Here I, like a real Grinch, spoiled the statistics of Phillippone by sending 3 merits at once, which contributed to the fact that he did not see the most cherished number 7777.  [devilish laughter]So, my next victim was El duderino_ ... ironically, he also missed the opportunity to contemplate the four sevens. Because LoyceV now hates me and threw me a strike, now I have to punish him. [...] I've been brewing on revenge too. I'm planning to pull an icopress on you when I get the chance  Keep in mind, the more practice, the higher the prices, so you won't get off with a pair of fox socks. [... ] icopress, is... how to say... a sort of scarecrow  of the forum for some users  I advise to try proper bribing towards him, in order to make sure of having him being merciful. He accepts wine in plastic bottles and sacrificed young veals. , and I will publish it if you agree with El duderino_ on a bribe .... In principle, I would be satisfied with a pair of suits, but even if there is only one, I will be satisfied (we will wear in turn). |
|
|
|
|
1. Stoke - 2:0
2. Bournemouth - 3:1
3. Fulham - 1:0
4. Hull - 1:0
5. Blackburn - 2:1
6. Middlesbrough - 1:0
7. Draw - 1:1
8. Bristol City - 1:0
9. QPR - 2:0
10. Sheffield Utd - 2:0
11. Birmingham - 2:0
12. Nottingham - 2:0
Sportsbet username: icopress
|
|
|
|
|
TryNinja if you have time, please do the pagination, [otherwise when you open the thread archive, have to scroll to the bottom to view the archive of the latest messages].
|
|
|
|
I suggest to leave everything as it is, since I have indicated this thread as a discussion thread (you can only edit the top and the name of the thread a little).  In the second annual round, the number of nominations has been reduced to 13 / Public voting will last until the end of Feb (+ reserve 2 weeks), in which any active users who has reached the rank of a full member or has received 50 merit. At the voting stage, intermediate contests will be published in which we will play free bets. |
|
|
|
Update:We are glad to announce that a new sponsor has joined this event, and we are very pleased that ChipMixer still supports and appreciates public initiatives! Thus, the total prize fund has expanded to 100 mBTC! Moreover, ChipMixer expressed a desire to reward ordinary users, those whose names will not appear in any of the nominations, therefore, 10 vouchers of 2 mBTC each will be raffled among all voters! best regards Mr. X
|
|
|
|
Gracias por aclararme para no olvidarme de ti... aunque el año pasado no se tomaron en cuenta los votos en las juntas locales, me mostraste claramente que apoyar a tu sección local es muy importante! Citaré tu mensaje en el hilo principal por si acaso. |
|
|
|
[...]
[...] I was also a little surprised that the link to this topic was fixed in the news feed  The point is that He Who Must Not Be Named made a similar gesture of goodwill in last year's vote. |
|
|
|
52 weeks [...]
How insatiable you are However, I'm sure that even after 52 weeks you are still a beginner ... because peeping through the keyhole, I've never seen you try on a foxtail. Btw, did everyone answer question 23 correctly? |
|
|
|
I passed the quiz and I have to admit that I did have some mistakes, but some questions are a bit bias, like for examples about sexiest forum gang? I know it's all chicks and girls in this club, but I beg to differ there are other sexier gangs in forum, and I won't name them here  So how many correct answers did you get? As for your opinion ... I'll probably agree on the bias, since each of us has our own views on sexuality. But I had no choice, because I cherish the dreams of getting an invitation to at least one orgy ... I'm tired of peeping through the keyhole. So I had no choice but to try to lick the ass of the supreme leader.  11/22 SFR10
12/22 vapourminer But there are also advantages, right? You are at the top of the list and you have more correct answers than SFR10. |
|
|
|
One of the requirements to submit a vote is to be a Full Member or have 50 merits. Are you making any distinctions between airdropped and earned merits? I think earned merits should be considered but maybe a lower minimum. I would take a lower-ranked member with 50 earned merits over an active Legendary who hasn't earned any since the merit system got implemented any day of the week.
Since I am using the BPIP extension, I can see how much merit one or another user has earned, including those that were received by default, so when counting votes, all these aspects will be taken into account. However, I will try to be very flexible and make a few exceptions to the rules (for example, if the user gets 50 merit after they voted). And at the same time, it is more strict with the votes of those who formally have the right to vote (for example, users involved in 1xBit or those who have been seen in slanderous plots, ardent spammers, etc). I hope I was able to satisfy your curiosity. I need clarification, does that mean full member or higher with 0 merit eligible to vote?
