|
OLDEST:
Snake
Pitfall
OLDER:
Mortal Kombat
Donkey Kong II
Super Mario Bros 3
Sonic
Beyond The Third Dimension
Heavy Gear
Age Of Empires
Civilization
OLD:
Silent Hill
Dino Crysis
Metal Gear Solid
Driver
Cool Boarders 3
Tony Hawks Pro Skater
Gran Turismo 2
Twisted Metal
Tomb Raider
Duke Nukem 98
Duke Nukem Forever
New:
Splinter Cell
Simcity 3000
Newer
Unreal Tournament 2008
Driver 2
Stuntman
Gran Turismo 3
Grand Theft Auto San Andreas
Just Cause 2
Newest
Fallout 3
NBA 2k12
Assasins Creed 2
Kayne & Lynch 2
Left For Dead 2
N:Way of the Ninja
|
|
|
|
interested in ripple? No.interested in you adding all the new coins to the list? YES. |
|
|
|
you're not understanding though, this new build process results in a non executable binary on my os. thats why i need the other method which doesn't else why would i even bother making this thread? How can anyone understand that when you haven't said it? Also, what OS is this? Is it actually an OS we support? If not, don't expect it to work right, even if it compiles and runs. If you want to change that, perhaps you should be volunteering to maintain a port for said OS. Finally, the autotools still is only in git, which is explicitly untested and unsupported.It is not a release at all, not even alpha or rc, let alone beta (yes, I'm aware beta usually comes before rc, but that's backward for this project). I still have a long list of "issues" I have with it myself, but the way forward (to an eventual release) is fixing those issues, not regressing back to a broken set-of-inconsistent-makefiles-that-only-work-with-mangling. ah my mistake i didn't check the releases. i found 8.5 and its compiling... * r3wt eats a heaping helping of humble pie. |
|
|
|
I am very displeased with the change in compiling procedures. where might i find the previous version with normal compiling procedures(make and qmake) thanks.
How about _any_ released version, including the most current one? (though the procedure you gave there is needlessly complicated in any case) Though I wonder why you are displeased with Bitcoin being build-able in the same way as virtually every other open source unix package for the past twenty years: and instead prefer your six step process (which doesn't even suffice for building on many systems). you're not understanding though, this new build process results in a non executable binary on my os. thats why i need the other method which doesn't else why would i even bother making this thread? |
|
|
|
the software i use without no compensation was written by satoshi, not the people who manage it now.
Why don't you use 0.3.19 if the current developers aren't adding anything? ok, let me try it again a little more respectfully. I am very displeased with the change in compiling procedures. where might i find the previous version with normal compiling procedures(make and qmake) thanks. |
|
|
|
Perhaps next time you could be a little more vague about your problems, insulting to people who write software you use without any compensation from you the software i use without no compensation was written by satoshi, not the people who manage it now. i have no beef with the software, its the unnecesary extra steps that have been added to the compiling process that was easy and familiar. so do you see how implicitly wrong your statement that i'm insulting the people who wrote bitcoin? because that is not what i'm doing at all good sir, i'm addressing the people who are fucking it up, for lack of a better word. |
|
|
|
Thank you for your super helpful and descriptive problem report. The complete lack of information about what version(s) you're attempting to build and what reasons the build are failing have helpfully freed me from making any actual effort to assist with your problem.
Perhaps next time you could be a little more vague about your problems, insulting to people who write software you use without any compensation from you, and indifferent to any benefits (of whatever change is implicated) tob other people? ... because as is I still feel some residual desire to solve whatever problem you're having here but I'm sure from your yellow ignore throbber that you could do better.
the build didn't fail genius, it was just a pain in the ass. the old way was simple and showed alot of helpful debugging information. see i also have other clients i have to build on aregular basis ( http://github.com/r3wt/) and the new fancy smancy version of bitcoin interfere's with my dependencies. This was the old way that didn't interfere with me: HOW TO BUILD BITCOIN IN 30 Seconds why replace this simple, easy to understand method of producing a working executable with a ridiculous autoconf and automake script that works half ass at best. i don't understand. try and help me understand, oh holy one of self righteousness who is indelible of ever making mistakes. bitcoin qt compiling wasn't broken why mess with it? and atleast if your gonna throw stones, be a doll and point me to the last working version that didn't use this god forsaken autoconf script so that i can compile the shit on my computer. please and thank you. IF IT AINT BROKE, DONT FIX IT! |
|
|
|
which OS are you building on?
