|
passati anche i 1100 $, si vola!
|
|
|
|
|
Per curiosià qualche settimana fà ho compilato nheqminer e cpuminer su di una board arm allwinner a10 (monocore a 1200 MHz), il mining funzionava ma non ottenevo shared dato che tutti i job venivano rifiutati dalla pool per la poca potenza della cpu
|
|
|
|
@thefix only 15W with option t2 [2017-01-02 19:15:19] CPU #0: 1.41 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:15:19] CPU #1: 1.59 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:15:57] CPU #1: 1.60 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:16:01] CPU #0: 1.45 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:16:34] CPU #1: 1.64 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:16:40] CPU #0: 1.56 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:17:08] CPU #1: 1.82 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:17:15] CPU #0: 1.73 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:17:43] CPU #1: 1.74 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:17:51] CPU #0: 1.70 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:18:18] CPU #1: 1.75 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:18:29] CPU #0: 1.61 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:18:58] CPU #1: 1.53 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:19:16] CPU #0: 1.29 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:19:40] CPU #1: 1.46 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:20:02] CPU #0: 1.34 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:20:16] CPU #1: 1.69 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:20:37] CPU #0: 1.63 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:20:41] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 3.32 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 19:20:51] CPU #1: 1.72 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:21:14] CPU #0: 1.67 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:21:25] CPU #1: 1.79 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:21:50] CPU #0: 1.70 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:22:00] CPU #1: 1.74 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:22:28] CPU #0: 1.60 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:22:36] CPU #1: 1.70 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:23:06] CPU #0: 1.64 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:23:13] CPU #1: 1.66 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:23:25] CPU #0: 1.58 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:23:27] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 3.25 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 19:23:49] CPU #1: 1.68 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:24:01] CPU #0: 1.68 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:24:24] CPU #1: 1.73 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:24:38] CPU #0: 1.68 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:24:59] CPU #1: 1.76 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:25:15] CPU #0: 1.64 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:25:33] CPU #0: 1.63 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:25:34] CPU #1: 1.76 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:25:41] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 3.40 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 19:26:09] CPU #1: 1.75 H/s
[2017-01-02 19:26:10] CPU #0: 1.68 H/s $ sensors coretemp-isa-0000 Physical id 0: +73.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 0: +73.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 1: +69.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device temp1: +27.8°C with option t1 $ sensors coretemp-isa-0000 Adapter: ISA adapter Physical id 0: +69.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 0: +62.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 1: +69.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device temp1: +27.8°C |
|
|
|
Mai paragonato l'oro al bitcoin e non ho nessuna laurea quindi protrei benissimo sbagliarmi... ma di una cosa sono sicuro e non potete smentirmi: in questi giorni il bitcoin vale oro!  |
|
|
|
can this new algo be mined effectively with gpu or it's like the old one that only cpu work and it is not worth to use gpu? i hope the dev understand that runnign a bot fest coin will never do anything good to the project, mining is very centralized now in this coin
It works better with certain cpu configurations with quad channel memory or dual channel memory. From what I have seen so far the top miners are using Amazon spot instances to get the cheapest cpu prices when the prices are most profitable. I have tested with multiple cpus and the best configurations seem to be those with dual or quad memory setups Amazon might be the best way to harvest the most coins, but for the average user a dual core pentium skylake cpu with dual channel memory will give you the most bang for the buck. I have yet to get my hands on some higher end quad channel memory supported xeons. I have a feeling quad channel xeon setups will perform much better than dual channel setups but would be very cost prohibitive. Socket 1150 xeons perform about the same as similar clocked pentiums in dual channel configurations. Might be good to put together a list of cpu speeds and configs if anyone is interested I have got a i5 5200u processor on my notebook with ubuntu 16.10 cpuminer with option -t 1 [2017-01-02 17:26:20] CPU #0: 2.85 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:26:36] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 2.85 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 17:26:59] CPU #0: 3.07 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:27:59] CPU #0: 3.04 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:28:59] CPU #0: 3.00 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:29:39] CPU #0: 3.06 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:29:39] xzc.suprnova.cc:5596 lyra2rev2 block 14537
[2017-01-02 17:29:39] CPU #0: 5.94 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:31:20] CPU #0: 2.99 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:31:59] CPU #0: 3.09 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:32:23] CPU #0: 2.92 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:32:30] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 2.92 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 17:32:33] CPU #0: 2.97 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:32:36] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 2.97 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 17:33:12] CPU #0: 3.12 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:34:10] CPU #0: 3.12 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:34:26] CPU #0: 3.02 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:34:53] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 3.02 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 17:35:23] CPU #0: 3.18 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:36:12] CPU #0: 3.13 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:37:08] CPU #0: 3.22 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:37:12] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 3.22 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 17:38:03] CPU #0: 3.29 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:39:00] CPU #0: 3.18 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:39:56] CPU #0: 3.20 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:40:23] xzc.suprnova.cc:5596 lyra2rev2 block 14539
[2017-01-02 17:41:14] CPU #0: 3.11 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:41:20] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 3.11 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 17:42:08] CPU #0: 3.34 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:43:04] CPU #0: 3.22 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:44:00] CPU #0: 3.25 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:44:13] CPU #0: 3.33 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:44:44] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 3.33 H/s yes!
