What they are trying to discuss in this webinar is indeed quite good, this is a form of their concern for the young generation in England. In addition, the webinar is very focused on discussing how ad display policies are adjusted at certain hours. So that way they don't have to ban gambling advertisements completely, because from these ads are quite a large tax revenue, they don't just think about tax revenues, and are selfish about their impact. Other countries can also refer to doing the same activity, and pay more attention to how ads don't appear anywhere. But income is also not hampered.

Most people give the same advice. In gambling all games based on luck are games that are quite easy for beginners. As for dice, it is the easiest game after slots. So you really choose the right game to start gambling. In the dice itself you just need to place it and press a button.

So regarding the question there seems to have been completed and the thread should be locked immediately. Because after all I noticed the answer is almost the same.

You just need to be good at dealing with Hype conditions, regardless of what consequences you will get when the Hype ends, people will immediately welcome the next Hype.
Nothing is impossible in the crypto industry, there will always be innovator changing each other. Starting from DeFi which is now drowning from its community who knows nowhere, now the earth is booming with NFT everywhere. It has become a natural cycle. People will flock from one Hype to another, taking; profit and go find another profit center.

Depending on the popularity in a particular country that does dominate gambling. Indeed, women can also happen as the data above. The gambling population is not enough just based on one or two specific data taken from one sample only. Maybe if we can make some kind of statistical calculation of all the country's data that does enforce gambling for women, it can be used as a reference.

However, if one were to assume, women might be more appropriate to work in casinos as support operators, or as casino promoters.

Recently I found a Source that makes me feel proud enough to know cryptocurrency so far. However, we are always more optimistic. After some time after the announcement given by Dorsey, I began to try to analyze several sources personally to strengthen the existence of Bitcoin in the future.

AIER released this article as we all know Dorsey often tells everyone that "Bitcoin has shown me the future". This opens the truth about what decentralization really is, which is that all public skepticism, especially cryptocurrency users, is getting stronger in responding to claims of political authority.

In other words, adopting crypto is not just about digital money. But as an alternative answer to all intermediary transactions without taxes. So it would be nice if Dorsey confidently who will always pamper creative twitter users with a valuable fee this has an exponential impact.

Good news, because that would not only have an impact on the strength of adoption, but also the impact on twitter would obviously be very good. Maybe some twitter users who hate crypto especially Bitcoin will be quite hot to hear this news. Although currently the trial will be carried out for Apple iOS users. I will keep waiting for Android user queue. Besides this will be launched of course I will monitor how it will run effectively.

I have locked my thread, and interested in discussing in your thread.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361545.0

Since this topic has already been discussed, and out of respect for him I will lock this thread. let's construct in the thread.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5361544.0

thank you   

That's the title I got from this latest news about the very extraordinary thing that Jack Dorsey put forward. As of today users on twitter can tip any creative content creator or his favorite content with Bitcoin. Well as a Jack Dorsey is no stranger to how he really likes crypto.

So how do you think Bitcoin will have an impact when this rule is enforced on Twitter? Are haters like Warren going to make some kind of Conspiracy? Hope he sleeps well. LOL

News source https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/23/you-can-now-get-paid-in-bitcoin-to-use-twitter.html

Unfortunately, this Policy is too complex for us to comply with. I know that this kind of KYC will be avoided by most people. Is there no other alternative? I know this is already listed, but while this site is a new gambling site, then you as a person who contributed to it may be able to re-consider policies that will burden users to feel comfortable gambling.

LOL  ,
I was not given permission to access this site. Why so many lists of countries that are blocked? this should be a light if not then what can you produce. Because it is possible that a country that is blocked can actually provide a large income for your casino. It's a shame we're having a limited time following up on the site you're trying to promote in this thread.

In fact I'm wondering, does the OP have any intention or not in building a casino? that's all the OP needs to answer for my question.

