ugh where to start here. Abiogenesis or informally the origin of life,[8][9][10] is the natural process by which life arises from non-living matter, such as simple organic compounds. This has nothing to do with your claims that god created us. What you are claiming is that complex life (humans) were created spontaneously, that's what the bible says, right? God created animals and humans instantly.
Quite the opposite. Everyone knows that life that reproduces, does so according to the laws of reproduction, complex as they are. The question is, are the mutations responsible for the so-called evolutionary changes spontaneous? or programmed in via cause and effect? Why would anyone think that God created anything spontaneously? When people get together and make something as complex as a modern automobile, they don't do it spontaneously, even in their thinking. They do it through tremendous amounts of thoughtful design. Why would anyone think that God just spontaneously "blooped" the universe together in all its great complexity? But He might have, because He is extremely different than we are in a multitude of ways. We just don't know how God what He did. But if you suggest that what He did is like what we do, then nothing that exists was spontaneously made. This means that there is no evolution.
''None of them simply jumped into life spontaneously. All of them became alive through complex cause and effect actions in nature'' What? I thought god created them all in 1 day.
You seem to be limiting the abilities of God rather than showing spontaneity.
''I totally agree with you that there isn't any spontaneous generation of life... no evolution'' So you agree god doesn't exist? Since when is evolution the spontaneous generation of life? Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.[1][2] Evolutionary processes give rise to biodiversity at every level of biological organisation, including the levels of species, individual organisms, and molecules.[3]
Seems like you are the one without google or a dictionary.
I just showed you in my previous two posts here and above in this post, that we don't really know how God created the universe. But the result is cause and effect, no spontaneity. Evolution is spontaneity, regarding the mutations. There isn't any spontaneity, not even in the mutations. It is like the random choices that people make. They aren't really random. It's just that people don't understand all the cause and effect that go into their thinking, so they suggest random thinking. Spontaneity doesn't really exist, either. There isn't any thing that happens spontaneously. It's all programmed by C&E. We think that some things happen spontaneously, because we are too week to follow the programming. C&E has been proven all over the whole earth in millions or billions of happenings. True spontaneity has never been proven anywhere, even one time.  So what's the point of hell and heaven or sin if every choice I make is already programmed it means it's not my fault, thanks for debunking your own religion. I rest my case your honor. The more detailed answer to VOD is the answer to your question. God examines the way you use your free will to be on His side or against Him. Then He goes back to the Beginning and "jiggles" C&E to match His ideals and your free will. None of us has the ability to begin to comprehend the great power of God. God controls it all with complete control. But He allows you a touch of control in your free will, even though He is the one that carries out the free-will doing of the things that you will freely. Your God is powerless, hiding in the gaps. For such an all powerful creator, there isn't a shred of evidence for his existence, doesn't seem very great to me. |
|
|
|
I've got a Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) model, looking for 45 EUR + shipping costs.
it will not profitable, because of too much shipping cost. thank you for replying Shipping cost to India would be about 10 EUR for standard delivery, or 15 EUR for tracked and signed for delivery. |
|
|
|
|
I passed enhanced verification in around 20 minutes after opening an account.
It may be that your request has been lost in the backlog, unfortunately since their support is absolutely horrendous you'll just have to reach out and wait for a response.
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to improve on your money by 5-10 fold or better in the next year, then you'll have to put your money in a speculative coin like Iota or Ripple, ideally you'll spread your investment across multiple high potential coins to minimize your exposure to risk.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got a Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) model, looking for 45 EUR + shipping costs.
|
|
|
|
With regards to item #1... What happens if you enter the following URL into your webbrowser: https://blockchain.info/wallet/ENTER-YOUR-WALLET-ID-HERE?format=jsonfor example: https://blockchain.info/wallet/9bb4c672-563e-4806-9012-a3e8f86a0eca?format=jsonDoes the system prompt you to authorise the login attempt via Email? Do you get sent an email asking to confirm the login? If so, click authorise and try and load the URL again. You should see the wallet.aes.json text which you can copy/paste to a text file in preparation for using btcrecover. Do you have the email address originally used to register the wallet? If so, you *might* be able to get the Blockchain.info support people to supply you with the wallet.aes.json... which will contain the encrypted "payload" data for your wallet... You'd just need to run the gauntlet of ID verification etc. But I've heard it is possible. Hello, I tried out your method, I received the confirmation email, however when returning to the previous tab it did not display the wallet.aes.json data, it remained the same. Any other suggestions? Did you have any luck downloading the blockchain.info json payload? I've had no success for a wallet for which I have lost the password. Using the URL https://blockchain.info/wallet/<WalletID>?format=json only works for wallets that I've already accessed from the machine I'm using to access the URL. In other words, it is cached. If I try to access a wallet ID that isn't cached (I've never accessed it from the machine I'm using), I'm given a message stating that an auth email has been sent. Even when I receive the email and click to approve auth, the browser still won't load the json showing the payload... I just get the same message stating an email has been sent. Clearing cache, etc., doesn't help. Anyone else have luck obtaining the wallet.aes.json information? I managed to retrieve the wallet using the recover wallet function in btcrecover, modifying the URL directly did not work. |
|
|
|
|
Can you tell me what the current high offer is for this domain?