getting bitcoind to build and run on openbsd or bitrig was such a pain that it was the starting point for btcd (see my sig).
elementary OS luna. some little deviant version of Ubuntu |
|
|
|
"if it aint broke don't fix it." * r3wt slaps bitcoin dev team |
|
|
|
Hi, i was wondering if electrum was open source. i would like to port it to my project, OpenSourceCoin as a liteclient. should i change the name so people don't get confused? like, Electrum-OSC edition? for more info on OSC https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=268705.0thanks in advance. i wanted to ask permission before i went forward with my project |
|
|
|
Hahaha... Whenever Stunna says denied, it reminds me of a TV show!  Dragon's Den? :S No, Susie Orman show!  He has to go "DENIED!" every time, that would make more dramatic. I like that show a lot though. She is a little more animated than Dave Ramsey. Stunna could you make it all dramatic? I don't know, it might hurt some of the newbies feelings when they go to ask for an innocent loan and have "DENIED!" shouted at them. Although it will definitely be a kick in the arse for scammers.  Now wait just a damn minute DiamondCardz, what the hell is you tryin' to say!! |
|
|
|
|
dude, go to sleep tweeker!
|
|
|
|
|
OSC-- i think people will grow to see the greatness of combining Bitcoin proof of work with ppcoin remote/auto checkpointing without including proof of stake
|
|
|
|
|
bump! its go time biatches!
|
|
|
|
i need another loan stunna. amount BTC .15 collateral offered: 4.13 LTC + my credentials from previous reason: my friend has a motherboard/cpu/ram combo for sale i'd really like to buy as i desperately need a new compiling computer. he has it for sale for BTC .35 . counting my ltc i'm only about BTC .08-.07 short of buying it. i'm offering you my 4.13 ltc for you to do with as you see fit + repaying the remainder of the loan. so for example if you got .08 out of the ltc i would pay back .07 optionally you could just loan me .7 and i could sell the ltc on exchange. repayment: 3 weeks or less, probably less but just to be safe. <--begin signed message--> address1r3wtGDjMByDazi1e4UEU9f6GmhS1wqfF this is r3wts address , i am requesting a loan from stunna!! HGWpyQ3+vYTdklspAYapkLCGR848o0qDxCkxjy1dlz8f2izdJjKkVaJdqVtYJm17ZHl1N/Htpq7ni3uM4A1oKuY= You do an .07? Did you right your prior wrongs? i still owe .4 to iGotSpots but we're working that out in an alternative agreement, ie i'm working it off. |
|
|
|
i need another loan stunna. amount BTC .15 collateral offered: 4.13 LTC + my credentials from previous reason: my friend has a motherboard/cpu/ram combo for sale i'd really like to buy as i desperately need a new compiling computer. he has it for sale for BTC .35 . counting my ltc i'm only about BTC .08-.07 short of buying it. i'm offering you my 4.13 ltc for you to do with as you see fit + repaying the remainder of the loan. so for example if you got .08 out of the ltc i would pay back .07 optionally you could just loan me .07 and i could sell the ltc on exchange. repayment: 3 weeks or less, probably less but just to be safe. <--begin signed message--> address1r3wtGDjMByDazi1e4UEU9f6GmhS1wqfF this is r3wts address , i am requesting a loan from stunna!! HGWpyQ3+vYTdklspAYapkLCGR848o0qDxCkxjy1dlz8f2izdJjKkVaJdqVtYJm17ZHl1N/Htpq7ni3uM4A1oKuY= |
|
|
|
A screenshot of http://opensourcecoin.org which is being developed by zelles. won't look exactly like this, but it gives you a good indicator of what you can expect.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
