Sigurno je olakšavajuća okolnost to što su kartice virtualne, dakle nema dizanje novca sa ATM-ova. Limiti kod ovakvih kartica su također niži. Ovdje je maksimalan iznos dopune $750. Viđao sam druge gdje su limiti slični (između €500-€800). Dopunjavaš novac jedino preko bitcoina. To je sigurno jedan od razloga što nema KYC-a. Da dopunjavaš PayPalom, karticama, elektronskim novčanicima, imali bi dovoljno podataka o tebi ili možda tražili još više.

Mene zanima koja država/banka/finansijska institucija izdaje ove virtualne kartice sa stranice? Neka Banana Republic ili nešto ozbiljno?

If you are using a centralized exchange and your government or Central Bank doesn't look kindly on bitcoin, you have already given them plenty of proof of where the money came from. You can't have a CEX deposit fiat into your bank account without your bank knowing about your activities. And the bank can report you to the tax office or other authorities if they suspect something or have reasons to believe you haven't paid your taxes. Depending on where you live, your local tax authority could have the means to check the flow of money as well.

If you are talking about DEXs, that's a bit different. In that case, it's one person sending money to a different person. If the sums are significant, the authorities can still ask questions. Then it's on you to explain what's the source of that money.

Many businesses will lie to protect their interests, and that's not something that occurs solely in the hardware wallet space. Don't ever think they will put your interests in front of their own.

Ledger has conveniently not told the truth about their secure element chips because everyone thought that no data on it can be accessed online. Turns out, a piece of software code is the only thing that prevents remote access, with or without user acceptance. A different type of code could, therefore, enable online sharing of sensitive data.
Trezor is conveniently not telling the truth about the physical vulnerabilities their devices suffer from. They don't mention that to new users who purchase their HWs. Their documents explain how to set up and configure a passphrase, but not that Trezor suffers from seed extraction vulnerabilities you can't protect yourself from but can only mitigate with passphrases and or additional codes stored on SD cards.   

That's another example of a convenient lie. Ledger only talks about how the Recover feature is a great backup choice if you lose your seed. They don't explain what potential problems it introduces: sharing custody of your private keys, sending your seed over the internet, and putting yourself in a position to have your crypto confiscated by your government with a proper court order. Not to mention hacking incidents where parts or complete seed shards and decryption keys could get stolen.

My negative opinion and criticism of OP is not because he got tricked into buying a wallet file whose coins he will never ever get access to. He got tricked and cheated, simple as that. My issue with the person is that they obviously don't mind they are holding someone else's fake wallet data and are asking for help to steal its contents. NeophyteReq is a morally corrupt individual.

I have never understood the Fear and Greed Index or its purpose to be honest. It's kind of self-explanatory and just shows what the market is currently going through. If bitcoin's price is increasing, the fear is on the lower end. Opposite of that, if bitcoin is dumping, then it's showing more fear among investors. If the movements are sideways, the index arrow stays in the middle.

Don't claim that you are a non-custodial exchange because you aren't. ChangeNOW also makes such claims and calls themselves "free of custody" and similar terms.
I was just playing around with the swap window to check the rates. To initiate a swap, I have to send my coins/tokens to an address displayed on screen. Where is the private key for that address? If you were non-custodial, I wouldn't have to ask you. If something goes wrong, I can't get to my coins by myself. I would have to get in touch with your customer support or perhaps one of your partner exchanges. And you would probably still not help me regain access to my crypto without KYC. That's not how a non-custodial service operates.

Too bad that there is very little activity on the platform. At least for now.
There is currently only 1 job ad. The situation looks a little better for gigs - 51 at the moment.

Is this platform targeting Arabian countries, or is it just a coincidence that almost all freelancers have Arabian names?
Where is the exact list of coins and tokens that your site supports?
Besides the 8% you take in fees, are there any other charges? For example, withdrawal fees, etc.?

It seems like OP abandoned it.

The website was never finished. It allows you to log in or register, but if you head to the Mining section, there is nothing there except a notification saying 'Coming soon'.
Their Twitter and Medium pages are empty. There seems to be some activity in the Discord channel and a few pull requests on GitHub this year.

It's worth noting that OP is still active on the forum, so you can probably PM him and ask for updates.
There is another topic you might be interested in checking out where there has been some more activity recently: Blinkhash - Open-source, easy to use, mining pool software.

VR technology is going to be a great hit in online casino gambling. You are sitting at home wearing your headgear but the game takes you to a real casino where you get to walk around the floor among other gamers. You can walk over to the slot machine section and begin wagering on slots. Or you take a set at any of the casino tables to play roulette, blackjack, poker, etc. The possibilities are endless, and with the way technology is evolving, it's a crazy how far this thing can go.

