Lol exactly! I am always a little bit disappointed when I win lottery tickets but most of the times when I use my WOF spins it is always a combination of lottery tickets, RP and satoshis.
I just realized, if you disabled receiving lottery tickets, what would happen if you receive them from the WOF? |
|
|
|
|
^ Exactly. It is worded like Google is against crypto.
Just another common thing on the Play Store though. Remove 10, there are 100 still hiding.
|
|
|
|
Why do I get a Warning: "Report it or find help. Images of child abuse are illegal" notification when I search Google for "loli.net"?
Because loli, or lolicon is a term (slang) for underaged children, in Japanese culture. Similar to hentai = animated Japanese porn, loli leans towards characters that look like kids/ pre-adolescents. Therefore when some enters it, Google would think its about searching for the genre, or porn of the sort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon |
|
|
|
you can just ignore the email if you have no time to get back at him.
blackmails in crypto are usually funny like that caught jacking on camera. those who paid will really make the blackmailer believed they did it infront of computer camera. its got t be something new this 2021 otherwise this blackmailer is outdated.
One of the reasons why covering the webcam (if you own a laptop) is practiced by many :p There's also another one, about using old/ outdated/ archaic passwords. |
|
|
|
Don't worry mate. Wait for the inevitable bear market(whenever that will be) and I could almost guarantee that it will fix your "addiction", as you're probably going to hate seeing the Bitcoin logo by then  And probably uninstall those price chart apps from his devices  |
|
|
|
Just keep doing the freerolls in bear and bull markets to accumulate some satoshis. I only participate in the lottery with the tickets I win with the WOF but you never know you can get lucky. I am approaching the 100k RP so that's an extra 100k satoshi in the pocket . The face when you see 4,000 lottery tickets only to realize later than there are a bunch of other users with similar fate  |
|
|
|
Now you guys mentioned it... I recalled The Ghoul (presumably alt) posting a Chinese image link some time back, which I hardly ever saw as far as I remember: Source: https://github.com/marktext/marktext/issues/426This definitely sounds very sus. |
|
|
|
hey, if i sell my fun tokens after holding them for a year and i buy them back do i have to hold them for a year again or does my previous holding period still count in the benefits i receive for premium membership
You'd have to hold them for a year again, I believe. |
|
|
|
I believe the answer is yes. Although so far none of the topics I created have been locked by moderators but users will lose access to unlock topics if moderators have locked them. If the topic owner can reopen topics locked by moderators due to a lot of spam, then the moderator's actions at that time are useless. I believe the moderator's action when locking the topic is a well-considered final decision. Maybe for a different case the OP can make a request to the moderator to reopen the topic if something needs updating, but in most cases the locked topic is a topic full of spam so it's impossible to reopen.
IIRC, I've read somewhere that they have both soft (can be unlocked by the OP) and hard (cannot be unlocked by the OP) locks. The former is more of a gentle reminder, and the latter is used when the user still persists on re-opening despite being told not to. |
|
|
|
Don't that count as deleted? For deleted post, we used to receive a PM in our inbox. I'm not sure but logically there should be a PM for a thread trashed. Correct me if I'm wrong; I can't remember if I have seen such info anywhere.
Yep, just that we won't get to find out who removed it so we're left with the guessing game. |
|
|
|
Moderators must leave a trail when they perform the act of merging user posts that violate rule 23. This can tell the offending poster and other users that it was the act of the moderator and not someone other than the mod or poster who did it. At least there's nothing other than posters and moderators can't do because we're on the internet and this bounty can be used as a reason why bugs can still happen. But for the OP's case, it's clear that the moderators did. $10 000: If you can make undetectable edits to arbitrary posts or PMs. Compromising a moderator account doesn't count. But when a thread/ post gets trashed, none of those affected would know who did it  |
|
|
|
BuNga_cute is still active on the forum five years later and still making crap-ass posts like the ones above. That is some serious dedication to shitposting, and if we gave out trophies with bronze turds, I think he/she ought to get one right up the wazoo.
Damn, and she's in the same signature campaign as I am. How did Hham manage to pick her of all applicants... |
|
|
|
New Dashboard page for v2.   Sadly this forum doesn't support GIFs, but you could watch it here  |
|
|
|
(and no, I'm not offering to give you a loan - I don't even know what "CBD" oil is...)
