|
I would purchase this excellent exercise dvd. (But only with inflatable comedy guvpaper. And, if it was really cheap.)
|
|
|
|
I've earmaked 10% of my MN profits for good causes, I like the idea of supporting p2pool in some way. In fact I would be perfectly happy for blocks submitted by p2pool to pay reduced MN fees vs. regular pools.
Decentralisation is crucial to everything, it's the fundamental underpinning of cryptocurrencies.
What if.....MNs contributed their income to an LLC and the MN owners were given stock. We could then float the MNs onto the NASDAQ. eCash and SnapChat type encrypted messaging, tied to a payment platform - all on the NASDAQ under the ticker DRK. $50bn easy. I like where this is going.  Subvert and undermine the financial system from within, using the enemies own existing greed-structures. Or we could just use NXT. |
|
|
|
While looking at the DRK tattoo on my girlfriends ass, I had an ephiny.
With the Master Nodes taking care of the anonymous transactions and having capacity to do other things, why not do snapchat type messaging for android running off the same Master Node infrastructure.
That way you could do anonymous transactions, with discussions that include pictures, video etc.
Q. What's it look like?
A. Wait a minute, I'll send you a few pictures.
Q. How much?
A. 500DRK each one. Available next week. Click to buy now and I'll give you 10% discount.
Q. Great. Click; buy. Bye.
I was surprised when Evan said RC4 was the final anonymity solution for DRK with no mention of I2P. The mastenodes would still need I2P or something like it for distributed private comms. edit: or the clients. But ideally encyption on all ends. edit2: an in-wallet IRC type thing that included video streaming, using MN infrastructure, encrypted, with fees based on MN bandwidth used...? edit3: use a system similar to masternodeprivkey to sign blocks/hashes so that miners get private comms credits, thus incentivising miners and encouraging hash decentralisation? It needs to be for android and IOS, that way Google or Facebook will offer $50bn. Get the infrastructure set up and lease the API - anyone who wants to can buy MN bandwidth, profits distributed between MNs / The Institute / shojayxt, because he deserves it  |
|
|
|
While looking at the DRK tattoo on my girlfriends ass, I had an ephiny.
With the Master Nodes taking care of the anonymous transactions and having capacity to do other things, why not do snapchat type messaging for android running off the same Master Node infrastructure.
That way you could do anonymous transactions, with discussions that include pictures, video etc.
Q. What's it look like?
A. Wait a minute, I'll send you a few pictures.
Q. How much?
A. 500DRK each one. Available next week. Click to buy now and I'll give you 10% discount.
Q. Great. Click; buy. Bye.
I was surprised when Evan said RC4 was the final anonymity solution for DRK with no mention of I2P. The mastenodes would still need I2P or something like it for distributed private comms. edit: or the clients. But ideally encyption on all ends. edit2: an in-wallet IRC type thing that included video streaming, using MN infrastructure, encrypted, with fees based on MN bandwidth used...? edit3: use a system similar to masternodeprivkey to sign blocks/hashes so that miners get private comms credits? He has, but way before. And I suspect a few other things too, now that he has the man-power to lead To anyone who ever doubts my intention towards miners, please read this I wrote on April 27 2014 https://darkcointalk.org/threads/masternode-donation-to-p2pool.326/I've earmaked 10% of my MN profits for good causes, I like the idea of supporting p2pool in some way. In fact I would be perfectly happy for blocks submitted by p2pool to pay reduced MN service fees vs. regular pools. Decentralisation is crucial to everything, it's the fundamental underpinning of cryptocurrencies. |
|
|
|
While looking at the DRK tattoo on my girlfriends ass, I had an ephiny.
With the Master Nodes taking care of the anonymous transactions and having capacity to do other things, why not do snapchat type messaging for android running off the same Master Node infrastructure.
That way you could do anonymous transactions, with discussions that include pictures, video etc.
Q. What's it look like?
A. Wait a minute, I'll send you a few pictures.
Q. How much?
A. 500DRK each one. Available next week. Click to buy now and I'll give you 10% discount.
Q. Great. Click; buy. Bye.
I was surprised when Evan said RC4 was the final anonymity solution for DRK with no mention of I2P. The mastenodes would still need I2P or something like it for distributed private comms. edit: or the clients. But ideally encyption on all ends. edit2: an in-wallet IRC type thing that included video streaming, using MN infrastructure, encrypted, with fees based on MN bandwidth used...? edit3: use a system similar to masternodeprivkey to sign blocks/hashes so that miners get private comms credits, thus incentivising miners and encouraging hash decentralisation? |
|
|
|
I thought about running some masternodes.
