A match is supposed to be unpredictable and no credible player will fumble like this, this nonsense wasn't supposed to happen in the first but who knows if they are not paid weekly and bonuses. But there is something bothering me about this event, who are the people capable of making this happens if not for Sportsbet or the organizers themselves. Here are my reasons:
1. A team wouldn't pull this nonsense, they wouldn't give up their league cup for some bets, they would rather try their best to win the league than risk amounts.
2. If the team cannot do this set up, then a single person can't either except the organizers or sports bets but what will they stand to gain when this thing is obvious to the public, they would lose their reputation, and names for nothing.

Did you say fun with the word MOST people NO! I beg to differ, perhaps you can enlighten me more about that because the way I see people gamble from my place, I don't think passion is what motivates most people to play but an avenue to do some big cash out due to their financial position.
Gambling has dip eaten some students, especially the university students who don't have any other means to source money, their passion for sports is what always triggers them in the first place but the main objective is to win big, when you see them with a long slip of tickets, just know that they have stake/wager money in some games and expecting results in some days.

I like the concept but I'm not too clear about the review part. What is the potency of your reviews and how reliable are they to depend on? You said a lot of things about what it takes to review a casino but what if your platform becomes big, wouldn't this becomes too centralized with favouritism to some established Casino over the small ones.
On your Home page, I can see top casino slots with different descriptions but they are kind of misleading, they all have a Play button that redirects to another page but what it shows are just reviews and a little description about the game, one will think a slot play page will open when you open a page, may be you should change it from play to another thing.

It is a product that can give value to a token, if a casino and the team can do more than the platform itself, investors wouldn't worry about short-term growth like the way you fear now, one of the problems with these casinos is that you can never predict their longevity and be sound to the demands of players. As long as players keep using the medium to bets, there will always be a utility for the token and employing a burning mechanism will improve the value over time.

Actaully, in terms of damage control, MMA and Boxing didn't come to Football, Basketall and other sports that require more than two player, I know that it require just a single person to start a turnament in boxing but if you compare it to other sporting activities, it is very easy to handle when a single player becomes corona positive and quickly evacuate and quarantine than when a single player that is in the mix of 11 players, football requires you to attack an opponent which brings you too expose to other players.

GiftedMAN wasn't wrong either but wasn't supposed to be generalized as he put it, in some situation some gamblers are always known to disguised under that umbrella so that people don't view them as gambler especially when they see them as a responsible and public model, you know that some society view gambling as a wayward thing to indulge in, they always find a way to hide under this circumstances.
People are different and our financial status have different tastes, there are some gamblers that truly play to have fun and have a nice time, doing it in the first place is not because of money but when it goes as predicted, that doesn't mean they wouldn't take the money, after all, we all do like money.

I think you missed the point of KTC, he is talking about whale, especially one that may be so influential that his words alone will satisfy their T&C and allow him to play without undergoing any Secondary identification, just the way Drake became a special VVIP player on Stake Casino and even with that, he has lost a couple of bets and still later partner with them, he officially announced it on his IG and that also brings in lots of more players to stake bet casino.

Just hope the company in charge of your KYC doesn't have a data bridge as often they use to say, if that happens eventually, there is nothing you can do when your ID gets leaked to the wrong hands. Personally, I dislike KYC not because they want it but because anything could happen to it if it falls in the wrong hands. An email and a password are enough for me to roll some dice.

What did I just watch? 
Those players are plain clowns and paid to come to play nonsense for the league else no credible player will want to play with his career, the way they did it looks even too stupid and I'm surprised that the fans didn't invade that pitch in crowd.
This is just one of the reasons why I don't watch local leagues, so much corruption and manipulation of matches and this is clearly one of them, I hope FIFA is watching these and should take action against those who organised this event because this is a taint on them.

I wouldn't compare them with rest of the tokens out there since they have a good use case and such will help grow the value of their tokens. However, looking at the three of the tokens you made mentioned, TFS is the only one with too much total supply, it wouldn't go far when you compare it with others and also, buying these tokens for the sake of APY reward in USDT and BNB is not too convincing. I know they are trying to avoid dumpers but they should build and increase the utility of the Casinos, they would worry less about those that will dump their rewards.

Did you call Bitcoin the most hyped coin? You must be really good at making comparisons about altcoins with king BTC. You were fair in your first statement and then change your tone in the last paragraph. I hope you make a deposit next time on a Casino that supports Luna and other shit-related tokens.
If you play on a Casino that keeps a balance on bitcoin, buying bunch of bitcoin right now is the best as you will get more value when the price appreciates and have more dollars to wedge and less satoshi to pay the casino on games to play.