It's hashish oil, or marijuana oil. Mainly used in smoking, ointment, cooking, etc... |
|
|
|
Not really. Newly created accounts can't use their signature space to advertise anything. Spammers and scammers are often shitposters as well, so they won't have the required post quality to rank up an account to a decent level.
For those loaded, they can afford to purchase accounts at a premium. Like the 1xBit sig campaign which pays handsomely for participants to bring in more victims.
I don't agree that's not possible to moderate scam. But here such thing would be difficult. If mods would start to moderate every potential scam and make investigations about, they wouldn't have time left for their main job - moderating forum.
Perhaps to let the public educate the public? Rather than hiding the scams, the feedback and negative reactions might dissuade any newbie/ potential victim to decide against joining/ parting with the cash/ credentials. Obvious red flags are better deterrents that suppressing something. Nevertheless if the user decides to join, then it's too bad. |
|
|
|
Well, if that's the case then shouldn't it automatically be locked or the mods should've locked it already if the issues addressed already since most incoming replies would just be a tangle of the OP and I feel like we need more of this engagement thing with users creating this threads.
The OPs has to either lock them, which is a miracle if they happen or we could simply report them to the mods and they'll get locked soon enough. If it encourages discussions between users, that's fine in my books. In the gambling section, most of the posts are in response to other quotes. |
|
|
|
And what would the section be left with if all of those posts were deleted? Most of the good stuff! That's why all of those shitposts should be reported when you see them--and I'm not saying you need to go out of your way to look for them, but if you're reading threads in sections like Bitcoin Discussion you're inevitably going to come across them. It only takes a few seconds to report a garbage post to the mods and then your part is done.
I just made a post in Meta about the quality of posts in Economics deteriorating lately and asked whether this might be due to an increase in signature campaigns and/or bounties. I don't follow the Services section (or the bounty one), so I don't have a good sense of how many are currently active. But it sure as hell seems like those old "bitcoin has a bright future and is increasing day by day" posts are making a comeback.
Agreed. Much easier to digest what's going on without seeing the same thing posted over and over again. But then, if this happens while I'm an advertiser, I'd be pretty sad because I need them to spread my brand If you're referring to the number of signature campaigns, you could check out the Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns by Mitchell. I won't bother with bounties because they're aplenty and I doubt anyone has the time to make a compilation AFAIK. But it sure as hell seems like those old "bitcoin has a bright future and is increasing day by day" posts are making a comeback.
Tell me about it. Happened to stumble across one thread earlier today about "deciphering" the Bit from Bitcoin and one senior member expressed his exasperation because of this. |
|
|
|
I don't have any qualms with quota, it makes you work hard for what you have. I feel like those people that burst post because of having other jobs is an excuse, I mean it's not like posting in the forum is time consuming, pretty sure that people will find a way to complete their quota. Also, isn't that the point of posting in the threads? To answer the OP if it's your first post in that thread?
Sometimes when the job tends to be too time-consuming, you tend to overlook/ take things for granted. It happened to me before so I could relate to that. About the OP thing, most of the time the first few replies would already address the concern/ issue. It's just that those posters downright tend to ignore anything else because they don't want/ plan to engage with other users: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5337846.0I see we’re still congratulating a banned account on this thread (OPs) … If anybody is interested in seeing the first merited post of any (non-airdropped) merited account, I’ve updated a file which I published some months ago on another thread. Data is now as of 13/08/2021: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_I7WfxSnzOe7wvjE9dJ-aqH59PnfsMnKSVzycYljrx0/edit?usp=sharingAnecdotally, there are 113 accounts that were awarded 50 Merits on their first received merit TX. Going some of them is not for the faint of heart … |
|
|
|
For the wearers of signatures, how will it be considered a spam, I always try to chase the maximum posts per week and I don't burst post. Will I be affected by this because I feel like it attacks those campaigns that pays per post?
Because of the quota, they try to reach them by posting whatever that comes to their mind, often ignoring other posters and solely focusing on the OP's content. Then there are those that might not have time to post consistently over the week which could be due to an IRL job, and when they realize they're falling short of the minimum threshold, they burst post. Non joiners or even joiners themselves might find it hard to shake off the impression that sig campaign bearers tend to shitpost, but what to do, to each his own. Still, there are some legit posters out of the many. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