It's true, as I said earlier that altcoins are better for staking. As for ending Bitcoin ownership and selling everything, it's a difficult choice other than selling some and moving some to stable coins when you are really pushed by the need. Well we talked about necessity and that's hard to deny. Whatever our ownership of Bitcoin we have bought it in cheap times, but like everything else, we are past that time. So inevitably there will be a time when we end ownership for certain targets.

I remember about this one Shiba. this is a story told of those who are newbies and find magic in crypto. In September someone told me that he invested $2K, he held Shiba and went through a few months of collapse from November 2020 to the end of May 2021 his finances reached around $33 million. Well behind it all there is a price to pay, when fighting for trust after some time Shiba had dropped in price.

We will never do that if it has given up our rights to a second party just for the sake of staking Bitcoin. I better keep it until it's bad. It's terrible that anything can happen, targeting Bitcoin with an alibi like this is often found. And the holders must think about this carefully. In my opinion Bitcoin is not to be gambled, As for other altcoins I will not forbid it.

Do you want to invest or want to gamble? Of course with an amount like that, you want multiples that will impress us. Wherever you invest and hope. 1000% profit then we will jump first before suggesting it to you. I agree with what @bitmover said, that $100 is very small if your profit target is 1000%. Maybe if you raise up to $1000 it's quite realistic and the price is a multiple of over 100%.

LOL....  Thanks, apparently I'm late mate.
But no problem I'll probably try the deposit. However I only half read the FAQ, and they enforce n KYC rules. I need to read the whole rules. Because after all we have to avoid KYC. I don't want withdrawals to be delayed just because I have to comply with KYC. That's really annoying.

Welcome to the Forum.
You come with a pretty good promotion, I'm interested in signing up and thank you for making this forum your choice in launching promotions. In the future, of course, I believe that a good start will definitely get good reviews from users on this forum.

Btw, unfortunately the promo code can't be used anymore, is there something I'm missing. LOL

I think this depends on the gambling habits of a region. Usually it is the men who dominate the casino. But as the information OP said the pandemic brought some of the flow of women to start gambling. Even before the pandemic, women whose hobbies had always been gambling were not reported much. Due to the impact of the current economic situation that almost every country is said to be quite concerned about, online gambling on several women's social media also participates in streaming. This has opened up new topics for exposure to the mass media.
For me personally, this is not too surprising, even to this day I still often fight female gamblers who are quite bearable in some physical casinos.

Of course it depends on how you see Litecoin as a potential coin. So don't ignore this desire, especially if you have seen that the prospects for Litecoin are quite good. Litecoin also looks at least able to survive the very extreme conditions in the market. But remember to invest from a percentage that is not too large.

We cannot draw unilateral conclusions about how economic conditions from two opposite directions, between the poor and the rich are all on the same track with various domains and concerns. Broadly speaking, economics is about position and social equality where all the worries can arise without making a ticket first.

It's simple: in most cases, a rich person will feel less about what he already has because the more he gets what he wants, the more he worries about what he doesn't have. Meanwhile, on the part of the poor, no matter how hard they are, they have to endure the hardships of life, both in urban and rural areas, all of which always refer to the economic gap between the middle and upper social layers.

which points are suitable for us to choose? not A nor is it B, if I were you it would add a point C where there are people who feel enough, enough in terms of responding to the seriousness of economic life. Those in this realm tend not to think too much about things that can have detrimental consequences on the pace of the economy, while they have a chance to survive they will be much simpler and stronger to survive.

My question to the OP is: is there any data and evidence to suggest an impact in certain areas that is already legal on this impact on minors? Do not be too skeptical and make gambling as if it has entered the concrete operational area of ​​children. They are with their world and we still see that today they are just busy playing games.
Keep in mind that there will always be closer scrutiny of how we don't find that data anywhere. So it would be great if you provide us with reliable data and which area you are talking about.
If there is no relevant evidence, then this is just a warning, so far children are not familiar with this type of crazy gambling. Their world is just play and play.