Allow me to use this analogy: Just because alcohol is abused and intoxicated by some people, I haven't seen the call for its ban, why should gambling be banned? Besides, it is a financial instrument for some people, they have made a lot of fortune from it.
I'm not too familiar with casino games but I can wage my last card for my club when they have matches against their opponent and when they are playing against a weak opponent, I may even stake a bigger amount I can afford to lose, this why they called it "play for the entertainment of sport and for the fun." Anything you see on earth has a pro and cons and because people abuse it doesn't mean it should be totally stopped, after all, there use to be warning in most bet mediums and the risk associated with them, I don't see any valid reason why gambling should be ban.

It is not as if they cannot support the swap of native Bitcoin into other coins and tokens, it doesn't just align with their view of bitcoin. As you can see from the https://www.github.com/thorswap, they can fork their idea but I don't think there is a need to swap real Bitcoin to wrapped bitcoin, holders don't need it except the lenders and some decentralized finance who used it to bridge between blockchains and another reason I think Trust wallet wouldn't copy that idea is that native and wrapped bitcoin is already available in Binance, doing that on trust wallet is will be pushing some users from Binance especially those who don't want KYC.

An accusation has one thing which is been wrong and when that happens, it must be treated with fair judgement. It doesn't matter if the casino has been known for a good reputation for a long time, after all, good guys have turned bad in many situations, if the evidence found against them is valid, they must come out plain and pay out what they own except otherwise where the players must have invalidated their terms and policy, they have that right to penalise a player, especially the cheaters.

They can also get more deposits from users if they are very transparent and don't always find a way to hold onto player's money whenever they win a large amount with KYC and later change their mind that the players must comply and do verification even though they said it wasn't necessary at first and even after doing the verification, they should adhere to fair policy and allow users to withdraw their money, which will instil some level of confidence in the player. That money they withdraw will either directly or indirectly return to the casino, it could be they are putting the integrity of the firm they played and won with to the test.

It is not difficult as you think if you have wrapped BTC or any other tokens, your choice of chain is arbitrary but fees should be your number one scale of preference. Most exchanges accept wrapped tokens be it BTC, coins or tokens, click on the deposit and you will see a drop-down menu of any blockchain they support, the popular ones are Ethereum, Solana, and Binance smart chain.

But do you really need wrapped BTC? It is stress and workload with all these conversions and swaps.

It is their choice, you can't force people to invest in something they don't want to but don't get tired of advising them to embrace bitcoin, some of them will learn after they get rekt especially during this kind of bear period that things are so hard for all altcoins. I also don't blame them sometimes because I was in one live stream on Tiktok and this guy probably gave many of his followers instruction to buy some shitcoins which didn't go as planned and was assuring them that bull run happens like crest wave yearly, i.e it will collapse a year and rise the second year, he was giving them words of confident that it will rise back next year and I was just shaking my head and smile. It is not as if they don't want to buy bitcoin, it is just that they receive wrong orientation from the beginning.

Sadly many wouldn't want that to happen because they wouldn't be able to do their usual fouls like favouritism, the corruption they called networking and cheating. I see nothing wrong with being taxed from your income, the only problem I see is how these taxes are allocated, spent, and get stolen by some groups. However, I think decentralization will solve this because you can't manipulate a public ledger that is visible to everyone, you see why decentralization will be massively rejected.

This is funny and I somehow pity them with their ignorance, was not/it is not a forced currency imposed on people but as legal tender which means it can be used as a settlement of debt and exchange of goods without any problem within that jurisdiction, no business entity is or was forced to accept bitcoin, its a choice.


My concern about this Chivo wallet is that it is centralized storage which is not in line with my view of bitcoin adoption, every bitcoin in those wallets are watched and if things go south, they could be seized and even get arrested, you know the government and their shitty head especially if there is a change in the government or if another party take over democracy in El Salvador.


Same as I have said above, using of that centralised app is not a good choice of the wallet if Bukelle wanted bitcoin for everyone and not somebody(government).

I have checked through the website and i must confess that I really find it very interesting but it is odd to me that in the whole of Nigeria, it has just two ATMs and all in Lagos. I'm not unsatisfied about them being in Lagos but the fact that it is just two could either be that the query was manually designed and doesn't automatically search or perhaps they don't want it all to be seen by the government. The Nigerian government has placed a restriction to crypto investors, it is possible that some are hidden from the regulators.
I have a question by the way, how do ATM machines work technically? I'm really interested in the behind scenes.

Is there anything like strong in paper currency? If there is, I don't think there will be parity between Euro to USD. As long they are fighting inflation by printing arbitrary paper with values written on them, they will always struggle to maintain them during crises.
Don't ever make the mistake of buying a currency as a hedge against inflation, you could buy as many bunches you want but trust me, in a few years time, you will only be able to spend them on pairs of shoes, clothes and dinner.


I hope you have heard of Bitcoin, buy it, secure it, and hold it for some time, you will know how transparent and very efficient it is to capitalize your investment on Bitcoin.