You see, we are starting to rub off on you. That's how some people started here. First they were trolls, then they were sceptical, then they were miners, then they were members of the community, then they were helpers.....and then they were holding a bag of eCash. You'll wake up one morning with a Darkcoin addiction and a DRK tattoo on your girlfriends ass. Hehe  coins101 I get these points but my wife does not have a tattoo yet...meaby when I`ll buy a house thnx DRKcoins she will have I am willing to have the Darkcoin symbol tatoo'd on my arse for 1000DRK.  I'll do it for 999DRK Edit: I'll get mine tattoed for 999DRK, I won't tattoo yours... just in case it was not understood! Damn I had just set up the webcam to televise the event! |
|
|
|
I thought about running some masternodes.
You see, we are starting to rub off on you. That's how some people started here. First they were trolls, then they were sceptical, then they were miners, then they were members of the community, then they were helpers.....and then they were holding a bag of eCash. You'll wake up one morning with a Darkcoin addiction and a DRK tattoo on your girlfriends ass. Hehe coins101 I get these points but my wife does not have a tattoo yet...meaby when I`ll buy a house thnx DRKcoins she will have I am willing to have the Darkcoin symbol tatoo'd on my arse for 1000DRK. |
|
|
|
What makes you think that its a terorist in the picture ?
Just because he is not white and has no US flag all over, he is a terorist ??!
Makes me sick how most of people think.
If most people think that way then maybe the idiots should stop posting stuff that offends most people. Deliberately quoting the stupidest thing I have read yet today, but the day is young and I suspect he has plenty more in him, entitlement like Brighton Rock. |
|
|
|
well I also dont like the picture very much, but it is nothing official. And I also dont like big holders posing with their masternode income. But we cannot prevent such shit, this is a open forum.
but you just trolling and want to exhibition some weaknesses
Do you get upset when someone talks about their £5000 90MH/s mining rig farm? That's a small holding, an allotment. I know, that was kind of my point. |
|
|
|
well I also dont like the picture very much, but it is nothing official. And I also dont like big holders posing with their masternode income. But we cannot prevent such shit, this is a open forum.
but you just trolling and want to exhibition some weaknesses
Do you get upset when someone talks about their £5000 90MH/s mining rig farm? And having a masternode, right now, costs just about as much, but will earn sh!loads more! My rig is up for peanuts locally to get more DRK ASAP. Maybe, maybe not: stu_: !calc 90000 stu_: With last 24h supply of 3092 DRK (source:chaeplin|3m3s) and a network hashrate of 85.65 Gh/s (source:elbzone|44s) your 90.00 Mh/s would have generated 3.249067223 DRK @ 0.01026934 DRK/BTC (source:mintpal|43s) = 0.033365776 BTC/Day / 21.15 USD/Day (source:bitstamp|36s) You'd heve to be VERY lucky to earn 3+DRK per Masternode daily. Variables are variable obviously... |
|
|
|
well I also dont like the picture very much, but it is nothing official. And I also dont like big holders posing with their masternode income. But we cannot prevent such shit, this is a open forum.
but you just trolling and want to exhibition some weaknesses
Do you get upset when someone talks about their £5000 90MH/s mining rig farm? |
|
|
|
Jesus Christ you are stupid. I am a miner, have been mining DRK since the day I first read about it.
No I'm not stupid. I see things very clearly. I'm mining Darkcoin now as well. But I'm getting 20% more than you are. Those few extra tampons you can afford now are just delaying your ability to buy them by the truckload. |
|
|
|
I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what...  I think Evan wants to respect the decentralised mining ethic as much a possible (well - he doesn't have much choice). "God" is a centralised concept. Ultimately, it isn't god who "flips the switch", it's the mining population. Unless they agree, it's a no show for RC4. So we want a nice, smooth *concensual* transition, not a versioning battle between the devs and the miners. Evan has got the right approach. I don't give sh*t about my few missed masternode payments - keeping all players on board this ship is much more important. EDIT: Hey !! I just noticed I got "senior poster" status. That makes me feel kind of geriatric. Might have to get myself a "newb" account to revitalise myself. Consensus is a mutable term - if uncompliant pools don't want to play by the same rules as the rest of us, they are free to go away and play on their own worthless fork. At the moment, Evan has a switch instead of that switch being nonexistant and the software simply orphaning uncompliant blocks by itself - the mining population remains free to mine wherever they want.You'll never get a 'nice, smooth *concensual* transition' in a world full of dunderheads. Play the game or get off the pitch... The only dunderheads are the arrogant assholes like you that think anyone that isn't a crazy Darkcoin Cult Member like you is a worthless piece of shit. Then you have your nonchalant attitude towards miners making statements like "the mining population remains free to mine wherever they want". Will the network function without miners? Will new coins be mined without miners? You better shut you cack smacker and start showing the people that this coin needs to survive the respect they deserve instead of being in such a hurry to put your greedy hand in their pocket to take 20% of their coin. The arrogance and feeling of entitlement in this thread is disgusting. Don't like what I have to say? What are you going to do? Send your terrorist buddy over here to get me? Jesus Christ you are stupid. I am a miner, have been mining DRK since the day I first read about it. Masternodes add value to what the miners are mining by being essential to the core functionality of the coin. Also, some 'terrorists' are hot. |
|
|
|
