAPPS transactions are not counted on waves dex, but generate fees? attributed to each dapp?
|
|
|
|
thank you all for documenting the references. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