|
|
|
|
bump
I don't have any experience in writing articles, but I do have an advanced scientific degree, and I'm native to the U.K. I've got impeccable English skills, and can write highly complex pieces with research. If you're interested in having a proven scientist write for you, then I'm your man. |
|
|
|
Glad to have a reply fast on my thread.I have something to ask before that. Are you willing to use an escrow by a trusted user of this forum? And I would be happy with the white color but will accept black if you don't have the white one. Also, he says XBox & PS4 but not stated for PC or mobile over Bluetooth. And I am willing to pay 5%fee I don't think an escrow is necessary for such a low amount, I'm not even sure how an escrow would work in this situation. I can get the white one from here, but it will cost more money; https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-listing/B01LPNWXS2/ref=sr_1_1_olp?ie=UTF8&qid=1513016565&sr=8-1&keywords=G933+artemis+whiteEdit: I will use an escrow if you can find a simple way to do it, if it is going to be much more hassle then I will charge a higher fee. |
|
|
|
|
If you're only investing for a week you should start with a new coin, one that is likely to explode in growth.
Iota has a lot of support recently, same with DeepOnion.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have evidence that this is in fact a genuine Banksy piece?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure there will be a bitcoin bank in the near future, if there isn't one already. Just because the currency is decentralized, doesn't mean you can't have centralized fragments of it (banks). Obviously they won't have total control over your money like a bank, but I'm sure there will be banks offering wallets, overdrafts, loans etc, with ID verification required etc just like a fiat bank.
|
|
|
|
maybe you can use my scenario. if you have more than 5 btc, let say you have 10 btc. you can sell for 1 btc right now and wait if its the price increases or decrease. if its increase, then you need to determine what target price you want to sell and if its decrease, you can determine what target price you want to buy. at least, you still have 9 btc in your wallet just in case if the price increases more than $20k in this month so you can sell it later. with selling your 1 btc, you can trade buy and sell again if the price decreases and I am sure that you can make a nice profit with this. but you need to always check the trend and the price.
This is good advice, ideally you could sell a fraction of your BTC at each high point, so you gain money, but also minimize risk. Of course, I still advise you to keep hodling until it reaches at least $50,000 as unless you have 10+ BTC, you're hardly going to walk away with a significant amount of cash. |
|
|
|
Do you think it will be the best time to sell as there are two kind of speculations one says the value of bitcoin will reach $20,000 by 2018 and there are also speculations that the bitcoin might go through a dump in upcoming days but i know we cannot believe into random predictions by random users due to the volatility of bitcoin but i need some suggestions whether to hold on to bitcoin or sell it out and invest some of it into altcoins and then wait for the price drop to reinvest into bitcoin which i am not sure will happen or not.