I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... I think Evan wants to respect the decentralised mining ethic as much a possible (well - he doesn't have much choice). "God" is a centralised concept. Ultimately, it isn't god who "flips the switch", it's the mining population. Unless they agree, it's a no show for RC4. So we want a nice, smooth *concensual* transition, not a versioning battle between the devs and the miners. Evan has got the right approach. I don't give sh*t about my few missed masternode payments - keeping all players on board this ship is much more important. EDIT: Hey !! I just noticed I got "senior poster" status. That makes me feel kind of geriatric. Might have to get myself a "newb" account to revitalise myself. I think a successful demonstration of spork enforcement would be very good for the coin. Consensus is a mutable term - if uncompliant pools don't want to play by the same rules as the rest of us, they are free to go away and play on their own worthless fork. At the moment, Evan has a switch instead of that switch being nonexistant and the software simply orphaning uncompliant blocks by itself - the mining population remains free to mine wherever they want. You'll never get a 'nice, smooth *concensual* transition' in a world full of dunderheads. Play the game or get off the pitch... |
|
|
|
Evan's restraint in deploying the Fist of God is amazing. I would flip the switch without hesitation, in fact this would be the ideal time to do so - get the message across and verify that God Mode works before RC4. I'm struggling to see the benefit of effectively allowing pools to mine on outdated and uncompliant code - it's like they have forked anyway and we're helping them insert and integrate incorrect blocks for... what... |
|
|
|
$5trillion changes hands each day around the world, and Darkcoin is a threat to people?
Think about that sentence. I did. And it made me feel all warm and fuzzy. |
|
|
|
Hello Everyone,
I know this has been kind of said before, but real quick...... I'm a proud Dark bag holder as well as a proud bag holder of XC and Vertcoin. I believe all three coins have their strengths and weaknesses. I'm seriously sick and tired of researching coins on the forums and seeing nothing but useless fud and people arguing. Re-quoting and arguing with other posters does absolutely nothing to help promote Dark. All it does is discourage investors, having to scroll through pages and pages of worthless arguments to find anything useful. When I jump on a forum and have to dig and dig to find what I'm looking for, I just end up walking away with a bad taste in my mouth about that particular coin. It gives me an idea of the type of people invested in that coin. Please, lets change the game here for Dark! No more arguing with fuders and no more re-quoting ignorant people! Also, investors want to see innovation and development. If you are qualified to speak in either of those departments, post! If your not, please don't. If we create a forum of just good info for investors and holders, you will see Dark's value go through the roof!!
I'm qualified to shove a boot up your ass! LOL. |
|
|
|
hi all finally i can get my masternode. but after 3 days i cant receive any payment yet. masternode status is up and running on https://elbzo.net/masternodes.html. is there anything that i am doing wrong? thanks. ssh into your node and run: darkcoind masternode list | grep <your IP> - if it comes back with a ':1' you're good, sit tight.  |
|
|
|
People make stupid statements to think they dont need privacy and anonymity for bitcoin because the use case for it right now is still quite limited. Those statements made by Shojayxt show how naive and immature his thinking is. "ohh I can purchase stuff now and its all fine"....what you dont realise is that we are still in a very early adoption phase. Would you be OK if someone today could look up your bank account number and see every transaction you have ever made in the past, link that to businesses and how much money you have? Once btc becomes more mainstream there will be a big opportunity (and its already started) to scrape and data mine addresses for the purpose of marketing & selling that information. - you can bet your left ass cheek that bitcoin is going to have a SERIOUS privacy issue on its hands. Shojayxt likes nothing more than a big truncheon up his arse, he has a thing for men in uniforms. And there's nothing wrong with that, it's his combination of innate subservience with truly baffling stupidity that inspires mirth and pity... |
|
|
|
This seems great at first blush, but won't there will be an issue with Darksend transaction liquidity over time? I mean, all transactions should be Darksent even if they don't need it so that there is the highest Darksend related activity on the blockchain. You want to maximize those confusing redenominated transactions flying around to make things as foggy and uniform as possible. Enabling a one-time sterilization process is bad because it makes it harder from a liquidity perspective for other (especially larger) transactions to be anonymized. The proposed RC4 diagrams from a few days back (i.e. two stage masternode transactions) seemed dialed in just right. Am I missing something?
Would it be possible if the client asked the MN if there are "enough" darksend transactions in the pool waiting to be mixed, and if there are, send normal transaction without darksend, and if there aren't, use darksend? That could be a good workaround. It's 'Darksend on demand' as needed by the network, essentially, but that would eliminate the appeal of instant anonymous transactions. Upon further reflection, it might be good enough to have two types of e-cash on hand in the wallet. 1. A Pre-anomymized balance (ready for instant anonymous transactions) and 2. A regular balance for Darksend+. Then you have a checkbox that selects "Use Darksend+" vs. "Send instantly". You wont need to worry about it, everything you send will be pre-anonymised. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
