[1] as BTC goes up they can cut fees to 0.00001 and so on.

[2] BTC is behaving like a store of wealth, though that may mean PPC is the new btc

[3] BTC will be used for things like buying houses, cars, larger items, paying wages, services and perhaps bills etc, where the real money is.

[4] Off chain solutions may arise, though I'm yet to be convinced of how this will work exactly

[5] i can actually touch type now after all theses years as long as I don't think about it while I am doing it.

you didn't give an address

starcon II or other in melee

We just hit 10 Billion Market cap

next 13 - 20 months, 100 Billion, then 13 -20  months after 1T.

I think at the 10K per bitcoin, it starts to become useful for large investors, 401k funds, insurance funds, investment funds etc.


but at 100K a coin it  becomes much more useful as there would be enough liquidity to absorb 100M investments,


at 1M a coin, BTC could be potentially used for overnight settlement

pts 7 million

wdc 2 millon

I think pts would be a contender.....

isn't PTS, 5 mill market cap >>>>than WDC,

no what I mean is I wanted different people to get the 50 GLD, not give 2x of 50 to the same person.

keep the majority of you coins on your own wallet, not on an exchange or online wallet

Sent!

I will give away 50 GLD coins to 10 random addresses in this thread

EDIT Sent some out, let me know if you get it all right

Twiztid your address is the same as uk1

DxXuw8b5ENuFRUndK4JXqvFF7tujnYTkB5

I did not realise, could you send the second 50 you received on to EAWZqUqMdNGuPYPjYw3pk1ETvVUWJ9usv5
in the spirit of things

improve your chances by joining vircurex.com referral ID 514-5283 save today, and let me know in your address request

something I could never figure out about the coin lenders model, was when you get a bitcoin evaluation event, as we have seen recently from 150 - 700 or about that , how would a person who has taken out a loan cover that (except in mining, and we all know how that always works out), as in any other asset/investment class its going to be hard to pay the loan rate plus 400%. The maths of this just does not add up, yet alone a person would ever even believe they could pay this back. I raised this issue with TF before all of this went down. Essentially you need a re-insurer with coins to back your coins

I went to the forum and it well....it still was not clearly set out, need a diagram flow chart or something

Can any one explain this to me?

[1] Is it that protoshare is encouraging each new alt to adopt the state of its userbase as the zero point of the new alts Genesis block? through the bitshare mechanism? Thus getting a premade community.

[2] What are general views

[3] How does the bitshare mechanism work exactly>

[4] has any one confirmed virii in the downlaod (saw one claim)

[5] Why does the website look like its from 1998?

[6] is it of Chinese origin

[7] how credible it the dev team?

[8] the market cap is $5mil, is this reasonable at this point?

[9] What are these email functions etc?

i have prime coin, and think it is innovative, and was the only coin I have mined.

Diversification is the biggest draw, and that Sunny King was the DEV

this is why you have peercoin, solves this exact problem

good practice is to use pywallet and extract all private keys before placing anything in the wallet addresses.....regualr updates for change addresses

a nas can be used to store and dwnld blockchain

so just selfi googled and this came up.

The whole point is to stress test this so I can know that ripple is secure.

Also there problem is BTC(TF) should not be able to the added to BTC(Bitsamp), but ripple allows this, and inmho its a flaw

I have posted this issue on the Ripple forum here

https://ripple.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3949

and reasons here

https://ripple.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2597&start=10

I may consider doing this but face some issues

[1] Have not been member of forum long enough
[2] Don't know if comfortable holding over 100 btc, while I have very secure robust methods, the price has gone up, and I would rather see more holders of smaller amounts say 100, as this would make it more distributed and less than one point of failure. Competing with that is finding enough trust worthy people.
[3] I would have thought full reserve would be required as it would be hard to re-insure against an evaluation eg the recent run up to 600, it would be much more sercure to allow a fixed storage and handling charge
[4] I think an even mix of known and anon trustees would be the best way to ensure distributed and no single point of failure.
[5] I can however look at the contract(s) and maybe make some commentary.
[6] Have a mix of single sig and multi sig accounts. Probably no more than 2 sigs per account as people disappearing or un-contactable could lock up vast amounts of btc

In relation to [5] some comments for example on the "agreement"


I'm not sure an agreement can have any force where it is non-legal, I think you know this, but what you may mean to say is


also where ever the server resides the courts would probably declare that their jurisdiction is in force. (courts don't like privative clauses and love to enlarge their jurisdiction) but what courts will almost always enforce is where the parties have agreed to alternate dispute resolution first, and would not allow the matter to go to court until that process is exhausted your disputes part probably serves this well but I have not had time to analyze this yet. Further there could be a form of estoppel that arises if you draft it right to stop parties going to court. Alternatively you could define a jurisdiction that prevails. Sometimes where the agreement is made determines jurisdiction, that may be the place where the receiving address resides.

further to say

"agreement is intended to be enforced in a ... non-legal way by the community." could be read you intend to enforce it in an illegal (unlawful) way

a better wording would be


you could then go on to outline a specific process of alternative dispute resolution

so all together perhaps the wording would be


this gets a bit tautological, and its not perfect but it's all I have time for right now

bitcoin is agnostic to who uses it for what and who owns it. The tech/maths stands on its own merits

you may be confusing the uses and users of BTC with the bitcoin itslef