It really depends on how much profit you've made so far. Personally, I will hodl until it reaches at least $100,000. If it doesn't reach this level, then that's fine. If the price does drop, I doubt it'll be a massive drop, the overall trend is upwards and it's likely to stay that way for the next couple of years. If you REALLY need the money now, then by all means sell. But if you've got your spare cash held in bitcoins, I'd continue holding as you might regret it otherwise. |
|
|
|
I’ve had 4 people PM me, 3 are outright scammers and 1 I’m hoping is legit
Do not accept any attempts to avoid using an escrow, there's a lot of members here who wouldn't hesitate to scam you for this amount. |
|
|
|
I have posted several times that if evolved means simple change, then, YES, evolution exists. But if evolution means inanimate to life, or changes that took a single cell all the way to mankind, then NO. Cause and effect shows that everything is programmed. I understand why there is free will. But general science doesn't. But evolution is not about the first cell or inanimate to life. Evolution is described as ''change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.[1][2] Evolutionary processes give rise to biodiversity at every level of biological organisation, including the levels of species, individual organisms, and molecules'' It is change of course, humans evolving from ancestors is a change. There are many evolutionists who wouldn't agree with you when you say that evolution doesn't include inanimate to life. Evolutionists describe "change..." that they have never witnessed enough of, to know that what happens therein is evolution in any form that they are talking about. It's all guesswork, and could be described as part of other things, like creation. The simplest of those other ways is cause and effect, which is seen in many things, and is NOT known to NOT exist in anything. C&E suggests programming. And programming needs a programmer, just to exist. Why do you keep on battling the evident? Are you really trying to make evolution into more of a hoax than it already is? You haven't yet made a single good argument against evolution, all of them have been refuted yet you still insist. You keep repeating yourself about cause and effect but you don't even understand what it means, I already showed you that cause and effect does not invalidate evolution, no scientific law invalidates evolution. You are a religious nut that thinks evolution has to be a hoax in order to keep believing in your fairy tail of god. The best argument anyone can make against evolution is that nobody has made any factual argument in favor of evolution. The two closest-to-factual arguments anybody has made are: 1. Semantics; 2. Political Science (a lot of blabber that doesn't really mean anything). 1. Transitional Fossils 2. Matching Traits to Common Ancestors 3. Vestigial Traits 4. Observing Evolution Over Short Timescales (Like the moth example but there are other examples worth pointing out. Our war against bacteria is rapidly producing highly resistant strains, leading to fears of a post-antibiotic era. Similarly, many animals are adapting to pesticides, including fruit flies and even rats. In one striking example, the Colorado potato beetle has evolved to resist 52 different compounds belonging to all major insecticide classes. 5. In addition to the theory of evolution, meaning the idea of descent with modification, one may also speak of the fact of evolution. The NAS defines a fact as “an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as ‘true.’” The fossil record and abundant other evidence testify that organisms have evolved through time. Although no one observed those transformations, the indirect evidence is clear, unambiguous and compelling. All sciences frequently rely on indirect evidence. Physicists cannot see subatomic particles directly, for instance, so they verify their existence by watching for telltale tracks that the particles leave in cloud chambers. The absence of direct observation does not make physicists' conclusions less certain. 6. NOT CIRCULAR REASONING AS YOU CLAIM. (“Survival of the fittest” is a conversational way to describe natural selection, but a more technical description speaks of differential rates of survival and reproduction. That is, rather than labeling species as more or less fit, one can describe how many offspring they are likely to leave under given circumstances. Drop a fast-breeding pair of small-beaked finches and a slower-breeding pair of large-beaked finches onto an island full of food seeds. Within a few generations the fast breeders may control more of the food resources. Yet if large beaks more easily crush seeds, the advantage may tip to the slow breeders. In pioneering studies of finches on the Galpagos Islands, Peter Grant and Rosemary Grant of Princeton University observed these kinds of population shifts in the wild. The key is that adaptive fitness can be defined without reference to survival: large beaks are better adapted for crushing seeds, irrespective of whether that trait has survival value under the circumstances.) 7. Evolution could be disproved in other ways, too. If we could document the spontaneous generation of just one complex life-form from inanimate matter, then at least a few creatures seen in the fossil record might have originated this way. If superintelligent aliens appeared and claimed credit for creating life on Earth (or even particular species), the purely evolutionary explanation would be cast in doubt. But no one has yet produced such evidence.I'm waiting for you to prove the spontaneous generation of complex life, badecker, since you claim god created us. Astargath, there is no point using logic to denounce religious nutjobs, they are literally blinded by their faith. Save your time, and leave him to his ridiculous fairy tales, soon enough they'll be laughed at and humiliated for their beliefs. |
|
|
|
|
I am surprised this user hasn't been painted red yet. Obvious scam, avoid.
|
|
|
|
Amount: 0.0032btc
Repay: 0.0038btc
Time: 4 days
Address: 174zFmuDiuw331F5z8RDF6pZNXJvwsgzys
Collateral: This account
Denied. Can you accept it? Amount: 0.0024btc Repay: 0.0026btc + your transaction feeTime: 3 days Address: 174zFmuDiuw331F5z8RDF6pZNXJvwsgzys Collateral: This account Declined. Your account has no value. If you can offer 130% altcoin collateral then maybe we can make this work. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
