Not mining on a 980 but getting about 580-610 Mhs on a 750ti. Thanks SP
Thx |
|
|
|
|
Sp..... what does the 750ti do with DECRED #4 ?
EDIT: IS THAT 580-610 Mhs for the 750ti r #4 ?
Anyone
|
|
|
|
Yes. Only decred optimized in the decred miner #4 On the 980ti you earn $10.6 per day with my private kernal @3000 MHASH http://decred-calc.cryptohub.info/I am working on vanilla coin optimalisation. In the the next version you will get both decred and vanilla optimized. (0.2BTC) (0.1BTC for the decred buyers) Ok thx |
|
|
|
Don't forget to donate guys. More hash is comming in release #5
sp what is the difference between sp private 5 that I have from your and DECRED sp #4..... is that only for DECRED ? Meaning will my hashrate drop on other algo's from private 5 rates if I contribute to DECRED #4? Thx |
|
|
|
 Hi Crackfoo, I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please? That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's . If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind.  Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Your pool is the best.  Thx so much. I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list. It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?) miners. But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one. Must have had a brain fart when I wrote that, I meant below the wallet. Edit: While on the topic the expanded wallet details (pending coins) could use alphabetizing. Yes like I said up above .. ...Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. |
|
|
|
Hi Crackfoo, I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please? That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's . If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind. Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Your pool is the best. Thx so much. I have similar thoughts about the miner summary. I would like to see it just below the coin list. It's nice to order the pools by profitability but the normalization isn't correct for many (most?) miners. But right below means you still have to have 2 pages open..if to the left only one. |
|
|
|
Thank you crazyearner. That's what I was looking for..a comparison chart with the pools. |
|
|
|
Hi Crackfoo, I find myself switching back and forth looking to see if all my miners are working and looking at the top of page to see what the algo's are paying. Could you please switch the amount payout scheme and the workers scheme please? That way I can stay on the top of page to see my miners are all working and the best paying algo's . If there is a lot of coding to do this.. then never mind. Also could you lock the algo's in alphabetical order like nicehash does please. Your pool is the best. Thx so much. |
|
|
|
Etherum will hardfork, but dwarfpool has 57% of the network hashrate. What if they refuse to upgrade the wallet. Then there will be no hardfork..
Etherum
Nethashrate: 1 303 320 GHASH
Dwarfpool: 740 872 GHASH
In the early Dash days (darkcoin) many pools refused to upgrade their wallets, because the payouts to the miners was reduced.
Where are the list of pools sp?thx |
|
|
|
|
Where are the list of pools plz
thx
|
|
|
|
|
Read post 527......and 501....
|
|
|
|
Now is the time to do JACKPOT coin 2 |
|
|
|
C.A.T is very difficult to set up ?
That is one reason I don't buy it and it takes up all your computer memory to use it is what I heard. You heard bullshit. I use Cat on a 8 years old dual core, on 10-25 markets at the same time. Sampey sorry... someone did tell me that. The whole problem here is the difficulty in using it as someone posted here. I'm a real noob at this stuff .. meaning a newbie at it. And I dare not take the chance of losing .75 BTC on something I won't be able to use. Then C.A.T. is probably not for you (yet). I suggest learning the basics of trading, especially ping-pong trades to make some small profits on volatile markets. Once you can reliably make (small) profits by repeatedly buying low and selling high and you come to think "Wouldn't it be great if my computer could do this all day and night long for me" then it is the time to think about buying a C.A.T. license and let it do the job for you, basically C.A.T. follows your own strategy for you when you need or want to be AFK. In other words: If you know what you are doing on a market, C.A.T. can do that for you 24x7 reliably. C.A.T. is no magic bullet that "just makes money on altcoin markets". C.A.T. has a lot of settings you can adjust, that can be overhelming in the beginning. But once you realize you only need to create a ping-pong trade with default settings it becomes very simple as Sampey says. C.A.T. is extremly stable and it certainly has no memory problems and is very lightweight in its resource usage. I run it on a VPS with 1G RAM for ~30 markets on 2 exchanges, current uptime is over 45 days (yeah sorry Sampey, still running 3.5 at the moment but I promise to update soon ). Thank you Yes I'm trading a little but I don't know what ping-pong trades are..... so maybe it's not for me. Thx |
|
|
|
C.A.T is very difficult to set up ?
