What do you hope to gain here by continuing this absurd ritual? According to theymos, if they are not able to show the written contract, then they will be removed from the DT list!  And so, what? They have to be removed from the DT list! Your reputation here is irretrievably damaged by your own actions, How and by what own actions? |
|
|
|
How can the community prevent bitcointalk accounts to abuse the trust system? Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. The below extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts knowingly support the incorrect fact-statement that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, but are not able to show the alleged written contract! h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, IconFirm, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, (mocacinno), morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, thisnewcoin, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei
Is bitcointalk.org a legal-free zone where everyone can abuse the trust system? |
|
|
|
DuckDice has obtained a Random Number Generator Certificate from iTech Labs that certify that iTech Labs has evaluated the Random Number Generator (RNG) and found that the RNG complies with the relevant standards!  |
|
|
|
You are the one who is hiding behind anonymity and you are the one who is threatening and blackmailing other people. You totally lost your sense of reality. We will see who lost its sense of reality! What do you hope to gain here by continuing this absurd ritual? According to theymos, if they are not able to show the written contract, then they will be removed from the DT list! Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. |
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly. I have an impression that what Game-Protect is doing when he is "helping" someone to get their money back, is spamming the casino with complaints, threats etc., and in the end some of them give up and pay.
We have a lot of such "services" where I live. They propose their clients "to resolve the issue" for a small percentage in return. But what their clients don't realize is that they could resolve the issue by themselves just as well, without the need to pay anything to anyone.
The fact that Game Protect is not issuing a refund, as promised, is something I don't tolerate neither. It is a fact that the 210€ were refunded after request on 3rd September: h4ns to GP 100,000€ current compensation demand for damages caused by his public defamation campaign - GP to h4ns 210€ = h4ns to GP 99,790€ |
|
|
|
However, i still believe my initial support for this flag was correct. I read h4ns's topic and to the best of my knowledge, i tought it was valid. I asked you to show the alleged written contract and you are not able to deliver! Therefore you knowingly support a flag containing incorrect fact-statements and abused the trust system! Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. I am not a lawyer, and i'm not interested in discussing wether or not an e-mail is to be considered to be a written contract (or not), or that mixing the word "donation" into the conversation results in making every payment a donation (or not). In other words, you publicly support that a written contract was violated, but you do not want to know whether or not it is true!  3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment); Does not exist! Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement. Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract Does not exist! Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such! |
|
|
|
@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, AdolinWolf, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, IconFirm, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, (mocacinno), morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, Ringg, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei Please show the written contract? h4ns alleged the following, but later withrew it: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, AdolfinWolf, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, IconFirm, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, (mocacinno), morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, Ringg, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei |
|
|
|
Only because extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts declare a simple email as a written contract does not make it a written contract!!!  UK law is similar to the law in most commonwealth countries. For contracts to be legally binding, five essential elements must be present. There must be: 1) An offer; 2) Acceptance of the offer; 3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment); 4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract; and 5) Certainty as to what the parties have agreed. https://businessadvice.co.uk/business-development/business-planning/are-emails-legally-binding/[/quote] 3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment); Does not exist! Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement. Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract Does not exist! Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such! |
|
|
|
The Flag system requires Flag-creators to withdraw their support once they've been made whole. Did that happen?
Game Protect never scammed h4ns and the scam accusation is false and misleading! theymos announced to remove DT members who knowingly support a flag containing incorrect fact-statements. Did that happen? Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. Game Protect does not make any contracts and never made any written contract with h4ns! The supporters know that a written contract does not exist, because I asked them multiple times to show the alleged written contract, but they are not able to show it! h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei |
|
|
|
Betbit.com has never breached the trust of a client. The BetBit scam breached the trust of the whole world with publicly false and misleading claiming that the applicable jurisdiction is Malta while it does not have a license there!  |
|
|
|
@Game-Protect
Because you said so in your email. You tried to extort us.
Facts: You deposited and played. If you would have won you kept the winnings. If you lose then you claim the losses based on regional jurisdictions. That is called "bad faith". Your business model is set up to be a parasite on gaming services. We would never concede to these extortion attempts.
In contrast, we strive to protect players by being responsible. We have set up an extensive self-exclusion system to prevent players from wagering outside of what they would consider entertainment. I challenge you to try to convince anyone on our staff to remove your self-exclusion settings. It would not happen, no matter how big of player you are.
Do you do what you do for yourself or for players? From reading above it seems that you do it for the 5% upfront fees. Also, screen your cases to make sure that the brands are at fault based on ethical behavior and not regional jurisdictions. I am sure there would be plenty of work out there for you if you were ethical yourself. You might even find brands like our supporting that type of business model. You could make players' lives better, protect against rogue brands and make a living with no one hating you. I'd say do that, as opposed to what you are doing now, which is blatantly predatory.v Predatory on gaming brands and predatory against players themselves.