True ... but I added a note saying that the OP has the discretion to ignore the votes of newly awakened accounts and inactive posters.
We are glad to announce that a new sponsor has joined this event, and we are very pleased that ChipMixer still supports and appreciates public initiatives!
Thus, the total prize fund has expanded to 100 mBTC! Moreover, ChipMixer expressed a desire to reward ordinary users, those whose names will not appear in any of the nominations, therefore, 10 vouchers of 2 mBTC each will be raffled among all voters! |
|
|
|
As far as I understand, we are talking about his soulmate, Mrs LoyceV |
|
|
|
Konuyu çevirdiğiniz için teşekkürler... geçen yıl biri çeviriyi yaptı ama bu konu aktif olmayan bir kullanıcı tarafından yönetiliyor, bu yüzden yeni bir başlığın bulunması bence oldukça uygun. Bu arada, konunuzu ana sayfaya ekledim, tek isteğiniz bu başlığı tartışma olarak yeniden adlandırmanızdır, çünkü bu konudaki oylar sayılmayacaktır. Ayrıca "Tartışma [Eng] [Spa] [Rus] [Ger] [Por]" ibaresi yerine lütfen ana konuya link ekleyiniz. Berbat Türkçem için özür dilerim ama burada cevap vermek için tercüman kullanmak zorunda kaldım. |
|
|
|
I can assure you that the Merit Cycling Club has members who are both male and female; there is no truth to the rumour that I am "female only".
I will say more, rumors that this club exists are just rumors.  |
|
|
|
Friends, no one denies the importance of Satoshi, but keep in mind that this vote is dedicated to the past year for the most part. You may have noticed that in the last voting I took into account such votes, but the circumstances were different ... last year there was a test launch of BCA, so any candidate for all the past years could be nominated. This year, such votes will also be taken into account, but in this way you can deprive one of the active users of the prize. |
|
|
|
@icopress, how will you choose the three VIP winners?
You probably meant to say "one winner + 1 (for example, you and your wife). [Just hover your mouse over "note"]If this is the case, it makes a lot of sense. I'll cast a few votes and that'll be the end of it. I'm weary of folks nominating Satoshi and Lauda; shouldn't this award go to active users only? Since there are prizes in each category
To be honest, it's their right, and if the user read the entire description before voting, they should know that unclaimed collectibles will be put up for auction and the proceeds will go to support the BitcoinTalkShow. In addition, if Satoshi wins in any category, the number of winners between whom the prize fund will be divided will also be reduced, ( everything is provided ... as they say). |
|
|
|
Quoting for reference. Pls find attached here the BBcode link to my own test score, as am unable to post image as a newbie  Thank you |
|
|
|
This can be easily avoided if people don't give merit only to those that give them vote and ignore the rest. I know that some people like to use merit as a "thank you", but IMHO in these situations it's best to avoid that practice as some will vote only to scoop couple of merits. I remember last time we had some members who were so lazy that they just copy/pasted other people's votes. [...] I am having the same issue. For now I just left some categories blank and will eventually fill them up when/if I figure out who is the most deserving. Or maybe I am taking this too seriously. I remember this heated discussion... so I'm of the opinion that only people who are not on my ignore list deserve ratings (in the context of how I feel when a person has spent 5-10 minutes making a conscious choice). Btw, there is nothing wrong with leaving a couple of empty graphs, to me it just means that the person has a slightly narrower range of interests than others ... after all you have a month or so to edit your post. |
|
|
|
Crazy times! [The result of 6,42x BTC ~ $215.000 on it] Here is the OMEN's 9 USB Stick Miners:  And here's the CGMiner image showing the 35.5T submitted!!!  HOLY SHIT!!! I'm still going nuts over here.... |
|
|
|
Wtsimis, SatoPrincess ... I always knew that each new generation of members of the forum is becoming smarter than the previous one, and it is interesting for me to visually observe how this trend develops. Since you guys have exceeded my wildest expectations considering that you registered less than half a year ago and your results prevail over the results of those who have been on the forum for a very long time. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