That is one reason I don't buy it and it takes up all your computer memory to use it is what I heard. You heard bullshit. I use Cat on a 8 years old dual core, on 10-25 markets at the same time. Sampey sorry... someone did tell me that. The whole problem here is the difficulty in using it as someone posted here. I'm a real noob at this stuff .. meaning a newbie at it. And I dare not take the chance of losing .75 BTC on something I won't be able to use. |
|
|
|
C.A.T is very difficult to set up ?
Not if you have the ability to read and/or watch a youtube video. Those who complain obviously didn't take the 3 minutes it takes to understand. I did and the video is in low definition ... you can't see what is what. |
|
|
|
C.A.T is very difficult to set up ?
That is one reason I don't buy it and it takes up all your computer memory to use it is what I heard. |
|
|
|
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
That looks like 750ti rates. Most profit switching uses AMD performance for mormalizing profit among algos. Quark is always rated too low for Nvidia GPUs. Nicehash rates quark at about 1.25 x11 but on Maxwell it's closer to 2. Miningpoolhub has different rates for AMD and Nvidia, but it's only for show. I made my own measurements and use my own factors. I also tune lyra2v2 differently for 750ti due to the higher relative performance compared to other Maxwell GPUs. AMD yes I see that everywhere most profit nvidia is quark. X11 is worthless on nvidia. It was doing fine. Here is a little of my bat file all numbers are related to hashrate based on the other algo's hashrate. I could have 7 mh/s quark and 5 mh/s lyra2re2 and put 1 and 1.2 or use the hashrate 7 and 5 doesn't matter. I'll give it over night and see...it maybe the coins that popped up. ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0 timeout /t 1 ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0 timeout /t 1 Have you tried the sample on the multialgo page? If that doesn't work it's a pool problem. No... but it's working fine now thz |
|
|
|
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
That looks like 750ti rates. Most profit switching uses AMD performance for mormalizing profit among algos. Quark is always rated too low for Nvidia GPUs. Nicehash rates quark at about 1.25 x11 but on Maxwell it's closer to 2. Miningpoolhub has different rates for AMD and Nvidia, but it's only for show. I made my own measurements and use my own factors. I also tune lyra2v2 differently for 750ti due to the higher relative performance compared to other Maxwell GPUs. AMD yes I see that everywhere most profit nvidia is quark. X11 is worthless on nvidia. It was doing fine. Here is a little of my bat file all numbers are related to hashrate based on the other algo's hashrate. I could have 7 mh/s quark and 5 mh/s lyra2re2 and put 1 and 1.2 or use the hashrate 7 and 5 doesn't matter. I'll give it over night and see...it maybe the coins that popped up. ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0 timeout /t 1 ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0 timeout /t 1 |
|
|
|
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
Did you balance your profitability based on hashrate using the password field? Also, time to find a block might make the pool put you where you will earn faster. Yes but the pool has me stuck on lyra2re2 and qubit right after he made the fine tuning and now my profits dropped drastically. Pending too. It maybe that the pool had me there to find a block. Here is a little of my bat file all numbers are related to hashrate based on the other algo's hashrate. I could have 7 mh/s quark and 5 mh/s lyra2re2 and put 1 and 1.2 or use the hashrate 7 and 5 doesn't matter. I'll give it over night and see...it maybe the coins that popped up. Wink ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0 timeout /t 1 ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet -p x11=3.1,quark=6.6,lyra2v2=4.8,qubit=3.5,neoscrypt=0.185 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0 timeout /t 1 |
|
|
|
|
lyra2re2 5mh/s pay .43 quark 7 mh/s pay .49 but doing lyra2re2 ??
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