[2017-01-02 17:45:11] CPU #0: 3.15 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:46:08] CPU #0: 3.17 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:47:02] CPU #0: 3.36 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:48:57] CPU #0: 3.11 H/s
[2017-01-02 17:49:56] CPU #0: 3.05 H/s cpuminer without option -t [2016-12-31 08:51:49] CPU #1: 0.66 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:51:49] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 0.66 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 08:54:05] CPU #2: 0.77 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:54:06] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 1.43 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 08:54:42] CPU #2: 0.76 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:54:42] accepted: 3/3 (100.00%), 1.42 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 08:56:44] xzc.suprnova.cc:5596 lyra2rev2 block 14138
[2016-12-31 08:56:45] CPU #1: 0.78 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:56:45] CPU #3: 0.82 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:56:45] CPU #2: 0.82 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:56:45] CPU #0: 0.78 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:57:12] xzc.suprnova.cc:5596 lyra2rev2 block 14139
[2016-12-31 08:57:13] CPU #2: 0.84 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:57:13] CPU #3: 0.87 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:57:13] CPU #0: 0.84 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:57:13] CPU #1: 0.83 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:57:19] CPU #2: 0.67 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:57:19] accepted: 4/4 (100.00%), 3.20 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 08:58:02] xzc.suprnova.cc:5596 lyra2rev2 block 14140
[2016-12-31 08:58:03] CPU #3: 0.84 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:58:03] CPU #2: 0.84 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:58:03] CPU #0: 0.80 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:58:03] CPU #1: 0.82 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:59:43] CPU #1: 0.79 H/s
[2016-12-31 08:59:43] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 3.27 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 09:00:19] CPU #3: 0.82 H/s
[2016-12-31 09:00:19] accepted: 6/6 (100.00%), 3.25 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 09:04:03] CPU #3: 0.77 H/s
[2016-12-31 09:04:03] accepted: 7/7 (100.00%), 3.20 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 09:05:12] CPU #2: 0.80 H/s
[2016-12-31 09:05:13] accepted: 8/8 (100.00%), 3.17 H/s yes!
[2016-12-31 09:05:28] CPU #2: 0.76 H/s
[2016-12-31 09:05:29] accepted: 9/9 (100.00%), 3.13 H/s yes! Why with only 1 thread cpu makes about 3 H/s and with 4 threads cpu makes only 0.80 H/s ? |
|
|
|
|
La verità è che siamo ancora agli inizi delle criptovalute e non essendoci precedenti nessuno può sapere cosa ci riservi di preciso il futuro. Possiamo solo ipotizzare il prezzo che sarà sempre dato da domanda e offerta come per oro e altre valute
|
|
|
|
|
ecco, passati i 1000$
In rete molti dicevano per fine anno e in effetti è stata passata la soglia dei 1000 con solo una ventina di ore di ritardo...
Chissa cosa ci riserverà il 2017?
|
|
|
|
I want to know when the MTP is available ? it's so long to finish this algo. The zcoin wallet is synchronizing too slow eventhough it sometimes stops synchronizing. may I tranfer my xzc coins from bittrex exchange to my private wallet ? my wallet is running on the link https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/releasesYou can withdraw XZC from Bittrex to your wallet with 0.02 XZC fee |
|
|
|
|
Su poloniex siamo arrivati a 999.9 $, mancano solo 10 cent
|
|
|
|
zcoin sarebbe Zeta coin?
beh adesso è al secondo posto nella lista delle piu profittevoli primo posto monero e terzo zcash................
è appena stata lanciata no? si aspettano dei bei reward, cmq ora sembra che sia abbastanza conveniente minare.. si guadagna il doppio di quello che si spende in elettricità , ho il contatore dell'elettricità attaccato sotto il pc.
zcoin è XZC mentre Zeta coin è ZET quindi non credo tu stia parlando della stessa moneta ZET l'ho trovata su coinwarz mentre XZC no XZC usa un nuovo algoritmo e si può minare solo ed esclusivamente con CPU... |
|
|
|
|
Ho controllato, l'app richiede autorizzazioni per archiviazione, fotocamera, posizione e telefono... se disabiliti tutto tranne posizione continua a funzionare senza problemi.
Non richiede permessi per uso del microfono.
|
|
|
|
Toccati i 980$ su poloniex, sono curioso di vedere se domani sfonderà il muro dei 1000$!  |
|
|
|
Con il balzo di oggi credo siano diventati profittevoli da minare... avendo l'hardware |
|
|
|
@ocminer: many thanks for your investigation  |
|
|
|
I ask to Bittrex about XZC wallet: The wallet is still on the original chain and will be disabled before the fork block while we work through what we are doing |
|
|
|
|
Tanti auguri a tutto il forum e alle vostre famiglie
|
|
|
|
|
Da indipendentista veneto vi dicosolo una cosa: non fatevi fregare da Busato!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
