Just had an Adsense account of mine get shut down, although it was only making me pennies. I've heard/seen of this happening to others too who ran Bitcoin-related websites. Has this happened to anyone else?
I hope not. |
|
|
|
|
To bad Bitcoin is not really "anonymous". To bad it's not money "laundering" either.
|
|
|
|
|
I am loving these ideas, keep em coming guys.
And MarkM, traffic will come don't worry about that. This site will be fully SEO'D and heavily marketed under several different social mediums. I have made sites rank before, and I am wholly confident that I can do it again.
|
|
|
|
This guy takes his role of troll very seriously here.  |
|
|
|
Edited first post to have notes in case anyone scrolls down and thinks a different thread is going on lol
Sorry brother not my intent to derail here. Much <3 for you, and anyone trying to push the currency. We really need to work together in the future lol  . |
|
|
|
Make sure you document what is going on in Bitcams. There has been a full attack against me, and what I am trying to do for the community, and it needs to be exposed...
The bitcams idea is awesome, don't let anyone tell you different. Have you seen the thread? Your encouragement is beautiful, but we need more voices. They hacked tweetforum, and are trying to kill Bitcams in it's infancy. http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=20984.0You think the people in the thread hacked your forum? Evidence? I'm not naming any names, and obviously you know that whoever did hack it used proxy's so the logs I have are useless. Why the hell are you getting so defensive? I didn't call anyone out here sir.  EDIT: I am not implying that you or anyone hacked it. Your a good guy bro, and I even donated to your project firstbits to show you my appreciation for your work . 90% of the people in that thread are good people. Anyone that has been following bitcams can easily pick out the bad apples. |
|
|
|
Make sure you document what is going on in Bitcams. There has been a full attack against me, and what I am trying to do for the community, and it needs to be exposed...
This was a test episode. I had written down that thread and replies as something of an interesting story in itself in fact, but didn't have anything written out yet, still noted though, and is timeless lol. You do good work bro, hopefully you continue to fight for the little guys. That is what we all are here folks, "little guys". It's our job to fight together, and to progress this form of exchange on-to a whole new level. |
|
|
|
Make sure you document what is going on in Bitcams. There has been a full attack against me, and what I am trying to do for the community, and it needs to be exposed...
The bitcams idea is awesome, don't let anyone tell you different. Have you seen the thread? Your encouragement is beautiful, but we need more voices. They hacked tweetforum, and are trying to kill Bitcams in it's infancy. http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=20984.0 |
|
|
|
|
Make sure you document what's going on with Bitcams. There has been a full attack against me, and what I am trying to do for the community, and it needs to be exposed...
|
|
|
|
|
If 256 SHA encryption is cracked. And if that happens, Bitcoins will be the last of our worry's....
|
|
|
|
|
This plays into my theory that everything will be public for the world to see in the future. Part of the NWO, Apocolypse, and Utopia theory's. Depending on your "views" of it.
|
|
|
|
Maybe this will help:
I deposit 0.5 BTC on the site. I select 20 (currently idle) models that I would pay 0.5 BTC to see perform. Once ten customers like me have put a 0.5 BTC deposit on the same individual model, the model does a group performance which only these paying customers can view. The ten customers pay out 0.5 BTC * 10 for a total of 5 BTC going to the model/middleman. The customers' 'bids' on other models are withdrawn. Bids/pledges/(whatever you want to call them) should be standardized (e.g. all set to 0.5 BTC) for this system to work well.
Since I don't want to risk losing my 0.5 BTC without getting a show, the 0.5 BTC are returned to me once I have waited for 30 minutes and no show has happened.
Niceee really nice. But can't we just do this right from within the chat? I think that would be even more exciting, all the guys root Mr. Big Bucks on to tip the model so she shows more. The environment you are talking about is sort of like an online strip club with tips. Many people (maybe the majority) like that environment. For me, egging on Mr. Big Bucks is a turn-off. Why not offer both types of services? If you offer services people haven't seen before, it could give your site a unique appeal. I think we will have both, I have to talk to the team first but I don't see why you're idea isn't doable. We want to make the coolest experience for users/models to interact in ways they never thought imaginable. If you have a killer idea and you don't want to share with the public (if its good enough) I am willing to give you a share. Our goal is perfection. We are in the final stages of choosing a designer. I must admit that we are behind on schedule because of the recent hacking of TweetForum . My team is donating their time to help me recover/secure what has been destroyed by the pettiness of a few clowns. However, not to worry, TweetForum will be back with even MORE features, and better design, and all the content/posts will be right back. We haven't lost ANYTHING in this hacking, just time.. EDIT:The team will be announced to the public as soon as we have a designer, tweetforum is back up, and we are public on https://glbse.com/. |
|
|
|
|
Exchangers will be the very first, pools second, big miners third. I never expect them to go after the little guys though, thats IF they go after anyone to begin with... They could just tax the exchangers and make a shit-ton of money. Why does everything have to be so damn negative all the time?
|
|
|
|
Maybe this will help:
I deposit 0.5 BTC on the site. I select 20 (currently idle) models that I would pay 0.5 BTC to see perform. Once ten customers like me have put a 0.5 BTC deposit on the same individual model, the model does a group performance which only these paying customers can view. The ten customers pay out 0.5 BTC * 10 for a total of 5 BTC going to the model/middleman. The customers' 'bids' on other models are withdrawn. Bids/pledges/(whatever you want to call them) should be standardized (e.g. all set to 0.5 BTC) for this system to work well.
Since I don't want to risk losing my 0.5 BTC without getting a show, the 0.5 BTC are returned to me once I have waited for 30 minutes and no show has happened.
Niceee really nice. But can't we just do this right from within the chat? I think that would be even more exciting, all the guys root Mr. Big Bucks on to tip the model so she shows more. |
|
|
|
ER!
WTF!?!
Good to remember that Gox is just getting back on it's feet and that we are not out of the woods yet. There were spikes last night as well.
This threatens both confidence and the ability to trade.
I am getting sick and tired of them. If they can't handle doing an exchange they need to get the hell out of this business. If not people will crucify them. Lets hope there isn't to many compromising error trades.. |
|
|
|
It is just a system which allows models to sell group shows to customers rather than individual shows.
Maybe someone else can help explain what I mean? I appear to be having trouble here.
Ohh so basically it's a group view? That is a good IDEA and is something that I was planning on integrating. Now, do you basically want it to be where people bid for tips? Or how exactly do you want to structure this. |
|
|
|
An EMP discharge which knocks out all PC's in the US
Starcraft ? We need to have a forums only Starcraft 2 tourney so I can own all of you guys. I am preatty sure we can play SC2 with fully maxed settings running the shit we're running lol. |
|
|
|
|
AWESOME! On so many levels.
|
|
|
|
Consider offering a pledge feature (this is a kind of assurance contract).
Customer deposits X BTC on site. Customer puts several X BTC pledges towards models he would like to see perform. Pledges not fulfilled within 30 minutes are cancelled and the BTC are returned to the customers account.
Model offers performance for a minimum nX BTC, with minimum pledge of X. Let the models pick n, but not X [or maybe restrict choice of X to a few numbers]. If model receives n pledges, then a show begins for the pledging customers. As soon as the show begins, pledging customers other outstanding pledges are cancelled. Customers can join a show in progress by adding another increment X to the pot.
This sounds complicated. Are you talking about sorta like a bidding system for models? I really don't think they would like that lol. But it would be interesting, correct me if I am wrong but that's basically what you mean right? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
