Loan Amount: 0.025 Signed message from a staked address: no old enough address (i did not even have any addresses here before i think) Amount to be repaid: 0.03 Repayment Date: 23.01.2017 Bitcoin Address: 1ETYMARmNow5BgWnFB8yb4NHHaHWHuXhrn Collateral: this account
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.04 Reason for Taking out a Loan: Bus card load Amount to be repaid: 0.045 Repayment Date: 23.01.2017 Type of Collateral: This bitcointalk account Bitcoin Address: 1J6Ai6FKmbR7R9PJEh2RoN6LGwoUaJa1to -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I am onnz423 from bitcointalk.org, today is 07/01/2017. I am asking for a loan from zazarb with my account onnz423 as collateral. If I default my loan, zazarb will be the new owner of my account. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0) Address: 1J6Ai6FKmbR7R9PJEh2RoN6LGwoUaJa1to H5rnHGIUP2HGZi+6ept08uGkB5+GTIP+R3ZX+6hUGvbVeXxnzrkO89Mu4XCdOyy4PI7MwympJG8NuNXiXRjQyk4= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Please tell me if i missed something, thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
username: onnz423 email: onnz423@gmail.combtc address: 1ETYMARmNow5BgWnFB8yb4NHHaHWHuXhrn amount to loan: 0.015 amount to repay: 0.02 Will pay back on 16.01.2017. Can offer a steam account with cs:go as collateral if needed. Not until kongosplit pays me back. I've been burned. Ah alright, i hope he will get what he deserves ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) take care!
|
|
|
username: onnz423 email: onnz423@gmail.combtc address: 1ETYMARmNow5BgWnFB8yb4NHHaHWHuXhrn amount to loan: 0.015 amount to repay: 0.02 Will pay back on 16.01.2017. Can offer a steam account with cs:go as collateral if needed.
|
|
|
Like many people have said, you'll have to wait around max 72 hours. After that the transaction will get rejected by network and added back into your wallet. I use 100sat/byte fees most of the times, sometimes 150sat/byte if there is lots of unconfirmed transactions. I think rebroadcasting it is not going to do anything either, hold on there ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I think if vote decides to distribution via giveaways, some video or music site rewarding the uploaders with 42 could be something special ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) If you are really interested in the free coin distribution, please vote until the end of the swap (only 7.3% of the holders left their votes). Yeah im going to vote when i get home, i just think that distributing the remaining coins as rewards would be alot better than handing them for free.
|
|
|
its only valuable if the coin is valued above 1 btc after release..
Everything depends on us. The 42 emission is fully completed and nobody will be able to produce new coins and drop the price each day (like on other coins). This makes 42 attractive and safer for investors. Price is an important factor, people are not interested in cheap coins with low capitalization, they usually come on pump and buy when the price is high... So, the higher the price we will keep, the more attention will be to the 42. Here are some calculations, to be in 100 by marketcap (to much crappy coins there) we need the price not less than 10 btc per 1 coin; in 50 (still a lot of garbage) - 37 btc; in 20 (some scam coins there) - 220 btc; in 10 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) - 700 btc, this is less than our record - 1900 btc. I definetly agree with you, i think our first priority is to build a community that is quite large. With community comes more support. You can call me captain obvious. I think if vote decides to distribution via giveaways, some video or music site rewarding the uploaders with 42 could be something special ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
who the hell is matt???
Matt related to what? I've not heard about any matt here, so if you could clarify it could help. Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
1Lh1iLwKDvSVWraUxzxhNidJNkjbWyrpCx Thank you ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Will update after testing the site
|
|
|
Currently, we have lack of miners in the old chain to confirm transactions to the burn address.
I'll put my VPS working on it too. Edit: i cannot find any working pools.
|
|
|
I am offering an escrow service. The fees are just 1% or 10$ (the one that is least for your trade).
PM me if interested.
How about getting some trust and reputation first? Why should anybody choose your service without any confidence that you don't run away with the escrowed coins? //alex Exactly, new accounts are not really the people want to hire as a escrow
|
|
|
Please PM, i would love to take the task ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Hello! I am willing to escrow for 0% fee because i am giving free service for first 5 customers. All i am asking is feedback on my escrow thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1732873.0Please do pm me with some details about the trade, or reply to my thread if you are interested. Cheers, Onni
|
|
|
EDIT: Thank you for your advices, i really do appreciate them. I will come back with some feedback next time ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) everyone have a great day!
|
|
|
I can translate the ann to finnish language, is there bounty for it? Also, how can i receive byteball on the mainnet? Since the ann points out that there is some way to receive free byteball but i do not really understand how.
|
|
|
Trying to compile on raspberry pi, but this is pretty much only error im getting when trying qmake.
I built the daemon just fine:
WARNING: Failure to find: src/qt/forms/refereeentry.ui WARNING: Failure to find: src/qt/forms/optionsdialog.ui WARNING: Failure to find: src/qt/forms/qrcodedialog.ui /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/qt5/bin/rcc: File does not exist 'src/qt/bitcoin.qrc'
Any help with this? It lists many failure to find's
|
|
|
One thing, your main programmer already made one clonecoin with pretty much no modifications. So i qm not exactly sure if you guys can really deliver up to your promises. Bitcedi (former coin that lulworm released): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1474935.0Good point. If that's the only dev on this project it's doomed. Aand here comes a new thread, i just find this project overall very suspicious.
|
|
|
One thing, your main programmer already made one clonecoin with pretty much no modifications. So i qm not exactly sure if you guys can really deliver up to your promises. Bitcedi (former coin that lulworm released): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1474935.0
|
|
|
|