I think you should mention the sources you used to write the book to not find yourself in a position where someone calls you a plagiarizer. I was pretty sure you had to use various resources. But try to remember them and give them the credit they deserve.

I am sure here is talking about two Bitcointalk members, kano and -ck. They are both miners. Kano runs his own mining pool. -ck is a developer for mining software and used to have (maybe still has) a mining pool as well.

Considering that you are using Trust Wallet, which is already closed-source and a hot wallet, you might as well up your security a tiny bit by moving your altcoins to your Safepal. It's also closed-source, but at least it's a hardware wallet and beats the Trust Wallet in that regard.

I think the S1 is the only one Safepal has, so I am pretty sure that's the one dansus021 bought. I remember there was some talk about security vulnerabilities with the S1 a few years ago. I couldn't remember the specifics, but a quick search led me to this thread: Safepal S1 wallet have serious flaws!

Apparently, the device is equipped with an unknown secure element chip and not the one Safepal claims it uses.
The second issue is that Kraken managed to install alternative firmware software on the device easily. They didn't extract any keys though.
The last issue is not directly related to the security of your funds but to license violations. There were signs that Safepal used open-source code that they later closed for the public and claimed it was their own creation. 

A few observations.

I was playing around with the satoshi calculator.
When you click on sat to alts and enter 1 ETH, the conversion it gives in the table is different from the ETH value shown at the top of your site. While I am writing this, the table says 1 ETH is 6759107 sats or $1737.3. The top of your website shows 1 ETH = $1742.

I would suggest adding sat/vByte in your Gas & Fees tool. It shows gwei suggestions for ETH, but for BTC, only a USD average. 

Otherwise it's nice work, keep it up!

As you can see from this thread and some others that have popped up on the forum, Trust Wallet is not that convenient now when people have started experiencing connection problems, missing transactions, balance updates, no history of transactions, etc.

For DeFi, ETH tokens, or other altcoins, sure, go ahead and use Trust Wallet. It's not like the competition is any better because almost all multi-coin wallets are closed-source and not the best security-wise. E.g., Atomic Wallet had a huge breach (apparently) not that long ago. But you have better options for bitcoin hot wallets and I fell like you should use them.

I appreciate and applaud the effort, but it's really difficult to look at. For example, you have blocks of text of hundreds and thousands of words. It would look much cleaner if we had more headings and shorter paragraphs. You could also add some images, graphs, or tables to make it a bit more interesting to the readers.   

All this is exclusively your work? No sources?

I am going to say what many probably think. You, NeophyteReq, are an idiot! By saying that it doesn't matter to you whose wallet it is, shows that you are ok with stealing money and bitcoins that don't belong to you. Which means that you are not just an idiot but a piece of shit on top of it. I hope you paid a lot of money for it and that you got scammed. You deserve it.

Onda se nismo razumjeli. Učinilo mi se da si u prošlom postu napisao da možeš da kupiš LN BTC preko ta dva novčanika.

Onda se vračamo na ono što sam ja napisao u zadnjem postu. Opet praviš on-chain transakciju i plačaš standardne mrežne naknade da bi došao u situaciju da svoj BTC koristiš na LN mreži. Kod čestog korištenja LN mreže to onda ima smisla ali jedno korištenje baš i nema.

If you are talking about moving your bitcoins to a better wallet, you need to cut all ties with the Trust Wallet. That means sweeping your balance to a new wallet whose seed was generated on that new client. Exporting and importing the Trust Wallet private keys isn't recommended in that case. As Charles-Tim suggested, OP should create a new wallet with a new set of keys.
 
After a quick google search, it seems like it's a Brazilian exchange.

He said 'Digtra', but the actual name is Digitra, not Diagra.

You obviously got it to work because I can see that you made a transaction on 29 May in which you sent your coins from the above mentioned address to somewhere else.
Stop using Trust Wallet for Bitcoin. There is no need to use such a buggy client when there are quality BTC-only mobile wallets. I suggest Blue Wallet instead of Electrum.
If you work with altcoins and shitcoins, then you are stuck with something like Trust Wallet or a similar alternative that is equally bad. Luckily, there are better ways to handle your bitcoin.

There are no exact dates, but the way it was written suggests that we should already be somewhere between phase #2 and #3 if everything went according to plan. A few days after the roadmap announcement, they were supposed to release a Ledger Recover whitepaper and technical posts explaining the Recover feature. And a few weeks after that, parts of their Recover framework was supposed to become open-source. Etc., etc.,. It's just a waiting game now.

The blockchain is a public record that one individual can't compromise. All nodes verify that the information being added to the blockchain is correct. Its decentralized nature means that the data it shows is correct no matter where you are. Your bank statements and bank accounts for that matter, are only worth something to one particular bank and its branches. Walk across the street to a different brand, and they will have no idea who you are and what you own.