If they cannot do business in your country then using bitcoin to break the law would just make them liable for prosecution, no sane executive would allow that.
There are a few bitcoin poker sites, just move your business there...
|
|
|
Did you check the transaction on a block explorer?
Has it been confirmed by the network and you're waiting for Coinbase to make it available on your account or is the transaction not yet confirmed by the network?
|
|
|
Have you tried with different browsers or with different computers?
If the problem is not at your end there's nothing you can do besides waiting.
|
|
|
Maybe they should advertise the offer in US dollars instead of bitcoin, or setting a rate when they already bought the coins to pay people in the end of the term.
How they can use US dollars instead of bitcoins on this forum ? After all , its a bitcoin based forum buddy. Something like, you get 30 cents for post, in the end of the month you made 100 posts, you get whatever $30 in bitcoin is, pretty simple actually...
|
|
|
May he is also on Blockstream payroll.
|
|
|
it was good while it lasted! it is starting to go back up having said that!
It can always be a bear trap.
|
|
|
From his perspective he makes a very good point, banks have to comply with a lot of regulation, imagine if banks operate like Bitcoin, no KYC, no AML, immediate non-reversible transactions, that would be a nightmare.
How often got banks away with fraudulent behaviour in the past?! They paid a ridiculous fine compared to the profit they've made with their schemes.No one ever went in jail! This so called regulation is a joke! And still they complain. Banks are centralized entities. Bitcoin is not!Good luck trying to control it. Just my 2 satoshis! Correct, even with all these safeguards there is lot of corruption and fraud made using the banking system imagine if there wasn't...
|
|
|
Looking at the price now... UK time 09:35 at £243 down 12% on yesterday already... has the bubble been popped.
It seems so, it de-escalated quickly also.
|
|
|
From his perspective he makes a very good point, banks have to comply with a lot of regulation, imagine if banks operate like Bitcoin, no KYC, no AML, immediate non-reversible transactions, that would be a nightmare.
|
|
|
I follow a lot of bitcoiners on Twitter, people tweet the relevant news, so there isn't a one site I go for bitcoin news, I go to a lot of websites.
|
|
|
Maybe they should advertise the offer in US dollars instead of bitcoin, or setting a rate when they already bought the coins to pay people in the end of the term.
|
|
|
The truth is nobody knows, there are always a ton of good things happening in bitcoinland it may be the sum of all these stuff, people are seeing bitcoin as a solid investment/store of value and a lot of people decided to get on the train to the moon.
┗(°0°)┛
|
|
|
Do you need full ID and verification at bitstamp? Ultimately I just want to daytrade BTC vs USD. And then withdraw the BTC back to my wallet when needed. bitstamp looks to have a liquid market, but I dont want to give them my full ID, etc.
Bitstamp indeed needs full id verification. They want ultra high resolution scans of your documents. That's what I had to do in order to start trading there. It's annoying, but it is only 1 time. even to just trade BTC/USD and only withdraw BTC? not planning on withdrawing USD Check out BTC-e, they are very relaxed when it comes to ID.
|
|
|
Bitstamp is very good, amongst the best you can find.
|
|
|
Sim, mas cada país tem de ratificar essa decisão, é mais uma sugestão do que uma obrigação, mas de qualquer forma esta deliberação ajuda muito a impulsionar o business, pelo menos existe um pouco mais de clareza.
|
|
|
Pretty sure we can find topics like this one for bitcoin reaching $10, $100, $200, $500, and all these achievements were unlocked, eventually $1000/BTC will be the stable value and if still new bubbles form by then, the price will be quite high at the peak.
|
|
|
It's just a small step, farther worlds await.
|
|
|
It can go very high, like all time high. Everyone likes to give their opinion but no one really knows what the future will bring us. What a time to be alive.
|
|
|
You're not the only one to see it, and it was always meant to be like this from the beginning. The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306Long before the network gets anywhere near as large as that, it would be safe for users to use Simplified Payment Verification (section to check for double spending, which only requires having the chain of block headers, or about 12KB per day. Only people trying to create new coins would need to run network nodes. At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware. A server farm would only need to have one node on the network and the rest of the LAN connects with that one node. http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/emails/cryptography/2/#selection-67.0-83.14
|
|
|
|