Please show the email? |
|
|
|
Since game-protect is just a scammer and takes peoples money you will probably never collect but it's always good to make sure that everyone knows they are a scammer. Who did I scam and how? |
|
|
|
How can someone be in crypto world and say "show me shareholder contract" is beyond my understanding. I am not responsible for your inabilty to understand basic things, but in the real world shareholders of a company hold shareholder contracts!  Like how did you managed to live in crypto world for that long without understanding what decentralized is. Feel free to show me the decentralized shareholder contracts? Look I have been saying negative feedback towards earnbet as well but you are focusing on the wrong part. Offering an online casino with a shitty games selection and 50% more rake like competitor casinos is stupid and a failed project, but it is not a criminal offense. Therefore Game Protect rightfully focuses on the criminal offense of investment fraud EarnShit commits! |
|
|
|
Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. The below extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts persist to abuse the trust system with knowingly supporting the incorrect fact-statement that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, but are not able to show the alleged written contract! h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei |
|
|
|
Based on what laws and regulations are Malta courts applicable, even though the BetBit scam does not have a Malta license? |
|
|
|
Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. The below extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts persist to abuse the trust system with knowingly supporting the incorrect fact-statement that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, but are not able to show the alleged written contract! h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei |
|
|
|
After your brain substantiated that Game Protect is a scam / show, would not you withdraw your 7 pending enforcement cases? (September 3rd) My suspicion substantiated when he asked me to borrow him €10. For the second time. Or would you want Game Protect continue to enforce your 7 claims towards sportsbooks? Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such! According to you game protect makes no contracts. Correct. Show me the contract that continues his claim. Game Protect does not make contracts! Show your capacity to represent him in a real life court ! Game Protect does not represent claimants at courts! |
|
|
|
@Game-Protect
Because you said so in your email. You tried to extort us.
Facts: You deposited and played. If you would have won you kept the winnings. If you lose then you claim the losses based on regional jurisdictions. That is called "bad faith". Your business model is set up to be a parasite on gaming services. We would never concede to these extortion attempts.
In contrast, we strive to protect players by being responsible. We have set up an extensive self-exclusion system to prevent players from wagering outside of what they would consider entertainment. I challenge you to try to convince anyone on our staff to remove your self-exclusion settings. It would not happen, no matter how big of player you are.
Do you do what you do for yourself or for players? From reading above it seems that you do it for the 5% upfront fees. Also, screen your cases to make sure that the brands are at fault based on ethical behavior and not regional jurisdictions. I am sure there would be plenty of work out there for you if you were ethical yourself. You might even find brands like our supporting that type of business model. You could make players' lives better, protect against rogue brands and make a living with no one hating you. I'd say do that, as opposed to what you are doing now, which is blatantly predatory.v Predatory on gaming brands and predatory against players themselves.
How do you know that the email is from Game Protect? |
|
|
|
Please show the WRITTEN CONTRACT?
No. Why are not you able to show it? Please tell at what day and how the scam happened?
No. Why are not you able to tell it?
Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. The below extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts persist to abuse the trust system with knowingly supporting the incorrect fact-statement that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019, but are not able to show the alleged written contract! h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
Support: 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, Alveus, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Game-Protects, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei |
|
|
|
@ 1982dre, actmyname, addarmstrong, alexrossi, asphyxiate, asu, Astargath, Avirunes, babo, BayAreaCoins, BigBoy89, bL4nkcode, blurryeyed, bob123, bones261, cabalism, Captain Corporate, CASIO, ChiBitCTy, crwth, CryptopreneurBrainboss, DaveF, DiamondCardz, DireWolfM14, DreamerBT, eckmar, efialtis, examplens, Foxpup, Hakorede, HCP, Hhampuz, hopenotlate, iasenko, iluvbitcoins, Initscri, jimmyhate, JSRAW, Kalemder, Kevinn22, kruglikov, LeGaulois, LeonGhibli, LFC_Bitcoin, lighpulsar07, Lutpin, marlboroza, mindrust, Mirae, mocacinno, morvillz7z, mosprognoz, mu_enrico, NeuroticFish, nutildah, o_e_l_e_o, Pamoldar, pandukelana2712, PassThePopcorn, passwordnow, RHavar, rhomelmabini, robelneo, Rodeo02, Royse777, ScamViruS, sheenshane, Slow death, squatz1, stompix, subSTRATA, suchmoon, SyGambler, TECSHARE, The Parmasist, TheUltraElite, TMAN, TwitchySeal, whitcher_sense, WinRateCasino, xtraelv, yahoo62278, yazher, yogg, Zwei You publicly support that Game Protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, around July 2019 h4ns alleges: game-protect violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. game-protect did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance. Please show the written contract? Please tell at what day and how the scam happened? I am hereby declaring fees for use of my copyright, the name brand TECSHARE. This notice is to inform you of the licensing fee I will from now and perpetually be requiring to use my property "TECSHARE" in public. This fee for use shall only apply to the user known as "game-protect". Every time the user "game-protect" uses my copyright name "TECSHARE", they hereby consent to pay me $1000 in Bitcoin at current market prices, per instance of the use. This fee is to be paid upon demand. Further use of my copyright property "TECSHARE" constitutes acceptance of these terms. Usage of the copyright property "TECSHARE" more than 2 times in any 30 day period will also void all contractual consideration for "game-protect" to use the property and incur an additional fee of $5000 for every instance the copyright property is used after this threshold is breached. All rights reserved. Thank you for confirming that you are not able to show the alleged written contract and that you are not able to tell at what day and how the scam happened! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
